‘BBC Breakfast' Boss Richard Frediani Faces Further Bullying Claims: 'A Tyrant On The Shop Floor'
BBC Breakfast boss Richard Frediani is facing further allegations of workplace bullying and misconduct, with senior presenter Naga Munchetty among those thought to have misgivings about his behavior.
Deadline revealed last month how Frediani was the subject of at least two misconduct complaints, including one from a woman who had her grievance upheld after claiming that the Breakfast editor physically shook her during a newsroom exchange last year.
More from Deadline
'Line Of Duty' Stars "Commit To Season 7 Return In 2026" - Report
Russell Brand Charged With Rape And Sexual Assault
'The Capture' Renewed For Season 3 At BBC
Now, Deadline can report that concerns about Frediani's conduct run deeper at the BBC, while he has also been accused of behaving inappropriately at his previous employer, ITN, where he was overseen by the same executives now running BBC News. The BBC declined to comment on individual HR matters. Frediani's position is that he was unaware of any complaints being made about his conduct at ITN.
After nine of Frediani's colleagues spoke to Deadline for our original investigation, a further 11 people have come forward to discuss their experiences. Seven of these individuals worked with Frediani at ITN, where he held senior roles on the team that produces ITV News. We can reveal:
Several sources said Breakfast presenter Naga Munchetty has raised concerns with BBC bosses about Frediani's conduct. Tina Daheley, another senior presenter, has chosen not to appear on News at One, the flagship bulletin that Frediani also edits.
Current and former ITN employees said they felt Frediani was a 'bully,' who would shout, swear at, and intimidate colleagues. Sources claimed complaints were made about his conduct.
Deborah Turness and Jonathan Munro, BBC News' two most senior executives, oversaw Frediani at ITN and sources claimed they were aware of his reputation. Neither could recall any complaints being made about Frediani at ITN.
After Deadline's original story, Breakfast employees were told that misconduct allegations would be treated seriously, but some are dubious that action will be taken because of Frediani's status at BBC News.
The allegations come as the BBC prepares to publish an external review of its workplace culture later this month, following a series of scandals about the conduct of powerful men. BBC director general Tim Davie has said he wants Change Associates, the management consultancy leading the review, to make practical recommendations about how managers can create a culture where there is 'zero tolerance' for wrongdoing. Davie told lawmakers last month that the BBC has improved its complaints handling and staff are more confident in processes, but he said that if there are examples of concerns not being treated seriously, it is a 'grade one' issue.
Four people familiar with the tensions over Frediani said Munchetty, one of Breakfast's most prominent hosts, has an uneasy relationship with her editor and has spoken to BBC News managers about her concerns. A journalist at a rival news organization said she is 'quite open' about her disquiet regarding his treatment of Breakfast employees. Munchetty did not respond to requests for comment.
Separately, three sources said Radio 2 newsreader Tina Daheley has chosen not to appear on Frediani's News at One. She was named as a presenter on the bulletin last May, but is said to have been deeply upset by how her appointment was announced.
A press release unveiling News at One's presenting line-up featured images of all the white news anchors but did not picture Daheley, per an archived web page. The BBC press office took full responsibility for the error, which was quickly corrected after Daheley voiced her dismay. A source said Frediani, who was quoted in the press release, did not see the final version before it was published on the BBC website. He later apologized to Daheley. Daheley did not respond to requests for comment.
Munchetty and Daheley have each worked at the BBC for more than 17 years and both feature among the corporation's highest-paid presenters. Munchetty juggles her Breakfast duties with Radio 5 Live, while Daheley also hosts Points of View and News at Six.
Other BBC employees came forward with their experiences. One person claimed to have witnessed an incident in 2019, during which a 'clearly angry' Frediani cornered a Breakfast colleague up against a wall and was 'jabbing his finger' as he voiced displeasure about that morning's show. Two sources alleged that Frediani is known for 'screaming' down the phone at other BBC News desks and complaining about the quality of content they supply Breakfast.
