Italy's abortion taboos challenged by new law in Sicily
The foetus had a genetic syndrome. Monia, who declined to give her surname, asked her gynaecologist what she could do.
Advertisement
"Nothing. You don't want to terminate, do you?" the doctor asked her, she said.
He was a conscientious objector, Monia said, one of hundreds on the southern Italian island. More than 80 per cent of gynaecologists in Sicily refuse to perform abortions for moral or religious reasons, according to the latest health ministry data, which dates to 2022, even though the procedure has been a legal right for women in Italy since 1978.
To address that situation, in late May Sicily's regional council - run by a centre-right coalition - passed a law in a secret ballot requiring all public hospitals to create dedicated abortion wards and to hire staff willing to provide the service.
Under the national rules, abortion is permitted within the first 90 days of a pregnancy, or later if there are risks to the mother's health or foetal abnormalities. The latter circumstance applied to Monia, who went to the Sant'Antonio Abate hospital in the city of Trapani, in western Sicily, to terminate her pregnancy.
Advertisement
"All the gynaecologists were objectors," she said. "An obstetrician gave me a bed with only a mattress cover and said they would administer a pill every three hours until I went into labour". She was told she would receive no further assistance.
Her story is far from unique in southern Italy, where cultural traditions are more conservative than in the Catholic country's richer north and centre.
At first, Monia's pills were ineffective, but after five days and a change of treatment she finally miscarried, attended to by a doctor and a midwife.
Hospital staff referred to her as "Article 6," she said, after the provision in the law that allows abortions beyond 90 days.
Advertisement
In response to a request for comment, the Sant'Antonio Abate hospital said it was sorry for Monia's "difficult experience". However, the hospital said it was unable to verify the facts because both the hospital manager and the head of the gynaecology department at that time had left.
The hospital said it now has three non-objecting doctors and was able to provide abortion services.
Abortions are only available in around half of Sicily's hospitals, health ministry data shows, a figure much lower than in central and northern Italy, where rates are around 70 per cent.
Like most of his colleagues, Fabio Guardala, a 60-year-old doctor, refuses to perform abortions. He operates at the Cannizzaro hospital in the Sicilian city of Catania, on the east coast of the island.
Advertisement
"A doctor's job is to heal," said Guardala, who is also deputy head of a healthcare unit at his local Catholic church. "Abortion is not treatment but killing. Nobody can force a doctor to kill."
Silvia Vaccari, president of the Italian federation of midwives, FNOPO, said health outcomes can be grim in areas where legal abortions are hard to access.
"The absence of facilities sometimes leads people to turn to non-professionals, putting them at risk of death, or to continue with pregnancies and give birth to babies who are abandoned in places where they may never be found alive," she said.
Catholic influence
Most other European Union countries allow health workers to refuse to perform abortions on ethical grounds, according to a 2022 study published in the Acta Biomedica journal. But the right is generally exercised far less commonly than in southern Italy.
Advertisement
One exception is deeply Catholic Poland, where abortion is only legal in cases of rape or incest or when a woman's health or life is at risk. The Acta study said many Polish women have been forced to travel abroad to terminate their pregnancies.
Abortion has always been contentious in Italy, a Catholic country that hosts the Vatican. Right-wing prime minister Giorgia Meloni passed legislation last year to try to deter women from terminating pregnancies.
Pro-life groups have been allowed into abortion advice clinics, in a move Ms Meloni's party said was aimed at giving women an opportunity for reflection before making a final decision.
Nationally, the number of abortions dropped to 65,000 in 2022, according to the latest health ministry data, against 110,000 in 2011.
More than 60 per cent of gynaecologists are conscientious objectors.
On the island of Sardinia, the region's ruling, left-leaning 5-Star Movement last month presented a law proposal similar to the one adopted in Sicily, suggesting that other southern regions may soon follow its example.
Dario Safina, a centre-left Democratic Party lawmaker in Sicily and the promoter of the new law, said many Sicilian women seeking an abortion feel forced to resort to the private sector.
