logo
Hegseth Says the Pentagon Has Given Trump Options for Israel-Iran Conflict

Hegseth Says the Pentagon Has Given Trump Options for Israel-Iran Conflict

Yomiuri Shimbun5 hours ago

The Associated Press
Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 18, 2025.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing options to President Donald Trump as he decides next steps on Iran but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes, an action that could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East.
Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of a series of combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year.
In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth said 'maximum force protection' was being provided for U.S. troops in the Middle East and that it is Trump's decision whether to provide Israel a 'bunker buster' bomb to strike at the core of Iran's nuclear program, which would require U.S. pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the U.S. may do next.
'They should have made a deal. President Trump's word means something — the world understands that,' Hegseth said of Trump pressing Iran to agree to a deal during U.S. talks over Tehran's rapidly developing nuclear program.
'And at the Defense Department, our job is to stand ready and prepared with options. And that's precisely what we're doing,' Hegseth said.
Options for Israel
Hegseth said the U.S. military was readying options for Trump, noting that it's his job to provide the president with options and what the ramifications could be.
Trump would not say Wednesday whether he has decided to order a U.S. strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation.
Israel has struck multiple Iranian nuclear facilities in the past several days, but one of its key uranium production sites, Fordo, requires the deep penetrating munition from the U.S.
'I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.'
Democratic senators urged caution.
Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the committee's ranking Democrat, warned that 'the Trump administration must take urgent steps to prevent a wider war.' He said Israel launching the attack on Iran against 'against the urging of the president threatens the stability of the entire region and the safety of American stationed there.'
The U.S. has shifted significant numbers of refueling tanker and fighter aircraft to position them to be able to respond to the escalating conflict, such as by supporting possible evacuations or conducting airstrikes. Hegseth said this week that was done to protect U.S. personnel and airbases.
Troops being sent to Los Angeles protests
Hegseth's testimony last week in three congressional hearings also was taken over by events, with the Trump administration dispatching the National Guard and 700 active-duty Marines to the protests in Los Angeles against California Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes.
Hegseth was repeatedly questioned on whether the California deployment was just the beginning of wider use of the military at home.
Hegseth would not directly say whether he had authorized troops to conduct arrests of civilians or use lethal force against them, instead, as he has in past hearings, redirecting the issue to immigration agents facing violent protesters. He would also not answer questions on whether the Pentagon has the authority to expand the deployment of troops to other cities.
'I take it from your answer that you do have contingency plans for the use of military in other cities,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., pressed.
'We have never and will not illegally deploy troops,' Hegseth said. 'All have been under existing and well-established authorities.'
Last week, a district court ordered Trump to return control of the guard to Newsom. But the administration quickly appealed, and a three-judge appellate panel temporarily paused that order and appeared inclined to return that power to the president.
Questions on DEI, the renaming of bases
Hegseth has dedicated much of the early part of his tenure to social issues, such as eradicating diversity and equity influence from the military — to the extent that he has pursued restoring base names back to their Confederate origins and renaming warships that were honoring civil rights icons.
For example, Hegseth directed the renaming of a Navy ship that had honored Harvey Milk, a slain gay rights activist who served as a sailor during the Korean War. He also has touted other moves to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs and said a ban on transgender troops was a way to regain the 'warrior ethos.'
Hegseth was challenged on why the Pentagon has worked to find names similar to those of the Confederate officers the bases originally honored. For example, Virginia's Fort Lee, named for Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, was renamed during the Biden administration to Fort Gregg-Adams, honoring two Black officers — Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg, the first African American to serve as a three-star, and Lt. Col. Charity Adams, the highest-ranking Black woman of World War II.
The Pentagon announced Monday that the name Lee has been restored, now honoring Army Pvt. Fitz Lee, a Buffalo Soldier and Medal of Honor recipient. The Buffalo Soldiers were an all-Black Army unit.
The surviving members of the Gregg and Adams families were not contacted by Hegseth's office prior to the announcement that their names would be removed, said Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat.
'This was never about the names of the bases they were renamed to,' Hegseth said. 'It was about restoring all bases to their original names.'
In the previous hearings — where Hegseth appeared to discuss the Pentagon's spending plan — lawmakers made it clear they were unhappy that he has not provided full details on the administration's first proposed defense budget.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nippon Steel buyout deal hints at business fragility in U.S.
Nippon Steel buyout deal hints at business fragility in U.S.

