£650,000 awarded to transform derelict land in Ferguslie Park
Renfrewshire Council has been awarded £650,000 to deliver the Belltrees project in Ferguslie Park which will restore 2.69 hectares of derelict land and create a new multi-functional greenspace.
More than two hectares of derelict land in the heart of Ferguslie Park are set to be transformed thanks to a £650,0000 funding boost.
The Belltrees Project will see a multi-functional greenspace created with a natural play trail, event space, landscaping and native planting.
Two new shared pedestrian and cycle routes linking to local schools and services will run through the site which will also benefit from improved drainage.
The project has been made possible thanks to funding from Scottish Government's Vacant and Derelict Land Investment Programme (VDLIP), with construction set to begin early next year.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'The Vacant and Derelict Land Investment Programme is helping transform derelict sites the length and breadth of Scotland, creating homes, jobs and facilities that drive economic growth, tackle poverty and help support growing thriving communities.
'This funding forms part of a wider £62.15 million investment by the Scottish Government towards regeneration projects in 2025-26.
'I am delighted that this year's funding includes support for the Belltrees project and look forward to it contributing to the creation of a valuable asset for the local community for years to come.'
The regeneration project is part of The Making of Ferguslie — a long-term, community-led framework developed in partnership with local residents to reimagine the area and deliver lasting change.
Approved by Renfrewshire Council in December 2021, the plan sets out a shared vision for Ferguslie Park, with a focus on transforming underused land, enhancing greenspaces, and supporting local initiatives.
The programme is already delivering visible results, with key projects now underway or in development.
At the centre of the regeneration is the Ferguslie Green Line — a new green corridor and public realm spine that will connect key parts of the neighbourhood and provide a vibrant, multi-functional space for residents.
Designed to promote active travel, community activity, and biodiversity, the Green Line will act as a catalyst for wider transformation and a symbol of positive change.
Councillor Andy Steel, convener of Renfrewshire Council's economy and regeneration policy board, said: 'The Making of Ferguslie is a fantastic example of what can be achieved when we work hand-in-hand with our communities.
'I'm delighted that we have been awarded such a significant amount of funding to support the Belltrees project as this will make a visible difference to the area and will help create a greener, more connected and vibrant Ferguslie Park for generations to come.'
The first project to emerge from the Green Line is the Neighbourhood Centre at Bankfoot Road and this new activity space is transforming 0.66 hectares of long-term vacant land into a unique, sunken games and recreation area, framed by a tree-lined boulevard that links to local schools and the Tannahill Centre – with construction expected to complete this summer.
For more information on The Making of Ferguslie, visit: www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/the-making-of-ferguslie.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
SNP ‘all over the place' on funding for defence companies, claims Labour
The SNP has been accused of being 'all over the place' on state funding for defence companies, after the Government enterprise agency declined to back a Rolls-Royce welding skills centre. Rolls-Royce has been told the project in the Glasgow area cannot be supported with £2.5m of funding from Scottish Enterprise. A Scottish Government minister said the project could not be funded as it concerns 'munitions' and is part of a programme for building attack submarines. UK Defence Secretary John Healy has described the refusal to back the welding centre as 'student union politics'. SNP business minister Richard Lochhead responded to MSPs' questions on Tuesday. He said the Scottish Government and its agencies have a longstanding policy that public money should not support 'the manufacture of munitions'. PA Media Richard Lochhead said the project would be ineligible for Scottish Enterprise support PA Media Mr Lochhead said as the project concerns an 'attack submarine' it would be ineligible for Scottish Enterprise support, but a formal application had not been received. Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'The Scottish Government's position is frankly incoherent and their policy on state funded aid for defence is all over the place and applied selectively.' She pointed out that the Government-owned shipyard Ferguson Marine is carrying out subcontractor work for the Royal Navy's Type 26 frigate programme – arguing 'there are munitions on the frigate'. Mr Lochhead responded, saying: 'The Scottish Government very much values the role of the defence sector in Scotland and the many jobs it sustains, and indeed the value it adds to the Scottish economy. 'For that reason £45m of support through our enterprise agencies has been allocated to defence companies or companies partially involved in defence activities.' PA Media Labour's Dame Jackie Baillie said the SNP is 'all over the place' PA Media Dame Jackie asked: 'What does the Government believe the Army, the Navy and the air force should defend the country with? 'Pea shooters, bows and arrows, a telling off?' Conservative MSP Stephen Kerr aid the SNP's position is 'not just incoherent, it's totally hypocritical'. Mr Lochhead said funding had focused on the diversification of industry, noting defence is reserved to the UK Government. He also said governments must take into account 'ethical considerations' when it comes to funding companies in the defence sector. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Scotsman
9 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why looming £2bn benefits black hole can't be filled by more SNP tax hikes