Healthcare based on wealth is the end of democracy.
"Access to abortion is not a problem for those who can afford it, because they can go to a private clinic. But healthcare based on wealth is the end of democracy," he said.
Some doctors argue Sicily's high objection rates are not only due to ethics but also to staff shortages and poor working conditions that make it harder for gynaecologists to provide abortions on top of their regular duties.
Data from the GIMBE Foundation, a health sector think-tank, shows Sicily had nine healthcare workers per 1,000 residents in 2022, compared with a national average of 11.6 and far below the northern and central Emilia Romagna and Tuscany regions with 15.
"Hospitals always try to exploit doctors' work without paying them properly, so sometimes professionals are reluctant to perform abortions," said Salvatore Incandela, head of the Sicilian arm of AOGOI, Italy's gynaecologists' association.
Italian anti-abortion group Pro-Life Together rejects this, saying non-objectors in Sicily were only required to perform 1.5 abortions a week on average in 2022 - still above a national average of 0.9.
Legal challenges?
Six Sicilian hospital managers and health professionals contacted by Reuters said the new legislation could strengthen the service, but it was still important to ensure doctors could opt out as allowed under 1978 national law that sanctioned the right to abortion.
Under the law, health workers are exempted from abortion procedures if they declare an ethical or religious objection, so long as the woman's life is not in immediate danger.
Gaetano Sirna, the director general of Catania's Policlinico-San Marco hospital, one of the city's largest, said even with just six non-objecting gynaecologists out of a total of 39, he could still ensure abortions for those who needed them.
"We have no problems guaranteeing the availability (of doctors)... gynaecologists are free to declare themselves as objectors; we do not discriminate," he told Reuters.
Abortion is not the only case in which conscientious objection is permitted in Italy. It used to be grounds for avoiding compulsory military service, which was abolished in the early 2000s, and an opt-out for scientists from conducting animal experiments was introduced in the early 1990s.
Giorgia Landolfo, a pro-abortion activist in Catania, called the new law in Sicily a "landmark," but said she feared it would be hard to enforce.
Some anti-abortion groups say it will be challenged in court on the ground that job postings reserved for non-objectors discriminate against the others.
"Many measures in the past aimed at hiring non-objectors have been challenged and ultimately came to nothing," said Vito Trojano, the head of SIGO, the Italian Obstetrics and Gynaecology Society.
Some Sicilian politicians who strongly oppose the new rules believe the region should instead bolster its healthcare and support facilities for pregnant women, who often feel abandoned and see no alternative to abortion.
"Life is life from the moment of conception," said Margherita La Rocca, a Sicilian lawmaker from the centre-right Forza Italia party. "The foetus cannot just be considered a clump of cells when it's convenient."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 hours ago
- The Independent
This is the best time to take an exam to boost your chances of passing, study finds
Sign up for our free Health Check email to receive exclusive analysis on the week in health Get our free Health Check email Get our free Health Check email Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice Midday may be the best time to take an oral exam, interview for a job, or even go on trial, a new study has found. Researchers at Italy's University of Messina found a significant difference in students' pass rates in the late morning compared to early morning or late afternoon. At 12pm the students' passing rate was 72 per cent, compared to 54 per cent at 8am and 51 per cent at 4pm. Pass rates at 11am and 1pm were slightly lower at 67 per cent. 'We show that academic assessment outcomes vary systematically across the day, with a clear peak in passing rates around midday,' said Professor Carmelo Mario Vicario. 'Students were more likely to pass in late morning compared with early morning or late afternoon,' he said. 'We believe this pattern could extend to job interviews or any evaluative process scheduled throughout the day.' The study was based on the outcome of 104,552 assessments delivered by 680 examiners for 1,243 courses. The researchers chose to look at university oral exams, which are more subjective and aren't marked solely on correct answers, but also on delivery. It follows research showing that judges are more likely to rule in favour of a defendant at the start of sessions or after meal breaks. However, it is thought that this could also come down to the types of cases that are heard at different times of day. The study's author believes the findings could extend to job interviews ( Getty/iStock ) While the study could not identify the exact cause, it said the midday peak was consistent with evidence that cognitive performance improves over the morning and declines during the afternoon. The report said this could be due to the students' falling energy levels, as well as professors', who may give a harsher mark if they are experiencing decision fatigue. Researchers also said that it could be a result of students and professors competing chronotypes, the body's natural preference of sleeping times. 'People in their early 20s are usually night owls, while people in their 40s or older tend to be morning larks. The students might be least cognitively sharp at the time when the professors are most alert.' Prof Vicario suggested that to counteract these effects, students would benefit from better sleep, mental breaks, and scheduling exams outside of personal low periods. 'For institutions, delaying morning sessions or clustering key assessments in the late morning may improve outcomes. 'We believe this pattern could extend to job interviews or any evaluative process scheduled throughout the day. 'We would be very interested in investigating whether hiring decisions, too, fluctuate in fairness or outcome depending on time of day.'
