'We are the leaders of today': two young men, one shared vision for Blak futures
Both young leaders had travelled from the Central Coast to participate in the Young Aboriginal Leaders Program, a gathering of 19 emerging voices from across NSW.
They were there to speak truth – and to call for real change. 'Our Elders have fought the fight – but they can't do it forever,' Jai said. 'It's our responsibility to take the torch and let them rest. "We are not the leaders of tomorrow. We are the leaders of today.' Their words struck a chord, not only with those in the chamber, but with mob watching across the state.
In a building that has long excluded Aboriginal voices, two young Blak leaders reclaimed space and demanded better.
Grandmothers, guidance and grit For both Jai and Jacob, legacy begins at home. When asked what shaped their sense of strength and responsibility, they each pointed to the same source: their grandmothers. 'She sacrificed so much, leaving her Country in Gulargambone and moving to Willmot for a better life,' Jai said. 'That house she built became a hub for our family. "Fires going, music playing, a bed for everyone. I wear her name with pride.' Jacob echoed that sense of grounding.
'I found safety in my nan and pop,' he said.
'Every opportunity I have, I think about them because our old people weren't given the chances we have now.
"That's why I don't take anything for granted.'
Leading from lived experience While both leaders have different styles, they share a common belief: that real leadership comes from lived experience, community connection and culture. 'Young mob bring diversity, resilience and strength,' Jai said. 'We came together from all different places, regional, metro, rural. "When one of us didn't have the experience, someone else stepped up – that's what leadership looks like.' Jacob agreed – and took it one step further. 'We've lived the good and the bad in our communities,' he said.
'When we lead, we lead with that full experience, that's our biggest strength.'
Speaking back to power Their Parliament speeches were staunch and deeply grounded.
Jai used his time at the microphone to speak directly to young people.
'We're tired of being told we're too young to lead," he said. "We have every right to be at the table, to be part of the decisions being made about us.' Jacob used his speech to challenge how governments view Aboriginal youth. 'What government currently invests in is youth detention, mental health crisis, out-of-home care,' he said. 'If all we invest in are issues, that's all we're seen as.' Instead, he called for sustained investment in community-led youth programs, like the Empowered Youth Summit, which he helps run through his work at Barang Regional Alliance.
'Don't take us from community to teach us leadership. Let us show you what it looks like on our terms,' Jacob said.
Legacy rooted in community Both men have a strong sense of the legacy they want to leave behind. 'I want my legacy to be someone you walk with, not someone who leads from the front,' Jai said.
'Leadership, to me, is about care, nurture, making people feel included.'
Jacob said he measures success by how many others get the same chance he's had. 'If we do our job right, in a few years it won't be me in these programs, it'll be someone else from our community, that's the point," he said. His speech closed with a quote he holds close:
'A good society is one where we plant trees whose shade we may never sit under.'
Not waiting, leading now In a year where NAIDOC Week celebrates 'The Next Generation: Strength, Vision and Legacy', Jai and Jacob are living proof that the next generation isn't coming, it's already here. They're not waiting for permission. They're not waiting for inclusion.
They're leading now – with courage, culture, and community behind them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable builds consensus on road user charge, clearing housing approvals backlog
Progressing road user charging and clearing a backlog on homes awaiting environmental approvals are among the 10 immediate reform directions to result from a three-day roundtable aimed to boost Australia's ailing productivity levels. Speaking after talks ended on Thursday, Jim Chalmers said there was 'a lot of conceptual support for road user charging', however no final model had been settled. The next steps will involve presenting an options paper to state treasurers at a meeting in two weeks on September 5, which would be drafted by NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, Infrastructure Minister Catherine King and other relevant ministers. 'The model is not determined, but the key considerations are what's in and out and whether that's sequenced or not and over how long a time period,' he said. 'Treasurer Mookhey was very informed and very constructive on this question and really right around the table people had a view that this is an idea whose time has come and so we will do that work.' The charge, which would likely capture EV drivers currently exempt from the fuel excise, would reform how the government collects revenue to fund road maintenance and infrastructure upgrades. Other short-term reform initiatives involve fast-tracking deadlocked reforms on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act to speed up approvals for projects while protecting the environment, and further work to remove nuisance tariffs and regulation reductions. Speeding up housing approvals was another 'quick win' which achieved consensus following 29 hours of discussions, with Environmental Minister Murray Watt set to work with Housing Minister Clare O'Neil to speed through the 'backlog of environmental approvals for new homes, most likely in the tens of thousands'. Longer-term reform areas included investigating prefabricated and modular housing, plus more modern methods of construction to increasing housing supply. Mr Chalmers also highlighted three priority areas of tax reform, which dominated the last day of talks, and appeared to achieve little consensus beyond agreement on the need for reform. This included improving intergenerational equality, 'affordable, responsible' offsets to 'incentivise business investment', and a simpler and more sustainable system to fund services such as aged care and the NDIS. 'There are hundreds of different changes you can make to the tax system. Some of them obviously unpalatable to our government or to governments broadly,' he said. 'But what they wanted to do was to give us the guidance that they will help us in those three areas to do the work that we need to do to inform future budgets.' Speaking more broadly about the roundtable, which had been criticised as a 'talkfest' and a 'stitch up' by the opposition, Mr Chalmers said he 'finished the three days more optimistic than I was at the start'. He also praised participants for working through the issues in a 'methodical, considered, consultative way'. 'I'm genuine when I say at the end of that three days I looked around the table and I saw people of, you know, big achievers in their own areas representing workers, business CEOs, academics, economists, public servants and others,' he said. 'I drew great strength and confidence from their contributions because not because they had some kind of faux camaraderie, but because they take the challenge so seriously.'
News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Treasurer Jim Chalmers hails ‘consensus' on new tax that will be phased in starting with EV vehicles
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has emerged from his three-day economic roundtable with '10 clear areas' for reform and consensus on a new regime of road user charges to replace petrol excise. Wrapping up the talks in Canberra on Thursday night, the Treasurer confirmed that he will hold further talks with the states on September 5. Based on a planned NSW road user scheme, a national rollout will depend on your mileage but might cost between $300 and $400 a year. But there's no clear guidance yet on how much the new tax will cost, whether it will entirely replace petrol excise over time or when it will apply to EV cars and hybrids. The Treasurer also talked up reforms to harness the power of artificial intelligence, slashing red tape to build more new houses, abolishing nuisance tariffs, establishing a single national market and tax reform. 'There was a lot of support in the room for road user charging,'' the Treasurer said on Thursday night. 'There wasn't a final model settled, but there was a lot of conceptual support for road user charging.' 'There was more than the usual amount of consensus in a conceptual way around road user charging. A lot of reform appetite in that area, which is welcome. 'The states are putting together an options paper and to give you a sense of the considerations that people in the room were grappling with.' Tax reform On tax, the Treasurer said that participants had 'a few hours of very welcome conversation and debate about the future of the tax system' He said that there was support to address three objectives in the tax system. 'The first one is about a fair go for working people and including in intergenerational equity terms,'' he said. 'That's the first category. The second one was about an affordable, responsible way to incentivise business investment, recognising the capital deepening challenge that we have in the economy and what that means for productivity and for growth. 'And then thirdly, how we make the system simpler, more sustainable so that we can fund the services that people need, particularly in the context of the big shifts in our community, including ageing and other pressures as well. How EV tax could be rolled out Treasurer Chalmers said he would now hold further talks with state and territory treasurers on September 5. reported earlier this month that Australia's new tax on electric vehicle drivers is set to kick off with a trial period for trucks before it stings cars. The Albanese Government is looking at a staged rollout to test the proposed new EV tax and trucks will be the first cab off the rank. It is also interested in a new road user charge that sends price signals on the best time to be on the road, or the freeway. Over time, it could replace petrol taxes and apply to all cars based on distance travelled and when cars and trucks are on the road to tackle congestion. Free ride for EVs nearly over The free ride enjoyed by drivers of electric vehicles is coming to a close with Treasurer Chalmers and state governments finalising plans for a new road-user charge. All Australian motorists who buy petrol and diesel at the bowser pay 51.6 cents a litre in fuel excise. But drivers of EV vehicles pay nothing. 'The status quo won't be sustainable over the next decade or two,'' Treasurer Jim Chalmers told 'As more and more people get off petrol cars and into EVs we've got to make sure that the tax arrangements support investment in roads. 'But we're in no rush, changes of this nature will be made, because the status quo won't work in 10 or 20 years.' The Treasurer made no secret of his support for a road user charge before the election, but favours a staged rollout of the changes. Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas said that electric vehicles are 'heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles'. 'By giving drivers a clear signal about the cost of infrastructure, they would have an incentive to use it more efficiently,' the Productivity Commission report said. How does fuel excise work? The current rate of fuel excise is 51.6 cents in excise for every litre of fuel purchased. For a typical household with a car running on petrol, the tax costs more than $1200 a year. But the flat sales tax isn't paid by drivers of pure electric vehicles, who simply need to plug in their cars to recharge. While registration and driver's licence fees go to state and territory governments, fuel excise is collected by the federal government. Australian motorists paid an estimated $15.71 billion in net fuel excise in 2023-24, and are expected to pay $67.6 billion over the four years to 2026-27. However, governments have long-warned that a road-user charge will be required to fill the gap in the budget left by declining revenue from the fuel excise, as the petrol and diesel engines in new cars consume less fuel and Australians adopt hybrid and electric cars. What does the AAA say? The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) is calling for a national approach to road-user charging but wants a guarantee the revenue will be earmarked for road upgrades. The AAA backs a distance-based road-user charging as a fairer and more equitable way