70% of neurodiverse adults say they're facing increased stigma at work, and the ongoing corporate rollback of DEI programs could make the situation worse
Good morning!
Neurodiverse individuals, including people who have ADHD or dyslexia, often face multiple barriers in the workplace. And despite an increased awareness about these conditions over the past few years, the majority of neurodiverse workers say discrimination against them is only getting worse.
Around 70% of people who identify as neurodivergent say they face stigma at work, up from 60% in 2024, according to a new survey from Understood.org, a nonprofit that's dedicated to supporting individuals with learning and thinking differences. Around 77% of this group feels pressure to mask their behaviors for fear of retaliation, and another 64% worry that disclosing their condition will negatively impact how others perceive their abilities at work.
'There's an awareness around neurodivergency that has increased over the last few years, especially amongst young people, but there are still many myths and misperceptions out there,' Nathan Friedman, co-president and chief marketing officer at Understood.org, tells Fortune. 'So there's still a lot of work to be done, not only to continue to drive awareness, but for organizations to understand better what a learning difference is and how it manifests at work.'
The fear among neurodiverse employees about potential repercussions for disclosing their conditions could hold these employees back from asking for the kind of accommodation that could make their work lives easier. Around 64% of this group says they feel comfortable asking their employer for an accommodation, but around 76% of neurodiverse employees still say that there is stigma attached to doing so.
The current political climate around DEI is also causing workers to worry about what kind of options they will have in the future—inclusion for people with disabilities is considered an important part of many diversity policies. Around 64% of all workers—including both neurodiverse and neurotypical—believe that getting any kind of workplace accommodation moving forward will be more challenging because of how companies are rolling back DEI programs.
'The macro, political environment is not necessarily one that prioritizes inclusivity, and that's stemming from what the government has done regarding DEI,' says Friedman.
Ultimately, it comes down to each individual workplace to figure out how they can embrace neurodivergent workers and make them feel that they belong, no matter what's happening in the world at large.
'The best way to work on reducing stigmas is by driving awareness, both overt and implicit,' says Friedman. 'When you have advocacy, our data shows it comes with bottom-line growth for the organization.'
Brit Morsebrit.morse@fortune.com
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Doritos and Mountain Dew could carry a new ‘not recommended for human consumption' warning under landmark Texas bill
Texas Governor Greg Abbott will decide whether to enact a bill requiring food manufacturers to add warning labels to products if they contain ingredients like dyes that have been banned or restricted by other countries. Major food conglomerates have opposed the bill, arguing it would add greater uncertainty for consumers in a time of economic unpredictability. A Texas bill on the brink of becoming law would crack down on major food manufacturers, requiring them to label products with warnings about ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption,' under the standards of countries other than the U.S. Senate Bill 25 would require U.S. food manufacturers to, beginning in 2027, clearly mark products sold in Texas with warning labels that the foods contain certain ingredients like bleached flour and synthetic food dyes that other countries have prohibited or required warnings for. The legislation would impact major food manufacturers like General Mills, whose brands Pillsbury Toaster Strudel contain bleached flour, as well as PepsiCo, the conglomerate behind Doritos and Mountain Dew, which contain dyes. The bill also outlines requirements for physical education and nutrition education in schools. The legislation reached the desk of Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Sunday. Supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the bill's enactment would notch a victory for Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement. The HHS secretary, as part of his MAHA efforts, has advocated for the banning of dyes, additives, and seed oils, arguing the ingredients increase the risk of cancer, hyperactivity in children, inflammatory bowel diseases, and allergic reactions. The bipartisan bill's enactment would also mark a departure from Texas's history of being a deep red state with a light touch with regulations. Texas is the second-largest state in the U.S. by population, with more than 31 million residents in 2024. A spokesperson for Abbott did not respond to Fortune's request for comment, but press secretary Andrew Mahaleris said in a statement to Bloomberg that, 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families and will thoughtfully review any legislation they send to his desk.' The HHS did not respond to Fortune's request for comment. In response to the bill, dozens of food manufacturers and distributors wrote a letter on May 19 to the Texas legislature asking it to remove the section of the legislation regarding warning labels. 