logo
Gender 'shaping' federal election as Vote Compass finds gen Z women are deeply progressive

Gender 'shaping' federal election as Vote Compass finds gen Z women are deeply progressive

Emma Garvey is voting for the first time at this federal election and her political views are similar to many women her age.
She places herself on the left side of politics, drawn to progressive parties and policies.
New Vote Compass data shows the majority of women under the age of 29 identify with the political left, creating a gap between them and their male peers.
The 18-year-old, like many in her friendship circle, is still weighing up who to vote for, but she does know who she won't be supporting.
Emma Garvey from Penrith is preparing to vote in her first federal election.
(
ABC News: Billy Cooper
)
"I feel like a lot of [my friends] are more anti-Dutton than they are pro-Albanese, like they're more anti-Liberal than they are pro-Labor," she said.
"I feel like we've seen [Peter] Dutton trying to bring in that kind of [US President Donald] Trump politics, or the kind of Trump policies.
"We've seen what's been happening over there [in the US] … young women are really worried about the risks that can pose to us, especially around women's rights."
Stay updated:
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
According to Vote Compass data, 67 per cent of gen Z women identified as left or moderately left, this compared to 52 per cent of women from other generations.
While overseas there's been an observed trend of young men drifting to the right, Vote Compass data suggests gen Z men in Australia often consider themselves progressive.
Vote Compass found 50 per cent of males under 29 years old described themselves moderately left or left, compared to only 40 per cent of men from other generations.
The data comes from a demographically weighted sample of more than 350,000.
Gender 'shaping the election debate'
In the last two elections, only 26 per cent of gen Z, those born between 1996 and 2012, reported voting for the Coalition, according to the 2022 Australian Election Study.
"No other generation records such skewed preferences at similarly early stages of the life course," the study's authors wrote in the report.
Female support for the Coalition was at an historic low in 2022, the report found.
"The Coalition has never attracted such a low share of the vote overall, but from women in particular," the report said.
Photo shows
Hannah Ferguson
Gen Z are more progressive than previous generations at the same age, with young women sitting furthest left on the political spectrum.
Michelle Arrow, a history professor from Macquarie University, said across the world women have been moving to the left, leaving behind their male counterparts.
"It's happening across the many western democracies, where women's vote is shifting from a more conservative base, which it was right up until the 1980s and 1990s," she said.
"It reflects those broader social shifts that we've seen, more young women are in higher education, women still remain dominant in kind of care professions."
The 2022 Australian election was defined by gender issues, but this campaign was different, Professor Arrow said.
"[The 2022 election] was defined by allegations around misconduct in Parliament House, the rise of Grace Tame and Brittany Higgins as very powerful young advocates for women, the march for justice," she said.
"I think gender is not being discussed as much of a frontline issue as it was in the 2022 campaign … but I think gender is still very much shaping the election debate."
Young women 'not recognised' in campaigns
Vote Compass data found gen Z women were more likely to be supportive of social and environmental causes when compared to other age groups.
Australians under the age of 45, gen Z, and millennial generations now outnumber baby boomers as the largest voting bloc in this election, according to the Australian Electoral Commission.
"Young women are not yet recognised as a central or a really important voting category," Professor Arrow said.
"We still see a lot of the offerings more broadly in the campaign have been around cost of living relief, rather than things that have been specifically targeted to young women."
Young Labor sought to attract new members alongside other parties at University of Wollongong's orientation week.
(
ABC News: Billy Cooper
)
Young voters can be uninformed or unengaged with the electoral process, a Grifith University study found earlier this year.
Almost half of gen Z who did vote in the 2022 federal election said their main reason for doing so was to avoid being fined, the report found.
Stella Giacon, 19, is frustrated by the lack of political action on the issues that matter to her, which she admits leads her to "disassociate" from politics.
Stella Giacon says she wants to be able to vote for someone who has the best interests of young people in mind.
(
ABC News: Billy Cooper
)
"I'm extremely concerned about what's going on with our climate … I want to live in a world where polar bears and tigers exist, and I can explain to my children they're real," she said.
The University of Wollongong student is frustrated by what she perceives to be a lack of understanding of the serious issues facing young people.
"Just look at the problem of student debt, the current living situation for lots of young people," she said.
"Rent is extremely high, wages aren't going up at the same rate of as rent, and I think it'd just be great if we could vote for someone who has our best interests in mind as the young people of this country."
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
Professor Arrow believes Labor may have done a better job than the Coalition at appealing to young women this election.
"We've seen some male politicians going on to influence the podcasts and trying to engage with younger voters in that way," she said.
"We're seeing some kind of missteps from the Coalition's part, which perhaps reflects that they haven't learned the lessons of the 2022 election — most notably, you can see on the back flip around working from home."
Emma Garvey doesn't believe the major parties have policies aimed at helping young people.
(
ABC News: Billy Cooper
)
Ms Garvey believes the major parties can offer much more to young people.
"I feel like they're trying to appeal to young voters in general through their use of like TikTok and just jumping on trends randomly," she said.
"But I don't think they're doing a lot with policy wise to really connect with them."
Vote Compass is an educational tool designed to promote electoral literacy and civic engagement. While not a conventional public opinion poll, Vote Compass responses can be analysed using statistical methods similar to those used in polling to try to adjust for sampling bias.
Responses have been weighted by gender, age, education, language, religion, place of residence and past vote to account for the selection effects of the sample, enabling us to make statistical inferences about the Australian population.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Energy Minister Chris Bowen doesn't rule out carbon tariff on high emissions producing imports
Energy Minister Chris Bowen doesn't rule out carbon tariff on high emissions producing imports

