Tshwane to consider demolishing houses in illegal developments
Doomed? Kleinfontein is not among those that can be formalised through the provision of 'services and infrastructure' as it falls outside the urban edge. Picture: Kleinfontein Facebook page
One of the options in addressing illegal developments in the City of Tshwane is to demolish these structures, according to a special sub-committee appointed by mayor Dr Nasiphi Moya to deal with the growing problem.
These developments mostly comprise luxury houses built on properties that have not been correctly zoned and subdivided, no township establishment has taken place, and building plans have not been approved by the local authority.
According to a report by the sub-committee served before the mayoral committee on 18 June, which Moneyweb has seen, more than 10 000 houses may have to be demolished, as they are situated outside the nine 'developments' that the committee says are capable of being regularised.
The regularising of the nine 'developments', which collectively have 8 431 illegal structures on them, is still dependent on the availability of engineering services for water, electricity, and other municipal services – and is therefore not a given.
ALSO READ: Kleinfontein is not an illegal township, maintains CEO
Financial means
Whether the City of Tshwane, with its known financial restraints, will have the necessary funds to install such services remains to be seen.
The sub-committee hopes to take its proposals to the full city council at the end of July.
It was established 'to formulate a standard and fair approach to addressing illegal developments'.
Moneyweb earlier reported that multi-million-rand houses are being built in several such 'developments' spread over the city. In one of the Leeuwfontein 'developments' north of Pretoria, plots are openly being sold for as much as R600 000 each, and since last year a new phase has been opened in Haakdoornboom which already boasts several houses.
ALSO READ: Kleinfontein can't escape the law any longer
'Illegal properties undermine investments'
The South African Property Owners Association (Sapoa) called for action 'against the growing issue of illegal multi-million-rand property developments in Tshwane' late last year.
Neil Gopal, CEO of Sapoa, stated: 'Illegal developments undermine the investments of compliant property owners, who face a range of negative impacts – from declining property values to increased crime rates and service interruptions. We are particularly alarmed at the normalisation of flouting development regulations, which ultimately decreases oversight in property development.'
The Tshwane sub-committee identified 17 such developments, including the 'Boere-Afrikaner' community of Kleinfontein, which has been in existence for decades. It comprises at least 600 houses, an old age home, a school and shopping centre.
Last year disgruntled residents obtained a high court order that compelled the metro to enforce town planning legislation in Kleinfontein.
According to the board that runs Kleinfontein, its applications have been with the council for an extended period with no feedback. The sub-committee, however, reports that it could only find an 'old DFA [Development Facilitation Act] application that they wish to resuscitate'.
Kleinfontein is not among those that may be regularised as it falls outside the urban edge, the committee found.
ALSO READ: 'Obvious sore point'- EFF to march to exclusive Afrikaner township Kleinfontein
Allowing vs erecting
The committee distinguishes between those 'developments' where the property owners themselves erect illegal structures and those, such as Kleinfontein and Leeuwfontein, where the owners allow others to erect structures.
The illegal structures total almost 20 000 collectively – with only Haakdoornboom, Leeuwfontein 1, 2 and 3, Marula View, Mooikloof, Mashate Gardens, Onderstepoort and one near Prestige College outside Hammanskraal possibly capable of being regularised.
Only three of these currently have provision for water and only one for sewerage.
Two of these structures can get electricity from Tshwane substations and four are situated in Eskom supply areas. The three Leeuwfontein 'developments' have no bulk services for electricity, but form part of the planned future Roodeplaat primary supply area, according to the report.
The sub-committee sets out six options for dealing with the illegal developments:
Obtain an eviction order;
Application to court for the demolition of illegal structures, which comes with a warning that 'once an order for the demolition of the structures is granted by the court, the municipality does not have a discretion on whether or not to act on that order';
Regularising, which 'would involve formalising the township by providing essential services and infrastructure, and integrating it into the municipal planning framework';
Conducting inspections and issuing compliance notices;
Penalties and fines, which 'can serve as a deterrent to prevent future illegal settlements'; and
Community engagement 'to understand their needs and [work] towards providing legal housing solutions'.
