Was Trump's Africa summit just outsourcing America's immigration problem?
United States (US) President Donald Trump hosted a mini-summit with five African leaders in the White House last week. It was surprising that he met with African leaders at all, given his stance towards the continent. His choice of countries was also interesting — why Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia and Gabon?
Trump told the delegates his administration was 'committed to strengthening our friendships in Africa through economic development efforts that benefit both the US and our partners. And we're shifting from aid to trade,' noting that he had just scrapped the US Agency for International Development (USAid).
As to the five countries in attendance, he said they all had 'great land, great minerals, oil deposits', and that he wanted to discuss security. Trump encouraged the leaders to invest more in defence and to 'keep pursuing the fight against terrorism, which is a big problem in Africa'.
'Immigration will also be on the agenda, and I hope we can bring down the high rates of people overstaying visas, and also make progress on the Safe Third Country Agreements.'
The supposed wealth of these five countries in critical minerals has been offered as the main reason for their invitation. Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani said his country had 'minerals, rare earths, rare minerals', including manganese, uranium and probably lithium, and was the second-largest African iron ore producer.
Liberian President Joseph Boakai also said his country had many minerals and asked for US help in surveying them. Trump added an unintentional comic note by commending Boakai for his 'beautiful English'. He asked where Boakai had learnt to speak it — seemingly unaware that English is Liberia's official language. The country was, after all, founded in the 19th century by free slaves from the US.
Critical minerals
Gabon's President Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema also stressed that his country had oil and gas and critical minerals, including manganese, and invited the US to invest in processing it locally, including building the necessary electricity capacity. He said that if the US did not invest, others would. And he appealed to Trump to help Gabon stop maritime piracy in the Gulf of Guinea.
Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye noted that the US was conducting a geological survey in Senegal to help assess the potential of minerals. He added that thanks to US companies, Senegal had discovered oil and about 950 billion cubic metres of gas.
So critical and other minerals, and oil and gas, were clearly a factor in the choice of the five. So was security in a chronically insecure region. Some believe the US is looking for countries to host its military bases after Niger's junta forced out the US hub at Agadez.
Trump also boasted about the recent US-brokered peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda. Most of the African leaders thanked him for this, urging him to fulfil his intention to likewise broker peace in Sudan and Libya.
But was immigration to the US — a key domestic issue for Trump — the real heart of the matter? The Wall Street Journal reported that before the summit, the US administration sent the five countries requests to accept deportees from the US whose home countries refused them or were slow to take them back.
According to an internal document seen by The Wall Street Journal, the African countries would have to agree not to return transferred asylum seekers 'to their home country or country of former habitual residence until a final decision has been made' on their claims for asylum in the US.
This arrangement appears similar to that between the former Conservative United Kingdom (UK) government and Rwanda, but which was scrapped last year by the Labour government, which said the deal had not deterred migrants to the UK.
Reports say America previously tried to persuade Nigeria to accept an agreement with Venezuelan deportees — but Abuja refused. This might suggest that Trump is turning to smaller, perhaps more pliable, countries to try to persuade them to accept asylum seekers or deportees.
The Guardian reported on Wednesday that five men from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Cuba and Yemen — convicted of crimes ranging from child rape to murder — had arrived in Eswatini on a Safe Third Country deportation flight from the US. On 4 July, the US deported eight men convicted of violent crimes to South Sudan.
It is unclear how the five African governments responded to Trump's request, and none mentioned it in the public part of the meeting.
Two overlapping goals
Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Research Officer Zenge Simakoloyi said Trump's summit seemed mainly to have two overlapping goals: to test the waters on processing asylum seekers offshore, and to diversify US critical mineral supply chains away from China. Nigeria's rejection of the Venezuelans suggested that externalising the US immigration problem would be difficult, he said.
According to Aimée-Noël Mbiyozo, ISS Migration Senior Research Consultant: 'There are no good precedents for outsourcing asylum processes.' She noted that the Australian effort to do so had cost at least A$1-billion annually since 2012, and had 'failed to achieve all its objectives, including stopping people smuggling'.
