logo
Ian Blackford calls on SNP to support defence industry

Ian Blackford calls on SNP to support defence industry

At this week's NATO summit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer committed to raising defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035.
READ MORE
Mr Blackford said this was a "seismic shift" and would have "massive implications for the budgets of every government department over the next decade."
"Though in these islands we have excellence in many aspects of our armed forces, to a large extent our military capability has been hollowed out," he wrote. "The need to enhance defence capability and at pace is stark.
"There is now a race to invest and if we take last year's defence spending of £53.9 billion as our base, we are going to have to find by 2035 an extra £60 billion plus a year to invest in defence.
"Where is this to come from?"
The former MP said 'difficult choices' would need to be made. He argued that defence funding should not be seen as a moral compromise, but as an economic lever.
"Austerity will be a price to be paid as a consequence of having to invest in our national security.
"Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth."
He noted that the industry already supports 33,500 workers in Scotland and contributes £3.2 billion in gross value.
"We all want a high-growth, high-wage, high-productivity Scotland—a society that drives investment in skills and innovation."
The SNP has long opposed public money being spent on munitions. The Scottish National Investment Bank's ethical investment policy currently bars organisations 'primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons' from receiving support.
Ian Blackford calling on the SNP to embrace the defence sector (Image: PA) Recently, a new welding centre—backed by Rolls-Royce and intended to support Royal Navy submarine construction—was denied funding by Scottish Enterprise.
The UK Government has since stepped in to fund the initiative.
The SNP has faced accusations of hypocrisy, as the Scottish Government funds Ferguson Marine, which is subcontracted by BAE to work on Royal Navy frigates.
Mr Blackford's intervention comes as John Swinney faces mounting internal and external pressure to reconsider his government's position.
Recently, the First Minister suggested the policy could be "reconsidered" given the growing threat from Russia.
Speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast, he said: "I'm conscious we are living in a very different context today. I do think the Russian threat is very real. We have to consider these questions."
He added he had no objections if a company wished to set up a munitions factory in Scotland.
The First Minister added: "We do not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions but will support skills and defence companies."
Speaking to Scotland on Sunday, Stewart McDonald, the SNP's former defence spokesperson at Westminster, said it was time for the party to look again at the policy.
"It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012, when we changed the policy on NATO," he said.
"All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state—and an independent state in NATO and the EU—then we should have stuff to say on this."
Mr McDonald warned: "There is a risk the party falls behind in that debate."
He said: "That's a debate going on in capitals across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner.
"We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employing somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people, and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government—it has done so for a long time."
He suggested Mr Swinney should gather major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, invite the defence procurement minister from London, and ask: "How do I marshal the resources of the government—spending, policy, legislative—to better support this?"
"I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged," he added. "We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time—and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you."
Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on munitions-related investment "a stupid policy" and criticised restrictions at the Scottish National Investment Bank.
Meanwhile, in the Sunday Mail, Labour's Scottish Secretary, Ian Murray, called on the SNP to reverse its opposition to nuclear weapons entirely.
"Any responsible government has to make sure they put their national security and the safety of their own people first.
"Scots only have to turn on their TVs and pick up their newspapers to read about the fact that there is a changing global instability.
"I do think the Scottish Government should readdress it."
Previously, Mr Murray described himself as a 'lifelong unilateralist' and was one of 2000 parliamentarians to have signed the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) pledge, which obliges signatories to work for their respective nations to sign up to a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons through the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).
He added: "My views on nuclear weapons changed some time ago but they have been underlined and emphasised by the fact that the issue of nuclear weapons and deterrence has become a huge global stability issue.
"For the Scottish Government to tell Rolls-Royce, one of the most respected British institutions, that they will not contribute to them investing in a highly skilled welding academy in Glasgow tells the public that they do not care about jobs, growth and opportunities for the future.
"That is a huge part of the defence dividend we should be trying to capture. Places like Babcock and BAE Systems are hiring foreign welders from the Philippines and South Africa to do the work local people should be doing."
READ MORE
However, SNP defence spokesperson Dave Doogan told the paper that the party remained 'resolute' in its opposition to nuclear weapons.
"We believe we're firmly in step with the vast majority of civil society in Scotland on that point.
"Ian Murray, consistent with many other issues, is not in step with the majority of civil society in Scotland.
"I've spoken to armed forces professionals who deal with the nuclear deterrent and nobody talks about it in the triumphant way in which Westminster politicians of the two main parties do."
Any change in the Scottish Government's policy would likely be met with opposition from the Scottish Greens.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia launches largest airstrike on Ukraine since war began
Russia launches largest airstrike on Ukraine since war began