ALSO READ: Exclusive Afrikaner township defends legality after court orders Tshwane to enforce bylaws
Increase in rates bill
The report mentions the possibility of recategorising the properties where owners themselves erect illegal structures as 'non-permitted use' for the purposes of levying property rates. That comes with a drastic increase in their rates bill.
Currently these 'developments' are mostly categorised for agricultural purposes or 'undetermined' with massive underrecovery of rates compared to even residential rates that are payable by compliant home owners.
Where owners allow others to erect illegal structures, the city is currently pursuing the criminal prosecution of the 'owners' and applying for interdicts and demolition and the adjustment of their rates, according to the report.
It however states that 'challenges are experienced with regard to determining valuations based on illegal land use and the non-permitted use rating'.
The report does not expand on the nature of these challenges. Legislation clearly provides for such properties to be valued as if compliant. Tshwane, for example, adjusted the categorisation of some Kleinfontein properties last year, which resulted in the total rates bill for the community increasing from R5 230 in August to R126 148 in September.
ALSO READ: Opposition in Tshwane offers 'solution' for Kleinfontein rates problem
The board has declared a dispute in this regard.
Four of the 17 illegal developments are situated partially or completely on land belonging to the City of Tshwane, three on land belonging to national government, and the rest on private land.
The report does not address ways of streamlining and expediting own planning approvals for compliant developers.
Dawie Malan, who developed Mooikloof Estates, previously told Moneyweb that established developers don't want to trade in Tshwane any longer due to the difficulty in dealing with the metro and officials whose conduct he describes as obstructive.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Transforming Pretoria West: How the City of Tshwane plans to reclaim properties for economic growth
The City of Tshwane team led by Mayor Nasiphi Moya targets illegal tenants in Pretoria West for urban renewal. Image: Supplied/City of Tshwane The City of Tshwane plans to lease reclaimed buildings in Pretoria West to legitimate businesses following the eviction of tenants with unpaid bills in a bid to stimulate economic growth and promote spatial justice before the Tshwane Investment Summit in September 2025. The move follows the City's recent issuance of eviction notices to illegal tenants occupying municipal buildings in the area, who owe over R26 million in unpaid rent for 12 properties and 35 stands. Visiting one of the properties that had been illegally occupied for years, Mayor Nasiphi Moya said the City envisions Pretoria West as a thriving manufacturing hub. She noted that the building had been occupied by these individuals for years without the City collecting rent. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We have not been getting money for electricity and water and our people have not been using it to build their businesses,' she said. Kholofelo Morodi, mayco member for Corporate and Shared Services, said the city's Bad Buildings Committee has included the Pretoria West Precinct in the urban renewal strategy and investment readiness initiative to reclaim hijacked buildings. The urban renewal strategy seeks to revitalise neglected areas, safeguard municipal assets, and establish zones ready for economic development. Morodi described the high-impact operation in the Pretoria West Precinct as a success, underscoring the city's commitment to urban renewal, protecting assets, and investment readiness. 'This city-owned precinct had been unlawfully occupied by individuals without valid lease agreements or documentation. In addition to structural neglect and non-payment for services, authorities uncovered a network of illegal electricity connections — posing severe fire hazards and threatening to overload the grid, with implications for citywide energy stability and public safety,' she said. She explained that the operation forms part of the committee's mandate to systematically reclaim and reintegrate hijacked, misused, and unsafe assets into formal urban development frameworks. 