
When water becomes a weapon: India's treaty suspension hits Pakistan hard
When water becomes a weapon: India's treaty suspension hits Pakistan hard
On April 23, 2025, India announced a bold decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a 65-year-old agreement with Pakistan that governs how the two countries share the waters of the Indus River system. This move came a day after a horrific terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, where 26 people, mostly tourists, were killed. India's government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, linked the attack to Pakistan-based groups and decided to suspend the treaty until Pakistan stops supporting cross-border terrorism. But what does this mean for both countries, especially Pakistan? Let's break it down in simple terms. What is the Indus Waters Treaty?
The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960, is like a rulebook for sharing the water of six rivers—Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej—between India and Pakistan. The World Bank helped broker this deal after years of talks. Under the treaty:
– India gets full control over the three 'Eastern Rivers' (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej).
– Pakistan gets most of the water from the three 'Western Rivers' (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab), but India can use them for things like hydropower and limited irrigation.
– About 80% of the Indus system's water goes to Pakistan, while India gets 20%.
This treaty has been a rare success story, surviving three wars (1965, 1971, and Kargil in 1999) and many tensions. It ensures Pakistan's agriculture, which depends heavily on these rivers, gets enough water. Why did India pause the Treaty?
The Pahalgam attack was a tipping point. India's government says it has proof of 'cross-border linkages,' meaning the attackers were supported by Pakistan. The Cabinet Committee on Security, chaired by PM Modi, decided to hit back hard. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri announced that the treaty is 'on hold' until Pakistan stops backing terrorism. India also closed the Attari-Wagah border, expelled Pakistani diplomats, and banned Pakistani nationals from entering India.
This isn't the first time India has raised concerns about the treaty. Last year, India asked for a review, citing Pakistan's misuse of the treaty and India's need for more water for clean energy and development. But suspending it entirely is a huge step, something India has never done before. How does this affect Pakistan?
Pakistan's economy and survival depend on the Indus River system. Here's how the pause could hurt them: Agriculture in Crisis: Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces, its agricultural heartlands, rely on the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab for irrigation. About 80% of Pakistan's farmland depends on these rivers. If India restricts water flow, crops like wheat, rice, and cotton could fail, leading to food shortages and higher prices. Water Scarcity: Pakistan is already facing a water crisis. Blocking or reducing water from the Western Rivers could make drinking water scarce, especially in rural areas. Cities like Karachi and Lahore could face even bigger problems. Economic Fallout: Agriculture employs nearly half of Pakistan's workforce and makes up a big chunk of its economy. A water cutoff could lead to job losses, poverty, and economic instability. Pakistan's exports, like textiles, could also take a hit. Power Shortages : Pakistan uses river water for hydropower. Less water could mean more power cuts, which are already a problem in the country. What does it mean for India?
For India, pausing the treaty is a strong message to Pakistan: terrorism has consequences. It also gives India more control over the Western Rivers. For example:
– India can now build dams or store water on the Jhelum and Chenab without treaty restrictions, helping with flood control and irrigation in Jammu and Kashmir.
– It strengthens India's position as the upper riparian (upstream) country, giving it leverage over Pakistan.
But there are risks for India too:
– International Backlash: The World Bank, a treaty signatory, might raise concerns. Other countries could see India's move as aggressive, affecting its global image.
– Escalation with Pakistan: Pakistan could retaliate, maybe through international courts or by escalating tensions along the border.
– Legal Issues : The treaty has no exit clause, so suspending it might lead to legal challenges. Pakistan could demand arbitration, though India's stance is that terrorism voids the treaty's spirit. What happens next?
Pakistan's leaders are meeting today, April 24, 2025, to plan their response. They might appeal to the World Bank or the United Nations, claiming India's move is illegal. They could also try to rally international support, though Pakistan's global isolation might make this tough. Some experts warn that Pakistan's water crisis could worsen within months, especially during the summer when water demand peaks.
For India, this is a high-stakes gamble. The government is betting that the treaty's suspension will pressure Pakistan to crack down on terror groups. But it's also a test of India's diplomatic skill—can it justify this move to the world while managing tensions with Pakistan? A Tough but necessary step?
