
British students at Harvard report ‘growing anxiety' over US government attacks
British and international students at Harvard report 'growing anxiety' over their fate, as the Trump administration's latest attack on the university could see them forced to disrupt their studies and careers.
On Thursday, the administration said it would revoke Harvard University's eligibility to enrol international students, which was later temporarily frozen by a US federal judge on Friday.
Harvard lists 252 UK students enrolled on courses, including undergraduates and postgraduates, with those wanting to continue their studies having to transfer to other universities if the US government succeeds in barring all international students from the Ivy League campus.
Meanwhile, students who have been accepted on courses at Harvard starting this autumn would be forced to go elsewhere.
Sam Nicholson, from Potters Bar in Hertfordshire, who has spent the year at Harvard, said he has been left in limbo, unsure of his visa status and an internship in Washington DC he has lined up for the summer.
'There's a lot of anxious chatter on text messages. A lot of people have already left campus and gone home for the holidays so many people are in an information vacuum, through no fault of the university's.
'There's a lot of speculation about what this really means for us, whether it's an 'Art of the Deal' [move], put something extreme on the table and then walk it back, or if this is the reality,' Nicholson said.
He added there had been uncertainty circulating since the Trump administration first threatened Harvard and other universities with sanctions earlier this year, but that the latest crackdown, affecting all international students, still came as a surprise.
'This is so unprecedented, if you'd have told any of us, when we were told we would have this fortunate year at Harvard, that all international students would be banned, just months ago it would have been inconceivable.
'There was always this sense of: that won't actually happen.'
Nicholson now hopes that Harvard's court challenge will provide some clarity, with his internship tied to his student visa status.
'If there's any message I'd take from this year, it's that any longstanding assumptions you might have about the world or life, throw them out the window. Life is an uncertain thing,' he said.
The restriction – first revealed on Thursday – would even affect those on prestigious awards funded by the Kennedy Memorial Trust, commemorating the former US president John F Kennedy.
Adam Roble, who like Nicholson spent the year at Harvard on a Henry Fund fellowship but returned to the UK earlier this week, said he had sensed 'growing anxiety' among international students.
'Yesterday and today our group chats were going off – I'm in a fortunate position now that I've finished my programme but I feel for those who are halfway through and staying for longer. A mate of mine, he's on a two-year programme and he's just finished the first year – what's he going to do?
'They say you have to transfer to another institution or your visa is invalid. But it's really hard to transfer at short notice, there are deadlines that have passed. The uncertainty that it has created for people's futures, they are in limbo,' he said.
Roble said the Trump administration's initial attacks on Harvard had sent shock waves through the campus.
'I was particularly surprised about how fast things were moving, and how in the midst of everything else that was going on in the world, anyone could be sent packing in a moment's notice.
'A particular turning point was when they essentially snatched Rümeysa Öztürk off the streets at Tufts [a university in Boston], which is very near to Harvard, it's only about 20 minutes away. I've been down similar streets to those. You almost think, am I really in America?'
Roble said he feared for the long-term impact, not just on the international students affected but also on US students.
'It's unfair for the students themselves but it's unfair for America as well. British and international students bring so much to America and American university campuses.
'Even the semester when I was teaching American democracy to a class full of American students, I think they really enjoyed that, they gave glowing feedback. We contribute a lot and the administration should stop being so shortsighted in that regard.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Zia Yusuf returning to Reform UK two days after quitting
Zia Yusuf, the ex-chairman of Reform UK who resigned on Thursday, has said he will return to the party in a new this week, Yusuf resigned, saying working to get the party elected was no longer "a good use of my time", without expanding Saturday evening, he wrote on social media that he would return to run the party's "UK Doge team", which is modelled on the Department of Government Efficiency set up by US President Donald UK leader Nigel Farage told the BBC Yusuf will take on a more public role for the party, appearing more frequently in the media. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.


Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Zia Yusuf returns to Reform 48 hours after resigning
Zia Yusuf has returned to Reform UK two days after he quit as party chairman. Mr Yusuf announced his departure with a social media post on X on Thursday, declaring that his work for Nigel Farage was no longer 'a good use of my time'. His resignation was triggered by a disagreement with Sarah Pochin, the party's newest MP, after she called for a burka ban in the House of Commons, which he described as 'dumb'. The 38-year-old businessman, who is a practising Muslim, will now rejoin the party's senior team in a new role. In an interview with The Sunday Times, he said his resignation had been a 'mistake' and a result of 'exhaustion'.


Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Koran burner told of imminent terror threat to his life
An asylum seeker who burnt the Koran has received a police warning of an imminent terror plot to murder him, The Telegraph understands. Hamit Coskun was woken by officers acting on behalf of the Metropolitan Police at 2am on Saturday, who told him of 'an imminent threat', his lawyers said. The officers, who were from another force at a location where Coskun is in hiding, are understood to have read out what is known as an Osman warning. The 50-year-old was last week convicted of a racially aggravated public order offence, after shouting 'f--- Islam' and 'Islam is religion of terrorism' while setting fire to the religious text above his head during a protest on Feb 13. His supporters have accused the Met Police and Crown Prosecution Service of putting his life in danger by pursuing a prosecution against him. The court heard that Coskun, who was living in Derby and had to move to a safe house after a video of the incident was posted online, had been forced to leave his home country of Turkey two and a half years ago to escape persecution. In a letter to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, on behalf of Coskun, Lord Young of Acton, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, stated: 'We consider that the risk to Mr Coskun's life was caused, in part, by the actions of your officers and the CPS. Danger from 'Islamic extremists' 'Your force had repeatedly suggested publicly that Mr Coskun had offended the 'religious institution of Islam'. Doing so has increased the risk to Mr Coskun from Islamic extremists.' Police are obliged to issue an Osman warning when there is intelligence of the threat, but there is not enough evidence to justify the police arresting the potential murderer. A spokesman for the Met Police said: 'There remains an ongoing police investigation in relation to allegations of threats to kill against a 50-year-old male. Given the investigation is ongoing, we won't be able to comment further at this stage.' Coskun was prosecuted under the Public Order Act after burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish Consulate in Knightsbridge. Critics of the decision to prosecute him accused British courts of reviving blasphemy laws by the back door in pursuing his prosecution. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'This decision is wrong. It revives a blasphemy law that parliament repealed. 'Free speech is under threat. I have no confidence in two-tier Keir to defend the rights of the public to criticise all religions.' 'De facto blasphemy laws' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch added on social media: 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. This case should go to appeal. Freedom of belief and freedom not to believe are inalienable rights in Britain. 'I'll defend those rights to my dying day.' Blasphemy laws were abolished in the UK 17 years ago. In a statement after the verdict, Coskun said the decision was 'an assault on free speech' that would deter others from exercising their democratic right to protest. He added: 'As an activist, I will continue to campaign against the threat of Islam. 'Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago, and it cannot be right to prosecute someone for blaspheming against Islam. 'Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the Bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.' He has pledged to continue burning Korans and intends to go on a tour of the UK, visiting Birmingham, Liverpool and Glasgow, where he will set fire to the holy book. It is unclear if he will resist doing so until the case is heard at appeal - should he be able to challenge the verdict against him in a higher court. The CPS said that Coskun was not being prosecuted for burning the book. They argued it was the combination of his derogatory remarks about Islam and the fact that it was done in public that made it an offence. The CPS originally charged Coskun, who is an atheist, with harassing the 'religious institution of Islam'. CPS charge amended However, the charge was later amended after free speech campaigners took up his cause and argued he was essentially being accused of blasphemy. Katy Thorne KC, Coskun's barrister, had argued that his actions were not motivated by hostility towards the followers of Islam, but the religion itself. District Judge John McGarva, however, said he did not accept that argument. Giving his verdict, Judge McGarva said: 'Your actions in burning the Koran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' The judge ordered Coskun, who is currently claiming asylum, to pay a fine of £240. A man has admitted assaulting Coskun during his demonstration outside the Turkish Embassy, but has denied using a knife in the attack. The man, whose identity is subject to reporting restrictions, is due to go on trial in 2027.