Union warns against meat self-inspection plans
123RF
The Public Service Association (PSA) says potential plans to privatise New Zealand's meat inspection service could put food quality and safety at risk.
The PSA said the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is looking at allowing meat processing companies to carry out more of their own inspection work with reduced oversight from AsureQuality (AQ), the government's meat inspection service.
Vincent Arbuckle of New Zealand Food Safety said MPI has been reviewing inspection and supervision requirements for exported meat with support from industry and AQ, including looking at more flexible and efficient inspection and verification options.
However Arbuckle said no changes had been proposed yet, and any changes would involve a formal consultation process.
The PSA feared the changes could result in the loss of jobs at AQ, leading current meat inspectors to move to the private sector, with lower wages and poorer conditions.
National secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said independent meat inspectors were important for ensuring high food quality and safety.
"It's clear there are plans underway for company meat inspection, which is a major departure from the current situation where we have independent meat inspectors employed by AQ."
She said they had been doing an "excellent job" for many years.
"The work of meat inspectors ensures that disease and defects in products are identified and that meat is fit for human consumption.
"Independent meat inspectors are more rigorous because they have no vested interest in the end product and will not cut corners to increase company profits. Our overseas markets and consumers here at home will miss out if we lose the independence of our meat inspection services."
Arbuckle said instead, along with the support of industry and input from AQ, MPI had been developing a programme of work to review the inspection and supervision requirements for exported New Zealand meat.
"The programme is investigating possible changes to align New Zealand's requirements for inspecting and verifying exported meat more closely with international guidelines and our own domestic regulatory rules," he said.
"As part of this we are investigating models for meat inspection and verification that would allow New Zealand to maintain our high standards for meat products in a more flexible and efficient way."
Arbuckle said some companies had carried out inspections for more than a decade with no food safety incidents. Together they accounted for roughly 17 percent of all slaughter establishments, and had exported millions of kilograms of meat.
Similarly, he pointed to New Zealand's dairy sector which performed its own quality and food safety compliance with external verification from MPI-appointed verifiers.
He said nothing would be changed to risk New Zealand's reputation for food safety.
"New Zealand enjoys an excellent reputation for food safety and suitability - this cannot be jeopardised and will not change."
Arbuckle said any proposed changes would be subject to a formal consultation process, with the development of any proposals and consultations expected to take the remainder of the year.
"We, and our partner AQ, are doing the right thing by communicating with relevant unions to keep them abreast of developments, even at this very early stage."
Consultation on possible changes to meat inspection and supervision requirements could start in August. Any resultant changes would not come into force until next year.
AQ chief executive Kim Ballinger said as no consultation process had yet been undertaken, she could not comment on any potential outcome implications at this point.
She said they were "incredibly proud of our employees for the exceptional meat inspection service they provide" and looked forward to continuing a premium service for New Zealand exports into the future.
"We're continuing to prioritise collaboration with our people and unions, customers, MPI, industry bodies and our other partners, to support New Zealand's red meat sector in providing the high-quality, safe meat products that it's renowned for globally."
Richard McColl from the Meat Industry Association, which represented meat processors, said one of the models being explored would give members more control and flexibility.
"The current meat inspection model is resource intensive and has not evolved along with other parts of the sector. This programme is about giving meat processors and exporters responsibility and ownership of their own risks.
"This programme is an opportunity to explore and consider other meat inspection options to achieve the crucial food safety and market access requirements, while also building a more resilient and higher-skilled workforce, with roles that offer greater responsibility, development, and career progression for the thousands of staff employed by red meat processors."