Simakoloyi noted that countering China in African trade and mineral access was a hallmark of US foreign policy in Africa, as evidenced by the Lobito Corridor carrying minerals from Zambia and the DRC to be exported from Angola. He suggested Senegal's President Faye could serve the US as a diplomatic bridge to the Sahel's juntas, as Senegal had established a rapport with Mali and Burkina Faso's military governments.
Trump's shift from aid to trade and investment in Africa is in principle a good idea, though the abrupt termination of aid has caused significant distress on the continent. (Unconfirmed reports this week suggest that Pepfar – the US programme against HIV/Aids — may be reinstated.)
But how the US trades and invests in Africa will be critical. As Gabon's Nguema told Trump: 'We also want our raw materials to be processed locally in our country so that we can create value and to create jobs for youth so that they stop dying. They are crossing the sea, the ocean to go to other countries.'
That would be a more constructive and ethical approach to relations than outsourcing the asylum process and dumping criminals from other countries onto Africa. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
G20 SA 2025: a defining moment for the nation and the continent
Johannesburg, as host city, will become a strategic hub of diplomacy, business exchange, and cultural showcase. While the summit itself is a high-level, closed-door affair, South Africans can expect a wave of public engagement, community-driven programmes, investment conversations, and national pride as the event draws near. 'The G20 presidency is a powerful opportunity for SA to place Africa's priorities at the heart of global decision-making. We are committed to driving an inclusive agenda that ensures no country, and no person, is left behind,' says President Cyril Ramaphosa. For the South African government, this is more than ceremonial. It is an opportunity for G20 members to transform commitments into lasting action. Key issues remain a challenge in the country and on the continent, and there is a call for greater accountability to drive tangible progress in the global pursuit of gender equality SA's G20 presidency is also an opportunity to elevate African perspectives, strengthen international alliances, and advance sustainable development goals. It is a chance to reinforce SA's commitment to multilateralism and global co-operation at a time when unity is more important than ever. As preparations intensify in the coming months, all eyes will be on SA not just as a host, but as a bridge between developed and developing economies. The 2025 G20 Leader's Summit is more than just a gathering of nations. It is a moment for SA to lead with purpose, to shape global consensus, and to drive transformation that begins on the continent but resonates across the globe.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Leaders should save Africa to preserve Kwame Krumah's legacy
Sandile Gumede Image: File 'Do you like Kwame Krumah?' This is a question that was asked by George Apple-by-Smith to Makhaya Maseko in Bessie Head's book called 'When Rain Clouds Gather'. In this fictional situation, the policer in question was asking Maseko this question so that he could decide whether to grant him a political asylum after escaping from South Africa to Botswana, at the height of political chaos, with apartheid forces pouncing on those who fought injustices. Maseko, who understood the tricky question as an activist and a journalist, simply answered: 'No'. However, this is no book review, but it is meant to emphasise the role that the likes of Kwame Krumah played in the liberation of the African continent. Krumah and others like Julius Nyerere, Idi Amin and Patrice Lumumba to mention a few, played a crucial role in mobilisation of African leaders in efforts to unite the continent for its prosperity. In pushing the Pan Africanism agenda an Organisation of African Unity was conceived, which expedited the project of winning back Africa from the colonial masters – at least this is what they thought. I am not oblivious of the fact that these leaders were fallible – of which it is a nature of a human being. But they did a lot of groundwork, and had great vision which could have helped the continent from being too dependent on handouts from Asia and the west. The continent currently needs courageous leadership, who will be brother's keepers, not people who keep quiet, yet human rights are violated, or corruption happens unabated. African countries are rich in mineral resources, but these hardly benefit the majority of citizens except providing labour for European or Chinese companies. Instead, there are coups in our continent. We fight each other; not because we are trying to rescue the lives and livelihood of the people simply because the next leader feels that it is his time to benefit. There are leaders like Paul Biya who has been in power since 1982, but not much is being done to change the lives of Cameroonians. This results in compatriots emigrating to the very same France that had oppressed them. In Zimbabwe we have a similar challenge; the lives of ordinary Zimbabweans mean nothing. They end up emigrating to Britain and neighbouring countries. One of the biggest challenges is that every now and then these African leaders would meet in AU summits or SADC meetings