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Russia launches largest airstrike on Ukraine since war began

Russia has launched its largest air attack on Ukraine since 2022, deploying over 500 drones across multiple cities on Saturday. The attacks impacted Kyiv, Cherkasy, Lviv, Poltava, Kharkiv, Kherson, and Mykolaiv, with photos and videos shared by President Volodymyr Zelensky. Ukraine's Air Force confirmed one F-16 pilot was killed, though 475 of the 537 aerial targets were successfully shot down. In response to the six-hour assault, Poland scrambled its NATO jets and activated its ground-based air defence systems. Watch the video in full above.

After a dreadful first year, Starmer has no hope of fixing the economy
After a dreadful first year, Starmer has no hope of fixing the economy

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

After a dreadful first year, Starmer has no hope of fixing the economy

This Friday is the anniversary of Labour's victory at the polls, presenting us with an opportunity to assess Sir Keir Starmer's first year in office. I cannot comment on foreign affairs or domestic social issues. My bailiwick is simply the economy and the Government's influence over it. If a week is a long time in politics, then a year is a short time in the life of an economy. It is perfectly possible for things that have started badly to turn out well in the end and, equally, for things that started well to turn sour. So a judgment this early in a government's tenure must be provisional. We should start by acknowledging all the difficulties the Government has faced. It inherited a low-growth economy, accompanied by a serious fiscal problem. Notably, a deficit of nearly 5pc of GDP and a debt ratio not far off 100pc, and still climbing. Moreover, given the continuing war between Russia and Ukraine, and especially since Donald Trump's return to the White House in January, the international environment has not been favourable. With all that said, how has the Government done? Long ago, Labour's leaders acknowledged that the fundamental problem of the British economy was low economic growth, associated with weak productivity growth. They identified a low rate of national investment as the most important driver. Accordingly, much of Labour's wish list has been about increasing the rate of investment. It has undertaken a number of measures, including redefining the fiscal rules, to enable a higher rate of public investment. The effects of this change have not yet come through. And it has sought to reduce the planning obstructions to building more houses. As regards business investment, however, its approach so far has been woeful. It seems to have believed that, after the leadership chaos and infighting of the last 14 years, merely by not being Conservative, the new Labour Government would engender greater confidence. Things have turned out rather differently. For a start, the underlying problems were always more serious than Labour's diagnosis acknowledged. Moreover, the gloom and doom about the ' fiscal black hole ' relentlessly pumped out by the Chancellor didn't help develop any sense of optimism among business leaders. Then there were three key mistakes. The first was committed more or less immediately after taking office by caving in to the striking rail workers. This gave a green light to other militant groups to act, and it will surely take a long time for the Government to restore any sense of confidence that it will firmly resist militant union pay demands. In a similar vein, it conceded to junior doctors and thereby, in all likelihood, set off a wave of claims and industrial disputes across the public sector. Second, having boxed itself in with a pre-election commitment not to raise the main rates of personal tax and yet feeling that it had to increase some sort of tax to fund its increased spending, the Government then imposed a huge increase in business taxes in the form of increased National Insurance contributions for employers. Moreover, this came on top of a large increase in the minimum wage. To cap it all, the Government is in the process of getting the Employment Rights Bill through Parliament. This will greatly strengthen the bargaining position of workers against their employers. Many small businesses, in particular, are fearful that they will be in a weak position to stand up against rogue employees. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that business leaders feel depressed and are disinclined to invest or take on employees. Ultimately, it seems Labour really doesn't seem to appreciate the private sector or understand what makes businesses tick. Simultaneously, the Government has failed to understand the nature and scale of the problem concerning the public finances. Admittedly, most Labour Party supporters seem to think that we can increase the share of GDP accounted for by government expenditure without incurring any ill effects. Yet anyone reviewing the international evidence will conclude that government spending taking as high a share of GDP as it currently does is doing grave damage. One of the most important drivers of surging public spending is the ballooning benefits bill. Admittedly, the Government has made a nod in this direction by announcing various measures to combat the inexorable rise in welfare spending. But these measures have been pitifully small in scope. They amounted only to a total saving of some £6bn, compared to a projected total welfare bill (including pensions) this year of £326bn. Moreover, the Government has already retreated on some of its proposals. It may be about to abandon the rest of them this week. If you want to be optimistic, you could say that it is still early days. Even Margaret Thatcher's first year in office in 1979/80 was very far from an economic success story. Indeed, she began by agreeing to the pay recommendations of the Clegg Commission on public sector pay (no, not that Clegg). And her monetarist obsession caused interest rates to be jacked up from 12pc to 17pc, prompting the pound to soar and much of the British economy to go down the tubes. The economy picked up two years later, but it didn't really start to motor until after Thatcher's second election victory in 1983. Somehow, though, I don't see this Government's dire beginning leading to any sort of major recovery, let alone a Damascene conversion. With a tailwind from the international environment, things may get a bit better next year. But any sort of economic transformation looks unattainable. In that case, Labour's other aspirations will fall by the wayside. Meanwhile, the Government somehow has to find the wisdom to appreciate the peril that this country faces from foreign aggression – and to muster the political courage to spend what is necessary to defend us against it.

