Drivers warned of expensive 'engine killer' fault in UK's most popular vehicles
Have you heard of wet timing belts? While many drivers are unfamiliar with this type of engine part, they're a common component in many cars produced between 2012 and 2021, including some of the most popular makes from top manufacturers like Ford, Peugeot, and many more.
While they were initially introduced to help cut emissions and ensure a smoother ride, they've led to serious headaches for many drivers, including total engine failure and eye-watering repair bills.
What is a wet timing belt?
A wet timing belt has the same purpose as a dry one: it synchronises the rotation of the crankshaft and camshaft, ensuring the valves open and close at the right time. This keeps the engine running smoothly and efficiently.
The difference comes down to where the belt is housed. A standard timing belt is located outside the engine housing, while a wet belt sits inside it. Another major difference with this type of belt is that it is also constantly lubricated by an oil bath at the bottom of the engine system — hence the name.
Why do some cars have wet timing belts?
The idea is that the oil keeps the belt lubricated, allowing the belt and the engine to run more smoothly. In theory, this reduces noise and improves fuel efficiency. Engineers also hoped that the lubrication would help the belts to last longer than their dry counterparts, reducing the change interval and associated costs for the owner. That was the plan, at least!
Why are they controversial?
Wet timing belts are fine when they're in good condition and working correctly. But once they start to show wear and tear, things can start to go downhill fast.
Because the rubber belt is in constant contact with the oil, it can cause the belt to degrade more quickly, especially if the wrong type of oil is used. As a result, it may not last as long as the manufacturer's handbook states it should. This means the belt may fail before the owner of the car even realises there's an issue.
Wet timing belts can also cause another form of engine failure: one that is unique to this type of belt. As the wet belt gradually picks up wear and tear over time, small particles come off the belt and are picked up by the oil. Because the belt and the oil bath are inside the engine, they are then circulated throughout the rest of the engine system.
This can block or damage crucial engine parts and cause blockages in the system that prevent the engine oil from circulating, both of which will lead to engine failure. This means that owners of cars with wet belts have two major engine failure problems to contend with.
A lack of understanding about wet timing belts may be exacerbating the issue. Despite being quite common, many mechanics are much less familiar with them than other types of belts, meaning issues are harder to spot and fix. The knowledge and skill required to deal with the issue can make repairs more difficult and costly, too.
And, as a result, wet belts have certainly garnered their fair share of detractors in recent years. If you Google 'wet timing belts', you won't have to scroll for long to find forums full of disgruntled car owners lambasting the feature and comparing repair bills.
What are the symptoms?
There may be a few tell-tale signs that a wet engine belt is starting to fail. Symptoms may include:
Strange noises from the engine bay, such as squealing, grinding, or rattling noises when the engine is switched on or during acceleration.
The engine light is on.
Engine oil leaks. This can be a sign that the condition of the belt is deteriorating.
Low oil pressure.
The engine misfiring.
The engine running poorly when idling.
To further complicate things, there won't necessarily be any obvious signs that the belt is failing or that the oil has become contaminated until it's too late. Ultimately, the only way to check is for a qualified mechanic to conduct a thorough visual inspection.
Which makes and models are commonly affected?
Ford: EcoBoost and EcoBlue vehicles, including the Fiesta, Puma, Ecosport, C-Max, Focus, Transit, Connect, and B-Max.
Peugeot: 208, 2008, 308, 3008, 5008, Partner.
Citroën: Berlingo, C3, C4, C5 Aircross. Toyota: Aygo and Proace.
Vauxhall: PureTech engines, including certain Corsa, Astra, Granland, Crossland and Combo models Honda: Civic 1.0 litre Turbo
It's worth noting that not every model of car listed above will have a wet belt, as only models from certain registration years have them. The best way to establish if your vehicle has a wet belt is to look in the owner's handbook or ask a qualified mechanic to inspect the engine.
What can drivers do to protect their motors?
The good news? While there's not exactly an easy fix for the problem, there are ways motorists can protect and preserve their engines if they have a wet timing belt.
Regular inspections: Many motorists have complained that their wet belts failed or needed replacing well before the change interval stated by the manufacturer. So, one thing owners of wet timing belt engines can do is check the condition of the belt well before the replacement is due.
