HDMI 2.2 vs. HDMI 2.1: What You Need to Know
Apr 10, 2025 10:00 AM A new HDMI spec is coming, but don't worry about replacing your home theater. Photograph: Anker, Overclocking, Getty Images
If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Most people don't spend much time thinking about HDMI specs, but avid gamers know that the adoption of HDMI 2.1 across the best TVs and monitors came with multiple upgrades to get the most out of the latest game consoles and PCs. The spec includes plenty of other benefits, making it a buzzworthy term among the litany of other confusing TV acronyms.
At CES 2025, the HDMI Forum announced the latest HDMI specification, HDMI 2.2, which advances the technology. Does that mean you need to worry about upgrading your TV, gaming gear, and other home theater devices all over again? The short answer is: No, you're good. HDMI 2.1 is already well ahead of the game in terms of future-proofing your gear. That said, HDMI 2.2 is a cool innovation poised to bring real-world advances to consumers, especially in the realm of AR/VR technologies. Here's what you need to know.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED . Get best-in-class reporting that's too important to ignore for just $2.50 $1 per month for 1 year. Includes unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber-only content. Subscribe Today. What Is HDMI 2.1?
Before getting into the latest HDMI specification, it's important to know everything you can do with the current generation. (If you're already an HDMI 2.1 pro, feel free to skip ahead.)
HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface) is primarily tasked with transmitting high-definition video and multichannel audio between devices, which can take a lot of bandwidth. Officially announced by the HDMI Forum in November of 2017, HDMI 2.1 provided a major bandwidth upgrade over HDMI 2.0, moving from 18 Gbps (gigabits per second) to a whopping 48 Gbps. More pipeline means more room for advanced A/V transmission.
Now called HDMI 2.1b following minor updates, the spec's arrival brought new capabilities, starting with higher video resolutions and refresh rates. It supports 4K video at 120 Hz (higher with certain PC graphics cards), 8K video at 60 Hz, and even 10K video. HDMI 2.1b's speedy refresh rates mostly come into play with gaming, where it facilitates other advanced features like VRR (variable refresh rate) for more fluid gameplay as well as ALLM (auto low-latency mode) and QFT (quick frame transport) for reduced latency. The spec also supports all high-bitrate audio formats, including DTS Master Audio, DTS:X, Dolby TrueHD, and Dolby Atmos.
Other notable features announced with HDMI 2.1 include HDMI eARC for lossless hi-res audio transmission between eARC-supported devices, and dynamic HDR support, which allows for HDR content to be optimized for video scene-by-scene or even frame-by-frame.
Before you worry too much about which port you're using, there are some important caveats to note. Dolby Vision HDR delivered dynamic HDR to compatible TVs over HDMI 2.0 years before HDMI 2.1, due to how its dynamic metadata is embedded in the video, and its rival, HDR10+, can do the same. Similarly, HDMI eARC is available over HDMI 2.0, as shown in newer TVs from brands like TCL and Hisense, providing two HDMI 2.1 inputs and a separate HDMI eARC port.
HDMI 2.1 is backward-compatible with older HDMI versions, but not all features will be supported. You may also need to upgrade your HDMI cables for the higher bandwidth required, swapping out high-definition cables for ultra-high-definition cables like this one. What's New in HDMI 2.2?
With support for 8K and even 10K video (which essentially doesn't exist for consumers) and all major hi-res audio formats, HDMI 2.1b has your home theater covered for the foreseeable future. That means you don't have to worry about upgrading your TV or audio devices for HDMI 2.2 anytime soon.
Instead, the HDMI Forum is pitching the new spec for commercial applications and advanced consumer tech like augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) devices. HDMI 2.2 once again upgrades the bandwidth transmission rate, this time doubling it from 48 Gbps to 96 Gbps to improve 'demanding data-intensive, immersive and virtual applications …' according to the Forum.
Along with new AR/VR and mixed-reality applications, HDMI 2.2's advanced bandwidth is designed to enhance commercial technologies like medical imaging, and potentially even next-gen movie, game, and TV production. Another potential application is machine vision, a mix of software and hardware that, among other things, allows robots, self-driving vehicles, and other machines to orient themselves.
The most practical home theater advancement announced with HDMI 2.2 is Latency Indication Protocol (LIP), designed to improve audio and video sync between your TV and A/V receiver or soundbar. This was also a promise of HDMI eARC, which has mostly delivered. As such, it's hard to see many home theater brands jumping at HDMI 2.2 anytime soon—we're still waiting for more widespread HDMI 2.1b adoption nine years later.
As with HDMI 2.1, you'll need a new high-bandwidth cable to experience HDMI 2.2's benefits, which will presumably land in conjunction with the spec's arrival sometime in the first half of 2025. When we'll see real-world adoption remains to be seen, but if HDMI 2.1 is any indication, it will be a good while before we see it on the market, let alone on your devices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Most Expensive Teslas — Can You Afford One?
