Corporate box owners in Mexico are still uncertain about their properties for the 2026 World Cup
MEXICO CITY (AP) — A corporate box owner at the iconic Azteca stadium filed a complaint with Mexico's consumer protection agency Tuesday seeking clarity over his use of the seating for the 2026 World Cup.
The stadium, recently renamed Banorte ahead of next year's tournament, has been closed for renovations since May of last year.
FIFA wants full control of the World Cup stadiums from 30 days before the first match until seven days after the last. It's unclear what that means for the owners of the luxury seating.
'The consumer wants to know if his rights to use his box during the World Cup are going to be upheld,' said Angel Diego, a lawyer representing one of the luxury box owners who asked to remain anonymous. 'We are inviting the company that owns the stadium to express clearly what their intentions are.'
The history of how the boxes were purchased makes things complicated.
To help finance the construction of the stadium in the 1960s, Mexican businessman Emilio Azcárraga Milmo sold luxury boxes to private investors for 115,000 pesos, or about $9,000 at the time, giving the owners' rights to use them for 99 years. That included access to soccer matches, concerts and other events, including the 1970 and 1986 World Cups in Mexico.
But for the 2026 World Cup, the stadium owners are asking the luxury box owners to relinquish their access.
'There is only one solution and that is that they respect our contract. The World Cup is 408 days ahead. We have plenty of time to work this out,' said Roberto Ruano, a spokesman for the association of 134 box owners. 'It is not a request; we have the right to use them.'
The 83,000-seat stadium will host five games during the 2026 World Cup, including the tournament opener.
The owners of the stadium, a company related to Televisa, Mexico's largest television network, have released images of work done on the pitch and the lower seats, but the corporate boxes apparently haven't been touched.
Ruano, whose father bought the title for a luxury box, said the box owners have been talking with stadium officials for about a year but haven't reached a resolution.
'For the moment we are not going to do anything because we are still in amicable discussions with the stadium and we do not want to break them,' Ruano added. 'The doors are open, the dialog has not been interrupted.'
Last week, stadium officials said that a solution to the conflict was close, but didn't provide more specifics.
Ruano says that some box owners outside of his association have agreed to release their seats for the 2026 tournament in exchange for upgrades and other benefits, including tickets, but he doesn't want that.
'My box belongs to me, we have a designated space already and that is what we want,' Ruano said. 'We are going to give them more time to try to fix this before doing something else.'
___
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Cristiano Ronaldo says he does not plan to play in FIFA Club World Cup
Cristiano Ronaldo says he does not plan to play in FIFA Club World Cup Show Caption Hide Caption Timing of FIFA Club World Cup problematic for teams across the globe Seth Vertelney explains why the timing of the FIFA Club World Cup is sounding alarms for franchises across the globe. Sports Seriously Al-Nassr and Portugal forward Cristiano Ronaldo said on Saturday he did not plan to play at the Club World Cup in the United States, despite being courted by clubs participating in the expanded 32-team tournament. Speculation over the 40-year-old's future intensified last month when FIFA President Gianni Infantino said discussions were underway about Ronaldo playing in the Club World Cup, despite Al-Nassr failing to qualify. Al-Nassr's sporting director Fernando Hierro said last month they were negotiating with Ronaldo over a contract extension but faced competition from a host of clubs eager to sign the five-time Ballon d'Or winner. Ronaldo himself added to the uncertainty after Al-Nassr's season-ending match at Al-Fateh, posting on social media: "This chapter is over. The story? Still being written." Asked about the possibility of signing for another club in the coming days in order to play at the Club World Cup later this month, Ronaldo told reporters: "It's irrelevant, at the moment it doesn't make sense to talk about things other than the national team. "There has been plenty of contact (from clubs), I see things that make sense, others that don't. You can't go to all of them (clubs), you have to think short, medium and long term. "It's something that's practically decided on my part, which is not to go to the Club World Cup, but I've had plenty of invitations." On Wednesday, Ronaldo scored the winner as Portugal beat Germany 2-1 to go into the Nations League final, where they will face Spain. Many have labelled Sunday's final as a face-off between Ronaldo and 17-year-old Barcelona sensation Lamine Yamal but the Portuguese forward said he did not see it as such. "It's always been like that, whenever I've played football, whenever I've played a big game it's always been Cristiano against this one, against that one," he said. "It's been 20-something years and it's still the same, it doesn't keep me up at night anymore, it's a normal thing. They're completely different generations, a generation that's starting out, another that's finishing, which is my case. "In reality it's not like that, it's a team against a team. It will always be like that... What I want most is for Portugal to be at a good level, confident that things can go well, that we can play a great game and win against a very good team, possibly the best in the world."
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How to Watch Andorra vs England: Live Stream FIFA World Cup Qualifiers, TV Channel
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Qualifiers for the 2026 FIFA World Cup continue this weekend with a number of UEFA games, including this one on Saturday between Andorra and England. England currently leads Group K, putting it in position to qualify directly to the World Cup, though there's a lot of time still left to go. Andorra has lost both of its games so far. Harry Kane of England celebrates after scoring the team's third goal during the UEFA EURO 2024 European qualifier match between England and Italy at Wembley Stadium on October 17, 2023 in London, England. Harry Kane of England celebrates after scoring the team's third goal during the UEFA EURO 2024 European qualifier match between England and Italy at Wembley Stadium on October 17, 2023 in London, to Watch Andorra vs England Date: Satuday, June 7, 2025 Time: 11:50 AM EDT Channel: FOX Sports 2 Stream: Fubo (Try for free) In the first matchday of this group, Andorra lost 1-0 to Latvia while England won 2-0 against Albania. In the next game, Andorra was shut out again, falling 3-0 to Albania while England rolled to a 3-0 win over Latvia. England is looking to make the World Cup once again. The team has qualified for the last seven World Cups, but it last missed in 1994 when the tournament was held in the United States. The English side has won its last five matches overall, including four consecutive shut-out victories. As for Andorra, a World Cup trip feels incredibly unlikely, but weirder things have happened. The team sits just 173rd in the FIFA rankings and consistently struggles to win games, especially against strong competition like England, which has won all six previous matchups between these teams, both by shutout and multiple goals. Tune in on Saturday for this UEFA region FIFA World Cup qualifying matchup, available to stream live on Fubo. Live stream FIFA World Cup qualifying on Fubo: Start your free trial now! Regional restrictions may apply. If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.
20 minutes ago
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes — tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 — including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit — would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. 'It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue,' said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments — and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. 'It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. 'I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. 'It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. 'It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. 'Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program — the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called 'Liberation Day'' April 2 — saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened 'countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. 'You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy,' York said. 'You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said — more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. 'If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are 'a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''