'Pretoria West Precinct is one of many strategic properties the city will be securing and restoring to operational dignity. These buildings are not abandoned — they are being repositioned to fuel inclusive growth, job creation, and spatial justice ahead of the Tshwane Investment Summit in September 2025,' she said. She said the operation was carried out lawfully and peacefully, with coordination among key departments, including group property management, group legal, the city manager's office, and the Tshwane Metro Police Department, among others. Morodi said: 'The Pretoria West Precinct now forms part of Tshwane's broader Urban Renewal Strategy — a transformative blueprint to activate neglected urban spaces, safeguard municipal assets, and prepare spade-ready zones for catalytic development.' She vowed that the city will continue to step up multi-faceted operations across all seven regions, reclaiming hijacked infrastructure and transforming it into secure, functional, and economically thriving areas for everyone. In a recent operation, the city targeted a property housing over 20 shacks, where tenants were paying R1,500 to R2,000 per room. The city also issued bylaw contravention notices for two properties and had previously fined a nearby scrap yard dealership for constructing a wall that exceeded height limits without approval.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Trump tariffs sour fortunes of SA's citrus farmers
Citrus farmers are in a rush to get their produce to the US ahead of Trump's tariff deadline. Image: Dwayne Senior / Bloomberg Ntando Thukwana Walk down the aisles of a Trader Joe's or Whole Foods Market in the US, and chances are many of the piles of oranges, lemons, limes and grapefruit will be labeled 'Produce of South Africa.' They have become a staple in the US - the world's largest citrus importer - especially during the off-season summer months when in the southern hemisphere the South African winter harvest is at its peak. But now, those supplies are threatened by a potential 31% tariff President Donald Trump has slapped on the country. After earlier saying the levies would be imposed on July 9, US officials on Monday signaled that trading partners have until Aug. 1 before the tariffs kick in. The looming levy has cast a cloud over the sunny valleys of Citrusdal, a tiny, serene farming town nestled amid rolling green hillocks in the Western Cape area of South Africa. Tucked into the base of the Cederberg mountains about 100 miles north of Cape Town, the area is dominated by citrus farms, giving the town its name. For a quarter century, the juicy produce of the area's orchards - owned over generations by people mostly of Afrikaner heritage - has journeyed thousands of miles to make it to the fruit bowls of American homes. Citrus farmer Gerrt van der Merwe. Image: Dwayne Senior/Bloomberg But this season is different. Now, Trump's tariff policies are threatening the very same White farmers to whom he offered asylum, falsely claiming that they are targets of a genocide and that their land is being seized by the state. The levies are likely to have a debilitating impact on their operations, the livelihoods of the thousands of people they employ and the country's 35 billion-rand ($2 billion) citrus industry - one of the rare bright spots in South Africa's stagnant economy. 'Our business is built for the US market, and for about 25 years we've planted, we've picked, we've planned accordingly,' said Gerrit van der Merwe, the chief executive officer of family owned ALG Estates, as he stood in his 2,500-acre farm donning a gray puffer jacket, jeans and a pair of Veldskoen - leather footwear made famous by Afrikaner farmers. South Africa is the world's second-largest exporter of citrus fruits, behind Spain. Trump's tariffs are now threatening to price farmers in the Western Cape - the country's prime area for the produce - out of a key market, leaving them to navigate an uncertain future. Citrus growers have been preparing for a new reality. Over recent weeks, some orchards have been in a panicked rush to get their produce to the US market ahead of the looming deadline. Van der Merwe's farm, whose packing season began May 1, has been working on getting as much fruit as possible on vessels and shipped, he said. Local citrus farmers are dependent on the US market. Image: Dwayne Senior/Bloomberg But longer term, the damages could be more devastating and may push farmers to shrink orchards that are specifically developed to meet demand in the US, said Van der Merwe, whose farms employ 2,000 people and have been managed by his family for eight generations. 