Now that Tesla's CEO, and richest man in the world, Elon Musk, has left his White House duties and is once again refocusing on the finances of his car company, it's interesting to see just what his favorite income earner charges consumers. Teslas are many things, but one thing they are not is cheap. Read Next: Find Out: These cars offer some of the most innovative technology available to drivers today — that is, if they have the money to afford them. Here are some of the most expensive Teslas and what it could cost you monthly to buy one. 2025 Starting MSRP: $81,630 to $91,630 Estimated average monthly payment: $1,148 The Model S from Tesla has a lot to boast about, including a base dual motor which can power the car from 0 to 60 miles per hour in 3.1 seconds, as well as go for a 405-mile range. However, the price point is equal to that of the company's Model S Long Range, which was more than $88,000 back in 2023. It's a powerful electric vehicle that requires a bit of green to get behind the driver's seat. Discover More: 2025 Starting MSRP: $81,630 to $96,630 Estimated average monthly payment: $1,299 While it was originally priced at about $140,000 in 2023, the Model X Plaid has come down in terms of cost, but not in features. It has the same tri-motor AWD set up as the Model S Plaid while offering a roomy interior for up to six riders. While it's heavier than the average SUV and not as aerodynamic as other cars, it has a range of 326 miles and can go from 0 to 60 miles per hour in 2.5 seconds, which is why drivers pay top dollar to own one. 2025 Starting MSRP: $81,985 Estimated average monthly payment: $1,209 Love 'em or hate 'em, the Cybertruck is out on the road and for a pretty penny, too. The Cybertruck provides an up to 340-mile range, 600 horsepower, an estimated 340-mile range and 11,000 pounds of towing capabilities. After numerous production delays, Tesla's founder, Elon Musk, tried to make the Cybertruck $30,000 cheaper, but despite not being able to reach that price, thousands of drivers are currently behind the wheel of these EVs. 2025 Starting MSRP: $101,985 Estimated average monthly payment: $1,766 If you want the Cybertruck souped up, you will have to order the Cyberbeast. Deliveries tend to take about a year, making it the most expensive Tesla that one can find in the catalogue. It can still tow up to 11,000 pounds, as well as get a top speed of 130 with 845 horsepower and go for a range of about 320 miles. What you end up paying for is the power of the Cyberbeast. 2026 Starting MSRP: $200,000 to $250,000 Estimated average monthly payment: Could be upwards of $4,000 over five years One of the brand's original models got a significant upgrade with the New Tesla Roadster, a car that reigns as Tesla's most expensive vehicle to date — if it gets released, which would be in 2026 at the earliest. In order to simply reserve it, drivers need to put down $50,000 and then come up with the average starting price of about $200,000, with a Founders Series model specially priced for an estimated $250,000 total. If you are looking to get behind the wheel of one, start saving your pennies now. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on 5 Most Expensive Teslas — Can You Afford One? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘This is coming for everyone': A new kind of AI bot takes over the web
People are replacing Google search with artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT, a major shift that has unleashed a new kind of bot loose on the web. To offer users a tidy AI summary instead of Google's '10 blue links,' companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic have started sending out bots to retrieve and recap content in real time. They are scraping webpages and loading relevant content into the AI's memory and 'reading' far more content than a human ever would. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. According to data shared exclusively with The Washington Post, traffic from retrieval bots grew 49 percent in the first quarter of 2025 from the fourth quarter of 2024. The data is from TollBit, a New York-based start-up that helps news publishers monitor and make money when AI companies use their content. TollBit's report, based on data from 266 websites - half of which are run by national and local news organizations - suggests that the growth of bots that retrieve information when a user prompts an AI model is on an exponential curve. 'It starts with publishers, but this is coming for everyone,' Toshit Panigrahi, CEO and co-founder of TollBit, said in an interview. Panigrahi said that this kind of bot traffic, which can be hard for websites to detect, reflects growing demand for content, even as AI tools devastate traffic to news sites and other online platforms. 'Human eyeballs to your site decreased. But the net amount of content access, we believe, fundamentally is going to explode,' he said. A spokesperson for OpenAI said that referral traffic to publishers from ChatGPT searches may be lower in quantity but that it reflects a stronger user intent compared with casual web browsing. To capitalize on this shift, websites will need to reorient themselves to AI visitors rather than human ones, Panigrahi said. But he also acknowledged that squeezing payment for content when AI companies argue that scraping online data is fair use will be an uphill climb, especially as leading players make their newest AI visitors even harder to identify. Debate around the AI industry's use of online content has centered on the gargantuan amounts of text needed to train the AI models that power tools like ChatGPT. To obtain that data, tech companies use bots that scrape the open web for free, which has led to a raft of lawsuits alleging copyright theft from book authors and media companies, including a New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI. Other news publishers have opted for licensing deals. (In April, The Washington Post inked a deal with OpenAI.) In the past eight months, as chatbots have evolved to incorporate features like web search and 'reasoning' to answer more complex queries, traffic for retrieval bots has skyrocketed. It grew 2.5 times as fast as traffic for bots that scrape data for training between the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025, according to TollBit's report. Panigrahi said TollBit's data may underestimate the magnitude of this change because it doesn't reflect bots that AI companies send out on behalf of AI 'agents' that can complete tasks on a user's behalf, like ordering takeout from DoorDash. The start-up's findings also add a new dimension to mounting evidence that the modern internet - optimized for Google search results and social media algorithms - will have to be restructured as the popularity of AI answers grows. 