Using the right oil: Using the wrong oil will cause the belt to degrade much faster, so getting the right grade and type of engine oil for your car is crucial to the performance and lifespan of the belt. Check the handbook, or contact the manufacturer to get the most up-to-date advice on this.
Replacing the belt before the change is due: Many motorists have found that their wet belts failed before the stated change interval. You can get ahead of this problem by replacing your belt earlier than the manufacturer's recommended interval, at the first sign of deterioration.
Mark Barclay, Head of Ecommerce at My Motor World said: "Without regular inspections and proper maintenance, wet timing belts can be an engine killer. To avoid costly repairs, owners of cars with this type of belt really have to be on it with their maintenance schedule.
Recommended reading:
British Gas offering customers half-price electricity as a 'thank you'
BBC bosses issue statement on future of Ncuti Gatwa's Doctor Who amid reports
DVLA: Drivers with high blood pressure 'could be fined £1,000 and prosecuted'
"It might be annoying and expensive to keep checking and replacing the timing belt and changing the oil, but it's still cheaper than a new engine — or even a new car. It's a case of spending little and often to avoid spiralling costs further down the line.
"If you have a wet timing belt, my advice would be to get regular inspections at a garage that's familiar with them, replace the belt at the first sign of deterioration, and keep that engine oil as clean as possible. And only ever use the exact type of oil that the manufacturer recommends.
"It's hard to imagine what the engineers were thinking when they introduced this feature, given how unpopular it has become. But, it just goes to show that the rigorous testing cars undergo cannot catch every type of fault.
"Finally, a word of warning to owners of cars with the standard timing belts. You may not have the same issues to contend with as a wet belt, but you still don't want to get complacent, because they can and do fail. So, stick to the change interval given by the manufacturer.
"Replacing the timing belt is a fairly big job, but you might consider sourcing your own timing belt kit to help reduce the cost of professional repairs at a garage."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Just Revoked California's EV Rules. How Much Is California To Blame?
President Donald Trump just revoked California's permission to enforce its nation-leading clean-car rules — and Mary Nichols understands why. "No one likes being regulated," she told me ahead of Thursday's Oval Office signing ceremony. Nichols knows that better than almost anyone. As head of California's Air Resources Board for 17 years, she brought the world's biggest automakers to heel using the state's unique authority to go further than the federal government in setting vehicle emissions standards. It's those same automakers who lobbied Trump to "rescue the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating California's electric vehicle mandate once and for all," as Trump put it Thursday. It didn't have to get to this point. California officials had been in talks with automakers prior to the November election about how to keep them on board, but the state overplayed its hand, Nichols said. "Many people were acting on the assumption that it was going to be the Democrats continuing in power," she said. "So the state felt like they had all the cards in their hand, and then after the election, it was pretty hard to reset the conversation." To hear Nichols tell it, California may have gone too far this time in nudging the industry to ever-higher sales of zero-emission vehicles. The rules would have required automakers to hit increasing percentages — 35 percent by model year 2026 and 68 percent by model year 2030 — before reaching 100 percent of new-car sales in 2035. Maybe that would have worked if it were just about California. But a dozen other states are signed on to California's targets, and they have been slower and less generous with incentives and EV charging infrastructure. Where California has more than a quarter of its new car sales coming from EVs, New Jersey is at 15 percent, and New York is under 12 percent, according to the industry's latest figures. "They were definitely having issues with the California program because they didn't think they could meet the sales numbers in the mandate, especially [Gov. Gavin] Newsom's target of nothing but ZEVs with a deadline attached to it," Nichols said. "That was scary, and even the interim targets were going to be hard to meet." The pendulum has swung against California before: The George W. Bush administration was the first to attempt to deny California's permission from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require automakers to sell increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicles, and Trump went further in his first term by attempting to revoke the state's already-issued authority. But Republicans had never resorted to doing it through Congress, via an untested maneuver that congressional watchdogs have warned is likely illegal but that still drew 35 Democratic votes in the House and one in the Senate (Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), in the tradition of Detroit's John