Potholes and pavements the big issues in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Voters in Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart will go to the polls tomorrow to elect a new councillor – with candidates concerned about the state of the roads and pavements they will use to get there.
The by-election for the ward was called after Labour councillor Val Walker passed away suddenly in April.
Polls will open at 7am across the ward, and close at 10pm, and ahead of the vote we contacted the candidates to ask what issues local people were concerned about and how they would tackle them if elected.
And almost all raised the issue of potholes and poorly maintained pavements as being on the minds of residents. The council was criticised over 'quick fix' solutions, while one candidate said the state of local pavements was ' a disgrace'.
Anti-social behaviour was also a topic that kept coming up, with concerns over. youth violence rising in the wake of the Covid lockdowns.
Here are what some of the candidates had to say.
Mark Hooley, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party – 'Get the basics right'
Scottish Conservative and Unionist party candidate Mark Hooley, who has lived in the ward for five years, said that potholes, roads and anti-social behaviour were big issues.
He said: 'In terms of areas [of concern], it would definitely be the roads. I think that's an issue. In general, the state of the roads, sometimes the council just does a quick-fix job, and then it's not done properly.
'Also, I would want to focus on anti-social behaviour. We've had some issues down by the canal, so I would definitely want to focus on rectifying that.'
Mr Hooley, who has lived in the city for nine, says his campaign is all about getting the basics of government right.
He said: 'My basic philosophy is that government should do less, but do it better. It's not doing the basics as well as it should.
'I don't think it's surprising that when people get disillusioned from government, and then some more extreme options become more attractive to people because they say, 'oh, regular politicians aren't doing what they should do''.
Mr Hooley, who works in senior management at a betting firm and is studying an MSc in journalism at Napier, says he cares deeply about where he lives, and wants to help improve the ward by representing it at the council.
He also said that he wanted to be a visible presence in the community if elected, and further that he would want to encourage more civic participation in government.
Q Manivannan, Scottish Green Party – A more caring, considerate politics
Q Manivannan, a PhD student from India who moved to Scotland four years ago, is representing the Scottish Greens at the by-election.
They said that housing and traffic, as well as environmental issues, would be big priorities if they were elected.
They continued: 'Let's start with housing. Lots of people in the area, especially in Fountainbridge and Tollcross, are paying sky high rents.
'And in Hutchison and Chesser, lots of what used to be council housing is now let out privately.
'Besides that, residents have talked to me constantly about the road safety aspect of it all. I think traffic calming measures are long overdue.
'But way too many councillors are far too timid about reducing traffic and offering positive alternatives like walking, cycling and public transport.'
They said that their experience as a queer member of the Tamil community would help them relate deeply to constituents in the ward if they were elected.
They continued: 'This election is not just a chance to elect one of the 63 councillors, but it's also a chance for the people in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart to say they don't want the same as usual.
'I think people are yearning for a more caring, considerate politics – one that isn't just driven by remediating the worst things happening in society, but rather looking for new ideas and new kinds of people.'
In their life before entering politics, they have spent time working for the UCU trade union, as well as working at the United Nations on disability-inclusive responses to Covid-19.
They also convene the Green Party's Palestine solidarity group, and said the party's collective nature drew them towards it.
Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour – Continuing a legacy
For Labour candidate Catriona Munro, the biggest issues she sees in the ward are the state of the roads and the pavements, as well as road safety and the provision of public services.
She said: 'The concerns that people have voiced are a lot of issues around the roads, the state of the roads and the state of the pavements.
'It's a problem for all road users, all sorts – pedestrians, cyclists and cars. We need to get better at making sure that these are dealt with.'
She also said that she had gotten to know late councillor Walker 'so well' through their shared engagement in arts in the ward.
Their connection started over Ms Munro's efforts to save a dance space she used from closure, which Cllr Walker had taken an interest in.
Ms Munro, a solicitor, has lived in Edinburgh for almost 30 years, and recently retired from full-time practice.
She said: 'I've always wanted to engage in public service of some sort, and I have stood for election before, but I feel that the time has come for me to give something back to my community.
'I would be honoured to be given the opportunity to do so.'
