Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel
The committee raised fears that those weapons components could be used in attacks by Israel on aid workers and humanitarian infrastructure on Gaza.
Chair Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, wrote: 'As the Committee identified in its report, there are a number of avenues for accountability in response to violations of IHL (international humanitarian law), including the suspension of arms export licences.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment
'I remain concerned that there is a real risk that weapon components, manufactured in the UK, could be used in attacks, including those on aid workers or humanitarian infrastructure.'
The MP noted that Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty previously claimed that stopping F-35 exports to Israel would require the 'entire programme' to be suspended as it is 'highly integrated'.
However, Champion insisted it was 'fundamental' that the UK Government adheres to international law.
'I am concerned by the decision to exempt F-35 components from the suspension of arms export licences, given your assessment that there are 'clear risks' of serious violations of IHL by Israel in Gaza,' she wrote.
The MP then noted the UK's obligations under the Genocide Convention, asking if ministers accepted that the duty to prevent genocide has been triggered.
She asked: 'If so, at what point was this duty triggered? If not, why not?'
Champion also noted the UK Government's obligations under the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) which states that it is 'strictly prohibited' for a state transferring arms where the transfer would 'violate its relevant international obligations under international agreements to which it is a Party'.
Exports are also banned if the arms 'would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes,' Champion added.
The MP put several questions to ministers, including if it accepts exporting F-35 components is incompatible with its international legal obligations, and if it accepts Israel is using the components to commit war crimes.
Another question asks: 'What legal authority does the Government rely upon to support its position that a positive contribution to peace and security is to be balanced against a clear risk of the arms being used to commit serious violations of IHL/IHRL?'
READ MORE: YouGov poll predicts result in every Scottish seat – see the full map
Champion asked the ministers to reply by July 11.
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
It comes as a legal challenge over the UK's arms exports to Israel is currently underway.
We told in January how the Labour Government refused to review Israel's access to F-35 parts exported from the UK despite evidence that the planes have been used to bomb 'safe zones' in Gaza.
In September 2024, Labour blocked around 30 of 350 UK arms export licences to Israel after accepting that there existed a 'clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law'.
However, parts for F-35 fighter jets were specifically excluded – despite media confirmation that the jets had been used by Israel to bomb the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza in July 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as 'arch-hypocrite' Angela Rayner is selling off allotments... but not in her patch
has been branded an 'arch-hypocrite' after she campaigned for allotments in her own constituency but sanctioned their sell-off elsewhere. Before Labour came to power, Ms Rayner flagged up the work on community sites, describing one as a 'fantastic initiative'. But since the party has led the Government, the Deputy Prime Minister, who also runs the Ministry of Housing, has personally approved the sale of eight allotment plots across the country. The sites owned by councils are protected from development or sale under the Allotments Act 1925 but this can be allowed with a sign-off from the housing minister. Among the allotment plots sold under Ms Rayner's watch is one in Storrington, West Sussex, to make way for 78 homes. Two in Bolsover, Derbyshire, are also earmarked for closure. It comes as councils face a reported £8billion funding shortfall by the end of this Parliament. Earlier this month, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said Ms Rayner had put the 'nail in the coffin' of allotments by allowing councils to sell off the land. An allotment holder himself, Mr Corbyn said it would 'fill many with deep dismay'. But just three years ago, Ms Rayner visited a community garden allotment in Droylsden, Greater Manchester, praising it as a 'fantastic initiative'. Writing on her website, she added: 'Those that work on the allotment say the initiative has also helped them through some tough times and reduced loneliness and isolation in the area. 'They hold regular open days where residents can turn up and take food for free. The fruit and veg bags are topped up with store cupboard essentials to help those struggling with the cost of living crisis.' She also hailed other projects in her Ashton- under-Lyne constituency and Curzon Ashton Football Club which runs an allotment programme for ex-servicemen and women suffering from loneliness. Tory housing spokesman Paul Holmes said: 'Ms Rayner has been exposed as an arch-hypocrite, the ultimate Nimby who thinks selling off everyone else's allotments is fine – just not in her back yard. 'By declaring war on Jeremy Corbyn's treasured allotments, she has sown the seeds for the next iteration of Labour's Left-wing civil war. Rather than trying to prune her rivals by any means necessary, perhaps she should grow up and focus on what the country really needs to cultivate.' But a Ministry of Housing spokesman said ministerial approvals for sales last year, half of which were under the previous Tory government and half under Labour, were lower than in previous years. He added: 'We know how important allotments are for communities and that is why strict legal criteria are in place to protect them. 'It is simply untrue to suggest there is any change in the policy. The rules have been in place since 2016 and have not changed.'
