logo
'Incredible pride': 'Post' talks to IDF laser operator on cutting-edge defense of Israel

'Incredible pride': 'Post' talks to IDF laser operator on cutting-edge defense of Israel

Yahoo2 days ago

The breakthrough of the last week is only the beginning of the changes that operational military lasers will accomplish for the IDF.
After the announcement that the IDF's new laser defense system has shot down around 40 Hezbollah drones during the war, along with a Rafael Advanced Defense Systems announcement about its capabilities, IDF St.-Sgt.-Maj. A. told The Jerusalem Post in a recent exclusive interview that his time on the laser team protecting the country with this game-changing cutting-edge system has been 'incredible.'
A. is a reservist who was stationed in the North to work on how to operate the laser in real combat situations, and who had spent time in the IDF's air defense units mostly over a decade ago, but returned to assist when the current war broke out.
He said that he and everyone else had to learn how to best operate the laser in real time in the field, since it is essentially something that no one has ever done before.
'We received the system, we made adjustments while operating in the field, and we improved, with the [help of the] industry developers [Rafael], after we got a better understanding of what we needed to increase our shoot-down success,' said A.
There was a small group that had operated a laser before them, and there were the scientific experts from Rafael whom A. could not praise enough, but there was no real manual or guidebook, as he and his team were writing a new page in history.
Trying to develop lasers to shoot down aerial threats goes back to the 1980s in the US with the 'Star Wars' air defense program, but that program was a dismal failure.
Although Raytheon in the US, as well as Britain, Russia, China, Germany, and Japan are all at various stages of developing laser defense systems, Rafael said on Wednesday that it is the only company that has moved beyond test firings to actual use in the field.
In fact, defense sources said that some of these other countries, after announcing successful tests of their own lasers, have since visited Israel to try to work through problems they are still encountering in moving their lasers to the operational phase.
For example, although Britain performed a successful test with its DragonFire laser in January 2024, as of March of this year, the earliest that it was planning on deploying the laser operationally was 2027.
Also, in April of this year, Britain announced a successful test of a radio frequency directed energy weapon, but sources have told the Post that this kind of weapon is not only far from deployable, but has a number of weaker factors compared to laser defense.
In February of this year, the US Navy reported on a 2024 successful test of its 60 kilowatt High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) system. There are no reports on when it will be deployed.
America is also working on the HELSI and HELCAP lasers with 300 kilowatts of firepower, but testing and deploying those systems appear to be even further off into the future.
In contrast, we now know that after successful tests in 2022-2023, the IDF has been deploying the laser for real combat use since fall 2024, and that more systems of the laser will be deployed already by the end of this year.
All of this means that A. and his team had almost no one to consult or compare notes with.
Incidentally, returning to 'Star Wars,' A. was not particularly a fan of the movie saga or science fiction laser gunfights either, before he started to operate Israel's laser defense or after. Basically, he is interested in Israel's defense and nothing else.
A. does have a family, and he did need the support of his wife and children to return to an intense and critical reserve duty of operating the laser.
'It was very emotional when you see the enemy rocket and the shoot-down moment gets closer, but then you don't let it get to its target. It's a source of pride that I cannot express,' added A.
Moreover, he said that while to date the system was used primarily or exclusively in the North versus Hezbollah, and that he is not making decisions about locations for the system, he is confident that the new laser system could be 'used in the South or anywhere we will be. It will be very effective against threatening targets.'
'If we need to learn the challenges of a new area, we will learn,' he stated – with it being well published that all laser defense systems face challenges in maintaining sufficient heat levels and focus to destroy targets over certain distances, and encountering certain inclement weather, such as clouds.
Further, he said that his team and the laser system had learned how to adjust to special maneuvering issues brought out by drones, which change their trajectory, unlike many rockets which follow a predictable arch-like pattern from the moment they are fired.
Continuing, A. stated that he could not give enough credit to both his laser defense team, which had to learn how to operate a radical new air defense system with no real history, as well as the Rafael engineers who developed the seemingly 'science fiction' system and adjusted it frequently in real time to meet real life challenges.
The number of soldiers involved in laser defense is still classified, but it can be estimated that at least dozens are already involved, and that with its growing success, this number will grow as well.
Rafael said that aspects of the laser could even be handled by tiny teams of a few soldiers.
'There is no feeling like saving lives' with a new historic laser defense system, concluded A.
One issue that A. did not comment on, but which Rafael revealed on Wednesday, is that its new lasers could eliminate the need for Israelis to run to bomb shelters when faced with most aerial threats.