In the period after Deadline's first story about Frediani, insiders said that he has behaved as if it is business as usual. The day after publication, Breakfast and News at One staff were emailed by John McAndrew, BBC News' director of programmes, to remind them about the corporation's approach to complaints of wrongdoing.
'With regard to culture and behaviour – and this stands for all of our teams across the organisation – please be assured that if, or when, any allegations of any inappropriate behaviour come to me, they will be taken seriously, comprehensively investigated, and if upheld, action will be taken,' McAndrew wrote.
Some at Breakfast were dubious about this message given that Frediani has been the subject of complaints, and yet has been rewarded with more power. Bosses knew that Frediani had been accused of shaking a female colleague last year before they expanded his responsibilities to include the News at One. 'Senior management has been repeatedly told by various people that there is a problem, and they haven't done anything about it,' said a BBC source.
Seven of Frediani's former ITN colleagues, who spoke to Deadline on the condition of anonymity, recounted their experiences of his behavior. He did two spells at ITN, lasting a total of nearly 14 years, the most recent of which was between 2012 and 2019, when he left to join BBC Breakfast.
Characterized as a 'tyrant on the shop floor,' former colleagues said Frediani ran the newsroom with 'unbridled aggression,' creating a culture of fear among those around him, including his superiors. ITN declined to comment on historical allegations about Frediani.
Those interviewed by Deadline alleged that he would undermine colleagues in editorial meetings by muttering and swearing under his breath, taking assignments away from journalists he did not rate, and openly smirking or rolling his eyes at story suggestions that did not meet his standards. 'It would be a public humiliation exercise, right in the middle of the office,' said one person privy to the meetings.
Others recalled him having stand-up rows, shouting, swearing, and jabbing his finger in the direction of co-workers. 'He was accustomed to getting into your personal space when talking to you, leaning into you, perhaps inches away from your face, or touching you to make a point,' a former colleague recalled.
Sources alleged that he routinely ignored or sidelined colleagues he considered 'persona non grata,' stripping them of responsibility or freezing them out of desirable stories. Sources said this was because Frediani did not personally rate the individual or had previously clashed with them. 'In isolation, it doesn't sound hugely significant … but it had such a toxic effect on people,' said another former ITN insider.
The allegations echoed those made by BBC insiders, who shared stories about his alleged aggression and lamented the 'clubbable' atmosphere he has created at Breakfast, in which favorites are rewarded and others are left out in the cold. There is a feeling that his behavior does not accord with BBC values around fairness and inclusivity.
Several of Frediani's former ITN co-workers said complaints were made about his conduct, though it is not clear how formal these grievances were. One person told Deadline that they made a complaint to a manager and HR about Frediani's behavior, but were told to get used to his style.
Others said they stopped short of complaining because they worried it would not be dealt with seriously by ITN or it could be damaging for their career. 'If I'd made a formal complaint, it would have fallen on deaf ears, and I'd have been slowly squeezed out,' said one person.
Frediani was a programme editor at ITV News in Deborah Turness' final year as overall editor of the service before she joined NBC News. Jonathan Munro, now BBC News' global news director, also worked in a senior role at ITV News during this time. 'Turness is fully aware of what he is like,' said one person. Another source, a seasoned journalist, claimed that 'a blind eye' had been turned to Frediani's alleged conduct.
Turness' position is that she does not recall any complaint, formal or informal, about Frediani during the time they overlapped at ITN. Munro was also unaware of complaints and strongly denies that a 'blind eye' was turned to any alleged misconduct. Frediani's position is that he was unaware of any complaints about his conduct and nothing was raised with him.
ITN is currently facing questions over its handling of historical complaints and use of non-disclosure agreements after an independent report concluded last year that employees had 'low trust' in management processes. Deadline can reveal that the company recently engaged People Puzzles, an external HR consultancy, to improve its people management and complaints processes. Staff have recently been surveyed about their experiences.
An ITN spokesperson said: 'We are committed to a culture of openness and trust, which includes ensuring that any time a concern is raised, it is addressed promptly, thoroughly, and fairly.'