'We've built our supply chains, we've built our supermarkets, we've built our importing companies on that side, so we've been trying to own that market to make sure that we are very, very efficient, and that we can send the maximum fruit into that market,' he said. 'For us, we've become dependent on the US market, but also the US consumers have also become dependent on our fruit.' The US is the second-largest destination for South African exports after China, accounting for more than $20 billion last year. Major exports include precious stones and metals, organic chemicals and edible fruit. Although the nation sends just 5% to 6% of its citrus produce to the US, the exports had been expected to rise about 7.7% to 7 million cartons this season, and the industry had ambitious plans to grow that share. Trump's tariffs will hit hard and industry that has been one of South Africa's real success stories. Image: Supplied The US duties will be the latest blow to the industry that employs about 140,000 people at the farm level. A rare South African export success, it has been threatened by the crumbling domestic infrastructure at state-owned rail and ports operator Transnet SOC Ltd., that has been blamed for delays and dwindling shipments of key commodities. Should the higher tariff 'take effect, it would make our citrus completely uncompetitive in the US market,' said Boitshoko Ntshabele, CEO of the Citrus Growers' Association. The CGA estimates that logistical inefficiencies already cost the sector 5.3 billion rand a year. South Africa is among countries slapped with the steepest tariffs, placing it at an immediate disadvantage while competing with its citrus producing South American rivals, like Peru and Chile. To mitigate the impacts of the tariffs, growers may opt to reroute their fruit to other markets, including Europe, but that could undermine the stability in those markets and have 'a knock-on effect on the entire Southern African citrus industry,' Ntshabele warned. The sector is 'looking to add about 100 million export cartons by 2032, and therefore continuously working on diversifying exports markets,' he said. 'This will remain our focus in the near term.' Europe is already among the biggest citrus export markets for South Africa. The industry is also locked in a long-running dispute over the European Union's regulations, which mandated stringent cold-treatment measures and additional inspections of South African citrus following cases of fruits affected by the false codling moth. The moth lays eggs on the surface of the fruit, and the larvae that emerge from the eggs burrow into the rind, develop brown discoloration and render the fruit moldy and unmarketable. The CGA says EU regulations cost the industry about 3.7 billion rand each season. As farmers look to widen their export markets, they could turn to China and other Asian countries, said Paul Makube, a senior agricultural economist at First National Bank. China's recent announcement of a plan to grant 53 African nations tariff-free access presents an opportunity for citrus farmers to expand there. 'It has become increasingly important to start diversifying, and with the Asian markets with their big populations and income growth in China, India, they need to start opening up those Asian markets,' Makube said. That said, growing the industry's presence in the world's top market for the fruits remains critical. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa sought to reset strained relations with the US during an Oval Office meeting with Trump in Washington in May. South Africa is asking the US to drop its reciprocal tariff to the 10% baseline. 'We believe that if we have a live conversation going, we will be excluded from the 30%, maybe sitting with the 10%,' said Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen. 'That still allows us to compete against some of our competitors, particularly in the South American market.' On Monday, Trump said he's planning to announce trade deals and deliver tariff warnings. Meanwhile, gathered in Brazil, BRICS nations - which includes South Africa - expressed 'serious concerns' over the unilateral levies. With no indications the tariff situation will improve, Van der Merwe is worried. 'I think 10% is manageable; it's not ideal,' said the ALG Estates chief. 'For now, we're asking to be handled the same as Peru and Chile - our competition. Otherwise, we can't compete.' - With assistance from Jennifer Zabasajja, Andre-Pierre Du Plessis and Naomi Kresge. | Washington Post
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Did the Viljoens leave Tammy Taylor Nails franchisees in the lurch?
