Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa
President Donald Trump quickly reacted to fledgling riots in Los Angeles County over the weekend by activating the National Guard, a response that drew comparisons to the summer of 2020, when widespread violence and destruction arose from Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots.
Trump's decision to federalize 4,100 National Guard soldiers and deploy hundreds of Marines came in the face of forceful objections from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is now suing Trump over the move. Trump's deputies, however, say the National Guard was a necessary step to quash riots lest they reach the scale of the ones that occurred across the country in the aftermath of George Floyd's death on May 25, 2020.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Trump's decision would prevent a scenario like the one in Minnesota that year, when Democratic Gov. Tim Walz waited two days to call upon the National Guard to address unrest in his state.
"That's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers have been federalized, so they can use their special skill set to keep peace," Noem said in a recent television interview. "We're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen, and if you remember, it all happened in Tim Walz's state, in Minneapolis… and Governor Tim Walz made very bad decisions."
David Marcus: Two Ways Trump 2.0 Quelled The Would-be La Riots
Walz tried to get Trump to "bail him out" after the governor "let his city burn for days on end," Noem said.
Read On The Fox News App
Walz activated the National Guard in Minnesota on May 28, after looting and arson had already cropped up in the state in response to Floyd's death. Within hours of Walz announcing he had mobilized National Guard soldiers, rioters set ablaze Minneapolis' Third Precinct police station.
Although Walz ended up activating Minnesota's entire National Guard, his hesitancy prompted Trump to threaten on May 29 to federalize the soldiers "to get the job done right."
'State Of Rebellion': Expert Weighs In On Newsom Challenge To Trump Deploying National Guard
By May 30, Minnesota's National Guard announced that the governor had fully mobilized it, marking the "largest domestic deployment" in its history.
During these riots, Trump was far more deferential to governors, several of whom saw their cities ravaged by rioting, looting, arson, violence and death. The Democratic governors struggled at times to balance a law-and-order posture with their sympathy for those frustrated by police brutality.
The National Guard is a military force based in each state, and governors and presidents have shared authority over it. Governors typically have purview over their respective National Guard units, but presidents can call them into federal service in certain scenarios.
On June 3, 2020, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., pressured the Trump administration in a New York Times op-ed to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow the president to federalize the National Guard. The prospect was so controversial at the time that the newspaper retracted the op-ed, citing fierce blowback from its readers.
Jonathan Turley: Democrats' Rabid Anti-ice Resistance In La Against Trump Could Backfire
By June 4, governors in 32 states and Washington, D.C., activated a total of more than 32,000 National Guard soldiers as the chaos transpired across the country.
Click Here For More Immigration Coverage
DHS Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar echoed Noem's remarks in a statement online on Monday, saying Trump moved so quickly because he did not want the same level of violence and damage as in 2020.
Trump and Noem "will not allow violent radicals to intimidate and shut down law enforcement in LA," Edgar said. "This isn't the Summer of 2020 2.0. I thank the brave men and women of the National Guard defending federal buildings so that immigration officials can keep us safe."Original article source: Now and then: How Trump's response to LA riots has changed from 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Federal Agents Force Senator to Floor and Handcuff Him After He Interrupts Noem
'I'm worried about this country,' Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said on 'The Daily' for its latest episode. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California appeared on Thursday's episode of the New York Times podcast 'The Daily,' as he engaged in a tense standoff with President Trump over the military's involvement in anti-deportation protests in Los Angeles. Mr. Trump deployed nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to the city to clamp down on the protests, against Mr. Newsom's wishes, and the state of California responded by suing his administration, accusing it of an 'unprecedented power grab.' Here are six takeaways from Mr. Newsom's conversation with Michael Barbaro, the host of 'The Daily': Newsom accused Trump of inflaming the situation by mobilizing the military. Mr. Newsom argued that law enforcement officers in Los Angeles had routine experience dealing with protests, including at events as innocuous as World Series baseball games, and said that local officers had the situation under control. 'We deal with civil unrest. That's what law enforcement does,' Mr. Newsom said. 'The military's simply not needed. But what he's doing is trying to gin things up to create problems.' A small number of demonstrators have looted, vandalized and set cars on fire, and Mr. Newsom condemned those actions. But he suggested that the response from Mr. Trump was disproportionate. The arrival of the National Guard inflamed tensions, Mr. Newsom said, with protesters flocking in response. 