WHO IS RICHARD FREDIANI?Described as one of the most formidable British TV news editors of his generation, Richard Frediani has risen from being a local radio reporter in his native city of Preston to the BBC's most powerful news executive outside of London. Based out of Salford, Frediani has called the shots on BBCBreakfast, the UK's highest-rated morning show, since September 2019. He recently had his role expanded to include the flagship News at One. He is said to have an instinctive understanding of audiences outside of London, a much-prized skill at the BBC, which is often accused of being biased towards the capital.
Captain Tom MooreFrediani is known as a news obsessive. An ITN colleague recalled how he used to record the weekday news bulletins of his rivals and watch them back at the weekend while doing the family's ironing. Fueled by a love of sweet treats, Frediani is a near-constant presence in the office and asks his team to pitch stories that make viewers late for work because they are so compelling to watch.He has fashioned Breakfast into a show that seeks to set the agenda with human interest stories, such as propelling Captain Tom Moore into the national consciousness by spotlighting his pandemic heroics. Colleagues have called him a 'campaigning' editor, who doubles down on issues that strike a chord with audiences. Breakfast's coverage of the Post Office scandal is evidence of this and earned the show its first-ever BAFTA TV Awards nomination last month. Breakfast has won a Royal Television Society award on Frediani's watch.Those who have worked with Frediani claimed his skills and track record are the reasons why his superiors have been prepared to overlook behavior that allegedly upsets some colleagues. There is also the view that he has built a unique empire in Salford and is not subject to same managerial oversight as his London-based contemporaries.
Best of Deadline
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Brad Pitt's Apple 'F1' Movie: Everything We Know So Far

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘If you're a fascist, then get a Tesla': Neil Young's new album takes potshots Elon Musk
After weighing in behind Bruce Springsteen in his internationally reported takedown of President Trump's government onstage at Manchester Arena last month, this other left-leaning giant of American rock from the 1970s voiced fears that he, having been a consistent critic of Trump, chiefly over the issue of climate-change denial, may face problems regaining entry to his home nation following his European tour this summer. At this febrile moment, one might've expected Young, now 79, and as outspoken as ever – he made headlines last year after apparently refusing to sign up for Glastonbury 2025 on account of its BBC-driven corporatisation (he now appears to be headlining on Saturday night!) – to fill his latest long-player, his 46th studio outing, with polemical rantings, but as any long-standing fan knows, Young remains creatively wilful, and rarely serves up what might be expected of him at a given time. In recent years, he has been deluging the collector's market with archival releases, many of them 'new' old albums which he shelved years ago. In amongst all that, however, interested parties may be forgiven for not having noticed that Young had found a productive groove with a reconstituted line-up of his beloved, amps-on-11 backing band, Crazy Horse, releasing three new records with them, culminating with 2022's Rick Rubin-produced World Record. There, on Chevrolet, this unflagging automobile enthusiast wrung his hands about lusting after a vintage gas-guzzler. Further back, around his investment in a hybrid-electric model Lincoln, he wrote at length about the driver's responsibility to their children's health and survival on 2009's Fork In The Road, and perhaps the most immediately ear-catching moment on Talkin To The Trees arrives on Let's Roll Again, where, against clanging electric guitar chords, he urges America's automobile manufacturing giants, by name – Ford, GM and Chrysler – 'to build us something useful, something that won't kill our kids – come on America, let's roll again…on down the highway'. Alongside that responsible, depoliticised messaging, Young suddenly seems to find it hard to avoid needling at the Trump administration. 'China's way ahead, they're building clean cars,' he adds, knowing the mention of China will not be music to the president's ears. 'C'mon America, let's cover our backs, protect our children,' he goes on, before taking a clear potshot at Elon Musk. 