West Australian

time21 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Energy Minister Chris Bowen doesn't rule out carbon tariff on high emissions producing imports

Chris Bowen has been accused of following 'Donald Trump's lead' over comments suggesting Australia could force carbon tariffs on emission-heavy imports. Mr Bowen didn't rule out enacting a carbon tariff on carbon-heavy sectors like cement and lime, stating that 'we'll have more to say during the course of this term'. He said decisions would be made to 'ensure Australian industry is best placed to complete in a decarbonising world'. 'I'd urge against sweeping generalisations about policy settings,' he told the ABC on Sunday. 'What could be the case is obviously we look at particular sectors first, around cement and lime are places that we've looked at in particular, but again, I'm not going to get in front of the process.' Mr Bowen also referred to the Carbon Leakage Review which was conducted by Professor Frank Jotzo. Initial findings backed a border carbon adjustment mechanism that would make importers pay for the carbon created during production, identifying at-risk commodities like cement, lime and clinker, and moderate risk products like steel, glass and ammonia. 'We asked Professor Jotzo to look at this, he's been doing excellent work consulting Australian industry very heavily,' he said. 'I've had lots of meetings with steel makers and cement makers about these things over the past 12 months, for example, getting their feedback, and we'll have more to say during the course of this term.' Newly installed Coalition energy and emissions reduction spokesman Dan Tehan seized on Mr Bowen's comments. 'Now before the election, Chris Bowen, this arrogant minister, said nothing about carbon tariffs, and yet, here he is immediately after the election, talking about putting them in place,' he said in a video shared on social media. 'Now let's have a look at what this minister has presided over. He's put our energy security at risk. He's put electricity prices up, he's put gas prices up, and he's put emissions up, and now he wants to follow Donald Trump's lead and put in place tariffs. What a mess.' Appearing on Insiders, Mr Bowen also maintained that Australia is 'by and large on track' to meet our 43 per cent 2030 emission reduction targets, despite figures released on Friday revealing that emissions had increased year-on-year by 0.05 per cent. While Mr Bowen conceded Australia needed to 'do more' to reach net zero by 2050, he said output from renewables were 'very encouraging,' while transport remained an issue. 'Now our new vehicle efficiency standards only came into force on 1 January, for example. I wouldn't pretend that they've yet had an impact,' he said. 'These are the sorts of things that we need to keep going on to ensure that we can achieve and will achieve a 43 per cent emissions reduction, which I'm very confident we can and will.'

‘We'll determine our defence policy': PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China
‘We'll determine our defence policy': PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China

The Age

time29 minutes ago

  • The Age

‘We'll determine our defence policy': PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back on US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's calls for Australia to ramp up its defence spending to counter China's growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region. Hegseth made the request to Defence Minister Richard Marles when the pair met on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, where the US defence chief later delivered a strident speech warning China posed a real and potentially imminent threat to the region. But on Sunday, Albanese defended Australia's defence spending and policy settings when asked about Hegseth's remarks, and whether Australia would lift its defence budget to 3 per cent of gross domestic product – the figure the Trump administration has previously nominated. 'What we'll do is we'll determine our defence policy, and we've invested just across the forward [estimates], an additional $10 billion in defence. What we'll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region,' Albanese said at a press conference in Tasmania. 'Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.' The prime minister's comments on defence spending contrast with those made by Marles, who has also defended the government's investment but has said that Australia was 'absolutely up for having this conversation' with the US about increasing it further. Hegseth's speech at the dialogue, delivered to an audience of top defence officials on Saturday, has also provoked a furious response from China, which said he had 'smeared and attacked China'. It accused the US of being the 'biggest factor undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region'. 'The United States has deployed offensive weapons in the South China Sea, fanned the flames and created tensions in the Asia-Pacific region, turning the Asia-Pacific region into a 'powder keg', causing deep concern among regional countries,' China's foreign ministry said in a statement.

PM resists Trump on tariffs and defence
PM resists Trump on tariffs and defence

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

PM resists Trump on tariffs and defence

Anthony Albanese has pushed back against the Trump administration's higher steel tariffs and pressure on Australia to spend more on defence, setting up a testing first face-to-face meeting between the prime minister and US president at the G7 in a fortnight. Albanese declared on Sunday that the US was committing an economic 'act of self harm' by increasing prices for American consumers, after Trump shocked allies and partners by doubling tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium sold in the United States to 50 per cent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store