'We had to defend the National Guard. We had to use our own law enforcement to protect them,' he said. 'Just think about how perverse that is.' He questioned the president's mental acuity. Some of the sparring between Mr. Trump and Mr. Newsom this week has centered on their communication — or lack thereof — about the National Guard deployment. They spoke early Saturday morning, a conversation in which Mr. Trump has said he brought up the National Guard. (Mr. Newsom said that was false, calling the president a 'stone-cold liar.') But Mr. Trump then told reporters he called Mr. Newsom a second time, on Monday, to admonish him. Mr. Newsom says a Monday call never happened. The president 'starts making up all these things he claimed he told me about, which honestly starts to disturb me on a different level,' Mr. Newsom said. 'Maybe he actually believed he said those things, and he's not all there. I mean that.' Mr. Newsom added: 'He claimed he had another conversation with me. So there's something going on here.' Mr. Trump, days from his 79th birthday, has not faced the same degree of criticism over his age and cognitive ability as his predecessor, former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., but some of Mr. Trump's rambling speeches have drawn scrutiny. Newsom grew emotional as he talked about his daughter. Responding to comments from the federal border czar, Tom Homan, Mr. Trump said on Monday that he thought the idea of arresting Mr. Newsom over his handling of the protests was 'great.' Mr. Newsom has said Mr. Homan should 'come after me. Arrest me.' But on 'The Daily,' Mr. Newsom revealed that the threat had hit home. 'I have a 15-year-old who quite literally came home from school crying because she was told on her last day of school — God as my witness — because she was told her daddy was getting arrested,' Mr. Newsom said. 'And I said, 'That doesn't matter. That doesn't matter. What matters is what's happening with the military out on the streets. I can handle that, I'll be fine,'' Mr. Newsom said, his voice rasping with emotion. ''But I'm worried about you, I'm worried about this country.'' Mr. Barbaro chimed in: 'I'm sensing some emotion in your voice here.' 'Yeah,' Mr. Newsom replied, momentarily seeming at a loss for words. He said Mr. Trump had 'authoritarian tendencies,' but did not back down from overtures to conservatives. Mr. Newsom has always been willing to joust with Mr. Trump, but lately has seemed more apt to cast the president as an existential threat, and has called the deployment of the military in a domestic setting a crossing of a 'red line.' Referring to a televised speech on Tuesday in which he said 'democracy is under assault,' Mr. Newsom told 'The Daily' that people needed to 'wake up' and resist. 'I just pray that people don't give in — and this was the final words I said — to cynicism, to their own fear and anxiety,' he said. 'They're the antidote to that, as long as they don't give up.' Still, Mr. Newsom, seen as a likely 2028 Democratic presidential hopeful, struck a conciliatory tone toward conservatives after November's election loss and, on his podcast, hosted right-wing figures like Stephen K. Bannon and Charlie Kirk. And Mr. Newsom maintained that Democrats could learn from them how to win back working-class voters. 'At a certain point, divorce is not an option,' he said. 'I'm learning from these guys — I learn a lot. I listen to Steve Bannon' about economic populism, the governor said. He deplored ICE's tactics but highlighted his work with the agency, reflecting an immigration dilemma. Mr. Newsom endorsed comprehensive immigration reform, and highlighted the fear some families are feeling from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. 'You had a nine-month pregnant woman arrested,' Mr. Newsom said. 'A 4-year-old that's gone. People are disappearing. People are disappearing. Disappearing.' But Mr. Newsom also said that California Democrats had criticized him for working with ICE, 'which I've done over 10,500 times since I've been governor.' And he distanced himself from the policy of sanctuary cities like Los Angeles, which refuse to coordinate with federal immigration officials. Mr. Newsom pointed out that as mayor of San Francisco, in 2008, he enacted a policy that referred undocumented minors charged with felonies to federal immigration officials. The contrast reflected the dilemma Democrats face on immigration, an issue where voters have increasingly aligned with Republicans in demanding stricter border control measures. Newsom dialed back a threat to withhold federal tax dollars. Even before the conflict over military deployment, Mr. Trump threatened to cut federal funding to California, citing a transgender girl's success in high school track. Mr. Newsom responded by suggesting that California could withhold the taxes its residents pay the federal government. But how the state would do so is not clear, and Mr. Newsom said on 'The Daily' that he would not encourage residents to simply not file federal tax returns. 'That puts those taxpayers at risk — I would never do that,' he said. But how creative, Mr. Barbaro asked, was Mr. Newsom willing to get to carry out this threat? 'Well, I'm trying to be creative, and we're looking,' Mr. Newsom said. 'I have a team of people looking creatively.' Watch their full conversation below, or listen to it here.