'If you're a fascist, then get a Tesla: if it's electric then it doesn't matter. If you're a democrat: then chase your freedom, get whatever you want and taste your freedom.' Behind those words, of course, Young easily could've ramped up explicit themes of political dissent. Instead, his mind seems to be focused on enjoying the natural wonders of his ranch in Northern California, as well as, in the track Family Life, the domestic happiness he finds surrounded by his children and grandkids as he writes songs, and sings them for their approval, ' and also 'singing for my best wife ever, the best cook in the world' – a great review, indeed, for Darryl Hannah, the movie actor and activist, whom he married in 2018. Though second track Dark Mirage finds his 'new' band The Chrome Hearts – a mutation of his other one of late, Promise of the Real, with master soul keyboardist Spooner Oldham added – squalling into fierce feedback, as Young momentarily dips into lingering anger from his mid-'10s divorce – by and large, The Chrome Hearts are entrusted with summoning the kind of golden country-rock sound usually associated with Young's Harvest series – rustling acoustic guitars, blissful ivory-tinkling topped with Neil's wheezing harmonica, which light up rustic gems like First Fire Of Winter, the exquisite title track and the warm-hearted Thankful, As such, there's so much to enjoy here for long-standing fans – a mellow soundtrack perhaps for the four-wheel pilgrimage down to Glastonbury, with some fittingly thought-provoking messaging on automotive responsibility going forwards. In a week that has seen the passing of two of Young's West Coast peers, it's great to hear him sounding invigorated, domestically happy and creatively on song. Andrew Perry Prior to a brace of covers albums in 2023, it's fair to say that Belfast singer Van Morrison was in his 'late life super-grumpy' phase. Railing against everything from lockdown to scientists, he didn't hold back. My personal favourite from this era was a 2021 song called Why Are You on Facebook?, which contained the lines 'Why do you need second-hand friends? … Get a life.' And this from the sage who gave us Into The Mystic. Well, Van the Man is back doing what he does best. Remembering Now, his 47th album, is 14 songs of beautiful and reflective music addressing aging, romance and a sense of yearning for the landscapes and landmarks that made us who we are. It's 64 minutes of soulful blues and country folk, augmented by string arrangements by Fiachra Trench, who wrote the string parts for The Pogues' Fairytale of New York and worked with Morrison on his 1989 classic Avalon Sunset, to which Remembering Now can easily be compared. Folk star Seth Lakeman adds violin to three tracks. The album opens with Down to Joy, which soundtracked Kenneth Branagh's 2021 film Belfast and was nominated for a 'best original song' Oscar (Morrison lost out to Billie Eilish's Bond theme). Once In A Lifetime Feelings is one of three tracks with lyrics by Don Black, who's written for everyone from Meat Loaf to Michael Jackson. The song finds Morrison driving down to Monte Carlo with 'so much to say' to a loved one. It's fantastic. Stomping Ground sees the 79-year-old pleading to return to Belfast, while the closing nine-minute Stretching Out is simply swooning. The highlight is Haven't Lost My Sense of Wonder, which has touches of the awe that late songwriter Bill Fay saw in the world as he aged. 'Had my fill, 'cause I've been through the mill/ Now I'm saying 'Peace, be still,'' Morrison sings over lavish gospel-tinged soul. Under (hopefully) sunny skies, these songs will sound a treat when Morrison supports Neil Young in Hyde Park next month (along with Yusuf/ Cat Stevens). A lush return to form. James Hall Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
School killings leave stunned Austria and France searching for answers
Two shocking attacks within two hours of each other, in France and Austria, have left parents and governments reeling and at a loss how to protect school students from random, deadly violence. At about 08:15 on Tuesday, a 14-year-old boy from an ordinary family in Nogent, eastern France, drew out a kitchen knife during a school bag check and fatally stabbed a school assistant. Not long afterwards in south-east Austria, a 21-year-old who had dropped out of school three years earlier, walked into Dreierschützengasse high school in Graz at 09:43, and shot dead nine students and a teacher with a Glock 19 handgun and a sawn-off shotgun. In both countries there is a demand for solutions and for a greater focus on young people who resort to such violence. Austria has never seen a school attack on this scale, but the French stabbing took place during a government programme aimed at tackling the growth in knife crime. The Graz shooter, named by Austrian media as Arthur A, has been described by police as a very introverted person, who had retreated to the virtual world. His "great passion" was online first-person shooter games, and he had social contacts with other gamers over the internet, according to Michael Lohnegger, the criminal investigation chief in Styria, the state where it happened. A former student at the Dreierschützengasse school, Arthur A had failed to complete his studies. Arriving at the school, he put on a headset and shooting glasses, before going on a deadly seven-minute shooting spree. He then killed himself in a school bathroom. He owned the two guns legally, had passed a psychological test to own a licence and had several sessions of weapons training earlier this year at a Graz shooting club. This has sparked a big debate in Austria about whether its gun laws