Japan Today

time23 minutes ago

  • Japan Today

Nippon Steel buyout deal hints at business fragility in U.S.

Nippon Steel Chairperson and CEO Eiji Hashimoto speaks during a press conference at the company's headquarters in Tokyo on Thursday. By Junko Horiuchi U.S. President Donald Trump's bid to attract investment threatens to undermine the appetite for corporate spending in an ironic twist, with the 18-month saga over Nippon Steel Corp's buyout of United States Steel Corp showing the growing vulnerability of businesses in the U.S. market, according to analysts. The U.S. administration's earlier blocking of the $14.1 billion takeover deal was clearly driven by political motives and corporate executives will no longer be able to make decisions regarding their U.S. operations based only business criteria, they said. The wrangling in the high-profile case could lead global companies to think twice about making sizeable investments and acquisitions in the world's largest economy, with many moving to reduce their exposure to the U.S. market. "I do think many companies are pausing investments and major capital expenditures, not only because of the Nippon-U.S. Steel deal but due to general uncertainty surrounding political and economic dynamics in Washington," said Zack Cooper, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Trump had repeatedly rejected Nippon Steel's plan to take full control of U.S. Steel. But Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-largest steel producer, and U.S. Steel, the 29th largest, said Wednesday following Trump's approval of the buyout plan that they had signed a national security agreement with the U.S. government and finalized the acquisition transaction. Under the deal, the Japanese steelmaker is obliged to invest $11 billion by 2028 on bolstering the U.S. steelmaker's operations, far more than the previously planned $2.7 billion. The U.S. government also obtained a golden share allowing it to veto key management decisions, such as when reducing investment, shedding production capacity in the United States or closing plants. Nippon Steel CEO Eiji Hashimoto told a press conference on Thursday that his company had learned from a year and a half of negotiations with the U.S. government that a flexible management strategy is required. The top executive said it had been believed that governments should not get involved in business deals. "But are strengthening their involvement in economic and business matters through industrial policy," he said. Hashimoto said while his company's acquisition of U.S. Steel should help the world's largest economy, trade levies will not revive its manufacturing sector. "I believe President Trump came to the conclusion that it is necessary to utilize our power to revive the U.S. steel industry," Hashimoto said, adding the Japanese steelmaker aims to bolster its U.S. unit's overseas operations as well. Nippon Steel has concluded a National Security Agreement with the U.S. government, pledging to invest around $11 billion by 2028 in the iconic but struggling company and keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh. During the news conference, Hashimoto shrugged off the possibility that the security pact will hamper its U.S. business. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, initially blocked the purchase of U.S. Steel on national security grounds, saying the manufacturing icon, based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania -- a key battleground state in the 2024 presidential election -- should be "American-owned and American-operated." Trump also opposed the deal during the presidential race, saying the acquisition of a minority stake in U.S. Steel would not cause any issues, but foreign ownership of the company would not be good psychologically. He ordered a new review of the deal by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States in April with a deadline for Trump to make a final decision initially set for June 5. "Because predictability is insanely low right now in the United States, Japanese companies are going to cut back the percentage of their business in the country," said Keisuke Hanyuda, the chief executive of Owls Consulting Group. While rising costs must be dealt with, "The last thing a business wants is to lose predictability," said Hanyuda, a former Japanese trade ministry official in charge of trade talks. Nippon Steel is betting on firm demand for high-tensile strength steel in the U.S. market, capitalizing on its advanced production technology for high-end steel plates used in products such as electric vehicles. The United States is one of three growth markets for the Japanese steelmaker, compensating for shrinking domestic demand. Under Trump, the steel, aluminum, auto and semiconductor sectors have been targeted by specific tariffs driven by political pressures and companies in these industries should consider other markets for growth to hedge their risks, analysts say. Earlier this month, Trump signed an order doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50 percent. "I think Japanese companies will have a difficult time purchasing famous American companies in sectors that President Trump prioritizes, such as autos, steel, aluminum, and chipmaking," Cooper at the American Enterprise Institute said, though investment in other sectors may still be viable. "But any Japanese company that is considering a major deal in the United States should develop a detailed political strategy before announcing a deal, lest they suffer similar roadblocks as Nippon Steel," he said. The United States remains a lucrative market with high growth potential but some global companies are beginning to reduce their reliance on it after the tariffs imposed by Trump, Hanyuda said. The European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, for example, have resumed economic partnership negotiations, while the EU is also looking at Japan, which is part of a trans-Pacific free trade pact that took effect in 2018 without the United States. © KYODO