Gary Neill, Reform UK – Action on potholes and social housing
Gary Neill, originally from Belfast, is the Reform UK candidate for the by-election.
He said that potholes would be a focus of his if he became the ward's councillor, continuing: 'Some of the pavements are a disgrace. The roads are absolutely terrible.
'What are [visitors] thinking of a city like Edinburgh, when the council can't even present decent walkways, decent roads for people to drive on.'
He also says that he has heard many complaints about crime and housing.
On social housing and homelessness, Mr Neill wants to see stronger action from the council, saying: 'It takes anything between two and four years, if you're lucky, to get social housing.
'And the problem is, one, there's not enough. Two, the normal approach is, block book a hotel, block book a bunch of properties from private landlords, block book Airbnbs.
'What's a permanent solution [to homelessness]? Why not use some of the council land and build a prefab village, or a portacabin village?
'One might think, well, that doesn't sound great. But at least if you are allocated a unit, it's yours – you're not moved every six months because the hotel has run out of contract, you're not moved from A to B because of anti-social behaviour.'
He's had a wide-ranging background, spending time in the British Army and as a part-time police officer in his younger years before leaving Northern Ireland in 1984 to continue a career in sales, management and project management.
Mr Neill, who moved to Edinburgh in 2023, says that his work experience gives him a 'good background' for becoming a councillor.
Murray Visentin, SNP – A well-established local face
SNP candidate Murray Visentin says that one of the biggest concerns he's heard of in the ward is issues around the Caledonian Brewery redevelopment, in Shandon.
While it's not in the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart ward, he says many local residents are concerned about the parking impact the development – which has two parking spaces for almost 170 units – will have.
He also says he's heard that potholes are an issue, as well as anti-social behaviour. He said: 'One thing that has been, even in my Asda, is anti-social behaviour from youths not long after Covid.
'People were stuck in the house for a long time, and the kids felt like they could run amok like they could run amok in their houses.
'And then you've got what people always talk about, which is potholes.'
Having spent most of his life in the ward, Murray Visentin says he has a strong tie to the community he's looking to represent.
He believes he can serve his local community best by running for council, saying: 'My belief is that local politics can make a difference with people more than national politics.
'It can come across as a negative thing sometimes, but local politics, regardless of party, becomes, 'what can your councillor do for you?'
'And because I know an awful lot of people in the ward, they'll have this local personal contact, and I thought that's probably the best thing I could possibly do for my local community.'
Mr Visentin works as a manager at Chesser Asda, and says this brings him people and management skills that would make him well-suited for the job.
He presently works as a manager in the warehouse, where he's ended up due to his possessing a forklift license, but has worked as a manager in every part of the store.
All candidates
A full list of candidates is as follows:
Bonnie Prince Bob, Independent
Derrick Emms, Independent
Lukasz Furmaniak, Scottish Libertarian Party
Mark Hooley, Scottish COnservative and Unionist Party
Richard Crewe Lucas, Scottish Family Party
Q Manivannan, Scottish Green Party
Kevin Joseph McKay, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour Party
Gary Neill, Reform UK
Mark Rowbotham, Independent
Murray Visentin, Scottish National Party
Steve Cristopher West, Independent
Marc Wilkinson, Independent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Robinson unable to rule out compulsory redundancies
The long-delayed report, which was supposed to be published last month, says that without action, Scotland faces a £2.6bn gap in resource spending and £2.1bn in capital spending by 2029–30. READ MORE Alongside the MTFS, the Government published a Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan, setting out how ministers hope to close that gap. Specific measures include reducing the public sector workforce by an average of 0.5% annually. With 469,100 full-time equivalent staff on the books, this would be the equivalent of around 11,611 full-time workers by the end of the decade. Forbes, Swinney and Robison outside the chamber (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA) The move should lead to savings of £700m annually, and ministers are confident it can be achieved through staff turnover and a freeze on recruitment. However, speaking in Holyrood, the Finance Secretary, Shona Robison, was unable to say there would be no compulsory redundancies. Answering a question from Labour's Daniel Johnston, the minister said: "I have been engaging with the unions and the STUC around this, is that no compulsory redundancy maintains to be the default position. "But as a last resort, once all steps have been taken through voluntary severance, through redeployment, if there is no other route and there are no jobs for those people involved, then the compulsory redundancy can be