'To think of it as, 'Well, I'm optimizing my search for humans' is missing out on a big opportunity,' he said. Installing TollBit's analytics platform is free for news publishers, and the company has more than 2,000 clients, many of which are struggling with these seismic changes, according to data in the report. Although news publishers and other websites can implement blockers to prevent various AI bots from scraping their content, TollBit found that more than 26 million AI scrapes bypassed those blockers in March alone. Some AI companies claim bots for AI agents don't need to follow bot instructions because they are acting on behalf of a user. Mark Howard, chief operating officer for the media company Time, a TollBit client, said the start-up's traffic data has helped Time negotiate content licensing deals with AI companies including OpenAI and the search engine Perplexity. But the market to fairly compensate publishers is far from established, Howard said. 'The vast majority of the AI bots out there absolutely are not sourcing the content through any kind of paid mechanism. … There is a very, very long way to go.' Related Content He's dying. She's pregnant. His one last wish is to fight his cancer long enough to see his baby. The U.S. granted these journalists asylum. Then it fired them. 'Enough is enough.' Why Los Angeles is still protesting, despite fear.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's SpaceX plans raise major red flags for regulators
Elon Musk is facing problems from more than just his flagship company. As Tesla stock continues to trend downward amid declining sales and consumer backlash, its future appears increasingly uncertain. With the electric vehicle (EV) leader struggling so much, it can be easy to overlook the fact that Musk's other companies are also dealing with problems. One of his other enterprises is off to an extremely discouraging start this year, after multiple public failures, likely severely diminishing confidence in its products. 💵💰💰💵 The company in question is SpaceX, Musk's space exploration and technology startup, which became the world's most valuable privately held company in December 2024. Unfortunately, since then, it has attempted multiple rocket launches that haven't gone well, making things even more complicated for Musk. Now the company is gearing up to continue operations in the coming months, raising concerns among regulators. Anyone who follows SpaceX's recent progress knows that the company isn't off to a good start in 2025. The company has launched multiple Starship rockets this year, a central component of Musk's plan to help colonize Mars, both of which have ended in a literal comes at a time when SpaceX had previously seemed poised to usher in a new era of space tourism, something Musk had been highly focused on for years. With his new proximity to President Donald Trump, it seemed likelier than ever that his rocket company could reach new heights. However, after multiple explosions in just a few months, SpaceX may have a difficult time convincing regulators that its problems are over. The company is preparing to attempt another launch, which will send its Starship 9 rocket over the Caribbean, specifically over several British territories. According to reports, the previous SpaceX launches resulted in debris falling on these exact islands, a group that includes the British Virgin Islands, Turks and Caicos, and Anguilla. This has prompted concern among UK regulators that the people of these islands could be in danger if the SpaceX launch proceeds as planned. 'The worries from the UK government, detailed in a letter to a top American diplomat on Wednesday, follow the Federal Aviation Administration's decision last week to grant SpaceX's request for a fivefold increase in the number of Starship launches allowed this year, from five to 25,' reports ProPublica. More Elon Musk News: Elon Musk gets devastating news as the 'anti-Tesla' catches on Leaked Tesla policy should infuriate Tesla loyalists Elon Musk's robotaxi ambitions hit with major roadblock The outlet describes this space vessel as the world's most powerful rocket, noting that increasing its launches seems to be a priority for Musk. SpaceX has made the same claim, stating that it is 'capable of carrying up to 150 metric tonnes fully reusable and 250 metric tonnes expendable' into space. For the people of these islands, the prospect of another SpaceX launch could be a scary thought, and for good reason. Following the Starship 7 explosion in January, pieces of the rocket were found along beaches and roads in Turks and Caicos, and one resident reported that the debris damaged their TheStreet's Veronika Bondarenko reported, when the Starship 8 exploded three months later, flights in Orlando, Florida, were unable to take off due to what airport authorities described as 'space launch debris in the area.' People on the Florida coast and across the Bahamas claimed to be able to see red streaks in the sky from the failed launch. With that in mind, British regulators have asked the U.S. Department of State to consider having the launch trajectory or site changed to prevent further risks to British territories. They have also requested that more information regarding SpaceX's planned safety measures be provided before the launch of Starship 9, expected to happen next week. This makes it quite clear that they do not trust Musk or his company. SpaceX recently gained federal approval to launch more rockets in South Texas, but that doesn't mean regulatory agencies are confident that more missions won't mean more disasters Musk's SpaceX plans raise major red flags for regulators first appeared on TheStreet on May 21, 2025