'As currently written, the food labeling provision in this bill casts an incredibly wide net—triggering warning labels on everyday grocery items based on assertions that foreign governments have banned such items, rather than on standards established by Texas regulators or by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,' the letter said. The companies argued in the letter that Texas is outpacing national food labeling standards, and the enactment of the bill would 'destabilize local and regional economies' and limit access to foods in times of economic uncertainty. According to John Hewitt, senior vice president of state affairs at Consumer Brands Association, which represents several major U.S. food manufacturers, the food industry is committed to tools that increase ingredient transparency, but urged Abbott to veto the bill. 'The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously studied following an objective science and risk-based evaluation process,' Hewitt told Fortune in a statement. 'The labeling requirements of SB 25 mandate inaccurate warning language, create legal risks for brands and drive consumer confusion and higher costs.' Consumer Brands Association did not respond to Fortune's inquiry about what component of the warning language was inaccurate. In the past following the enactment of food labeling legislation, food manufacturers have had to make sweeping changes to packaging to abide by the laws, according to Jura Liaukonyte, professor of marketing and applied economics at Cornell University's SC Johnson College of Business. Her research includes analyzing the ramifications of the passage of a Vermont law regarding labels for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Following the law's enactment, several large food companies changed their labeling at the national level, finding it inefficient to only update labels for products in one state. A national law around GMO labels passed about 30 days later, essentially rewarding the companies' strategy. Christina Roberto, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Food and Nutrition Policy, told Fortune that in other cases, food manufacturers resist the legislation by taking legal action. 'The industry tends to not want to do something different, not want to do something that's going to incur costs,' Roberto said. 'And certainly this kind of legislation—where it's trying to warn consumers about the harms of aspects of the product—it's very unlikely that any manufacturer would be on board.' Liaukonyte noted another potential layer of uncertainty for food manufacturers is the bill's invocation of foreign food standards on U.S. products. Liaukonyte said the labeling mandate would highlight the disparities between food safety standards in the U.S. versus other parts of the world. 'There is a very different principle of how food and cosmetics safety is regulated in [the European Union] and in the U.S.,' she said. The EU uses the precautionary principle for food and cosmetics safety that requires rigorous testing, essentially that products are automatically deemed risky until proven safe. Meanwhile, the U.S. generally has a looser framework around safety. Companies can include additives to a product without explicit approval from the Food and Drug Administration, for example, if those additives are 'generally recognized as safe' (GRAS), meaning qualified experts deem the product safe based on past research and use. Kennedy has advocated for greater scrutiny of the GRAS framework. New York is considering a law that would require the disclosure of evidence for products that are GRAS. Republican support for increased labeling of ingredients largely marks a departure of a decades-old trend of opposing food regulation. Liaukonyte speculated Kennedy's MAHA efforts have championed a naturalist movement that equates health decisions with individual rights. 'There is a little bit of reframing health as a conservative value,' she said. 'Reframing the labeling initiative: It's an issue of parental rights, personal responsibility, and it's sort of like making your own decisions conditional on being informed.' While Kennedy's claims around vaccines causing autism have been proven false and his recent 'MAHA report' misinterpreted and omitted citations, public health experts agree tighter regulation of labels, particularly to align with more stringent European standards, is good news for public health. For Roberto, her qualm with the legislation in question isn't that it isn't supported by scientific research or oversteps boundaries with food companies, but that it doesn't go far enough in setting standards to protect public health. She would like to see legislation advocating for warnings about salt, sugar, and saturated fats in certain foods, as well as taxing or banning them from schools. 'It actually is an exciting time,' Roberto said. 'But I think a lot of these policies could go further to support children's health by coupling it with other types of policies that we know work.' This story was originally featured on
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Queer proms offer ‘escape' from anti-LGBTQ politics targeting schools, students say
Advertisement Queer proms have for years offered students an alternative to traditional proms, which can be loaded with unspoken expectations about gender roles and attire. But now, as President Trump rails against DEI and targets transgender rights, queer proms have become spaces where young people can celebrate their LGBTQ identities and bolster their spirits against Nicole Amaturo, 19 (center) danced during the Queer Youth Boogie Night on May 23 in Pawtucket, R.I. Amaturo, a nonbinary high school senior, organized the prom as their internship capstone project with Youth Pride Inc., a social services nonprofit in Providence. Erin Clark/Globe Staff Amaturo posed for a photo with their partner, Erudite Raine (left), as teacher Kate Booth took a photo during the Queer Youth Boogie Night on May 23 at a trendy art gallery in Pawtucket, R.I. Erin Clark/Globe Staff Amaturo's Pawtucket dance on May 23 was one of about a dozen queer proms organized by high school students across New England this spring. At Hingham High School, a dance Saturday night was dubbed a 'Kick-off to Pride,' and balloons bounced between students on a dark dance floor. Katy Perry's 'I Kissed A Girl' rang through speakers as attendees ate pizza and Jersey Mike's sandwiches. Parents and teachers chaperoning offered flyers connecting kids to local LGBTQ mental health services. Advertisement Hingham senior Hope Huffman, who has planned the school's queer prom for three years, said this year's dance was more than a celebration. It was a respite. 'Planning queer prom is an escape because it's a way to think about current queer culture in a positive light, it's a way to get away from the negativity,' said Huffman, 17. Hope Huffman, 17, hung LGBTQ flag bunting while decorating Hingham High School's gymnasium for the school's queer prom on May 31. Huffman, a senior who has planned the school's queer prom for three years, said this year's dance dubbed "Kick-off to Pride" was more than a celebration — it was a respite from negativity surrounding current LGBTQ issues. Erin Clark/Globe Staff 'Standing out' The weight of stereotypical norms at most proms can feel crushing to LGBTQ youth, Huffman said, causing some to try to blend in with straight peers or skip the events altogether. The rise in anti-LGBTQ rhetoric from some conservative lawmakers and media figures has made young people even more sensitive to scrutiny from peers, they said. 'It's more difficult for people to act and dress how they want, when they're unsure if people in that big space will be accepting,' Huffman said. Because formal attire comes with heavy expectations tied to gender, traditional high school proms place pressure on queer and transgender youth to conform to cis- and heteronormativity, said Robyn Freedner-Maguire with Hope Huffman and their mother, Lisa Huffman, before Hingham High School's queer prom on May 31. Erin Clark/Globe Staff 'There's this general sense of, ' Huffman, who had fun at her school's regular prom in a sparkly dress, said they wouldn't have felt comfortable wearing a suit there, because it would have made them stick out. 'That would be unexpected in a regular prom and make that person stand out, which can then draw negative attention,' Huffman said. Advertisement In Framingham, queer youth with the group OUT MetroWest said they've disliked prom traditions honoring one king and one queen. 'Gendered prom court is stupid — they could just be crowned as royalty,' said Lily Pearl, the OUT MetroWest's program and education manager. Prom season can be 'complicated' After Amaturo received the hateful Instagram message, they told their parents and teachers, blocked the account that sent the DM, and set their own account to private. Amaturo said the message didn't affect them much, since it was online. But at Amaturo's regular high school prom in Providence last year, some students gave them and their girlfriend 'dirty looks' on the dance floor. Other LGBTQ students wore extravagant dark lace gowns tied to the prom's Victorian-era theme, Amaturo said. The students were met with laughs, smirks, and 'judging,' Amaturo said. 'Every time of year, this is the issue. It's supposed to be this celebratory time and it's just complicated for queer and trans youth,' said Freedner-Maguire. Nicole Amaturo had their shoes put on by their partner, Erudite Raine, before the Queer Youth Boogie Night. Erin Clark/Globe Staff LGBTQ-themed bracelets and accessories sat in a heart-shaped bowl during the Queer Youth Boogie Night in Pawtucket, R.I. Erin Clark/Globe Staff The subtle bullying Amaturo observed last year was what inspired them to create a queer prom, which became their internship capstone project with Youth Pride Inc., a social services nonprofit in Providence. About 20 high school students attended the May 23 dance at a trendy art gallery in Pawtucket, where a DJ played '80s 'oldies,' new age, and rap, Amaturo said. 'Queer people deserve to be comfortable and not feel scared to dance with their partner just because people are really ignorant,' Amaturo said. Queer youth ask about Trump news Even in deep blue Massachusetts, queer high schoolers can feel overwhelmed by the nationwide push to restrict the rights of LGBTQ youth that began in 2021 with state bills targeting transgender athletes and gender-affirming health care for minors, said Zach Bagan, a Spanish teacher at Hingham High who sponsors its Gay Straight Alliance club and organizes the annual queer prom. Advertisement Over the years, students like Huffman have come to GSA meetings with questions about current events, like whether the Supreme Court could be open to revisiting its landmark 2015 ruling that gay Americans have a constitutional right to marriage, Bagan said. Across the US, LGBTQ young people experience higher rates of anxiety and depression than their straight and cisgender peers Huffman stood beneath an LGBTQ flag while their mother adjusted it before heading to Hingham High School's queer prom. Erin Clark/Globe Staff In Massachusetts last year, Bagan said he knows some students avoid reading the news because it can be 'incredibly depressing.' So at GSA meetings, Bagan gives members 'the rundown of what is objectively happening,' and lets students express their feelings and learn from each other. As seniors prepared for college or travel in other states and abroad, some navigated gut-wrenching choices about their gender marker on IDs, which became more fraught after the State Department in January began issuing passports with gender markers for people's sex assigned at birth, Bagan said. 'What it really boils down to for me is safety,' Bagan said. 'I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I didn't tell my kids that, at the end of the day, you have to do what you have to do to protect yourself.' Advertisement 'Finding joy' In Portsmouth, N.H., in April, queer youth traveled from hours away for a statewide Chappell Roan-themed prom hosted by NH Outright at a high school gym. Dozens of students twirled on the dance floor, holding hands and erupting in joyous laughter, said executive director Heidi Carrington Heath. The event was a contrast to what some of the young people likely experience at school, said Carrington Heath, who said some have mentioned an uptick in bullying. The negativity from some peers coincides with lawmakers in the state fighting to ban teaching about 'School environments in New Hampshire have been challenging for many years,' Carrington Heath said. Over 30 percent of those surveyed by the Trevor Project in New Hampshire said their families are considering leaving the state because of LGBTQ-related politics or laws. That number is similar to rates of families considering leaving states such as Alabama, Nevada, Pennsylvania, or Virginia, according to the Trevor Project. At the same time, attendance at NH Outright's queer prom has grown each year. Parents spend hours knitting and filling out crosswords in parked cars while their children dance the night away, Carrington Heath said. Inside the prom, first-time attendees often say things like, 'I thought this only happened in novels,' or 'This is better than any high school prom,' Carrington Heath said. Advertisement 'My heart grew three sizes this year seeing them finding that joy with each other,' she said. A rainbow-colored light display decorated a doorway during Hingham High School's queer prom dubbed "Kick-off to Pride." Erin Clark/Globe Staff Claire Thornton can be reached at
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Day: Branches aligned on reproductive rights stance