considered, but only at the end of that route. "So we believe that these reductions can be made through natural attrition and voluntary severance, and it is only in that extreme position that that would be enabled, and we don't see that happening in very many cases." Public sector wages represent 55% of Scotland's resource budget. Pay agreements in 2025–26, including NHS workers' 4.25% increase, have already exceeded the Government's 3% guideline. Alongside the strategy and the plan, the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) published its latest economic and fiscal updates. The watchdog said that the total funding available to the Scottish Government will rise from £61.3bn in 2026–27 to £66.5bn by 2029–30. However, after accounting for inflation, this represents an increase of only 0.8% per year in real terms. Next year, the Scottish Government's day-to-day spending will be £54bn, but after subtracting social security costs, only £46.3bn will remain. By 2029–30, this will increase slightly to £50.1bn. Ms Robison blamed the financial settlement from Westminster, pointing to a £400m shortfall triggered by the Labour Government's refusal to fully fund increased employer National Insurance contributions. She said changes to welfare payments could cost Scotland an extra £440m by 2029–30. "Managing the impact of Westminster austerity is all too familiar," Ms Robison told MSPs. "We continue to invest in the people of Scotland, supporting a better-paid public sector, delivering high-quality public services and providing welfare support not available elsewhere in the UK. And we have managed this while balancing the budget every year." Beyond cutting the workforce, the Government believes it can save between £600m and £1.5bn each year over the next five years by adopting new technology, increasing automation, and encouraging closer working between public agencies. Around 12,000 civil service jobs to go (Image: PA) The Government will also carefully reassess infrastructure spending due to high inflation in construction costs. Ms Robison confirmed she would publish a multi-year Scottish Spending Review alongside December's budget. The other key pillars of the plan to tackle the black hole are growth and tax. On economic growth, the minister said the Government would aim to increase business activity to broaden the tax base, while on taxation, she hinted at a potential wealth tax, with the Government committing to the publication of a literature review on the measure. Labour finance spokesman Michael Marra pointed to the £9.1bn extra coming to the Scottish Government in the coming years as a result of UK Government decisions. 'Today is the day years of gross mismanagement of the public finances by SNP ministers caught up with them – and the price is being paid by ordinary Scots,' he said. 'Let's be crystal clear, by no definition other than the SNP's can the budget they receive be described as austerity. 'The reason this Government is making cuts is because they have spectacularly mismanaged Scotland's budget. 'It's SNP ministers who have created a structural deficit of a staggering £2.6bn – that's a result of choices that you made.' READ MORE Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy said the workforce reduction target 'lacks ambition and detail.' He told MSPs: 'The last medium-term financial strategy was over two years ago – last year's was binned and this year's was delayed. 'By slipping out this year's strategy just before recess, we have no time to properly scrutinise this plan. 'But what we do know is that without radical action on public sector reform, on health and on labour force trends, Scots face substantially higher taxes or a state that does less. 'But the projected £5bn fiscal gap by the end of the decade is not Westminster's fault or responsibility, it is the SNP's.' David Phillips, an Associate Director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said "tougher financial choices" were still to come. He said the £2.6bn a year funding gap was "roughly equivalent to spending on Scottish police and fire services, or the revenue from increasing all rates of income tax in Scotland by around four percentage points." "As the MTFS and SFC make clear, current forecasts for the contribution of devolved tax revenues to the Scottish Budget are likely optimistic, as they assume earnings grow significantly faster in Scotland than in the rest of the UK from 2026–27 onwards. "All else equal, if earnings instead grew at the same rate as in the rest of the UK, the 'funding gap' for day-to-day spending would be closer to £3.5bn." He said the multi-year spending review would also have to say which services will be cut back in order to protect spending on the Scottish Government's key priorities – poverty, climate change, economic growth, and effective public services. "This will likely require steep cuts to some other 'non-priority' areas, and a laser-like focus on how effective spending actually is – not all spending on the Government's priorities can and should survive the chop. "Indeed, the scale of the fiscal challenge could necessitate the Scottish Government to make trade-offs between its four priorities." "The fiscal challenge facing Scotland is large and real. So as the current Government and opposition parties begin to set out their election pitch to voters, it will be vital to scrutinise what their plans would mean for Scotland's finances," he added.