He said whichever model was chosen, the final inspection would always be done by a government employee
"Our members' reputations rises and falls on the back of food safety outcomes. New Zealand has one of the highest if not the highest reputation for food safety so none of our members are going to compromise food safety outcomes."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
14 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Auckland money launderer Ye Hua has prison sentence reduced on appeal
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Ye "Cathay" Hua was sent to prison for seven and a half years after a jury found her guilty of 15 money laundering charges. That has now been reduced to six years. Photo: NZ Herald / Jason Oxenham A convicted money launderer repeatedly complained to international drug kingpin Xavier Valent that cash her staff were handling was wet, sticky and covered with white powder. "I am scared of drug money," Ye "Cathay" Hua told Valent in a text message. "Our staff sick of counting wet money ... are you sure not drug money?" asked Hua, who at the time owned a legitimate money-handling business turning over tens of millions of dollars a year. The messages were sent to Valent, the former Auckland Grammar student whose international drugs empire has been described as making him a modern-day Mr Asia. He is now serving a life sentence for the importation and supply of methamphetamine and other Class A and B drugs. Hua warned Valent, also known as Harry Whitehead, she was worried police would search her premises if the money he was sending was linked to drug dealing. She asked the drug smuggler for a $100,000 deposit to offset that risk. He did not meet that request, but Hua went ahead and processed the transaction anyway. Hua was subsequently found guilty after a jury trial of 15 money laundering offences involving $18 million, which she processed on behalf of Valent and three other convicted drug dealers. She was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison in 2023, but took an appeal against both that sentence and her convictions to the Court of Appeal. The appeal court upheld the convictions but, in a decision released on Friday, reduced her sentence to six years in jail. The appeal court judges said her offending was tempered by the fact Hua did not know for sure the cash was drug money, and she had not made unduly large profits by handling it. The court was told that the $18m was laundered within the context of her registered financial services business, Quian Duo Duo (QDD), which turned over $357m between 2017 and 2020. About $70m of those transactions were in cash. "While we agree that the period of the offending and the amount of money laundered are serious aggravating factors, the lack of actual knowledge of the source of the cash and the lack of any unusual profits temper the gravity of the offending," the Court of Appeal decision said. "Another factor tempering the gravity of the offending is the lack of any involvement in the crimes committed by those utilising the appellant's money remittance business." Although QDD was a registered financial services provider, it had a history of non-compliance with anti-money laundering legislation. In addition to the criminal case against Cathay Hua, the Department of Internal Affairs has recently prosecuted the company for failing to report over $19m worth of transactions between New Zealand and China. It is facing a fine of $1.25m. It was fined $356,000 for similar offending in 2018. Although Hua never met Valent face-to-face, communications between the money launderer and the drug-smuggler were cited in evidence that she was "reckless" about where the cash was coming from. At one point, she told him not to send any money on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday the following week, because she was due to have an on-site inspection by the Department of Internal Affairs on those days. On another occasion, vacuum-packed white powder was left at QDD by a person who dropped off the cash. Hua took a photograph of the powder and sent it to Valent, who replied that it was lithium. Hua messaged back to him: "As long as not drug". Valent was found guilty in 2023 of 86 charges including the importation, manufacture, supply and possession for supply of methamphetamine, cocaine, MDMA and ephedrine. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no parole for 10 years - one of the stiffest sentences for drug trafficking and of a level normally handed down to people convicted of murder. The drugs involved amounted to more than 200kg and Valent ran his operation so tightly that he subjected his syndicate members to lie detector tests if he suspected they were stealing drugs or money. - This story was first published by NZ Herald
RNZ News
14 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Foodstuffs North Island warned over likely breach of grocery competition law