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Last week my friend and colleague Douglas Ross MSP was thrown out of the Scottish Parliament chamber after heckling the First Minister John Swinney. He had taken exception to Swinney's deflection – after a serious question from Scots Tory leader Russell Findlay on how farming will have to adapt should the pursuit for net zero continue – with an irrelevant reference to the impact of Brexit. I can understand Ross's frustration at the inability to get straight answers from SNP ministers. It all adds to the burden of evidence that Holyrood as an institution is in urgent need of reform to ensure that opposition MSPs are better able to get the answers they need for their constituents, and that ministers can less easily avoid giving serious responses. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Given the inadequacies of the parliamentary chamber, we should be particularly grateful to external bodies such as the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) for the detailed work they do analysing the Scottish Government's finances. Their latest report, published just last week, contains some stark warnings about the looming black hole in Holyrood funding, as a direct result of SNP policy decisions. Getting John Swinney to answer a question can prove frustrating, but he will need to find one for the looming black hole in the Scottish Government's finances (Picture: Jane Barlow/pool) | Getty Images Record funding, crumbling services We are presently in a scenario where the total amount of money available to Scottish ministers to spend is at record levels, even taking account of inflation. According to the SFC, total Scottish Government funding in the current financial year 2025-26 will be £59.6 billion, around £800 million more than was originally thought. This is against a backdrop of record high taxation across the UK, with even higher taxes in Scotland, again thanks to SNP choices. And yet, despite all this extra money, all around us we see crumbling public services and cuts being made to vital projects. Something simply doesn't add up, but the SFC is helping by putting their fingers on some of the reasons for this mismatch. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are two major drivers of increased spending within the Scottish Budget. The first is the award of above-inflation public sector pay deals which, as the SFC point out, have exceeded the Scottish Government's published public pay policy. No one would object to public servants receiving more pay if that were in exchange for greater efficiency, but the second part of that equation appears to be missing. Clever politics? The other area is around welfare spending. Whilst even the UK Labour government has recognised the risks from an ever-expanding benefits bill, the SNP are heading in the opposite direction. The SFC forecasts that spending on devolved social security payments will increase from £6.9 billion in the current financial year to a staggering £9.4bn in 2030-31. When related to the Barnett Formula funding received from the UK Government, this leaves the Scottish Budget with an estimated £2.1 billion black hole in 2029-30. Now it is entirely a matter for the SNP to decide they are going to prioritise spending on benefits above other areas such as the NHS, schools, or infrastructure. It may even be clever politics to do so, to help create a body of voters reliant upon those benefits who will, in turn, reward the SNP with their votes. But none of this helps pay for the ever-expanding cost of benefits in Scotland, which is growing faster than other parts of the UK. And it is clear that SNP ministers have absolutely no idea how they are going to fund this growth. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Increasing taxes further to try and fill the gap is unlikely to be the answer. Already we hear concerns from Scottish business that differential rates of both personal income tax and land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT) make it increasingly difficult to attract higher earners to relocate to Scotland from other parts of the UK. 'Economic performance gap' As the SFC points out in their report, higher tax rates are not actually delivering the revenues that were projected. On a straight-line basis, the income tax hikes implemented by the SNP should be raising a net sum of £1.674 billion for the Scottish Government. But the actual projected income tax net position, compared to what it would have been prior to the devolution of Scottish income tax, is just £616 million. That means there is an astonishing £1 billion gap between what Scotland's higher income tax rates might have added to the Scottish Budget, and what they are actually projected to deliver. The SFC refers to this figure as the 'economic performance gap', which is largely made up of slower aggregate earnings and employment growth in Scotland compared with the rest of the UK, alongside effects from Scottish and UK policies, taxpayer behaviour, and differences in the sectoral make-up of the Scottish economy and in the distribution of incomes between Scotland and the rest of the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In simple terms, if the Scottish economy was growing at least at the same rate as the UK as a whole, with similar increases in average earnings, we would have £1 billion more to spend on public services than we currently have, and the SNP would be halfway towards meeting the ever-expanding costs of additional welfare spending. It once again demonstrates the overriding need for Scottish ministers to focus on economic growth. A faster growing economy, where we could at least match UK average rates, would generate the wealth we need to pay the bills, without the requirement for counter-productive taxes on higher earners which we can see are already having a dampening effect on economic growth. SNP ministers now have some very serious questions to answer about their tax and spending plans going forward. We can only hope that it won't take more outbursts in the Holyrood chamber to get the answers we all require.
Daily Record
11 hours ago
- Daily Record
Calls for delayed West Lothian train station to be funded by Scottish Government
As the council and Winchburgh Developments prepare to meet potential funders of the long delayed station, Labour's Linlithgow councillor Tom Conn called on the SNP government to 'stop ducking and diving.' A veteran councillor in West Lothian called on the Scottish Government to 'put its money where its mouth is' on plans for a railway station in Winchburgh. As the council and Winchburgh Developments prepare to meet potential funders of the long delayed station, Labour's Linlithgow councillor Tom Conn called on the SNP government to 'stop ducking and diving.' Designs were revealed on Friday with the news that a planning application would come to West Lothian Council 'imminently.' A report to the Executive described the recently published Scottish Government Programme for Government 2025/26. It said: 'The programme makes specific reference to a railway station at Winchburgh in the section on A Safe Sustainable Transport System for Scotland.' Having committed to that, Councillor Conn called for a commitment to meet costs of the £22.5m development. Welcoming the news that progression had been made in the ten months of cooperation between the council, Winchburgh developments, Transport Scotland Network Rail - councillors echoed concerns that there have been no concrete guarantees of funding. Councillor Conn said: 'There needs to be public money invested directly by Scottish Government in Winchburgh. They cannot continually suggest it's other people, other organisations that need to find the money. 'This is an abdication of responsibility by the Scottish Government. If they don't want to take responsibility for it, they shouldn't put it in Programme for Government 2025/26. 'The Scottish government needs to stop ducking and diving and need to put their money where their mouth is. This is talking about rail investment strategy. If all it is is words, not backed up with cash, stop speaking. It's not helping.' Fellow Linlithgow councillor Sally Pattle said the progress had been like wading through treacle as she sought clarification of when a business plan could come to the council. When told it would be two to three months she responded: ' I would just like to welcome the fact that the Scottish Government reference Winchburgh in their programme for government although I'm slightly unclear as to what that will mean in practical terms to actually getting this project moving forward. ' I do welcome all the work that has been undertaken collaboratively between key stakeholders since last September but I have to say that still feels like we are moving through treacle. I would also very much like it to be recognised by officers and key stakeholders that the longer this drags on the greater the negative impact it is having on my ward of Linlithgow because of all the commuters that come into use the train station and then park anti-socially across the town to do so so it would be good if that could recognised going forward.' The report detailed passenger usage at neighbouring stations, including Linlithgow which sees 1,400 a day using the station. Gordon Brown, Roads and Transportation Manager told the meeting: 'Progress on the Outline Business Case now allows the steering group to progress discussions with the Scottish Government on the case for investment, alignment with the overall rail strategy, public value and contribution to government priorities. 'These matters will be addressed as part of the funding application subject, of course, to the City Region Deal Joint Committee supporting an application via that route.' The City Region Deal is a mechanism for accelerating growth. It is made up of six local authorities, universities and the private sector working with the Scottish and UK government to pull in investment.' Winchburgh councillor Angela Doran-Timson pressed Mr Brown on what other alternative investment options there would be if the City Region Deal did not agree to fund the station. ' Was there a plan B?' she asked. Mr Brown said there was ' no plan B' but to date 'no alternative funding sources had been identified' Councillor Doran-Timson said: 'I'll echo what Tom Conn said. I welcome the report, fingers crossed that the funding does come forward from the Scottish Government.' A TS spokesperson said: 'As co-promoters for Winchburgh Station, West Lothian Council and Winchburgh Developments Limited are responsible for developing a robust business case and securing the required capital funding, should it proceed. 'Transport Scotland, via ScotRail, has committed to fund the fit out of the station and its annual operational costs, should it be delivered.' Transport Scotland also issued a joint statement issued on behalf of West Lothian Council, Winchburgh Developments Ltd, Transport Scotland, Network Rail and ScotRail which said: 'Further work continues to explore opportunities for innovative construction techniques to support efficient and low-disruption delivery. 'A stakeholder meeting with Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie MSP, is scheduled to take place in Winchburgh on 18 June. This will offer the minister the opportunity to see first-hand the progress made by the project partners.' That same statement contained comments from council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick: 'It's extremely encouraging to see this project continuing to move forward at pace. With the planning application submitted and business case prepared, we're entering an important phase, which reflects the positive collaboration between all parties.' Linlithgow MSP Fiona Hyslop added: 'It is good to see progress being reported on Winchburgh Rail Station from the Stakeholder Group which I helped to set up as the local MSP. 'A route to additional funding has been identified, as I suggested, through the City Region Deal and design and location plans are ready to be submitted for planning permission. 'This has been possible due to constructive co-operation between Winchburgh Developers Ltd and Network Rail and this news is an important step forward. 'There is still more to do to deliver the Winchburgh Rail Station, and I look forward to meeting Winchburgh Developers later in June.'