Dingell). It's a far cry from the bipartisan consensus that reigned when President Richard Nixon famously signed the Clean Air Act, which set federal air pollution levels for the first time but gave California permission to continue going further, owing to its decade-plus of vehicle emissions rules aimed at the smoggy Los Angeles basin. The automakers have been steadily lobbying against the rules since then, with a brief ceasefire from 2009-16, when ten automakers and the United Auto Workers signed a nonaggression pact in President Barack Obama's Rose Garden with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the EPA. That it happened at the same time that the federal government was taking an equity stake in General Motors was no coincidence, said Nichols, who helped broker the pact. "They saved them from bankruptcy," she said. California has less recourse this time around. Where Newsom signed deals in 2019 with Ford, Volkswagen, Honda, BMW and Volvo to abide by the state's rules even in the event of federal cancellation, he now only has Stellantis, which signed a separate agreement last year that goes through model year 2030. And several of the state's allies are peeling off. California had 12 other states signed on to follow its lead as of last year, but it now has 10, after Republican-led Virginia dropped out and Vermont delayed enforcement by 19 months. And Democrats are getting cold feet, too: Maryland Gov. Wes Moore signed an executive order in April delaying enforcement, and Democratic lawmakers in New York introduced a bill this year to delay their participation by two years. (California and the other 10 states immediately sued Thursday to preserve the emissions standards.) "If it was only California, I think [automakers] wouldn't have been as eager to jump in on the federal level and work with the Republicans, but it's the fact it's the other states that had the California standards that were killing them, especially New York," Nichols said. That echoes the automakers' argument. "The problem really isn't California," John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said in a statement after the Senate's vote last month to overturn the rules. "It's the 11 states that adopted California's rules without the same level of readiness for EV sales requirements of this magnitude."


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
You May Hate Elon But Tesla's 2025 Model Y Is Still The EV SUV To Beat
The front of the New Tesla Model Y has been significantly changed. The Tesla Model Y was the bestselling car in the world in 2023 and 2024, beating out the Toyota cars (mostly the Corolla) that had dominated the global market for years beforehand. But since then, there have been worrying sales figures, particularly from Canada and Europe. Many commentators blame Elon Musk's controversial association with the Trump presidency in the USA. But the Model Y was also in between the original release and a major update. I tested the New Tesla Model Y to see if it can revive the company's fortunes. Buying a car isn't usually a political choice, but the Tesla brand has become divisive thanks to Elon Musk's stint with the US government and his opinions expressed on X, formerly known as Twitter. While most pundits are citing this as the reason for reduced sales, the Tesla Model Y hadn't had an update since it was launched in 2020. Coincidentally with the sales dip, Tesla has been running down stock of the old Model Y over the last few months before the new car arrives, which is this month. The rear lightbar reflects off the body panel. There were limited Launch Edition cars on sale before that, which was what I borrowed for a week, but the main stock was only just arriving on the road at the time of writing. I've now begun to see a few in the wild in the UK, so deliveries have begun. The Launch Edition, which you can no longer buy, is essentially the Long Range All-Wheel Drive with the acceleration boost pre-applied and some additional bonuses such as privacy glass. Other than the Long-Range All-Wheel Drive, there's still a Long-Range Rear-Wheel Drive and a standard Rear-Wheel Drive to choose from. The exterior design changes are more noticeable than with the Tesla Model 3 facelift. The front lights are thin and Cybertruck-like, moving away from the froglike look of the original car. These are still matrix LEDs, a great technology that only dips sections directly facing oncoming traffic. The rear lights have become a single line, too, and take a novel approach. The red lightbar reflects off the rear panel rather than projecting directly, accentuating a generally more futuristic appearance. However, the side profile has barely changed, and the overall practicality of the Y remains the same. The car was designed to maximize interior space, so there's plenty of room for front and rear passengers. There have been some tweaks here. When the new Tesla Model 3 came out at the end of 2023 (which the company claims isn't called Highland despite everyone else calling it that), its lack of an indicator stalk (like the Model S Plaid) garnered criticism. Sensibly, Tesla has kept the indicator stalk on the New Model Y. For the new Model Y, an indicator stalk remains, although the drive modes are now operated with the LCD panel, like the latest Model 3, rather than a shift stick. There