Foodstuffs owns Pak'n Save and New World. Photo: RNZ The Commerce Commission has given Foodstuffs North Island a warning over a likely breach of grocery competition law and asking suppliers to bring forward any complaints about unfair treatment. The Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden said the Grocery Industry Competition Act required retailers to deal with suppliers in good faith at all times. "I'm concerned that this follows a pattern of behaviour that has been present in the industry for decades," he said. "This behaviour has been enabled for so long due to the significant power imbalance between the major supermarkets, who hold the vast majority of the market, and suppliers, who have limited bargaining power in comparison." While the Commerce Commission issued only a warning, van Heerden said further action would be taken if more examples came to light. "Foodstuffs North Island appears to have obstructed and delayed a supplier request by acting in ways that we believe were uncooperative and unreasonable," van Heerden said. "In this instance, based on the evidence we have, we decided a warning was the right response." He said Foodstuffs North Island category manager that acted as the main point of contact for the supplier, was also investigated regarding their role in the matter and given a warning. "Suppliers are reliant on their relationships with the retailers' commercial teams, so the staff in these roles within the supermarkets hold a lot of power. Any behaviour that weaponises this power imbalance is unacceptable," he said. "The major supermarkets have a responsibility to make sure their staff are properly trained. They need to make sure their staff follow the rules and deal with suppliers in good faith." He said further changes were proposed to the Supply Code which would provide more scrutiny and clarity about what was acceptable behaviour. "Our supplier survey showed that 37 percent of suppliers reported their interactions with Foodstuffs North Island as negative or very negative. "This is significantly higher than suppliers' ratings for Woolworths and Foodstuffs South Island, at approximately 20 percent." Van Heerden said the supply code was designed to protect small and medium sized suppliers. "We really appreciate where suppliers have come forward to tell us about issues so we can take action - like in this case where we heard directly from the supplier involved," he said. The warning letter can be found on the Commission's website.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kainga Ora cuts new developments as the housing crisis escalates
In Onehunga, Auckland, the site where a 186-apartment Kainga Ora development was planned now sits empty, after tenants of the previous building moved out and the new project was cancelled. Photo: Sharon Brettkelly New Zealand is short tens of thousands of social houses, and billions of dollars to fund them, while the numbers of "stressed" renters is growing, but a community housing leader says we can still fix the crisis that has dragged on for decades. "I actually believe as New Zealanders if we put our minds to this and we make some different choices we can absolutely solve this housing crisis," says Community Housing Aotearoa chief executive Paul Gilberd. But it will not happen overnight, and as demand grows he warns that overall investment in new social housing is falling. The "magic thing" that unlocks the ability to build the houses at scale is government funding of the community housing sector, he says. "If the government is willing to turn that dial up, we can as a sector walking alongside Kainga Ora, deliver the things that I think New Zealanders want in terms of the vision of the sort of country they live in," he says. Gilberd has worked in the sector for decades and in his current role oversees 100 community housing providers (CHPs) that run more than 30,000 homes. He says Kainga Ora's announcement last month that it has cancelled plans to build nearly 3500 new homes around the country and is capping the numbers of state-owned homes it provides at 78,000 is a reflection of a government that sees itself in a diminished role in commissioning new affordable housing, while backing the CHPs to fill the gap. He is telling his members to find partners such as church groups and local councils to deliver as many affordable homes as they can. The new Community Housing Funding Agency is a step in the right direction to finding the tens of billions of dollars needed to build more than 20,000 extra homes, he says, but it falls short of similar agencies in other countries which have the gold standard full government guarantee. "Then it becomes a gamechanger because it reduces the risk to investors," he says. Jeremy, a neighbour of a cancelled Kainga Ora project in Onehunga, Auckland tells The Detail of the saga of the on/off development that went on for years before the final announcement last month. Jeremy and his wife bought their house in 2018, believing that they would be living next door to architecturally designed, state-owned apartments. "It's been an empty site for over a year now and that peace is lovely for us right now but it's not a long-term solution. The thing that I wonder about is how much of this development next door is now going to be completely piecemeal," he says. For Newsroom Pro managing editor Jonathan Milne, the development on Jordan Avenue is close to his heart, as an Onehunga resident and former local school board member. He says that the tenants who were moved out of the development for the rebuild were promised first dibs on the new apartments. When he tried to track down families who had lived there before it was demolished, they were nowhere to be found. "I spent days trying to find former tenants of Jordan Ave, I couldn't find any. No one knows where they've gone, no one knows their phone numbers anymore, they've just disappeared." He says the dramatic change at Kainga Ora is difficult for the tenants. "In all this discussion we've heard a lot about dollars and hectares and numbers of residences and square metres, but we haven't heard from the voices of the tenants." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter .