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing
'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing WASHINGTON – The fury radiating off of Congressional Democrats is palpable. Hours after Alex Padilla, the senior U.S. senator in California, was forcibly removed from a press briefing with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, House Democrats roamed the Capitol seeking an audience with GOP leadership. Meanwhile, their Senate counterparts gave floor speech after floor speech, condemning the action as an "abuse of power" and "assault." House Speaker Mike Johnson called Padilla's actions "wildly inappropriate" and alleged he rushed at the secretary. House Democrats shouted over him, saying "that's a lie!" Padilla interrupted a press briefing Noem held in Los Angeles on June 12, amid days of protests against President Donald Trump's immigration raids in the city. Some of those protests have turned violent, with demonstrators burning cars and hurling objects at law enforcement. Trump sent in National Guard troops without Gov. Gavin Newsom's consent, spurring additional outrage from Democrats. 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and mayor have placed on this country,' Noem said as Padilla started asking: 'Madam Secretary I want to know why you insist on –' before he was grabbed and hauled out of the room by security guards. Padilla was pushed to the ground and handcuffed outside the room. "Anybody that looks at that video will understand that this amounts to an assault, a felony," said Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. "The White House is unhinged and out of control." Espaillat and more than a dozen other Democratic lawmakers attempted to enter Thune's office, who was meeting with the White House, and were turned away from Johnson's office. "They said he was busy, that he couldn't come out to meet with dozens of members of the U.S. House of Representatives, hiding behind the doors there," said Rep. Nanette Barragán, D-California. "It's a disgrace." On the other side of the Capitol, a string of Democratic senators delivered floor speeches hammering the indignity of the episode. 'I saw this happen to my colleague, and I am shocked by how far we have descended in the first 140 days of this administration . . . What is the becoming of our democracy? Are there no limits to what this administration will do?' said New Jersey Democrat Sen. Andy Kim on the Senate floor. Washington Sen. Patty Murray said on the Senate floor she 'cannot believe' lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are not calling the situation 'outrageous.' Republicans largely defended the actions taken by federal law enforcement agents. 'What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaged in that kind of behavior . . . A sitting member of Congress should not act like that,' House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. 'It is beneath a member of Congress. It is beneath a senator. They're supposed to lead by example, and that is not a good example." White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said Padilla 'embarrassed himself and his constituents with this immature, theater-kid stunt.' 'It's telling that Democrats are more riled up about Padilla than they are about the violent riots and assaults on law enforcement in LA,' she added. Trump dispatched 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell the protests. Padilla said in a press conference after the incident that he wanted more information from Noem on the Trump administration's "increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions." Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes afterward, according to the Department of Homeland Security. He added he was not arrested or detained. But, he said, "if this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country. We will hold this administration accountable.' Tricia McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, wrote on X that Padilla was 'told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands.' Contributing: Joey Garrison and Deborah Berry, USA TODAY
The Intercept
36 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Josh Hawley Blames Nonprofits for 'Bankrolling Civil Unrest' in LA Without Evidence
As protests against immigration crackdowns spread from Los Angeles to cities around the United States this week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., leveraged the perceived unrest to target nonprofits supporting the very communities the Trump administration has put under siege. President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard and the Marines, while the Los Angeles Police Department carried out a brutal response to protests objecting to workers' arbitrary detention by masked ICE agents in Los Angeles. After fueling the chaos in support of Trump's deportation regime, Republicans used the moment to target nonprofit leaders and discredit protesters as 'bought and paid-for flash mobs.' In a letter to multiple nonprofit organizations serving immigrant and Latino communities — including the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, also known as CHIRLA, and Unión del Barrio — Hawley accused the organizations of 'aiding and abetting criminal conduct' by 'bankrolling civil unrest.' 'Credible reporting now suggests that your organization has provided logistical support and financial resources to individuals engaged in these disruptive actions,' wrote Hawley, who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, in one version of the letter. 'Let me be clear: bankrolling civil unrest is not protected speech. It is aiding and abetting criminal conduct. Accordingly, you must immediately cease and desist any further involvement in your organization funding, or promotion of these unlawful activities.' The letter demands that the organizations preserve a large number of records from November 5, 2024, onward, including 'donor lists,' 'media or public relations strategies,' and all internal communications and financial documents related to protests. Hawley did not elaborate on any sources for his claims, and he did not immediately respond to The Intercept's request for comment. But in an interview on Fox News, he doubled down on his accusations. 'These aren't spontaneous at all. They're about as authentic as astroturf. They are bought and paid-for flash mobs, and I want to know who's doing the buying and the paying. That's why today I've launched an investigation,' Hawley said on Wednesday. CHIRLA denied fueling violence, saying the group won't be intimidated by the Missouri senator. 'Our mission is rooted in non-violent advocacy, community safety, and democratic values,' wrote CHIRLA executive director Angelica Salas in a statement reported by LAist. 'We will not be intimidated for standing with immigrant communities and documenting the inhumane manner that our community is being targeted with the assault by the raids, the unconstitutional and illegal arrests, detentions, and the assault on our first amendment rights.' The inquiry marks the latest chapter of the GOP's war on progressive-aligned nonprofits. Other Republicans have attempted to target CHIRLA and other nonprofits focused on immigrant rights. On Thursday, House Homeland Security Committee Chair Mark Green, R-Tenn., and Subcommittee Chair Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., launched an investigation into more than 200 nonprofit organizations, including CHIRLA, alleging that they 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' The congressmen also accused the organizations of 'actively advising and training illegal aliens on strategies to avoid cooperation with immigration officials.' In addition to CHIRLA, the House subcommittee called out Catholic Charities USA and Southwest Key Programs for their resettlement efforts. The letter demands that organizations provide a full accounting of federal grants, contracts, and payments received during the Biden administration, as well as information on whether they've sued the federal government and the services they provide to immigrants.