to fund land transport infrastructure. The 2024 federal budget forecasted a reduction in fuel excise receipts by $470 million over four years from 2024-25. Roadblocks to reform Currently, New South Wales is the only state with firm plans to introduce a road-user charge from 2027 or when EVs reach 30 per cent of new car sales. Plug-in hybrid EVs will be charged a fixed 80 per cent proportion of the full road-user charge to reflect their vehicle type. Western Australia has also stated an intention to implement a road-user charge. Meanwhile, Victoria's electric vehicle levy had to be scrapped following a ruling from the High Court. Two Victorian electric car owners launched a legal challenge on the basis the tax was not legal as it was an excise that only a federal government could impose. They won, with the High Court upholding the legal challenge. There have been several false starts to enshrine a road-user charge including in South Australia, where the former Liberal Government planned to introduce a charge for plug-in electric and other zero emission vehicles, which included a fixed component and a variable charge based on distance travelled. It was later pushed back to 2027 due to a backlash before the legislation was ultimately repealed.
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Halt on all environmental water flows in NSW angers land managers
A former director at the Murray-Darling Basin Authority says Australia is failing its international obligations after the federal government halted environmental water flows in New South Wales. On Monday, the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder, Simon Banks, announced a pause on all environmental water flows in the state, citing uncertainty about a recent shift in how various NSW water-sharing and policy frameworks interpreted held environmental water. In a statement, Mr Banks said the decision was separate to one made earlier this month by the NSW Natural Resources Access Regulator to order work to stop at Toorale National Park for not recording environmental water releases. Owen Whyman, a Barkindji community leader in Wilcannia, said he attended a meeting in Orange last week with the Murray-Darling Basin Authority. He said it brought together about 62 nations over a three-day event and there was no indication that this announcement was about to be made. "We would have thought the government would have advised them about what's going on. Surely we would expect to get that notice at the meeting," he said. "I'm pissed off. It's unacceptable. "They bring us altogether — all the different nations to try and better manage water — and that's vital information that they failed to give us." Rick Townsend, the treasurer of the Walgett-based Aboriginal group Dharriwaa Elders, said he was absolutely shocked by the news. "Water's life, you know? To have a healthy river, the river has to flow all the time," he said. "Once the rivers empty, that kills everything in that river, everything." Bill Johnson, a member of the Macquarie Environmental Water Advisory Group, said Australia had international obligations to follow through on planned water releases at the Ramsar-listed Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve. In 2007, the Australian government notified Ramsar about adverse changes at the site because of years of over-extraction of water. Mr Johnson said an upcoming environmental water release on September 1 was part of a long-term plan. Cattle grazier and irrigator Garry Hall echoed Mr Johnson's concerns, saying the situation for the Macquarie Marshes was "dire". "The Macquarie Marsh is in absolute free fall trying to recover from years and years of relocation in the Macquarie," he said. Mr Hall and his wife Leanne are also private Ramsar wetland managers, and are obliged to report any changes to the wetland's natural environment. "We take that responsibility very seriously. We graze on the site under the wise use principle," he said. "I've written to Simon Banks … expressing my concerns about the position we'll be put in as private Ramsar managers if this release doesn't go ahead." Mr Johnson alleges a long-running campaign by the irrigation industry to limit environmental water use may have contributed to Dr Banks's decision to stop environmental watering. Dr Banks previously made a submission to a 2023 review of the NSW non-urban metering framework issues and options papers, highlighting the emphasis on irrigation water delivery over environmental outcomes. "It is critical that these issues are carefully considered and resolved," he wrote at the time. Dr Banks pointed out that existing environmental metering practices were unclear under a new metering framework. Mr Johnson says Dr Banks's comments were never addressed, and then the framework was given effect with the passing of the Water Management (General) Amendment (Metering) Regulation 2018 bill, which came into effect on March 7 this year. He believes Dr Banks has ordered environmental flows to stop because it cannot use those methods. "The laws that were initially designed to protect the environment have been weaponised against the environment," he said. A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water said it had discovered a technical issue in the way the NSW Water Management Act was drafted, which it is working to resolve.