Rafael explained that a major advantage of its lasers – Iron Beam, Iron Beam M, and Lite Beam – is that they can shoot down enemy rockets and drones much earlier in the threat process. This means that, most of the time, no warning sirens or bomb shelters would be necessary.
The reason would be that the light energy of the laser travels much faster than any interceptor in Israel's arsenal and would already potentially destroy the enemy aerial threat shortly after it launches, and invariably while still in enemy territory.
In fact, because the laser fires so much faster, the IDF will also likely have more chances to hit a target that it initially misses, since it will know it has missed earlier on in the process.
That means that Israelis would likely only hear a siren and need to run to bomb shelters in those rare cases where the laser system missed its target, then likely missed it multiple more times.
Rafael's presentation of the three different laser systems comes as it expects to display the lasers' capabilities in a defense technology conference in Paris, June 16-22.
The fact of Israel's participation in that conference will be significant, independent of the laser issue, though the laser will certainly be one of the lead items at the conference.
In June 2024, France initially banned Israeli participation in a similar defense conference, but eventually allowed some Israeli participation after multiple rounds of legal battles in the French courts.
In November 2024, France again banned Israel from participation in a naval conference and exercise.
However, Israel may for the moment be getting some better cooperation for the upcoming defense conference, after Jerusalem threatened in late 2024-early 2025 to cut France out of involvement in policing the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire if it did not reverse some of its policies upsetting Israel.
That said, Israel and France are still at loggerheads over a possible move by France to recognize Palestine as a state in the near future.
SOME OTHER details that Rafael just recently revealed are that the Lite Beam is the smallest and most local short-range system of the three laser systems, which can be placed on individual ground forces vehicles and fires a 10 kilowatt beam.
Iron Beam M fires a 250 millimeter, 50 kilowatt beam and can be mounted on large trucks for mobility, but cannot be placed as a minor additional system on individual vehicles.
Sources also indicated that the Iron Beam M is not only generally mobile, but can even be fired while moving.
The full-size Iron Beam fires a 450 millimeter, 100 kilowatt beam, is designed to remain stationary for periods of time, and cannot be fired while moving. However, it can, with advance planning, be moved around, just as Iron Dome batteries, over time, can be moved around.
Of course, the breakthrough of the last week is only the beginning of the changes that operational military lasers will accomplish for the IDF.
It will take a significant amount of time to adapt lasers for use by Israeli aircraft and especially to use them for both defense and offense.
This is because there are many challenges with using lasers relating to turbulence, dust, clouds, and smoke, which are a partial issue even when the end target is up in the sky, but are a larger issue when the starting point is up in the sky.
Also, if laser systems firing at enemy aerial threats must consider somewhat additional objects that could get hit by the laser after it continues through the object it hits, those considerations are much more complex for any aircraft firing on ground targets.
In fact, due to that and other considerations, the impression was that the IDF has not even made it a priority to achieve such laser aircraft capabilities for the foreseeable future.
Yet, sources have explained to the Post that the power and advantage of such a laser on aircraft would be massive: the ability to immediately reverse from defense to offense and vice versa. This is a power that aircraft usually lack when carrying missiles, which are generally tailored more for defensive or offensive purposes.
Once the IDF sees more laser defense systems in action at the end of 2025, there could be major budget shifts to start to try a long plan toward integrating lasers on fighter jets.
It is unknown what impact such laser developments will have on the question of whether to adapt existing fighter jets or to develop new fighter jets that are more optimal for lasers – with new fighter jet development often easily taking closer to a decade.
In addition, it was unclear how quickly Rafael can roll out a larger volume of lasers that would be sufficient to handle a large volume of rockets or drone swarms, such as what Israel saw during the current war.
A number of times Israel had to contend with 200-500 rockets or drones in a short period of time.
It took years for Iron Dome to reach a volume of batteries sufficient to fight off mass rocket and drone attacks, and this even after the initial defense batteries were produced and deployed.
Laser systems are also a big improvement over Iron Dome for reducing the cost of each shoot-down attempt.
Each Iron Dome interceptor costs around $40,000, whereas each laser shot should cost around $3.
However, developing each laser defense battery is still extremely expensive.
Another major advantage of laser systems over Iron Dome, according to Rafael, is reducing the logistical burden.
For example, Iron Dome interceptors are not merely a cost, they require significant distinct logistical operations for both storage and movement.
Laser defense systems, in contrast, do not require special physical storage space for their 'interceptor,' because laser shots are simply made up of light energy created when the system fires.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists Make World's Smallest Violin
Scientists Make World's Smallest Violin

