Trump contradicts his spy chief on Iran's nuclear program
U.S. President Donald Trump signs a document as Tulsi Gabbard stands by, on the day of her swearing in ceremony as Director of National Intelligence, in the Oval Office at the White House on Feb 12.
By Jonathan Landay
U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday repudiated Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran has not been building a nuclear weapon, publicly contradicting his spy chief for the first time during his second term.
In rejecting his top spy's judgment, Trump appeared to embrace Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's justification for launching airstrikes last week on Iranian nuclear and military targets, saying he believed Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned early to Washington from the G7 summit in Canada, Trump was asked how close he believed Iran was to having a nuclear weapon.
"Very close," he responded.
When told that Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the U.S. intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead, Trump replied, "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one."
Trump's comments recalled his clashes with U.S. spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favor and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials.
Asked for comment, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence pointed to a CNN reporter's post on X quoting Gabbard as saying on Capitol Hill that she and Trump were "on the same page" regarding the status of Iran's nuclear program.
Gabbard also told Congress that U.S. spy agencies did not believe that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had ordered the restarting of a nuclear weapons program that the U.S. and the International Atomic Energy Agency assessed ended in 2003.
Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment program was only for peaceful purposes.
A source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard had not changed.
They said that U.S. spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice, a finding first reported by CNN.
Some experts, however, believe that it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee that it would work.
Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of U.S. officials opposed to his presidency.
Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
38 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Ukraine Allows Multiple Citizenship as War Drags on
Reuters Ukrainian national flag flies at half-mast near the Ukrainian Motherland Monument after Tuesday's deadly Russian missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine June 18, 2025. KYIV, June 18 (Reuters) – Ukrainians will be able to hold dual or multiple citzenship under a law approved by the parliament on Wednesday that aims to ease a demographic crisis exacerbated by the four-year war with Russia and to improve ties with the country's large diaspora. Previously, Ukrainian law did not recognise dual or multiple citizenship, meaning that ethnic Ukrainians living outside the country and holding other passports had to renounce their other citizenship if they wanted a Ukrainian passport. Government officials estimate Ukraine's diaspora at some 25 million people. They put the current population in Ukraine at 32 million, down sharply from 52 million in 1991 when Ukraine became independent after the collapse of the Soviet Union. 'This decision is an important step to maintain and restore ties with millions of Ukrainians around the world,' Oleksiy Chernyshov, minister for unity, said in a social media post on Facebook after Wednesday's vote. The issue of multiple citizenship has become even more pressing since Russia's invasion in February 2022, exacerbating a demographic decline that had started years before. Ukraine saw several large labour migrations in the early 1990s. With the start of the invasion, millions of Ukrainians fled the fighting. With the war now in its fourth year, data shows that more than 5 million Ukrainians live in Europe, while tens of thousands of people have been killed in the conflict. 'Since the situation in Ukraine is unstable, people… do not know whether to return or not…,' said Natalya Kostyk-Ustenko, who fled Kherson in southern Ukraine in June 2022 and lives in Lithuania with her two children. 'Our roots are Ukrainian, we love our country, we support it as best we can. This (move on citizenship) is significant support for us as refugees, we are all scattered around the world,' she told Reuters. Lawmakers said the new law would simplify procedures for children born to Ukrainian parents abroad and also for Ukrainians who obtain other citizenship by marriage. It will also make it easier to obtain Ukrainian citizenship for foreigners fighting for Ukraine on the frontlines. The law does not directly ban Russian citizens from obtaining Ukrainian passports but says the government will be able to implement restrictions related to the armed aggression against Ukraine. Foreigners would have to pass a test to prove their knowledge of the Ukrainian language, history and constitution.
Yomiuri Shimbun
38 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Nippon Steel's Purchase of U.S. Steel Closes, with Big Role for Trump
Reuters file photo The Nippon Steel logo is displayed at the company's East Nippon Works Kimitsu Area plant in Kimitsu, east of Tokyo, Japan May 26, 2025. June 18 (Reuters) – Nippon Steel's 5401.T $14.9-billion acquisition of U.S. Steel X.N closed on Wednesday, the companies said, confirming an unusual degree of power for President Donald Trump after the Japanese company's 18-month struggle to close the purchase. Under the deal terms, Nippon bought 100% of U.S. Steel shares at $55 per share, as it first laid out in its December 2023 offer for the well-known but struggling steelmaker. The companies also disclosed details of a national security agreement inked with the administration, which gives Trump the authority to name a board member as well as a non-economic golden share. White House spokesman Kush Desai called the deal historic and said the golden share would 'safeguard America's national and economic security.' Eiji Hashimoto, Nippon Steel's chairman and CEO, thanked Trump for his role, adding that 'Nippon Steel is excited about opening a new chapter of U.S. Steel's storied history.' The agreement contains an unusual level of control conceded by the companies to the government to save the deal, after a rocky path to approval spurred by high-level political opposition. The inclusion of the golden share in particular to win approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., which scrutinizes foreign investment for national security risks, could drive overseas investors away from U.S. companies, national security lawyers have said. 'The optics of a golden share – they suggest that it's a little bit harder to divorce pure national security analysis from political decision-making,' said Josh Gruenspecht, a national security lawyer at Wilson Sonsini. The press release announcing the deal notes the golden share gives the U.S. government rights, including, 'The right to appoint one independent director; and Consent rights of the President of the United States, or his designee, on specific matters.' The U.S. government will have veto authority over a raft of corporate decisions, from idling plants to cutting production capacity and moving jobs overseas, as previewed in a weekend social media post by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The share also gives the government a veto over a potential relocation of U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, a transfer of jobs overseas, name change, and any potential future acquisition of a rival business, the release shows. The United Steelworkers union, which has vehemently opposed the deal, said it would 'continue watching, holding Nippon to its commitments,' adding that the golden share gives Trump a 'startling degree of personal power over a corporation.' 