Japan to send 2 defense force planes for possible Mideast airlift
Japan to send 2 defense force planes for possible Mideast airlift

The Mainichi

timean hour ago

  • The Mainichi

Japan to send 2 defense force planes for possible Mideast airlift

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan will send two Self-Defense Forces airplanes to East Africa for a possible operation to evacuate its nationals from the Middle East, Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said Thursday, amid the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. Nakatani told reporters that two C-2 transport aircraft with a total of about 120 crew members will fly to an SDF base in Djibouti and be on standby there, following a request from Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya earlier that day. The planes are likely to leave Japan on Saturday, sources familiar with the matter said. "The situation in the Middle East has become more strained as Israel and Iran continue tit-for-tat attacks," Nakatani said, while stressing that the government "is still at the preparatory stage for a possible transportation" of Japanese citizens. The ministry is confirming how many of the about 280 Japanese nationals in Iran and 1,000 in Israel wish to flee the countries. Before the departure of the C-2s, about 10 SDF personnel left Japan for the Middle East to gather information, Nakatani said. Japan is also planning to evacuate by bus around 90 nationals and their family members from Tehran to neighboring Azerbaijan while also offering those living in Israel the option of a bus evacuation to Jordan, according to a government source. Israel said Friday it has begun striking nuclear facilities and military targets in Iran, its regional archrival, triggering retaliatory attacks by Tehran. Tensions have been further fueled by speculation that U.S. President Donald Trump may decide to join the Israeli attacks.

G7 Summit Closes: ‘U.S. absence' Reveals Group's Fragility
G7 Summit Closes: ‘U.S. absence' Reveals Group's Fragility

Yomiuri Shimbun

time2 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

G7 Summit Closes: ‘U.S. absence' Reveals Group's Fragility

This was a summit that symbolically indicated that an era in which the United States led the international order ended and the world is shifting to an extremely dangerous time. The summit of Group of Seven advanced nations, held in Canada, has ended. This year marked the 50th anniversary since the first summit, at which the leaders of six countries — Japan, the United States and European nations — met in 1975. But the leaders at this year's summit failed to adopt a comprehensive leaders' statement. It was the first time in the history of G7 summits. The direct cause of the unusual turn of events was U.S. President Donald Trump. He had opposed the adoption of the leaders' statement and abruptly returned to the United States after the first day of discussions. The G7 nations have maintained unity by sharing values such as democracy and the rule of law. However, Trump touts an 'America First' policy and turns his back on international cooperation. It can be said that the G7 nations have been transformed into a structure of 'the United States plus the group of six.' Although the influence of the United States is decreasing, the reality that the G7 framework cannot function without the United States has also become obvious. The situation in Ukraine, which should have been one of the main topics on the agenda, was not sufficiently discussed due to Trump returning to the United States, resulting in the G7 nations not adopting a joint statement on additional sanctions against Russia. Despite the extremely tense situation in the Middle East, with Israel bombing Iran just before the opening of the summit, it must be noted that the response of the G7 nations to the situation was far too inadequate. There is no doubt that Iran's continued nuclear development is the root cause of the current crisis. However, in a joint statement, the G7 nations did not condemn Israel's military actions. It is obvious the G7 nations are much too biased in favor of Israel. Before the start of the summit, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said, '[Israel's military actions are] absolutely unacceptable and I strongly condemn them.' Despite this, there are no signs that he asserted this point at the summit. With the debate among the United States, Canada and the European nations being dominated by support for Israel, it is unsatisfying that, as the only Asian country to participate in the summit, Japan failed to take advantage of the opportunity to throw a wrench into the discussions. Trump is trying to promote his own response, rather than work within the framework of the G7 nations. He is pressing Iran for an 'unconditional surrender,' and some observers believe that he may step in to intervene militarily at Israel's request. The era of the G7 nations being able to exert their influence by touting their ideals is over. In the face of a deepening crisis, to what specific extent will the behavior of Israel and the United States be tolerated? Europe and Japan are being forced to make tough decisions. Nevertheless, at the very least, the G7 nations should be able to agree on respecting sovereignty and territorial integrity and refusing to allow the status quo to be changed by force. The G7 nations must return to these principles and focus on stopping warfare. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 19, 2025)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store