ITV News
26 minutes ago
- ITV News
Pip and universal credit cuts explained: Who will be hit and how much will they lose?
Since the government's planned welfare cuts were first announced in March, concern among disabled people, charities, and backbench MPs has continued to grow. The outcry in response to the reforms has plagued Sir Keir Starmer and his ministers as they seek to win over Labour MPs on the changes. Despite more than 120 Labour MPs backing a move to block the legislation, the government insists it is pressing ahead with the reforms. But what are the changes, how many will be affected, and why are MPs so angry about it? What is Pip and who will lose out under the cuts? Personal Independence Payment (Pip) is paid to support people with a long term physical or mental health condition or disability. It's not connected to whether or not you can work, and is designed to cover the additional costs associated with being disabled or long-term sick. There are current 3.7 million people claiming Pip, and under the government's changes it's estimated the cuts will affect around 800,000 people. There are two parts to Pip - the daily living component, and the mobility component. The mobility component is not affected by the changes, but the government is making it more difficult for people to claim the daily living component by tightening eligibility. People are assessed for Pip through questions about their ability to do different daily tasks independently, with each task scaled on a scale from zero to twelve. They currently need to score eight points across the different categories for the standard rate, or twelve for the higher rate. But under the new plans, from November 2026 claimants will need to score at least four points for one activity, rather than a lower number of points across multiple activities. For example, an individual who needs help washing their hair or their body below the waist would score two points and therefore no longer qualify, but needing help washing between the shoulders and waist is worth four points, meaning that would make someone eligible. People claiming the daily living component receive either a standard rate of £72.65 a week, or an enhanced rate of £108.55 a week, depending on the severity of their condition. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill also says that there will be a 13 week transition period for anyone losing their Pip, instead of the standard four weeks. What are the changes to universal credit and how many will be hit? Universal credit (UC) is a monthly benefit paid to those who need extra support with living and housing costs. Single claimants over 25 get £400.14 a month on the basic rate, but people with a limited capacity to work, because of a disability or long term sickness, get an additional top-up of £416.19. Under the government's reforms, the UC health top-up for new claimants will be cut in half from £97 a week to £50 a week in 2026-7, and will then be frozen until 2030. Existing claimants will also have the incapacity top-up frozen until 2030. While the top-up is being cut for new claimants, the basic rate of universal credit will rise from around £92 a week to £106 a week by 2030. How many people will be hit? The government's own estimates say 3.2 families will be financially impacted by the cuts, with an average loss of £1,720 a year. But they have repeatedly pointed out those estimates don't take into account the number of people who will be helped into work from an extra £1 billion pot of funding announced as part of the package. The government anticipate 370,000 current Pip claimants will no longer qualify, and 430,000 future recipients will get less than they would under the current plans. The figures also say 2.25 million current UC claimants will lose an average of £500 from the freeze on UC health, although they point out those individuals will see an increase from the rise in the basic rate. 730,000 future recipients of UC health will lose an average of £3,000 a year. The government's impact assessment also confirmed that some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030. How much will the cuts save? The welfare bill has ballooned in recent years, with the government spending £65 billion a year on health and disability benefits. Before the government's reforms, the bill was set to rise to £100 billion by 2030. The cost of the Pip bill alone was due to almost double to £34 billion by 2030. The total package is expected to save the government £5 billion a year by 2030. One in 10 working age people now claim sickness or disability benefit, and 1 million young people are not in education, work or training. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. How many MPs are opposing the plans? For months Labour MPs have been voicing anger at the plans both publicly and privately, but this week over 120 have signed a reasoned amendment to the bill which could threaten to derail the plans. There are also 11 MPs from other parties backing the amendment. If all opposition parties vote against the bill, only 83 Labour MPs need to join them for it to be defeated. If the Conservatives decide to support the reforms, that could give the government a way out - but they have insisted on near-impossible conditions in return for their support. Kemi Badenoch said the Tories would lend the government votes to pass the legislation but only if Labour rules out tax rises in the autumn budget as well as reducing unemployment and lowering the welfare budget. Rumours swirled in Westminster on Wednesday that the government might pull the bill, but the prime minister insisted MPs will vote on the reforms next week as planned, dismissing the rebellion as "noises off". Asked if he has "failed to read the mood" among Labour MPs, Starmer said: "There's a pretty united front that say we need reform... the question is how is that reform is carried out." "I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs," he told journalists at a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague.