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anger as SNP spend £520m on dualling 11 miles of killer A9
Dualling just 11 miles of Scotland's most dangerous road has so far cost taxpayers more than half a billion pounds, it has emerged. And work on the next six-mile stretch of the A9 is expected to cost at least £300million – pushing the combined bill to more than £800million by spring 2027. The SNP vowed in 2011 to upgrade 88 miles of single carriageway between Perth and Inverness by this year. But ministers failed to fund the commitment and finally admitted two years ago that the timetable had become 'unachievable' – pushing back the completion date to 2035. Only two of the 11 sections have been fully dualled so far – the five miles from Kincraig to Dalraddy, near Aviemore, and six miles from Luncarty to Pass of Birnam, north of Perth. The next section set to be completed, the six miles from Tomatin to Moy, outside Inverness, was recently delayed from 2027 to 2028. Construction has yet to start on the other eight stretches, with the final cost forecast to be around £3.7billion. Figures released to the Tories under freedom of information show the SNP spent £520million on dualling the road between 2012 and June this year. This includes design, land acquisition, demolition and preparatory works, procurement of contractors and the cost of the construction works themselves. Another £300million of spending is planned by April 2027, taking the total to £820million for the completion of 17 miles. Scottish Tory transport spokesman Sue Webber called for emergency legislation to cut bureaucracy and 'get the job done'. 'The SNP's ongoing failure to dual the A9 is Scotland's national shame,' she said. 'They've managed to squander £800million of taxpayers' money and still not even a third of the A9 is dualled. 'As costs soar and progress stalls, more and more lives are being lost on the A9. Unlike the SNP, we would make dualling the A9 a top priority.' Despite being the key transport artery to the Highlands, the A9 has long been a notorious accident blackspot, with many fatalities where the route switches between single and dual carriageway. There have been 320 'injury collisions' on the road in the last four years, including 135 classed as serious and 28 fatalities. The deadliest recent year was 2022-23, when 13 people were killed, followed by 2024-25, when there were seven fatalities. Among the recent casualties was mother-of-two Ashleigh Watson, 31, who was pronounced dead at the scene after a single-vehicle crash just before Christmas last year near Inshes, Inverness. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'The A9 is an essential route in Scotland. It must be safe, reliable and resilient, and that is what this Government will deliver.'
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
Councils should not integrate migrants before their backgrounds & asylum claims have been checked thoroughly
Havant a clue IF you are worried about unknown men who came here illegally being housed in your local high street, or even close to your children's school, then Labour figures on Havant Council think you're racist. Your valid concerns about the hidden past of these strangers, or their possible toxic views towards women, are regarded by these councillors with utter contempt. They think asylum seekers should be housed handily close to shops, GP surgeries and schools, rather than in more remote sites, so they can 'integrate' faster and avoid what the borough council bosses called 'racist rhetoric'. It's one thing for refugees — who have been checked and granted asylum — to be welcomed and quickly assimilated into local communities. But the councillors at Havant want to integrate migrants before their backgrounds and claims for asylum have even been tested, reflecting the Government's own plans. It is a delusion of virtue-signallers to think that everyone crossing the Channel on small boats is fleeing persecution and not a single one poses a threat. Too many foreign criminals have shown otherwise. We look forward to seeing if the voters of Havant agree with their councillors when they next come up for re-election. 1 Rein it in, Rach IMAGINE Britain without the centuries-old sport of horseracing — without the magnificent thoroughbreds, the crowds, the colours or the spectacle. We won't have to imagine if, out of desperation, the British Horseracing Authority carries out an unprecedented strike. It will give us a glimpse of what the future could look like if the Chancellor goes ahead with a punitive increase in taxes on horserace gambling. It wouldn't just be four race meets postponed, however, if Rachel Reeves hikes the betting tax. There are worrying odds that it would wipe £330million off the value of the industry and send it into irreversible decline, with nearly 3,000 jobs lost and another nail put in the coffin of our culture and traditions. She must not take the gamble. Final salute BRITAIN'S war-time citizens were a special breed. None more so than those who earned the Victoria Cross – the highest award for gallantry in the face of the enemy. And now we have lost the last of those special heroes. The incredible bravery of former RAF Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank, who died aged 105, was matched only by his modesty and concern for his crew. He shrugged off any praise or accolades in life. But in death, let us salute him.
