Blanket ban urged for controversial medical device
A study published in the Medical Journal of Australia last week, based on private health insurance data, found 23 per cent of patients who receive a stimulator will need revision surgery – most within 18 months. In comparison, total knee replacement operations have a lifetime reoperation rate of about 2 per cent.
Loading
Private Healthcare Australia facilitated the provision of the data but did not fund the study or the researchers.
The University of Sydney's Dr Caitlin Jones, who led the study, said that on the basis of the evidence her team had collected she would support a ban on new stimulation implantations outside clinical trials.
Associate Professor Adrian Traeger, a University of Sydney academic who led a review of spinal cord stimulators for lower back pain, also supported a ban.
'Given the substantial risks, I'd want to see clear benefits over placebo from rigorous clinical trials before these surgeries were offered to patients,' he said. 'We expect this standard of evidence for drugs – why should it be different for surgical procedures?'
Personal injury lawyers Gerard Malouf & Partners have been investigating a potential class action since late last year against stimulator makers, and have been interviewing patients, this masthead can reveal.
Michael Ferraro, a researcher at medical research institute NeuRA who co-authored a review of stimulation for general chronic pain, said a ban would be useful if it pushed the industry towards conducting high-quality, placebo-controlled trials to prove the devices worked as claimed.
Marcus Barlow, who received a spinal cord stimulator in 2019 and found it dramatically worsened his pain, said the devices 'absolutely' should be banned.
'I am happy to lend my support to anything that could get these vile devices banned once and for all,' he said.
Ian Burgess, CEO of the Medical Technology Association of Australia, which represents device manufacturers, said there was robust clinical trial and real-world data proving stimulators' effectiveness and safety.
'We must not allow insurers to dictate clinical care, patient outcomes or to block access to therapies that can be life changing and restore dignity and function to people living with chronic pain.'
In response to questions about the ban proposal, the association connected this masthead with Kaleena de Voigt, a patient who received a stimulator to deal with chronic pain from an operation.
Two weeks after her operation, she was able to return to work, and she is now largely pain free.
'Within two days, my pain was down 85 per cent. Within the first three to four months, I was down 75 per cent of my opioids,' she said.
Loading
De Voight said she had not experienced any side effects or complications from the procedure, and that her doctors had managed to adjust the stimulation to remove persistent pain she felt in her hands, legs and feet from a separate condition.
'To deprive people of something like this that is so effective for so many, I think would be really quite sad,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
a day ago
- The Advertiser
Quad bike standards saving lives as crackdown urged
Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing." Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing." Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing." Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing."
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Quad bike standards saving lives as crackdown urged
Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing."
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Quad bike standards saving lives as crackdown urged
Farmers, their families and workers are returning home safely after a day on the land due to stronger quad bike safety standards, but tougher enforcement could save even more lives. Quad bikes have long been a leading cause of deaths on farms, with 10 fatalities in 2024 and 46 reports of injuries, according to Farmsafe Australia. National standards introduced in 2020 require vehicle stability testing, along with the installation of anti-crush devices that keep quad bikes off the ground if they roll over. Researchers have used coronial records to analyse 161 work-related quad bike deaths on farms between 2001 and 2024 to understand the effects of the new standards. Roll-overs were responsible for 65 per cent of those fatalities, according to the review published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Friday. Chest injuries caused deaths in more than half the cases, including instances of asphyxia, and a further 24 per cent involved head injuries. But there was a small reduction in fatalities in the few years after the safety standards came into force, academics from the University of Sydney's School of Rural Health found. Lead author Tony Lower said it was early days for the standards and fewer fatalities could be expected as new quad bikes replaced the older fleet. "They are a really effective vehicle, but we just need to see them designed safely and used safely," said Dr Lower, an honorary associate professor at AgHealth Australia. Victoria led the decline in fatalities, possibly due to greater enforcement of the standards than other states. Authorities issued 1200 prohibition or improvement notices to Victorian users in recent years, compared to 60 in NSW. While people don't always like enforcement, it has proven effective in areas such as road trauma, Dr Lower said. "Everyone should get home at the end of the day," he told AAP. With estimates of more than 20,000 anti-crush devices in use across Australia, there were no deaths involving vehicles fitted with roll bars, the paper said. But there were fatalities related to quad bikes where the devices had been installed and then removed. The Farmsafe Australia report, released in mid-July, showed fatalities from side-by-side vehicles had overtaken quad bike and tractor accident deaths for the first time in 2024. Side-by-side vehicles were thought to be a safer alternative to quad bikes, but riders died or were injured when they carried heavy loads, did not use seatbelts or went without a helmet. Engineering and design standards could only go so far, Dr Lower said. "There is certainly a role for farmers, producers and parents and everybody else that works and lives on farms to ensure they do the right thing."