New Statesman
43 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Jacinda Ardern's unexamined life
For 24 days in February 2022 protesters occupied the grounds of New Zealand's parliament. They were mimicking the trucker 'Freedom Convoy' that had ground Canada's capital city to a standstill earlier that year in defiance over Covid-19 vaccine mandates. In Wellington, protesters were outraged about New Zealand's own vaccine mandate, but there was also palpable rage over 'masks, the media, the UN, communism and the government', recalls Jacinda Ardern, who was prime minister at the time. 'They blocked off streets and erected makeshift toilets. A few ripped masks off the faces of commuters.' The protesters also had signs. 'I saw the American flags, the Trump flags, the swastikas,' writes Ardern, in her new memoir A Different Kind of Power. 'I saw my own image, with a Hitler moustache, a monocle and 'Dictator of the Year' emblazoned above my face. I saw the gallows, complete with a noose, which people said had been erected for me.' Such a scene would have been unimaginable five years earlier, when Ardern, as a newly installed leader of her Labour Party, rode a wave of 'Jacindamania' to become, at 37, the youngest female head of government in the world. She then bested her previous electoral performance in October 2020, months into the pandemic, by securing New Zealand's first majority government in 24 years. Yet the adulation and support that had once buoyed her premiership eventually curdled, so much so that by the time she resigned as prime minister, in January 2023, her net approval rating in the country had plummeted to just 15. As Ardern presents it, she was always a reluctant politician. Growing up in small towns on New Zealand's North Island, she was often surrounded by grinding poverty, particularly in Murupara, a small, remote forestry town the family moved to when Ardern's father, a police officer, was offered a job there. In an interview as a new MP, a reporter asked her when she first became political and, thinking of the town's economic struggles, Ardern responded, 'I became political because I lived in Murupara.' Despite this, Ardern describes her own childhood as happy. The Arderns were Mormons and, growing up, Jacinda was devoted to the religion. Going door-knocking for the church in her youth laid the foundation for political canvassing: 'I was already starting to prepare for a role I could never imagine holding.' It wasn't until she was in her twenties and had already started working as an adviser in the Labour Party that she began to interrogate her faith. She believed politics was the surest way to bring about positive change to people's lives, but she was increasingly confronted with tenets of her faith that ran counter to her liberal progressive 'values' – particularly regarding same-sex unions. At first, she would simply 'compartmentalise', mentally separating the clashing realities of her religion and her political beliefs, but as she got older and her career in politics progressed, she found that often difficult to do. She eventually left the church, a decision her family accepted gracefully. Ardern's rise in front-line politics might have been embarked upon reluctantly, but it was rapid. She had moved to London and was working as an adviser in Tony Blair's Cabinet Office when a former colleague called to convince her to return to New Zealand to run as an MP herself. She entered parliament the following year, but she was doubtful about her abilities. 'If there was any place that being a sensitive overthinker was going to trouble me, it would be here,' she thought at the time. Yet Ardern became determined to turn her weakness into a political strength – to make her lack of cynicism and her empathy the defining features of her politics. Her uncertainty over becoming prime minister in 2017 – after a surprise surge in support allowed her Labour Party to form a coalition government with the populist New Zealand First party and the Greens – had less to do with any nagging feelings of imposter syndrome and more to do with the fact that she was a few weeks pregnant. She was nervous about how the public would respond to a prime minister taking maternity leave, and her initial scans were clandestine affairs, carefully orchestrated and kept secret from even her security detail. A physician friend of a friend, who would meet with her in his clinic after hours, used the code name Kilgore Trout, a character from Kurt Vonnegut's novels, on all of her medical paperwork. When she finally did announce her pregnancy to the public, she was overwhelmed by support from New Zealanders and the world. While Ardern writes movingly about the private struggles of becoming a mother for the first time while also leading a government, publicly the