cheering each other; dining expensive cuisine forgetting to address the core issues faced by their people. The reality is that Zimbabwean issues become our issues as people flee the country for various reasons. Even the situation for South Africa is getting worse; with infrastructure dilapidating and scarce job opportunities there is growth in South Africans emigrating to Asia and Gulf states to teach English and other subjects. Whatever that Yoweri Museveni does in Uganda, it affects neighbouring countries like Tanzania and Kenya in that East region. Issues in DR Congo, also affect Rwandans and other neighbouring countries; therefore, the entire continent is interdependent. And this requires bold leadership from all walks of life whereby they can be honest with each other. That is what the AU summit should be about – not just talk shop and to be a boys' club with no clear vision for the continent. If we are reclaiming mines owned by foreigners in our countries, that should be the African agenda not just General Ibrahim Traore or Dr. Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah's pet projects as this will result in their countries being alienated by the west, whereas if this is done in unison it will be difficult to sanction the entire continent. This cannot be achieved by leaders who are there for themselves instead of the people. This cannot be done by leaders who are afraid of calling their counterparts into order. They should use the AU and other regional economic bodies to develop Africa, not buying properties in foreign countries or travelling abroad for shopping sprees or medical attention. This should be done by all those who claim to hold leaders like Kwame Krumah in high regard, not those who pay lip service. Sandile Gumede is sociopolitical writer and PhD candidate at the University of Witwatersrand in the Media Studies Department. SUNDAY TRIBUNE
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Egypt marks 73rd Revolution anniversary
Ties: Egypt's ambassador, Ahmad Sharief (centre) and South Africa's deputy minister Pinky Kekana (centre right) addressed the gathering at the Egyptian embassy. Photos: Marion Smith The Embassy of Egypt in Pretoria commemorated 73 years since the Egyptian Revolution which took place on 23 July 1952. Ahmad Sharief, Egypt's ambassador to South Africa reviewed the historical and symbolic dimension of the revolution, and how it was a major turning point in the path of national liberation, not only in Egypt but also in various parts of the African continent. Sharief condemned the violations of humanitarian law in the ongoing conflict in Palestine. 'On the humanitarian front, Egypt has led the global response to the Gaza crisis,' he said. 'Over the past two years Egypt has been the one country that contributed the most to humanitarian aid getting into Gaza, hosting hundreds of conveys and field hospitals on its territory.' Addressing the audience in isiZulu for a portion of his speech, Sharief stressed the depth of the strategic partnership between Egypt and South Africa, as well as the history of solidarity. Although located at the northern and southern most points of Africa, the two countries share a historical and good relationship based on upholding the principles of liberation, human dignity and the fight against injustice. 'We look to the future, Egypt and South Africa today stand shoulder to shoulder in a new struggle for economic liberation, sustainable development and continental integration.' He said Egypt and South Africa are committed to building a strategic partnership that serves both countries' aspirations of the continent and the Global South. High-level engagements have intensified, the joint committee has been revived and convened (twice in 2022) and preparations are under way for its 11th session in 2026. 'We aim to accelerate the African Continental Free Trade Area, complete the Cairo to Cape Town highway and deepen cooperation under the Brics framework,' the ambassador said. 'We are deeply grateful for South Africa, for supporting Egypt's accession to Brics and for inviting Egypt to this year's G20 deliberations and ensuring Africa's voice is heard.' South Africa's deputy minister of public service and administration, Pinky Kekana, gave an address on behalf of the government and people of South Africa. Reflecting on the longstanding relationship between the two countries, Kekana said: 'Our two countries therefore acknowledge that it is important to further translate the existing good political relations into concrete trade and investment ties between South Africa and Egypt.' She went on to say that more emphasis would be put on expanding cooperation in various sectors including defence, security, law enforcement, energy, mining, petrochemicals, infrastructure and industrial development, pharmaceuticals, information, communication and technology, science and research, as well as agriculture. This decision to expand cooperation came in the aftermath of the 10th Joint Commission for Cooperation held in Pretoria in April 2024 at ministerial level. This year coincides with the 31st anniversary of the resumption of diplomatic relations between Egypt and South Africa after the end of apartheid in 1994. In closing Ambassador Sharief said that the two countries 'are brought together by one spirit — the spirit of liberation, dignity and ubuntu'.
