logo
Proposed Walz bonding bill falls short of flood control needs in Red River Basin, managers say

Proposed Walz bonding bill falls short of flood control needs in Red River Basin, managers say

Yahoo08-02-2025

Feb. 8—Watershed managers in northwest Minnesota say they're concerned and frustrated with the level of funding Gov. Tim Walz has recommended for flood-control projects in his proposed infrastructure bill.
Walz's Capital Budget recommendations
include $5.6 million for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program (FHMGAP), which provides financial aid to local governments for flood control projects. That's far short of the need, according to Rob Sip, executive director of the
Red River Watershed Management Board.
The board, which is made up of several watershed districts in northwest Minnesota, helps fund and support projects to mitigate flooding and improve water quality along with addressing a variety of water-related needs.
Statewide, there's a current need for $139 million in FHMGAP funding to address flood mitigation projects, Sip said, including $48 million just in the Red River Basin.
That's a "far cry" from the $5.6 million Walz has recommended, he says.
Considering last summer's flooding in southern Minnesota, the failure of the Rapidan Dam near Mankato, flooding in northeast Minnesota and wet conditions last spring in the northwest part of the state, Sip says the "Red Board" — as it's informally known — was hoping for a better outcome in the Capital Budget.
"We were just hopeful with all (the flooding), the need would have been recognized and that maybe there would have been a bonding bill recommended of $30-some million, maybe $40 million — whatever," Sip said. "It's just frustrating, and it's like we can't get the agencies and the governor to listen to our needs."
Bonding sessions to fund infrastructure projects historically happen every other year, with funding coming from money the state borrows by issuing bonds for investors to purchase. Lawmakers failed to pass a bonding bill during the last legislative session.
In 2023, the Legislature allocated nearly $62 million to the Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program, Sip says, the largest allocation since the program's launch in 1987.
"But then we've had several other years, since like 2019 or so, where there hasn't been a bonding bill," he said.
Between the Red Board, member watershed districts, state funding and "some limited federal funding," more than $70 million has been invested in recent water storage and flood mitigation projects in the Red River Basin, Sip said.
"None of these projects are done," Sip said. "So, we have a bunch of bridges to nowhere. None of them are operational. None of them function yet.
"I guess if the state's OK with just not getting projects done, well then fine, but we need to get to a point where these projects are done because we have all the state investment," he added. "And I don't think there's enough awareness out there that these projects aren't done, and there's been a lot of state money pumped into them."
Among the unfinished projects in the Red River Basin is a flood control project in Newfolden to remove homeowners living on the east side of U.S. Highway 59 from the 100-year flood plain.
Work on the $12.2 million project, which includes a 396-acre impoundment north of Newfolden city limits, began last spring and is nearing completion, but $2 million is needed "to take us to the finish line," said Morteza Maher, administrator of the Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District in Warren, Minnesota.
The Red River Watershed Management Board has agreed to contribute the remaining funds necessary to complete the project, but that's money that won't go to other projects in the basin, Sip said.
Other needs outlined in the Red Board's bonding request include the Nelson Slough Improvement project, also in the Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District, $2 million; the Redpath Flood Impoundment in the Bois de Sioux Watershed near Wheaton, Minnesota, $13.7 million; and the Roseau Lake Rehabilitation Project in Roseau County, $9 million.
"Because there was no bonding bill (in the last legislative session), we've been planning and working through the project of, 'What can we actually fund and how can we do that?' " Sip said. "We have a lot of other financial commitments, so we fund as much as we can with the funds that are available."
Given the shortfall facing flood control projects in Walz's proposed capital spending bill, Sip said he's met with numerous Red River Valley legislators to highlight the needs.
"Our Red River Valley legislators know what we need. They get it — they understand it," Sip said. "We've done a lot of interaction with them.
"The challenge is, the bonding bill includes roads, bridges — all kinds of public infrastructure. So, we're competing against all that. It's hard to get funding when people's feet are dry."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa
Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa

President Donald Trump quickly reacted to fledgling riots in Los Angeles County over the weekend by activating the National Guard, a response that drew comparisons to the summer of 2020, when widespread violence and destruction arose from Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots. Trump's decision to federalize 4,100 National Guard soldiers and deploy hundreds of Marines came in the face of forceful objections from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is now suing Trump over the move. Trump's deputies, however, say the National Guard was a necessary step to quash riots lest they reach the scale of the ones that occurred across the country in the aftermath of George Floyd's death on May 25, 2020. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Trump's decision would prevent a scenario like the one in Minnesota that year, when Democratic Gov. Tim Walz waited two days to call upon the National Guard to address unrest in his state. "That's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers have been federalized, so they can use their special skill set to keep peace," Noem said in a recent television interview. "We're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen, and if you remember, it all happened in Tim Walz's state, in Minneapolis… and Governor Tim Walz made very bad decisions." David Marcus: Two Ways Trump 2.0 Quelled The Would-be La Riots Walz tried to get Trump to "bail him out" after the governor "let his city burn for days on end," Noem said. Read On The Fox News App Walz activated the National Guard in Minnesota on May 28, after looting and arson had already cropped up in the state in response to Floyd's death. Within hours of Walz announcing he had mobilized National Guard soldiers, rioters set ablaze Minneapolis' Third Precinct police station. Although Walz ended up activating Minnesota's entire National Guard, his hesitancy prompted Trump to threaten on May 29 to federalize the soldiers "to get the job done right." 'State Of Rebellion': Expert Weighs In On Newsom Challenge To Trump Deploying National Guard By May 30, Minnesota's National Guard announced that the governor had fully mobilized it, marking the "largest domestic deployment" in its history. During these riots, Trump was far more deferential to governors, several of whom saw their cities ravaged by rioting, looting, arson, violence and death. The Democratic governors struggled at times to balance a law-and-order posture with their sympathy for those frustrated by police brutality. The National Guard is a military force based in each state, and governors and presidents have shared authority over it. Governors typically have purview over their respective National Guard units, but presidents can call them into federal service in certain scenarios. On June 3, 2020, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., pressured the Trump administration in a New York Times op-ed to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow the president to federalize the National Guard. The prospect was so controversial at the time that the newspaper retracted the op-ed, citing fierce blowback from its readers. Jonathan Turley: Democrats' Rabid Anti-ice Resistance In La Against Trump Could Backfire By June 4, governors in 32 states and Washington, D.C., activated a total of more than 32,000 National Guard soldiers as the chaos transpired across the country. Click Here For More Immigration Coverage DHS Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar echoed Noem's remarks in a statement online on Monday, saying Trump moved so quickly because he did not want the same level of violence and damage as in 2020. Trump and Noem "will not allow violent radicals to intimidate and shut down law enforcement in LA," Edgar said. "This isn't the Summer of 2020 2.0. I thank the brave men and women of the National Guard defending federal buildings so that immigration officials can keep us safe."Original article source: Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa

Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa
Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa

Fox News

time7 hours ago

  • Fox News

Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa

President Donald Trump quickly reacted to fledgling riots in Los Angeles County over the weekend by activating the National Guard, a response that drew comparisons to the summer of 2020, when widespread violence and destruction arose from Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots. Trump's decision to federalize 4,100 National Guard soldiers and deploy hundreds of Marines came in the face of forceful objections from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is now suing Trump over the move. Trump's deputies, however, say the National Guard was a necessary step to quash riots lest they reach the scale of the ones that occurred across the country in the aftermath of George Floyd's death on May 25, 2020. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Trump's decision would prevent a scenario like the one in Minnesota that year, when Democratic Gov. Tim Walz waited two days to call upon the National Guard to address unrest in his state. "That's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers have been federalized, so they can use their special skill set to keep peace," Noem said in a recent television interview. "We're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen, and if you remember, it all happened in Tim Walz's state, in Minneapolis… and Governor Tim Walz made very bad decisions." Walz tried to get Trump to "bail him out" after the governor "let his city burn for days on end," Noem said. Walz activated the National Guard in Minnesota on May 28, after looting and arson had already cropped up in the state in response to Floyd's death. Within hours of Walz announcing he had mobilized National Guard soldiers, rioters set ablaze Minneapolis' Third Precinct police station. Although Walz ended up activating Minnesota's entire National Guard, his hesitancy prompted Trump to threaten on May 29 to federalize the soldiers "to get the job done right." By May 30, Minnesota's National Guard announced that the governor had fully mobilized it, marking the "largest domestic deployment" in its history. During these riots, Trump was far more deferential to governors, several of whom saw their cities ravaged by rioting, looting, arson, violence and death. The Democratic governors struggled at times to balance a law-and-order posture with their sympathy for those frustrated by police brutality. The National Guard is a military force based in each state, and governors and presidents have shared authority over it. Governors typically have purview over their respective National Guard units, but presidents can call them into federal service in certain scenarios. On June 3, 2020, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., pressured the Trump administration in a New York Times op-ed to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow the president to federalize the National Guard. The prospect was so controversial at the time that the newspaper retracted the op-ed, citing fierce blowback from its readers. By June 4, governors in 32 states and Washington, D.C., activated a total of more than 32,000 National Guard soldiers as the chaos transpired across the country. DHS Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar echoed Noem's remarks in a statement online on Monday, saying Trump moved so quickly because he did not want the same level of violence and damage as in 2020. Trump and Noem "will not allow violent radicals to intimidate and shut down law enforcement in LA," Edgar said. "This isn't the Summer of 2020 2.0. I thank the brave men and women of the National Guard defending federal buildings so that immigration officials can keep us safe."

Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response
Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem took a shot at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for how he handled the 2020 riots in his state, claiming that the Trump administration wouldn't let history repeat itself in Los Angeles amid immigration protests. Noem, who previously served as governor of South Dakota, defended the Trump administration's decision to deploy thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to address the protests in Los Angeles, using Minnesota as an example of what happens when a "bad governor" is in charge. "I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn," Noem told reporters Tuesday. "And the president and I have talked about this in the past, and he was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community where a bad governor made a bad decision." Ice Sweeps Through La Businesses As Local Democrats Cry Foul Over Trump Administration's Enforcement Actions Walz was first elected governor of Minnesota in 2019, leading the state as protests broke out after the death of Black man George Floyd at the hands of a White police officer in 2020. While Walz has said he takes the blame for a delayed response activating the National Guard in his state, he has also said he is proud of how Minnesota reacted. "I'm proud of Minnesota's response. I'm proud of Minnesota's first responders who were out there, from firefighters to police to the National Guard to citizens that were out there," Walz said in a 2022 gubernatorial debate. Read On The Fox News App Walz's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc Meanwhile, the Trump administration is dispatching a total of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after protests broke out Friday stemming from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests in the city. President Donald Trump has gone head-to-head with California's governor, Democrat Gavin Newsom, over the activation of the troops. While Trump has argued the National Guard troops are necessary to prevent destruction in Los Angeles, Newsom said most of the troops "are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders." Ice Official Puts Politicians On Blast, Demanding They 'Stop Putting My People In Danger' Additionally, Newsom argued that the move violates state sovereignty because state governors typically oversee National Guard troops. However, Trump invoked a law to place the troops under federal command to bypass Newsom. "This isn't about public safety," Newsom said in a post on X on Monday. "It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." The Associated Press contributed to this report. Original article source: Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store