Miami Herald

time15 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Scientists Make World's Smallest Violin

Scientists in the United Kingdom have made what may be the world's smallest violin, using advanced nanotechnology. The microscopic instrument, measuring 35 by 13 microns, and constructed from platinum, is less than the width of a human hair, said Loughborough University researchers. The tiny violin was created to demonstrate the accuracy and versatility of a state-of-the-art nanolithography system. Kelly Morrison, the head of Loughborough University's Physics Department, said the system would allow scientists "to design experiments that probe materials in different ways-using light, magnetism, or electricity-and observe their responses." Scientists said the technology could accelerate breakthroughs in sectors such as computing and energy, allowing researchers to build and study materials at the smallest scale. The miniature violin was made using a NanoFrazor, a system that employs thermal scanning probe lithography. This technique uses a heated, needlelike tip to sculpt material at nanometer precision. According to the university's press release, the process began with a chip being covered in two layers a gel-like material. The pattern was then etched, washed and coated in platinum, then cleaned again to show the final form. Each violin took about three hours to produce after the fabrication sequence was determined, but it took months of development. The violin, which is only an image at microscopic scale, cannot produce sound. The institution said the violin had not been officially confirmed as the world's smallest, though it is smaller than the diameter of a human hair, which typically measures 17 to 180 microns (a micron is a millionth of a meter). Research projects using the nanolithography system to investigate applications-such as developing energy-efficient and faster data storage by combining advanced materials and nanoparticles-are underway at the university. Other research explores quantum materials to make next-generation memory devices smaller, faster and more reliable, and the nanolithography system helps to produce accurate test structures. The team said the knowledge gained from the violin process was vital for these advances. The expression "world's smallest violin" is often used to mock exaggerated complaints. It is believed to have originated in a 1978 episode of M*A*S*H when Major Margaret Houlihan, rubbing her thumb and forefinger together, said: "It's the world's smallest violin, and it's playing just for you," According to ClassicFM. Kelly Morrison, the head of Loughborough University's Physics Department, said in a press release: "Though creating the world's smallest violin may seem like fun and games, a lot of what we've learned in the process has actually laid the groundwork for the research we're now undertaking." She added: "I'm really excited about the level of control and possibilities we have with the setup. I'm looking forward to seeing what I can achieve-but also what everyone else can do with the system." The researchers plan to use the experience and protocols established during this project in ongoing work on data storage and quantum material studies, furthering research into advanced computing technologies. Related Articles Woman's Friend Lives 2,000 Miles Away, Sends Iconic Birthday GiftViolinist on Southwest Flight Ignites DebateItzhak Perlman: I Had Polio-Its Resurgence Angers Me When We Have a VaccineAdorable Moment Little Girl Hugs Violinist Melts Viewers' Hearts 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?

