Suspected drunk driver flipped truck with four children inside
Andrew James Meyers faces felony counts of criminal child endangerment and driving under the influence, fourth or subsequent offense, in Flathead County District Court following the May 16 wreck. Meyers, who remains in the county jail with bail set at $300,000, is expected to appear before Judge Danni Coffman for his arraignment on June 5.
Meyers allegedly repeatedly admitted to drinking before getting behind the wheel after Kalispell Police officers arrived to the site of the wreck, near the intersection of Basecamp Drive and the bypass, about 9 p.m. Officers found Meyers' Ford F-150 upside down on the highway's northbound lane, according to court documents.
First responders took his passengers, including a woman and children — aged 12, 10, 8 and 3 — to Logan Health Medical Center for potential treatment. Three of the children suffered minor injuries and medical professionals treated the woman for possible shoulder and neck injuries, court documents said.
Meyers allegedly showed signs of intoxication during the course of three field sobriety tests. A preliminary breath sample returned with a breath alcohol content of 0.272, court documents said.
Meyers allegedly admitted he was drunk to officers, telling them he was "guilty," according to court documents. He allegedly said he should never have driven a vehicle with the children in it.
Meyers' criminal history includes three prior driving under the influence convictions: a 2018 conviction in Flathead County and 2019 convictions in Oregon and Utah.
He also earned a felony assault with a weapon conviction in Flathead County in 2024. In that case, Meyers allegedly pulled a gun during a parking dispute at a Hutton Ranch Road parking lot. He received a deferred sentence on May 30, 2024.
News Editor Derrick Perkins can be reached at 758-4430 or dperkins@dailyinterlake.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
The U.S. won't enforce car fuel efficiency rules. That could cost you money.
Last month, President Donald Trump's signature bill eliminated the penalties car makers would have had to pay for not meeting fuel economy requirements. The car industry applauded the move, which, federal data shows, has cost manufacturers over a billion dollars in fines in the last decade. While the fuel efficiency rules are still in the books, for now, taking away the fines, some experts say, can remove incentives to make cars use fewer gallons for more miles. 'If there's no penalty, the auto companies can cheat at will,' said Dan Becker, the director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at The Center for Biological Diversity. 'It's a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card.' But what does that mean for you? To illustrate the impact fuel economy rules could have on how much you pay at the gas station, USA TODAY compiled data for nearly 100 of the most popular cars by sales in the country. For example, driving the most efficient 2025 Ford F-150 for 15,000 miles costs about $2,000 today. That cost would be cut nearly in half if Ford retrofitted the truck to meet federal efficiency standards it was required to follow by 2031. That conclusion is based on the miles-per-gallon rating of this car now, compared with what it's required to have in a few years. Using the same method across all the popular car models, potential saving estimated by USA TODAY ranged from $53 up to $1,432, with most cars saving between $900 and $1,200, if the requirements are met. The analysis included passenger cars, SUVs, minivans and pickup trucks. Although car manufacturers plan their models years ahead, the rollback could mean that eventually they won't feel pressure to innovate or make their cars more fuel-efficient, Becker said. K. Venkatesh Prasad, senior vice president of research and chief innovation officer at the Center for Automotive Research, said there could be a slowdown in mileage improvements without regulatory demand, but the industry thinks on a global scale. 'Avoiding local (say, U.S.) cost given relaxed local regulations would hurt global sales or add new cost to sales of the US-designed products in other markets (China and Europe) so car makers and equally importantly the major suppliers would all invest to be ready for all major markets,' Prasad said in an emailed statement. Last year, the Biden administration said its fuel efficiency standards for 2027 through 2031 would save Americans over $23 billion. While it's an imperfect system, experts say the fuel efficiency requirements work, not only for drivers but for the environment too. David Greene, a research professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, co-authored a study that estimated the almost-doubling of fuel economy between 1975 and 2018 saved 2 trillion gallons of gasoline and 17 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide. Beyond the removal of fines, the broader fuel economy requirements set by the previous administration are also being reviewed, a National Highway Transportation Safety Administration agency spokesperson told USA TODAY, in a statement. Asked whether it still projects that drivers will save $23 billion in fuel costs in the coming years, the agency said: 'We look forward to sharing the updated assessment of costs and benefits as part of the rulemaking process. Once the updated standards are completed, the agency will continue to track and notify companies when they are out of compliance.' The agency pointed to the projected increase in costs for new cars from the standards in place. Its analysis last year showed that, while regulatory costs would add a few hundred dollars to car prices, that increase would eventually be offset by fuel savings. The removal of penalties is part of a larger trend to undo regulations around the fossil fuel industry. Recently, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed to rollback greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars. These two standards work together: the less fuel a car needs to use, the lower its emissions. Greene, who previously served as an advisor for the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, acknowledges that the emissions standards were ambitious, but said removing these could hamper efforts to curb climate change. 'That's a huge blow to the U.S. efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to mitigate the damaging effects of climate change, which we see just about every day now,' Greene said. Transportation, which also includes ships, trains and planes, is the largest sector emitting climate-warming gases, according to the EPA. When EPA administrator Lee Zeldin announced the car greenhouse gas emissions repeal, he touted the more affordable prices and regulatory relief. However, the agency's own draft assessment showed that the move could cost the economy hundreds of billions of dollars, USA TODAY previously reported. The Biden EPA rule would have increased costs of new cars: between $900 for a sedan to $2,600 for an SUV, according to the projections announced at the time. But in the long run, cheaper maintenance and fuel savings would have offset those initial costs, estimating sedan and SUV drivers saving $4,400 over the lifetime of the car. Incentives to switch to electric cars, which would have added to the savings, are also vanishing. For example, people who buy new electric cars no longer get $7,500 in federal tax credits. Trump administration also pulled the plug on a Biden initiative to grow the network of electric vehicle chargers. Whether car makers will continue to comply with the future fuel economy standards is yet to be determined, but Becker points towards the past. After the fuel standards were initially set, they stayed about the same for about two decades and emissions didn't improve further until they were upped again during Obama's administration. 'The auto companies, without the rules, failed to improve the efficiency of their vehicles,' Becker said. Our methodology USA TODAY based its analysis on the 100 most popular cars in the country. We looked up each model on a federal database to find its miles-per-gallon rating for 2025 models, or the latest available for some recently discontinued models. Each model has various trims (like 2WD or 4WD) with different fuel economy. We used the most efficient trim, excluding EVs and plug-in electric hybrids, to lean on a conservative estimate. We compared costs under that current fuel economy against the required economy for 2031, using the current fuel prices from the Energy and Information Administration. Some caveats: The fuel economy ratings for current cars are taken under ideal lab conditions. Real world fuel efficiency tends to be lower than lab ratings. The government-required levels also don't mean that every car meets or will meet them. These apply as a fleet average, weighted by sales, to car manufacturers. Potential fuel savings from an alternative method that David Greene showed USA TODAY projected smaller savings but still in the hundreds of dollars. This method calculated a fractional reduction in fuel consumption based on current and future fuel economy requirements.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
'If I die, it was Greg': Rehoboth man confesses to stabbing pregnant girlfriend, DA says
TAUNTON — A 22-year-old Rehoboth man charged with fatally stabbing his 18-year-old pregnant girlfriend was ordered held without bail in Taunton District Court Wednesday — as the prosecution shared harrowing new details of the victim's final moments. Gregory Groom, 22, of Rehoboth, confessed to police that he stabbed Kylee Monteiro multiple times in the neck and chest with a kitchen knife before burying her body in a hole on his property, Assistant District Attorney Jason Mohan said in court on Wednesday, Aug. 20. "The stab wound to her chest actually broke the blade off," Mohan said. Groom pleaded not guilty Wednesday to murder, assault and battery on a pregnant victim, assault and battery on a family or household member and aggravated witness intimidation in connection to the alleged altercation with Monteiro on Wednesday, Aug. 6. Groom is scheduled for a probable cause hearing on Sept. 10. 'My phone is at 4% and if I die, it was Greg': What investigation revealed Groom contacted the Rehoboth Police Department on Aug. 8 to report his ex-girlfriend, identified as Monteiro, missing, Mohan said in court. Groom initially told police he last saw Monteiro walking down the driveway of his property, located at 107 County St. in Rehoboth, after the two got into an argument over whether he would allow her to stay on the property. When Monteiro failed to contact family and friends and update social media in the days following her disappearance, police interviewed Groom again, where he reported Monteiro was approximately 11 weeks pregnant and that he was the father of the baby, according to Mohan. When police questioned Monteiro's family members, they learned she had texted her sister about the Aug. 6 altercation that, 'he threw me on the ground, pulled my hair, strangled me. My phone is at 4% and if I die, it was Greg',' Mohan said. On Aug. 14, Massachusetts State Police, including their Underwater Recovery, Air Wing and K-9 units, searched Groom's 25-acre County Street property. Nothing of significance was found during that search, Mohan said. During a third interview with police, Groom admitted he pushed Monteiro and that she fell back and hit her head during the reported altercation on Aug. 6. At that time, he was going to be charged with the two assault and battery and witness intimidation charges, according to Mohan. Defendant drew map for police, confessed to stabbing and burying body: Prosecution When investigators pressed Groom on Monteiro's whereabouts, they informed him they had a search warrant for his property, including cadaver dogs, excavators and chemists from the state's crime lab. When given an opportunity to confess, Groom drew a rudimentary map with the approximate location of where he'd buried Monteiro's body, Mohan said. He admitted the two got into an argument behind a shed on the property, where he stabbed her twice in the neck and once in the chest. Groom told police he spent several hours digging a hole approximately 20 yards away from where he killed her. As the sun came up, he pushed her body into the hole and covered it up with dirt and brush, Mohan said. According to Mohan, police discovered a body consistent with Monteiro's in a hole near the shed approximately five feet underground. The prosecution asked the judge to hold Groom without bail. Defendant held without bail Groom's defense attorney Elliot Levine did not argue with the prosecution's request for his client to be held without bail. Judge Michael Brennan ordered Groom held without bail pending a probable cause hearing scheduled for Wednesday, Sept. 10. Levine declined a request for comment from The Enterpise as he was leaving the courtroom. 'All of the evidence points to the defendant', Bristol DA In a press conference outside the courtroom, Bristol County District Attorney Thomas Quinn said Monteiro's body is undergoing official identification by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. Quinn said it's too early to determine motive and that the investigation is ongoing. "But all of the evidence points to the defendant at this point," Quinn said. This article originally appeared on The Taunton Daily Gazette: Kylee Monteiro's boyfriend arraigned for murder: What prosecutors said
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Authorities ID 2 El Paso man killed in Gaines County rollover crash
Authorities have identified two El Paso men who died in a single-vehicle crash Sunday evening in Gaines County. Jacinto Joel Ontiveros, 24, and Alejandro Ontiveros, 19, were pronounced dead at the scene of the crash that was reported about 7:30 p.m. Sunday on U.S. Highway 62 near County Road 316, according to a statement from the Texas Department of Public Safety. Investigators believe Jacinto Ontiveros was driving a 2008 Ford F-350 with a trailer east on U.S. 62 when, for unknown reasons, the vehicle failed to drive in a single lane and veered into a barrow ditch, where the pickup rolled. Both men were ejected from the vehicle. Neither was wearing a seatbelt. Other factors contributing to the crash were not immediately clear as the investigation is ongoing. This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Authorities ID 2 El Paso man killed in Gaines County rollover crash Solve the daily Crossword