are buttons above the rearview mirror available just in case the LCD panel becomes unavailable. The front seats are now ventilated as well as heated. For rear seat passengers, the small LCD panel introduced with the new Model 3 and Model S Plaid has been added, so passengers in the back can control their own air conditioning, watch streaming media and play games, although you will probably won't want to use the latter if you get travel sick. However, although Tesla Model 3 and Y interiors have gradually improved, they are still quite spartan. You might like this, but many prefer a more traditional premium finish and instrumentation, which BMW has the upper hand with. Chinese midsize SUVs are offering plusher upholstery, too, such as the BYD Sealion 7, Zeekr 7X, and Smart #5. The New Model Y continues the original's class-leading luggage space, with 854 liters even with the rear seats up. There's a sizeable 117-liter frunk, too, which is large enough for an overnight bag on its own, plus a big space under the boot floor. There's another upgrade here, because dropping the rear seats forward is powered. Buttons lower them with a 60/40 split, increasing the capacity to 1,869 liters, and these buttons will also bring the seats back up. You can drop the middle seat forward on its own, but this can only be achieved manually. The Y will tow 1,600kg braked, too, with the £1,090 towbar option. One thing that hasn't really changed with the new Model Y is the performance. Even the basic Rear-Wheel Drive takes just 5.6 seconds to hit 60mph, while the Long Range version drops this to 5.4 seconds. The Long Range All-Wheel Drive takes 4.6 seconds, and with the acceleration boost of the Launch Edition it's just 4.1 seconds. There are faster SUV options, but not that many, and generally more expensive. Tesla has improved the sound protection for the new Model Y, however. This is a quieter car on highways than previous versions. The Model Y wasn't famous for its ride quality, and this is another area of enhancement. The suspension is now much more forgiving of poor road surfaces, although there is a little more softness to the handling as a result. The New Tesla Model Y doesn't look that different from the side. Tesla has always done well with range and efficiency. Although there are now quite a few cars that go further, most use bigger batteries to do so. The battery sizes haven't changed since the previous version of the Y, although Tesla doesn't officially state what these are. The basic RWD car is believed to have 62.5kWh (net) while the Long Range options have 75kWh (net). However, there have been some aerodynamic improvements with the New Model Y, which have increased the efficiency. The original Long Range All-Wheel-Drive promised 331 WLTP miles, but the new version goes to 364 miles, or 353 with 20in wheels like my review car. The Rear-Wheel Drive car with the smaller battery can still manage 311 WLTP miles, while the Long-Range Rear-Wheel Drive car achieves 387 miles, which is impressive for a car with a 75kWh battery. I drove the New Model Y from London to Devon and back, mostly using motorways. Travelling efficiently at the speed limit I managed 3.4 miles per kWh, although this dropped to 2.8 miles per kWh with more vigorous A-road driving. Still, you can get 250 miles easily out of the Long Range All-Wheel Drive car if your driving is not too boisterous, and there's the superb Tesla Supercharger network to make long distance journeys easy. My trip to Devon was simple, with plenty of charging options along the way. The Tesla Model Y's price hasn't changed considerably with the update. In the UK, the Rear-Wheel Drive is £44,990 (€44,990 in Europe, not currently available in the US), the same as the old version. The Long Range option is £48,990 (€46,990 in Europe; $44,990 in the US), which is more expensive than it was before, and the Long Range All-Wheel Drive £51,990 (€52,990 in Europe, $48,990 in the US), which is a bit less than previously. There are cheaper options, but many more expensive. In its class, the Model Y is decently priced. The overall appearance is modernized but still a Model Y. It's certainly true that the clear lead Tesla enjoyed has narrowed. Competitors are closing in, particularly those from China, and a few surpass in some areas. The Smart #5 offers faster charging, while the Zeekr 7X offers a distinctly more premium feel. But neither are as efficient as the Model Y. Combining practicality, price, performance, range and efficiency with Tesla's superior connected technology, all in one package, the Model Y still edges ahead. Refusing to buy one because of Elon Musk is a personal choice, and there are plenty of great alternatives now. But they're not quite as good as the Tesla Model Y overall – not yet, anyway.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
McLaren Reveals Its 2027 Le Mans Challenger
McLaren revealed a first look at its 2027 Le Mans Hypercar competitor on Saturday, the biggest step yet in the brand's return to racing for the overall win at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. The unveiling comes just one day after the company announced engine, team partner, and leadership details for the upcoming program. This story will be Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car Sign in to access your portfolio