BOSTON (SHNS) – The House and Senate are 'aligned' on the need to resist attempts by Republicans in Washington, D.C. and other states to restrict reproductive and transgender care here despite any legislative process hiccups along the way, a top House Democrat said Tuesday. Representatives got a chance to weigh in publicly on legislation that Senate Democrats deemed a top priority weeks ago when a measure (S 2522) updating the 2022 shield law emerged at a Judiciary Committee hearing. Rep. Michael Day, the panel's co-chair, used the opportunity both to point out the less typical path the bill is taking as well as to insist there's agreement between House and Senate Democrats on the substance at play. 'While others and we may have some concern about the process by which this bill got here, that, to me, is really more about internal relationships between the chambers and not about the big picture this bill is,' Day replied to testimony by bill author Sen. Cindy Friedman. 'I think you did a good job of touching upon what the big picture is on this bill: women, women's health and gender-affirming care are under attack from other states and certainly being threatened by the current administration in Washington, D.C.' 'We in Massachusetts, certainly, I think, are aligned between the chambers here to push back on the idea that women shouldn't be able to make decisions about their own bodies,' he added. The House and Senate initially disagreed on whether the Judiciary Committee or the Health Care Financing Committee, co-chaired by Friedman, should review the measure first. On Thursday, the Senate acquiesced and allowed the proposal to go to the Judiciary Committee. Day said the arrival of the bill 'caught us on short notice' and that senators on the panel added it to the Tuesday hearing agenda 'within an hour.' 'I say that because I don't know that the committee members, on the House side at least, had an adequate chance to really get into this bill as we did with the other bills that had been noticed,' he said of the 16-page proposal. Much of the substance of the bill already got aired last week — albeit with no representatives directly involved — at a hearing held by the Senate Committee on Steering and Policy. Senate President Karen Spilka tasked that Friedman-chaired panel, which had not held a public hearing in years, with leading her chamber's response to the Trump administration. At both hearings, officials in Attorney General Andrea Campbell's office as well as reproductive and transgender health care advocates called on lawmakers to expand on a 2022 law designed to shield those services from out-of-state legal action. Top Senate Democrats including Spilka announced their support for the bill in mid-April when it was first filed. The proposal would restrict Massachusetts agencies from cooperating with or providing information for federal or out-of-state investigations, require acute care hospitals to provide abortion services when necessary to address a patient's emergency medical condition, and prohibit insurance companies from discriminating against nonprofits that offer reproductive health and transgender care. One section would require prescription drug labels for reproductive and transgender care to omit the name of the individual prescribing physician and instead list only the broader health care practice. Supporters pointed to the case of Dr. Maggie Carpenter, a New York doctor facing a felony charge in Louisiana and a penalty in Texas for prescribing medication abortion, as a reason for the proposed change. Allyson Slater, director of the reproductive justice unit in Attorney General Andrea Campbell's office, said the language was 'designed to protect the provider who may be mailing medication out of state.' 'We know that these providers are providing care across state lines, sometimes into hostile states, and certainly that puts them at great risk if their personal information is easily available and being sent across those state lines,' Slater said. Day rattled off other reforms Beacon Hill has embraced, including a 2017 law increasing access to birth control, the 2020 ROE Act and the 2022 shield law, the latter of which he called a 'national standard for other states.' He also noted that the House-approved fiscal year 2026 state budget included $2 million for the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. 'I know the Senate did not include that proposal. I'm very hopeful that they will agree to do so in the conference committee and in the final budget that we send to Governor Healey,' Day said. 'The essence, I think, is that we don't want to make women's health a bargaining chip in budget discussions. The challenges we're facing from the federal government, I think, are too important for that, and certainly too important for inter-chamber squabbles.' Friedman told the Judiciary Committee 'there's simply no time to wait based on the swift and unpredictable actions of the Trump administration.' 'I've always felt like both houses have been in sync with this issue,' she said. 'There was nothing in this that putting this forward this quickly was anything except about an incredible sense of urgency and getting it in front of you all so that we could move this along.' WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