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Covid-19: Sir Michael McBride denies he thought coronavirus 'won't happen here'
The chief medical officer has rejected claims that he felt the devastating path coronavirus had wreaked through care homes in Italy at the beginning of the pandemic in 2020 would not occur in Northern Michael McBride has been speaking at the UK Covid-19 told the inquiry that measures were being put in place at the time in conjunction with the UK government, its emergency Cobra committee, scientific advisory group Sage and all relevant bodies in Northern inquiry is currently examining adult and residential care as part of its scrutiny of how the response to the pandemic was handled. Counsel to the inquiry, Jacqueline Carey, asked Sir Michael about evidence given to the hearing on Wednesday from the former commissioner for older people, Eddie said Mr Lynch had stated that the view of the chief medical officer and the chief social worker on the situation in Italy - where elderly people were dying in care homes - was "that won't happen here"."Mr Lynch told us yesterday that his general impression in March was that there was an air of unreality, that it wouldn't happen in Northern Ireland," she if he had believed that what was happening in Italy was "not going to reach the shores of Northern Ireland", Sir Michael said: "I fail to understand those comments if I'm really honest."He said he was fully aware of the seriousness of the evolving situation and had met with all the relevant bodies to ensure there was a robust approach to Northern Ireland's preparations."I really don't understand any sense of unreality or lack of urgency," he said."Within days we had introduced, on the 16th March, social distancing, working from home, advising people not to go to pubs and restaurants, so I really don't understand that reflection." When Counsel to the Inquiry asked Sir Michael why care home workers had not been among priority front line workers who were being tested in March 2020, he said that was because Northern Ireland didn't have enough tests."A good example is that on 2 March, the then minister provided a statement to the Executive indicating that we had carried out 150 tests, and one had been positive," Sir Michael said. "That was not what was happening - it did not reflect the reality of how the pandemic was spreading or how rapidly it was spreading."It reflects the fact that in many respects we were running to catch up," added Sir told the inquiry that Northern Ireland's early surge plans lacked "specificity" and there were gaps around infection prevention in the care sector and how the care home sector would engage with hospitals."What I needed to see were overarching plans between the care home and the acute sector across the region, that regional coordination needed to be much more robust." "While there were several people with wide-ranging knowledge of the social care sector, there was no-one within the Department of Health who had specialist knowledge of social care," he said.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
JENNI MURRAY: I would be terrified at the thought at giving birth today
It's been 42 years since I gave birth to my first son and 38 years since the second one came along, and I look back at that time with awe, joy and amazement at just how brilliant the maternity services were. As soon as my first pregnancy was confirmed by my GP, I was allocated a midwife who looked after me and my unborn son throughout. She came to check on me every month at my home in Southampton, where I worked at the time, and I went for regular scans at the Princess Anne Maternity Hospital, attached to Southampton General. I was invited to see the delivery ward and meet the chief midwife, registrar and consultant. I was not a private patient, so everything I got was standard NHS practice.