India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty is a bold, emotional response to the Pahalgam tragedy. It shows that India is done tolerating attacks linked to Pakistan. For Pakistan, the consequences could be devastating—its farms, economy, and people depend on the rivers India now holds leverage over. But this move also risks escalating an already tense relationship.
As an Indian, it's hard not to feel a mix of pride and worry. Pride because our government is taking a stand against terrorism. Worry because water is life, and cutting it off could hurt millions of ordinary Pakistanis who have little to do with their government's actions. The hope is that this pause pushes Pakistan to rethink its ways, but the road ahead looks bumpy for both nations.
( The author Girish Linganna of this article is an award-winning Science Writer and a Defence, Aerospace & Political Analyst based in Bengaluru. He is also Director of ADD Engineering Components, India, Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of ADD Engineering GmbH, Germany. You can reach him, at: girishlinganna@gmail.com )
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
No development in the state for two years, no guarantee even for CM Siddaramaiah: R Ashok
Mysuru: In the last 11 years, continuous development work has been carried out under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, in the state, not a single development project has taken place in the last two years, said Opposition Leader R Ashok. Speaking at a press conference, he compared the 10-year rule of Manmohan Singh with the 11-year rule of Narendra Modi, stating that development has increased fourfold under Modi. Globally, India's economy was ranked 10th or 11th earlier, but now it stands at fourth place, and PM Modi aims to take it to third. During Indira Gandhi's time, India had to beg for wheat from other countries. Under PM Modi, India has supplied COVID vaccines to over 100 countries, he said. During the UPA regime, per capita income was ₹6,000, which has now risen to ₹20,000. Gas cylinder subsidies, which were ₹450 then, are now ₹500. The unsubsidized rate, which was ₹1,250, is now ₹850. In the UPA's 10 years, there were over 9,000 terror attacks. Now, every attack is met with a response. When Mumbai was attacked, no retaliation was made, but after the Pulwama attack, Indian soldiers destroyed terrorist bases, he said. Previously, there were 387 medical colleges; now there are 704. The number of airports has increased from 74 to 149. National highways, which were 91,000 km, are now 1.45 lakh km. AIIMS institutions have grown from 7 to 22. Medical seats have increased from 82,000 to 1.50 lakh. The national budget, which was ₹17 lakh crore, is now ₹50.65 lakh crore. LED bulbs, which cost ₹450 earlier, are now available for ₹70, he said. Earlier, we used to see bullet trains in other countries. Now, 60% of the work on a bullet train in India is complete, and it will soon be operational. Agricultural subsidies, which were ₹30,000 crore earlier, are now ₹1.27 lakh crore. Cooking gas connections have increased from 14 crore to 31 crore. In 11 years, 4 crore houses and 11 crore toilets have been built, and 27 crore people have been lifted out of poverty, he stated. The Congress has always been sympathetic to Naxals, but now there is a goal to completely eradicate the Naxal movement. Significant development work has also taken place in the Northeast states. There was a mindset to abandon Jammu and Kashmir, but after the revocation of its special status, development has increased there, and tourism has boosted local incomes, he said. No guarantee even for Siddaramaiah Chief Minister Siddaramaiah himself has no guarantee and is an outgoing CM. His government has achieved nothing in two years. DK Shivakumar has built a separate fortress, while MB Patil and Satish Jarkiholi are acting independently. Not a single irrigation project has been implemented in two years, he alleged. In Congress, everyone claims they will become CM. Parameshwara and DK Shivakumar are waiting to become CM. Due to guarantees, no work is happening, and people want the government to collapse. Four people are pulling at the CM's chair. The BJP has exposed the MUDA scam and the Valmiki Corporation scam, he said. The government is responsible for the stampede tragedy but is blaming the police. The CM himself admitted to inviting the Governor. The Chief Secretary personally called and invited the Governor, but this was not disclosed earlier. To cover up their mistake, action was taken against Govindaraju, he said.


Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Neville Roy Singham? Billionaire linked to activist groups involved in LA riots faces congressional probe
A reclusive U.S. billionaire with reported ties to radical left-wing groups is under scrutiny from Republican lawmakers following unrest in Los Angeles. Neville Roy Singham, a China-based tech mogul, is expected to be called before Congress to explain his financial support for a network of non-profits, some of which have been linked to recent anti-ICE protests and accused of promoting Marxist and anti-Israel agendas. Also Read: What is 'No Kings' protest? Movement planned against Trump during Army's 250th anniversary parade Born in the United States in 1954, Singham studied economics at Howard University before launching a successful career in software engineering. In 1993, he founded ThoughtWorks, an IT consulting firm specializing in custom software development and digital transformation services. Under his leadership, the company grew into a global industry leader, earning Singham a spot on Foreign Policy magazine's list of "Top 50 Global Thinkers" in 2009. According to ThoughtWorks' official website, Singham sold the company in 2017. According to The New York Post, in April, the Senate Judiciary Committee called on the Department of Justice to investigate The People's Forum and Code Pink—activist organizations linked to tech entrepreneur Singham and his wife, Jodie Evans. Though based in Shanghai, the couple reportedly channels substantial funding to U.S.-based leftist groups. Despite denying ties to the Chinese government, they are under scrutiny for their associations with the Maku Group, a pro-Beijing propaganda outlet, raising concerns about foreign influence in American political discourse. Most groups linked to Singham are based in a Chelsea, New York office and café, where The People's Forum hosts activist courses like 'Racial Capitalism' and 'Spanish for Social Justice.' Tied to Singham's network, other affiliated nonprofits include BreakThrough News and 1804 Books, a radical publishing house. Also Read: No Kings protest locations: Key cities and venues for June 14 protests Evans co-founded Code Pink and is a board member of The People's Forum. The 70-year-old is also a co-author of a book titled China is Not Your Enemy, which was written with Mikaela Nhondo Erskog. The latter is a researcher at another group, which is funded by Singham. Evans and a fellow Code Pink member visited North Korea in 2015 with 'Women Cross DMZ,' a Hawaii-based nonprofit often criticized for its pro-North Korean stance.


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration's visa delays drive surge in UAE university applications
The US government's recent visa restrictions and delays are prompting a sharp rise in international student applications to universities across the United Arab Emirates, according to officials at major higher education institutions in Dubai, Abu Dhabi , and Ajman. Following a proclamation by former President Donald Trump to restrict visas for international students at institutions like Harvard University-now temporarily blocked by a federal judge, students are increasingly turning to UAE universities for stability and access. The policy shift in the US has led to the suspension of student visa interviews, creating uncertainty and travel disruption for aspiring students worldwide. According to Gulf News, Heriot-Watt University Dubai reported a 53.5% increase in applications for its September 2025 intake compared to the same period last year. Professor Dame Heather McGregor, Provost and Vice Principal, said to Gulf News, the rise is driven by 'growing global restrictions on international student visas,' positioning Dubai as an 'attractive study destination.' 'Our campus recorded a 4.5 per cent year-on-year increase in enrolments for 2024/25,' she added. 'Cities like Dubai and Abu Dhabi rank among the world's safest, offering families peace of mind alongside academic excellence.' (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Ajman-based Gulf Medical University is also seeing expanded demand. Acting Chancellor Professor Manda Venkatramana noted that applications have increased significantly year-on-year, with interest growing from Asia, Africa, and the MENA region. Live Events MORE STORIES FOR YOU ✕ UK job market slowdown raises concerns for international students Indian students made up one in four international students in US in 2024: ICE report Harvard university scores legal win against Trump's international student ban « Back to recommendation stories I don't want to see these stories because They are not relevant to me They disrupt the reading flow Others SUBMIT 'We've observed a significant spike in enquiries and interest from both students and parents across several countries – particularly those who had initially planned to pursue higher education in the US,' he said. 'Families are beginning to view the UAE as a primary choice.' Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi confirmed that international student interest has nearly doubled from the previous year. Camille Assouline, Head of Communications, Marketing and Public Affairs, told Gulf News, 'The recent visa disruptions in the US may be contributing to this shift, as more students look toward stable, globally connected alternatives.' The Gulf News Edufair events in Dubai and Abu Dhabi also reflected this trend, with universities showcasing opportunities in medical, technology, and global mobility pathways. UAE institutions cite their streamlined visa systems, strong infrastructure, and part-time work options as key attractions.