While the Viljoens are living it up in Miami, Tammy Taylor franchisees in South Africa are wondering what will happen to them. Now that Peet and Melany Viljoen left the country, their Tammy Taylor franchisees have been left in the lurch. The principal franchisor, the Viljoens' Tammy Taylor Global Franchising, has left the country, but the salons still carry the Tammy Taylor brand name and logo despite South African and US courts forbidding the Viljoens from continuing to use it. Where does that leave the franchisees? Trudie Broekmann, a consumer lawyer from Cape Town and expert on the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), says a franchise operation can generally not operate without an engaged national franchisor which properly holds the legal rights to act as franchisor. ALSO READ: Did the Viljoens of Tammy Taylor-fame skip the country? The CPA's provisions regarding franchises were used in the application for an order against the Viljoens and Tammy Taylor Global Franchising recently, when Lebohang Hlathuka asked to be refunded the R600 000 she paid for a franchise. The court also ruled that the Viljoens be barred from using the Tammy Taylor brand name any longer. Tammy Taylor franchisees left to fend for themselves Broekmann says, from Hlathuka's recent judgment against the Viljoens, it is clear that at least those 'franchisees' who recently acquired their franchises from the Viljoens' entities do not have a valid franchise. 'These franchises would have to be reacquired or otherwise regularised by either a South African franchisor with a valid right for the relevant territory or with Tammy Taylor in the US. ALSO READ: US court rules Viljoens must pay real Tammy Taylor R71 million 'If earlier franchisees acquired their franchises validly from the Viljoens while they were authorised by Tammy Taylor to sell franchises, those franchisees have also been left in the lurch by the Viljoens' sudden departure. 'The older franchisees will have to negotiate new channels for their supplies and support. Even successful legal prosecution generally cannot rectify the devastation left behind by fraudsters. I can only commiserate with the non-complicit staff, franchisees and even customers of the franchisees who have been left to fend for themselves.' Judgment in US court against Viljoens A US court also issued an order at the end of June after the real Tammy Taylor sued the Viljoens for trademark infringement and breach of contract. The US judge ordered that the Viljoens' US Trademark Registration be cancelled and that Taylor's request for the maximum in statutory damages of $4 million against the Viljoens for counterfeiting the US-registered trademarks and breach of contract is granted. In addition, the judge ordered the Viljoens to scrub all references between them and the Tammy Taylor brand, including their website, from the internet. ALSO READ: Viljoens say Tammy Taylor will not get her R71 million [VIDEO] How do these judgments affect the Tammy Taylor franchisees in South Africa? Broekmann says the truth is that the franchisees are in a bind and there is probably not much they can do. 'Considering the rulings by the South Gauteng High Court and the California District Court in the US, it is clear that the Viljoens and their entities did not have the right to sell Tammy Taylor franchises since April 2022. 'Therefore, any 'franchisee' or potential 'franchisee' who contracted with them is entitled to claim their money back, along with damages. If these 'franchisees' attempt to conduct business as a Tammy Taylor salon they will be legally unauthorised and open themselves to being sued by Tammy Taylor Nails Inc in the US for breach of its intellectual property rights. 'I would suggest they instruct legal representatives to act very quickly to ensure that the Viljoens' assets are not dissipated or removed from the country to evade payment.' What can the Tammy Taylor franchisees do now? Broekmann says even the legitimate franchisees, who transacted with the Viljoens between April 2017 and April 2022 while they were authorised to sell franchisees, were left in the lurch by the Viljoens' hurried departure from South Africa. 'I assume their companies will not operate for much longer. I suggest the franchisees contact Tammy Taylor Nails Inc in the US to negotiate arrangements for support and supply of the correct Tammy Taylor products. Of course, there is no guarantee that the US company will be willing to support the South African franchisees and if so, at what cost.' ALSO READ: Judge orders Viljoens to immediately stop using Tammy Taylor trademark She says she has been inundated with requests for help from South African consumers who are victims of con artists and fraudsters. 'This judgment is a move in the right direction and demonstrates that our courts will come to the assistance of those who fall victim to business people who behave in contravention of the law, in particular the CPA, which regulates franchising.' Be careful if you want a franchise, lawyer warns Broekmann recommends that consumers who want to invest in a franchise involve an attorney to assist them throughout the process, as there are many potential pitfalls. 'The CPA requires a franchise agreement to be in writing and signed by the franchisor as well as the franchisee, but Hlathuka was forced to pay R600 000 before the contract was in place for a 'franchise opportunity that never existed'.' NOW READ: Hawks investigating Peet and Melany Viljoen for fraud with Tammy Taylor franchises