86 MILLION TONS OF PRODUCTION CAPACITY For Nippon Steel, securing a foothold in the U.S. is key to its global growth strategy. The American steel market, including demand for high-grade steel, Nippon Steel's specialty, is growing amid rising global trade tensions. The acquisition will involve $11 billion in investment in U.S. Steel through 2028, including $1 billion for a new U.S. mill that will increase by $3 billion in later years as first reported by Reuters. It will also allow Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-largest steel company, to capitalize on a host of American infrastructure projects while its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50%. The Japanese firm also avoids $565 million in breakup fees it would have had to pay if the companies had failed to secure approvals. Nippon Steel said on Wednesday its annual crude steel production capacity is expected to reach 86 million tons, bringing it closer to the company's goal of 100 million tons of global crude steel production capacity. Kim Ward, a Republican state senator in Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered, said the deal 'marks a new era for domestic steel and reaffirms our position as a global leader in the industry.' A ROCKY PATH The deal's closing was hardly guaranteed, though many investors saw approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30, giving his vague blessing to an 'investment' by Nippon Steel, which he described as a 'great partner.' After the United Steelworkers union opposed the deal last year, both then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, expressed their opposition as they sought to woo voters in Pennsylvania, a key swing state, in the presidential election campaign. Shortly before leaving office in January, Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. Trump's May 30 rally spurred hopes for approval, and his sign-off finally came on Friday with an executive order giving the companies permission to combine if they signed an NSA giving the U.S. government a golden share, which they did.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Hegseth Says the Pentagon Has Given Trump Options for Israel-Iran Conflict
The Associated Press Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 18, 2025. WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing options to President Donald Trump as he decides next steps on Iran but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes, an action that could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East. Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of a series of combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year. In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth said 'maximum force protection' was being provided for U.S. troops in the Middle East and that it is Trump's decision whether to provide Israel a 'bunker buster' bomb to strike at the core of Iran's nuclear program, which would require U.S. pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the U.S. may do next. 'They should have made a deal. President Trump's word means something — the world understands that,' Hegseth said of Trump pressing Iran to agree to a deal during U.S. talks over Tehran's rapidly developing nuclear program. 'And at the Defense Department, our job is to stand ready and prepared with options. And that's precisely what we're doing,' Hegseth said. Options for Israel Hegseth said the U.S. military was readying options for Trump, noting that it's his job to provide the president with options and what the ramifications could be. Trump would not say Wednesday whether he has decided to order a U.S. strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation. Israel has struck multiple Iranian nuclear facilities in the past several days, but one of its key uranium production sites, Fordo, requires the deep penetrating munition from the U.S. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Democratic senators urged caution. Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the committee's ranking Democrat, warned that 'the Trump administration must take urgent steps to prevent a wider war.' He said Israel launching the attack on Iran against 'against the urging of the president threatens the stability of the entire region and the safety of American stationed there.' The U.S. has shifted significant numbers of refueling tanker and fighter aircraft to position them to be able to respond to the escalating conflict, such as by supporting possible evacuations or conducting airstrikes. Hegseth said this week that was done to protect U.S. personnel and airbases. Troops being sent to Los Angeles protests Hegseth's testimony last week in three congressional hearings also was taken over by events, with the Trump administration dispatching the National Guard and 700 active-duty Marines to the protests in Los Angeles against California Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes. Hegseth was repeatedly questioned on whether the California deployment was just the beginning of wider use of the military at home. Hegseth would not directly say whether he had authorized troops to conduct arrests of civilians or use lethal force against them, instead, as he has in past hearings, redirecting the issue to immigration agents facing violent protesters. He would also not answer questions on whether the Pentagon has the authority to expand the deployment of troops to other cities. 'I take it from your answer that you do have contingency plans for the use of military in other cities,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., pressed. 'We have never and will not illegally deploy troops,' Hegseth said. 'All have been under existing and well-established authorities.' Last week, a district court ordered Trump to return control of the guard to Newsom. But the administration quickly appealed, and a three-judge appellate panel temporarily paused that order and appeared inclined to return that power to the president. Questions on DEI, the renaming of bases Hegseth has dedicated much of the early part of his tenure to social issues, such as eradicating diversity and equity influence from the military — to the extent that he has pursued restoring base names back to their Confederate origins and renaming warships that were honoring civil rights icons. For example, Hegseth directed the renaming of a Navy ship that had honored Harvey Milk, a slain gay rights activist who served as a sailor during the Korean War. He also has touted other moves to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs and said a ban on transgender troops was a way to regain the 'warrior ethos.' Hegseth was challenged on why the Pentagon has worked to find names similar to those of the Confederate officers the bases originally honored. For example, Virginia's Fort Lee, named for Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, was renamed during the Biden administration to Fort Gregg-Adams, honoring two Black officers — Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg, the first African American to serve as a three-star, and Lt. Col. Charity Adams, the highest-ranking Black woman of World War II. The Pentagon announced Monday that the name Lee has been restored, now honoring Army Pvt. Fitz Lee, a Buffalo Soldier and Medal of Honor recipient. The Buffalo Soldiers were an all-Black Army unit. The surviving members of the Gregg and Adams families were not contacted by Hegseth's office prior to the announcement that their names would be removed, said Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat. 'This was never about the names of the bases they were renamed to,' Hegseth said. 'It was about restoring all bases to their original names.' In the previous hearings — where Hegseth appeared to discuss the Pentagon's spending plan — lawmakers made it clear they were unhappy that he has not provided full details on the administration's first proposed defense budget.