perception was again one of strength: when Ardern brought three-month-old Neve to a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, she was celebrated as a trailblazer. Apart from the Covid pandemic, the defining event of Ardern's premiership was the Christchurch mosque shooting. On a Friday afternoon in March 2019, a 28-year-old man, recently arrived from Australia, walked into the Al Noor Mosque armed with several semi-automatic weapons and opened fire, livestreaming the attack on Facebook. He then made his way to Linwood Islamic Centre and once again started shooting. He was stopped by police while on his way to a third mosque. In total, 51 were killed, dozens more were injured. Ardern's response to the attack – which included swiftly banning semi-automatic guns and a public address in which she said of the victims: 'They are us. The person who has perpetuated this violence against us is not' – burnished her reputation at home and abroad as a compassionate leader. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe By the time the pandemic arrived on New Zealand's shores, the country still trusted Ardern. Her coalition government embraced a zero-Covid strategy, attempting to eradicate the virus completely – this meant an initial strict lockdown and the complete closure of the borders. That strategy worked at first: New Zealand had the lowest death toll out of all OECD countries, while schools remained largely open and hospitals weren't overwhelmed. Public support for Ardern was so strong that Labour won a landslide election in October 2020, allowing her to form a majority government. Yet by the time Covid's more slippery variants appeared, the strategy's effectiveness started to falter – longer and longer lockdowns were required, including one in Auckland that lasted 107 days. By the time the vaccine was rolled out in New Zealand, much of the solidarity in the country had evaporated. Hostility – toward restrictions, toward vaccines, and most of all, toward Ardern herself – took hold. Threats of violence and death against the prime minister and her family surged each year as the pandemic dragged on. Yet few of these details make it into Ardern's account, who writes vaguely about unspecified regrets. 'I still think about this time so often,' she writes of the protest outside parliament, 'not just the occupation, but the two years that preceded it, those long days and impossible choices.' While it's certainly likely that she has spent a long time dwelling on those regrets and impossible choices – overthinker that she is – she doesn't detail what mistakes she thinks she made or share what lessons she took away from this period. Bafflingly, Ardern devotes more pages to her relationship with Prince William over the years than she gives to an entire year of her premiership during the pandemic; 2021, with its variants and lockdowns and increasing radicalisation, is covered in just a page and a half. Why? Is she once again compartmentalising? This was clearly a monumental time for her; she resigned as prime minister in January 2023, before the end of her term. It's clear that Ardern is intent on forging on with her brand of compassionate leadership – it's the throughline of her book, the subject of a documentary about her time in office, Prime Minister, that was also released this year, as well as the focus of her fellowship at Harvard (she and her family have lived in Boston since mid 2023). But she doesn't reckon with the fact that, while more empathetic leadership is a worthy goal, far more people would prefer effective leadership. Ardern made a global name for herself by embodying the former and there's clearly potential for her to capitalise on that momentum outside New Zealand. When it comes to the latter, however, it's hard to argue that Ardern had much lasting success. Her government failed to make a dent in child poverty, despite it being an animating issue of her politics; many of the reforms she implemented while in office to tackle New Zealand's housing crisis were reversed by the next government. This also goes unmentioned in A Different Kind of Power. The most generous interpretation is that she – like many incumbents around the world who were punished at the ballot box once the pandemic waned – is still reckoning with the many 'hard, imperfect' decisions that may have triggered the backlash against her. A much less generous interpretation is that she simply doesn't see the value in publicly grappling with failure. Perhaps she is now satisfied with being a symbol of a type of politics, rather than continuing on with the hard graft of actual politics. A Different Kind of Power Jacinda Ardern Macmillan, 352pp, £25 Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from who support independent bookshops Related [See also:
