Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Bend Test Done: Does The Thin Phone Survive?
Last Updated:
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge gets a thin frame and light design but does that make it fragile or can it handle the dreaded bend test?
Samsung has made a thin and lightweight phone in the form of Galaxy S25 Edge which had everyone concerned for the dreaded bend test and other grueling routine. People put these phones through bend, scratch and other tests that tell us how a device can fare if you put it through the grill.
The companies don't like it but that does not stop people from trying these stunts and JerryRigEverything is known for these tests. So when the Galaxy S25 Edge was put through the renowned bend and scratch test, people were in for a surprise, but is it good or bad?
The Bend Test Ultimatum: Does It Win?
The screen has been protected with ceramic coating which seems to have helped the Galaxy S25 Edge handle a lot of rough stuff and the platform confirms that the quality is reliable and does not show any permanent damage.
But how does the Galaxy S25 Edge fare when the thin frame is put through the bend test? The platform feels extremely surprised by the results, because the titanium frame of the device has managed to hold up even after they tried to bend the phone with intense pressure to see if it cracks, and looks like it doesn't.
These two tests can be deal breakers for brands and have shown iPhones being fragile over the years. But Samsung will be mighty pleased to see its new premium device handle the grunge and show everyone that a thin phone can be durable and strong as well.
We're also keen to see how the iPhone 17 Air works and more importantly does Apple bring a premium device that can fare equal or even better than the S25 Edge when it launches later this year.
First Published:
June 03, 2025, 08:10 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Did Apple fire Jon Yongfook, designer behind Liquid Glass UI? Here's the truth behind viral claim
Claims about Apple firing a Jon Yongfook, allegedly the lead designer of the Liquid Glass UI unveiled at WWDC 2025, surfaced on social media on Monday. Yongfook, an influencer on social media, posted about being fired. However, now several social media users are saying that Yongfook never worked with Apple. 'I was fired by Apple today. Me and my design team have spent the last 18 months tirelessly testing different levels of gaussian blur on backgrounds when foreground elements are in focus. If you are looking for experts in the blur, glass liquid, grass or fur UI space, lmk,' Yongfook said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: Russia fines Apple for violating 'LGBT propaganda' law, TASS reports His followers were quick to note that Yongfook never worked at Apple, and his tweet seemed satirical. 'Media has picked up this tweet and reported that Apple has fired their lead designer Jon Yong Fook for Liquid Glass design. Jon is an entrepreneur that runs SaaS products, and did not work at Apple's design. It's their in his bio Media did not even bother to check his bio...' one person tweeted. Yongfook is a serial entrepreneur, not a documented Apple employee. He founded Bannerbear, a SaaS for automated image generation, and previously worked at Aviva. His website and LinkedIn focus on startups, with no mention of Apple. Read More: 'Steve Jobs would have fired everyone': Apple's Liquid Glass design triggers online backlash 'Senior Digital leader with over 15 years of global technology and business experience at both multinational organizations and startups. Seasoned entrepreneur and technology innovator with two successful exits. Experience in industries such as Financial Services, Ecommerce and Consumer Internet. Working experience in markets including Japan, China, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore,' his bio on LinkedIn states. Apple unveiled Liquid Glass, a translucent, dynamic UI for iOS 26, macOS Tahoe 26, and other platforms, led by Craig Federighi and Alan Dye. It features Gaussian blur, rounded controls, and adaptive navigation. Apple's Human Interface Design team, under Dye, developed Liquid Glass, with no mention of Yongfook.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
France's Mistral unveils its first 'reasoning' AI model
French artificial intelligence startup Mistral on Tuesday announced a so-called "reasoning" model it said was capable of working through complex problems, following in the footsteps of top US developers. Available immediately on the company's platforms as well as the AI platform Hugging Face, the Magistral "is designed to think things through -- in ways familiar to us," Mistral said in a blog post. The AI was designed for "general purpose use requiring longer thought processing and better accuracy" than its previous generations of large language models (LLMs), the company other "reasoning" models, Magistral displays a so-called "chain of thought" that purports to show how the system is approaching a problem given to it in natural means users in fields like law, finance, healthcare and government would receive "traceable reasoning that meets compliance requirements" as "every conclusion can be traced back through its logical steps", Mistral said. The company's claim gestures towards the challenge of so-called "interpretability" -- working out how AI systems arrive at a given response. Since they are "trained" on gigantic corpuses of data rather than directly programmed by humans, much behaviour by AI systems remains impenetrable even to their also vaunted improved performance in software coding and creative writing by Magistral. Competing "reasoning" models include OpenAI's o3, some versions of Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, or Chinese challenger DeepSeek's R1. The idea that AIs can "reason" was called into question this week by Apple -- the tech giant that has struggled to match achievements by leaders in the Apple researchers published a paper called "The Illusion of Thinking" that claimed to find "fundamental limitations in current models" which "fail to develop generalizable reasoning capabilities beyond certain complexity thresholds".
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
France's Mistral unveils its first 'reasoning' AI model
French artificial intelligence startup Mistral on Tuesday announced a so-called "reasoning" model it said was capable of working through complex problems, following in the footsteps of top US developers. Available immediately on the company's platforms as well as the AI platform Hugging Face , the Magistral "is designed to think things through -- in ways familiar to us," Mistral said in a blog post. The AI was designed for "general purpose use requiring longer thought processing and better accuracy" than its previous generations of large language models (LLMs), the company added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Like other "reasoning" models, Magistral displays a so-called "chain of thought" that purports to show how the system is approaching a problem given to it in natural language. This means users in fields like law, finance, healthcare and government would receive "traceable reasoning that meets compliance requirements" as "every conclusion can be traced back through its logical steps", Mistral said. Live Events The company's claim gestures towards the challenge of so-called "interpretability" -- working out how AI systems arrive at a given response. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Since they are "trained" on gigantic corpuses of data rather than directly programmed by humans, much behaviour by AI systems remains impenetrable even to their creators. Mistral also vaunted improved performance in software coding and creative writing by Magistral. Competing "reasoning" models include OpenAI 's o3, some versions of Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, or Chinese challenger DeepSeek's R1. The idea that AIs can "reason" was called into question this week by Apple -- the tech giant that has struggled to match achievements by leaders in the field. Several Apple researchers published a paper called "The Illusion of Thinking" that claimed to find "fundamental limitations in current models" which "fail to develop generalizable reasoning capabilities beyond certain complexity thresholds".