Frankie Boyle joins call to halt proscription of Palestine Action
Frankie Boyle joins call to halt proscription of Palestine Action

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Frankie Boyle joins call to halt proscription of Palestine Action

Signatories include the two Scots, as well as many others from north of the border, as well as the likes of Caroline Lucas, Max Porter and Vinay Patel. Boyle has been vocal in his support for Palestine and the group say it is an attack on the freedom of political expression if the proscription goes ahead. Speaking about it, Brady said: 'Civil disobedience, protest and the expression of political solidarity is not terrorism. To say that it is would be an indictment of the UK democracy and every self-respecting comedian should take a stand!' Frankie Boyle The Author Statement on the Right to Freedom of Speech adds: 'What is at stake here is the very principle of freedom of political expression as we know it in the UK. Whether we as individuals support Palestine Action is irrelevant: we oppose their proscription on principle. 'Civil disobedience is not 'terrorism', as history shows us, from the suffragettes to Martin Luther King Jr. It is the right of all citizens in a democracy. In 2004, Keir Starmer made this very argument when he represented an activist who sabotaged a military aircraft, making the case that his actions were lawful because they aimed to prevent an 'illegal war'.' The statement has been released to align with the vote on the proposed ban in parliament on Monday. It insists that support of Palestine Action is not the aim of the coalition but says it is against classing the group's action at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 as an act of terrorism and believes it is 'completely unprecedented' in the UK. The coalition, which is made up of signatories across the political spectrum, urges the government to reconsider its plans. It calls on the government to halt the proposed ban and uphold the essential principles of freedom of expression and the right to protest that are cornerstones of British democracy. Read More Novelist and screenwriter Nikesh Shukla is one who signed it and said: 'As a precedent for what constitutes free speech and appropriate civil disobedience, this is appalling. I hope all free speech advocates across the divide call this what it is: unjust and wrong.' Comedian Josie Long added: 'Comedians talk a lot about freedom of speech being under threat. But this is the real deal – it would make it illegal simply to express verbal support for Palestine Action. Keir Starmer's government is criminalising our right to express political solidarity. If they come for Palestine Action, make no mistake: they will come for you next. Every comedian, everyone with a platform needs to speak up.' Poet Rebecca Tamás said: 'If this government truly believes in free speech and freedom of expression, then it will not proscribe Palestine Action. This is the action of an authoritarian regime, not an open and trustworthy democracy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store