need to be tightened – and about the level of care available for troubled young people. It has emerged that the shooter was rejected from the country's compulsory military service in July 2021. Defence ministry spokesman Michael Bauer told the BBC that Arthur A was found to be "psychologically unfit" for service after he underwent tests. But he said Austria's legal system prevented the army from passing on the results of such tests. There are now calls for that law to be changed. Alex, the mother of a 17-year-old boy who survived the shooting, told the BBC that more should have been done to prevent people like Arthur A from dropping out of school in the first place. "We know… that when people shoot each other like this, it's mostly when they feel alone and drop out and be outside. And we don't know how to get them back in, into society, into the groups, into their peer groups," she said. "We, as grown-ups, have got the responsibility for that, and we have to take it now." President Alexander Van der Bellen raised the possibility of tightening Austria's gun laws, on a visit to Graz after the attack: "If we come to the conclusion that Austria's gun laws need to be changed to ensure greater safety, then we will do so." Austria has one of the most heavily armed civilian populations in Europe, with an estimated 30 firearms per 100 people. Although there have been school shootings here before, they have been far smaller and involved far fewer casualties. The mayor of Graz, Elke Kahr, believes no private person should be able to have weapons at all. "Weapons licences are issued too quickly," she told Austria's ORF TV. "Only the police should carry weapons, not private individuals." What we know about Austria school shooting Graz in shock and grief after attack Armed gendarmes were present at the entrance to the Françoise Dolto middle school in Nogent, 100km (62 miles) east of Paris, when a teenager pulled out a 20cm kitchen knife and repeatedly stabbed Mélanie G, who was 31 and had a four-year-old son. The boy accused of carrying out the murder told police that he had been reprimanded on Friday by another school assistant for kissing his girlfriend. As a result he had a grudge against school assistants in general, and apparently had made up his mind to kill one. Schools were closed on Monday for a bank holiday, and Tuesday was his first day back. The state prosecutor's initial assessment was that the boy, called Quentin, came from a normal functioning family, and had no criminal or mental health record. However, the child also appeared detached and emotionless. Adept at violent video games, he showed a "fascination with death" and an "absence of reference-points relating to the value of human life". The Nogent attack does not fit the template of anti-social youth crime or gang violence seen in France until now. Nor is there any suggestion of indoctrination over social media. According to the prosecutor, the boy did little of that. He had been violent on two occasions against fellow pupils, and was suspended for a day each time. There is no family breakdown or deprivation and school officials described him as "sociable, a pretty good student, well-integrated into the life of the establishment". This year he had even been named the class "ambassador" on bullying. For all the calls for greater security at schools, this crime took place literally under the noses of armed gendarmes. As Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau put it, some crimes will happen no matter how many police you deploy. For more information on the boy's state of mind, we must wait for the full psychologist's report, and it may well be that there were signs missed, or there are family details we do not yet know about. On the face of it, he is perhaps more a middle-class loner, and his apparent normality suggests a crime triggered by internalised mental processes, rather than by peer-driven association or emulation. That is what strikes the chord in France. If an ordinary boy can turn out like this from watching too many violent videos, then who is next? Significantly, the French government had only just approved showing the British Netflix series Adolescence as an aid in schools. There are differences, of course. The boy arrested for the killing of a teenage girl in the TV series yields to evil "toxic male" influences on social media – but there is the same question of teenagers being made vulnerable by isolation online. Across the political spectrum, there are calls for action but little agreement on what should be the priority, nor hope that anything can make much difference. Before the killing, President Emmanuel Macron had angered the right by saying they were too obsessed with crime, and not sufficiently interested in other issues like the environment. The Nogent attack put him on the back foot, and he has repeated his pledge to ban social media to under 15-year-olds. But there are two difficulties. One is the practicality of the measure, which in theory is being dealt with by the EU but is succumbing to endless procrastination. The other is that, according to the prosecutor, the boy was not especially interested in social media. It was violent video games that were his thing. Prime Minister François Bayrou has said that sales of knives to under-15s will be banned. But the boy took his from home. Bayrou says airport-style metal-detectors should be tested at schools, but most heads are opposed. The populist right wants tougher sentences for teenagers carrying knives, and the exclusion of disruptive pupils from regular classes. But the boy in Nogent was not a problem child. About the only measure everyone says is needed is more provision of school doctors, nurses and psychologists in order to detect early signs of pupils going off the rails. That of course will require a lot of money, which is another thing France does not have a lot of.