logo
Court dismisses case on inmate executed while seeking retrial

Court dismisses case on inmate executed while seeking retrial

Asahi Shimbun14-05-2025

OSAKA—The Osaka District Court on May 14 dismissed a case seeking a total of 16.5 million yen ($112,230) in state compensation for three lawyers who represented a death row inmate executed while his retrial request was active.
In filing the lawsuit, the three claimed that the rights of their defense were violated and they suffered emotional distress due to the death of their client, a former yakuza member, during the request period.
While the court said in its ruling that "careful consideration is required," it concluded that "the constant repetition of requests for retrial will make execution virtually impossible on a permanent basis."
The three plaintiffs had served as defense lawyers for the retrial of former death row inmate Keizo Okamoto (nee Kawamura), a former high-ranking member of a crime organization. Okamoto's death sentence for robbery and murder, among other charges, was finalized in 2004.
Even so, Okamoto said he did not intend to commit a robbery and sought a correction to his sentence. His execution in December 2018 occurred in the midst of his fourth retrial request.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that as defense attorneys they were "entrusted with the life of a death row inmate," and that executing Okamoto made it impossible for them to confirm the facts presented against their client.
His death also 'made it difficult to pursue our mission of correcting the wrongful verdict,' according to them.
The plaintiffs claimed that the central government was liable for 'obstruction of proof.'
The state refuted this by citing that the Code of Criminal Procedure specifies that 'a request for a retrial does not have the effect of suspending the execution of a sentence."
It expanded on its counterargument, saying, "There is no legal obligation to refrain from executing an individual during a request for retrial, and it does not constitute a violation of the right to counsel."
The practice of waiting to execute death row inmates awaiting retrial occurred for some time after World War II, taking the possibility of wrongful convictions into consideration.
However, criticism over "life extension" grew as many death row inmates began to request retrials.
The execution of a death row inmate awaiting retrial in 1999 was the single outlier until 2017 where a series of executions were carried out.
Kana Sasakura, a professor at Konan University and an expert on the death penalty, offered the United States' protocol for these situations—death row executions are put off until the court reaches a final verdict if there is a motion that constitutes a request for a retrial.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Editorial: Science Council of Japan must not become government tool
Editorial: Science Council of Japan must not become government tool

The Mainichi

time36 minutes ago

  • The Mainichi

Editorial: Science Council of Japan must not become government tool

The Science Council of Japan is a representative organization of scientists dedicated to the pursuit of the truth. It must not become a government tool. A law has been passed to turn the Science Council of Japan from a special organization operating independently of the government into a special corporate entity, effective October 2026. There remain concerns that the operational independence of the council could be threatened. It is only natural that the council and academic organizations across Japan have joined in calling for the legislation to be amended or repealed. With the transition, a new mechanism of government oversight has been included, whereby auditors and evaluation committee members appointed by the prime minister will review the council's activity plans and operations. If the government interferes with policy proposals or research directions, academic freedom will be shaken. Government influence may also extend to the selection of members when the new organization is launched. Experts appointed by the prime minister will be included in the committee responsible for selecting members. It will also become possible to dismiss members in the science council's general meetings. Manabu Sakai, the minister of state for special missions in the Cabinet Office, stated in the Diet that dismissal could occur if "specific ideologies or partisan claims are repeatedly made." If political opinions become grounds for dismissal, there is a risk of infringing on freedom of thought and belief. In the first place, reform of the council stemmed from government intervention in personnel decisions. In 2020, a problem erupted over then Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga's refusal to appoint six people to the science council. Without explaining the reasons, the government proceeded with an organizational review as if to reproach the council for its opposition; an act that invited distrust. The Science Council of Japan was established as a response to the fact that many scientists were coerced into cooperating with the government and military during World War II. In 1950 and 1967, the council issued statements that it would not engage in research for war or military purposes. In 2017, it similarly expressed a cautious stance toward government-promoted research with potential military applications and has repeatedly made recommendations from an independent position. The government's argument is that "to spend government funds, a certain level of involvement is necessary." But if the new organization panders to the government or is used to endorse government policies, questions will be raised about its very existence. Its international reputation will also suffer. Academic freedom and its results are foundational supports for the interests of humanity. The council cannot fulfill its role as an academy providing scientific views as long as there is room for political intervention.

Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning
Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning

Japan Today

time8 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning

Bruce Springsteen performs with the E Street Band at the Olympic Stadium in Berlin, Germany, Wednesday, June 11, 2025. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber) By STEFANIE DAZIO Veteran rock star Bruce Springsteen, a high-profile critic of President Donald Trump, slammed the U.S. administration as 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' during a concert Wednesday in Berlin. He was addressing tens of thousands of fans at a stadium built for the 1936 Olympic Games that still bears the scars of World War II and contains relics from the country's dark Nazi past. 'Tonight, we ask all who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism, and let freedom reign,' he said. Springsteen, long a political opponent of the president, has made increasingly pointed and contentious public statements in recent concerts. He denounced Trump's politics during a concert last month in Manchester, calling him an 'unfit president' leading a 'rogue government' of people who have 'no concern or idea for what it means to be deeply American.' Springsteen is no stranger to Berlin. In July 1988, he became one of the first Western musicians to perform in East Germany, performing to a ravenous crowd of 160,000 East Germans yearning for American rock 'n' roll and the freedom it represented to the youth living under the crumbling communist regime. An Associated Press news story from that period says 'fireworks steaked through the sky' and hundreds of people in the audience waved handmade American flags as they sang along to 'Born in the USA.' Almost four decades later, Springsteen issued a stark warning: 'The America that I love, the America that I've sung to you about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration." © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

A former student opens fire at an Austrian school, killing 10 and taking his own life
A former student opens fire at an Austrian school, killing 10 and taking his own life

The Mainichi

time21 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

A former student opens fire at an Austrian school, killing 10 and taking his own life

GRAZ, Austria (AP) -- A former student opened fire at a school in Austria's second-biggest city Tuesday, killing 10 people and wounding 12 others before taking his own life, authorities said. There was no immediate information on the motive of the 21-year-old man, who had no previous police record. He used two weapons, which he was believed to have owned legally, police said. "Today is a dark day in the history of our country," Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker told reporters in Graz, a city of about 300,000 people in southeastern Austria. He called it "a national tragedy that shocks us deeply" and said there would be three days of national mourning, with the Austrian flag lowered to half-staff at official buildings. A national minute of silence was to be held Wednesday morning in memory of the victims. Special forces were among those sent to the BORG Dreierschutzengasse high school, about a kilometer (over half a mile) from Graz's historic center, after calls at 10 a.m. reporting shots at the building. More than 300 police officers were sent to the school, which was evacuated. Footage from the scene showed students filing out quickly past armed officers. Police said security was restored in 17 minutes. The assailant, who acted alone, was a 21-year-old Austrian man who lived near Graz, police said. His name wasn't released. Regional police chief Gerald Ortner said two firearms -- a long gun and a handgun -- were used in the shooting and recovered from the scene, and that the assailant was apparently legally in possession of them. The man took his own life in a bathroom. Interior Minister Gerhard Karner said the gunman had been a student at the school and hadn't completed his studies. He didn't specify when the man left the school or at what age. Karner said Tuesday afternoon that six of the dead were female and three male, but didn't give further information. He said 12 people were wounded. The state hospital in Graz later said that a 10th victim, an adult woman, had died of her injuries, the Austria Press Agency reported. Austria's Red Cross said it had deployed 65 ambulances to the scene and 158 emergency staffers were helping treat the injured. In addition, 40 specially trained psychologists were counseling students and parents. The Red Cross also called on locals to come forward and donate blood. Metin Ozden was in his kebab restaurant near the school when he first heard police cars sped by, and then a police helicopter above. He told the Krone newspaper: "I knew something bad had happened. ... I've never seen so many emergency services in my entire life." He also described to the paper seeing parents walking past his restaurant and crying on the way to the school. Tuesday's violence appeared to be the deadliest attack in Austria's post-World War II history. In 2020, four people were killed in Vienna and the suspect, a sympathizer of the Islamic State group, also died in a shooting. More than 20 other people, including a police officer, were wounded. In June 2015, a man killed three people and injured more than 30 when he drove through a crowd in downtown Graz with an SUV. Austria, which has a strong tradition of hunting, has some of the more liberal gun laws in the European Union. Some weapons, such as rifles and shotguns that must be reloaded manually after each shot, can be purchased in Austria from the age of 18 without a permit. Gun dealers only need to check if there's no weapons ban on the buyer and the weapon gets registered in the central weapons register. Other weapons, such as repeating shotguns or semi-automatic firearms, are more difficult to acquire -- buyers need a gun ownership card and a firearms pass.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store