Apple and Disney are both huge players in the entertainment sector. The question is, when it comes to Apple vs. Disney stock, which is the smarter investment? This guide will walk you through the ins and outs of both and whether or not you should buy Apple or Disney. Find Out: Read Next: Apple has consistently outperformed Disney in terms of revenue and profit margins. As of recent earnings reports, Apple boasts higher revenue figures, driven primarily by even its relatively soft iPhone sales, the services segment and expanding product ecosystem. Here are some key considerations when it comes to investing in Apple stock: Stock price: $203.64 Market cap: $3.01 trillion 52-week high: $260.10 52-week low: $169.21 Dividend yield: 0.51% Discover More: Disney has faced some headwinds lately, particularly in its streaming division and theme park operations. While its streaming service, Disney+, has gained traction, the company's financials have struggled to maintain profitability in its direct-to-consumer segment. Here are things you should consider as an investor: Stock price: $113.91 Market cap: $203.06 billion 52-week high: $118.63 52-week low: $80.10 Dividend yield: 0.88% For investors and stockbrokers seeking stability, strong cash flow and a proven growth trajectory, Apple appears to be the better overall buy. Its financial strength, diverse revenue sources and ability to innovate make it a compelling choice. However, for those willing to take on more risk in hopes of a turnaround story, Disney could present a long-term value opportunity if its streaming and entertainment segments regain and keep momentum. When comparing Apple and Disney stock, there are a few main factors to consider. Apple's growth strategy revolves around innovation, subscription-based services, and emerging markets. With new product launches for everything from MacBook Air M4 and iPhone 16s and expansion into artificial intelligence, Apple is well-positioned to sustain its revenue growth and remain a strong buy because of how it has been performing. Furthermore, its substantial cash reserves allow for aggressive stock buybacks and dividend payouts, making it an attractive investment. Disney's long-term growth potential hinges on its content dominance and the recovery of its theme parks. While the company owns valuable intellectual property, including Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar, competition in the streaming industry remains fierce. Still, analysts project an average stock price target of about $130 in 2025. The success of Disney+ and other streaming ventures will play a crucial role in the company's future performance, but its stock still comes in with a buy recommendation. Neither of these stocks could be considered a bad buy, but factor in your risk tolerance before investing in one company's stock over the other. That said, if you can only invest in one of these companies, Apple is considered more reliable and currently a better value than Disney. Yes, in general, Apple stock (AAPL) is often considered a stronger investment compared to Disney stock (DIS), especially for those seeking stability and proven growth. In many analysts' opinions, Apple's strong financial performance, diverse revenue streams and consistent innovation have led to significant returns for investors, whereas Disney stock may be undervalued due to relying on the Walt Disney Company's theme park attendance and box office performance. Editor's note: Company stock information is accurate as of Jun 3, 2025, and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?

The editor-approved Philips Norelco OneBlade 360 is 20% off for Father's Day
The editor-approved Philips Norelco OneBlade 360 is 20% off for Father's Day

Indianapolis Star

time15 hours ago

  • Indianapolis Star

The editor-approved Philips Norelco OneBlade 360 is 20% off for Father's Day

A while back, my TikTok feed was crawling with the lime green Philips Norelco OneBlade 360. It was everywhere and I ended up getting it. I could've given it to my husband but I wanted to treat myself! It is so easy to use, never nicks me (even on sensitive areas like under my arms!) and honestly, it just looks so cute and sleek. This viral beard and body trimmer has become a grooming essential for influencers and editors alike, and it is an easy Father's Day gift. Just in time for dad's day, Amazon is offering 20% off this top-rated shaver, complete with bonus accessories for a clean, all-over trim. Whether dad has a super precise grooming routine or just gives himself a quick refresh every week, this deal is too good to miss. Below, we break down why the OneBlade 360 is worth gifting, plus a few more grooming deals to shop now! The 360 Blade is designed to flex in all directions, allowing it to adjust to the curves of your face and body. This ensures constant skin contact and control, making it easier to trim and shave hard-to-reach areas with fewer strokes. ✔ Price: Originally $69.96, you can save 20% and ring up at $55.96 with this limited time Amazon Father's Day deal. Buy now at Amazon The OneBlade 360 offers up to 45 minutes of continuous shaving power after an eight-hour charge. It comes with a USB-A charging cord, but the adapter is not included. Inclusions: One Philips Norelco OneBlade 360 with Connectivity, one 360 Blade for face, one 5-in-1 adjustable comb (1-5mm), one body kit, one travel case, one protection cap, one USB-A charging cable (no power adapter). The OneBlade 360 is fully waterproof, so you can use it for both wet and dry shaving. You can even use it in the shower, and it's easy to clean by simply rinsing it under the tap. Buy it on TikTok Shop: Philips Norelco OneBlade 360

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store