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry And Meghan Snubbed From The Trooping The Colour Again As Royal Rift Deepens
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were not invited to the 2025 Trooping the Colour, marking their third consecutive exclusion from the royal event. Despite Harry's recent call for reconciliation, insiders say the rift with the royal family is deepening. King Charles reportedly remains distant due to trust issues, and Prince William is firmly against mending ties. Experts highlight that no palace aides are encouraging reconciliation, and the royals no longer trust Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with private conversations. According to People Magazine, Harry and Meghan have not been invited to this year's Trooping the Colour, the annual military parade held to celebrate King Charles' official birthday, set to take place on Saturday, June 14. This marks the third consecutive year the couple has been excluded from the event amid their ongoing estrangement from the royal family. The last time the pair attended the military parade was in 2022, during Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee. Even then, they weren't permitted on the main royal balcony and instead watched from a separate area reserved for non-working royals. Since Queen Elizabeth's passing and Charles's rise to the throne later that year, Harry and Meghan have been entirely left off the guest list for Trooping the Colour. Royal commentator Richard Eden emphasized the significance of their continued absence. He noted that 2023 was "the first year of his life that Harry hasn't been invited at all." Reflecting on how their status has evolved, Eden said: "With Harry and Meghan, we've always had a sort of 'will they, won't they' before every big royal occasion." "Well, it seems like the palace has tackled this this time by just not inviting them at all," Eden added. "So, you know, it's significant. Despite stepping back from royal duties and relocating to California in 2020, there had once been hope that Harry and Meghan would still be included in major royal traditions. Eden recalled that "When Harry and Meghan quit royal duties, I think officials were very keen to stress that they would still be invited to occasions such as Trooping the Colour." The US-based royals' ongoing absence, however, has now reflected a deeper rift that might never heal between the warring parties. "The fact they haven't been invited is very significant," he noted. News that Harry and Meghan were not invited to Trooping the Colour for the third consecutive year comes amid fresh tensions within the royal family, and just weeks after Harry publicly expressed a desire to reconcile with his father. In a May interview with the BBC, the Duke of Sussex opened up about his strained relationship with the royal family after losing his final bid for taxpayer-funded security in the UK. "There have been so many disagreements between me and some of my family," he said, adding that he had now "forgiven" them. He continued: "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore. Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile." Despite Harry's plea for peace, insiders suggest the damage may be beyond repair. According to royal expert Hilary Fordwich, there is reportedly "no turning back" for Harry and Charles after more than five years of fractured relations. "King Charles remains tender towards his son, but can't risk communication. Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences," Fordwich told Fox News. "The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry," she added. "Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." Fordwich emphasized that "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it." Fordwich's remarks align with recent reports from People Magazine, which also highlighted the king's hesitance to reconnect with his youngest son. In the report, Royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the publication: "The underlying issue is trust. The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders further revealed that Charles is not being advised by anyone within the palace to make amends, and William is firmly against extending any olive branch. As royal author Valentine Low pointed out: "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move.'"