logo
Home Office probes Palestine Action over suspected Iran link

Home Office probes Palestine Action over suspected Iran link

Spectator5 hours ago

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced on Monday afternoon that the UK government had decided to proscribe activist group Palestine Action – and now it transpires that officials are investigating its funding over concerns that there may be an Iran link. As reported by the Times, Palestine Action's donations are being probed amid worries that the Iranian regime is funding the campaign group via proxies given their aims align. How curious…
Palestine Action's donations are being probed amid fears that the Iranian regime is funding the campaign group via proxies
Palestine Action – which states its purpose is to 'dismantle the apartheid regime in Israel through targeted campaigns against companies that profit from the occupation and genocide of the Palestinian people' – admits on its website that as it is a grassroots movement, its funding may be 'sometimes inconsistent'. Donations can be made via its site, but the group does not publish financial information – although one of its few public donors is known to be James 'Fergie' Chambers, a US communist who is also the heir to the billion-dollar Cox Enterprises empire. NGO monitor, a research organisation that holds activist groups to account, has blasted Palestine Action for not revealing its funding sources, saying this 'reflects a lack of transparency and accountability'. And now the Home Office has waded in, with concerns about exactly where the group is getting the significant sums required for its legal costs. Dear oh dear…
Cooper told the Commons on Monday that her decision to proscribe the group was made in parr by considering Palestine Action long history of controversial and damaging stunt. In 2022, seven members of the group broke into the Bristol headquarters of Elbit Systems UK, a subsidiary of the Israel-based arms manufacturer, with sledgehammers. In the same year, the group attacked the Thales defence factory in Glasgow and Instro Precision in Kent. In March last year, a Palestine Action activist slashed a 1914 portrait of Lord Balfour at Trinity College, Cambridge. The following month, four activists were charged with causing some half a million pounds worth of damage at the Teledyne factory in Shipley, which supplies electronics to the defence sector. Earlier this year, Palestine Action sprayed Allianz Insurance's London offices with red paint and graffitied Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland. They don't do things by halves, eh?
The Home Secretary will lay a draft proscription order next Monday, and MPs will vote on the motion the following Wednesday. If passed, it is down to the House of Lords to have the final say before the legislation comes into force on 4 July. Stay tuned…

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Government refuses to reveal assessment of Israel's nuclear weapons
UK Government refuses to reveal assessment of Israel's nuclear weapons

The National

time11 minutes ago

  • The National

UK Government refuses to reveal assessment of Israel's nuclear weapons

Labour ministers have repeatedly declined to address Israel's secret stockpile of nuclear weaponry – obtained outwith the international Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) – even after the nation launched strikes on Iran's nuclear sites on June 13. Israel's strikes were followed by the US bombing further Iranian nuclear sites in a bid to stop the country obtaining a nuclear weapon. Assessments from the US and International Atomic Energy Agency earlier in the year concluded that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, and the country had been due to enter talks on its nuclear program, before the Israeli attacks. At Westminster on Tuesday, Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer was asked if he could share the UK Government assessment of 'Israel's stockpile of nuclear weapons'. Falconer flatly refused, saying MPs 'will understand why I wouldn't comment on these issues from the despatch box'. The previous day, Foreign Secretary David Lammy also declined to address Israel's nuclear weapons, but implied he knew about them. In response to a question from former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Lammy said: 'I don't want to go back to the days of Mordechai Vanunu – but I would just remind him Israel is not threatening its neighbours with nuclear weapons. "It's Iran, it's Iran that we must stop at this time.' Archive image, broadcast on Israeli TV in 2005, of Israel's secret Dimona nuclear research facilityVanunu was a whistleblower who told the press about Israel's secret nuclear weapons program in the 1980s. He was kidnapped from Italy and imprisoned in Israel for treason for revealing the details of the program. Estimates today say that Israel controls between 80 and 200 nuclear warheads. However, the country has never formally acknowledged them and never allowed international inspectors to view the facilities. Elsewhere on Tuesday, Middle East Minister Falconer was pushed on the UK's involvement with Israel's operations in Palestine. Scottish Labour MP Brian Leishman, who has backed Corbyn's calls for a full public inquiry into the UK Government's role in Gaza, said: 'The war criminals of Benjamin Netanyahu's government are carrying out the most vile human rights abuse and genocide. 'At the same time, the UK carries out the training of Israeli military personnel, facilitates almost daily spy flights that provide intelligence, and there is a continued exporting of military equipment to Israel. READ MORE: Labour see 'massive increase' in UK military equipment sent to Israel 'With all of that, I ask the minister if the Government will support an independent public inquiry into UK involvement in Israeli military operations in Gaza?' Falconer said: 'I think it's important to be focused on the facts at issue. 'We're not supporting spy flights. We have a Limited presence in order to try and find hostages in Gaza for reasons that the whole House would understand and support. 'There are less than 10 IDF personnel receiving any training in the UK, and that training is academic and non-military in its nature. 'We are not arming Israel's war in Gaza. We categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition for use in military operations in Gaza.' He added that while the Government 'welcomes scrutiny', it would not support a full public inquiry. Falconer (above) also announced that a second evacuation flight had been arranged for Britons in Israel. He told MPs the first RAF flight took place on Monday 'and I can confirm to the House now that we will fly another today'. 'We are providing support and advice to more than 1000 British nationals as they seek to leave the region by land and air," he added. 'We have deployed teams to Israel, Cyprus, Egypt and Jordan.'

Trump tells Fox News he's madder at Israel than Iran as Morning Joe crew marvels at his ‘remarkable anger' at ally
Trump tells Fox News he's madder at Israel than Iran as Morning Joe crew marvels at his ‘remarkable anger' at ally

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump tells Fox News he's madder at Israel than Iran as Morning Joe crew marvels at his ‘remarkable anger' at ally

President Donald Trump spoke to Fox and Friends host Lawrence Jones on Tuesday morning, around 90 minutes after his extraordinary rant about the collapse of the short-lived ceasefire between Israel and Iran, to explain why he was more annoyed with the former than the latter. Crossing the South Lawn of the White House as he set out to attend a NATO summit in The Netherlands, a furious Trump stopped to tell the press: 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing, do you understand that?' On Monday, the president had been showered with praise by relieved anti-war conservatives for getting both sides to commit to a cessation of hostilities following 12 days of back-and-forth missile strikes and just hours after Iran had blasted an American military base in Qatar in response to the U.S. bombing raids on its nuclear facilities on Saturday. But on Tuesday, the ceasefire quickly fell apart as Israel and Iran accused each other of violating its terms, prompting the explosion of anger on Truth Social and in front of the TV cameras. On Fox News 's flagship breakfast show, Jones told viewers: 'I got the opportunity to just talk to [Trump] before we just went on air for the 8 o'clock hour and I said, 'I haven't seen you this upset in a while, what's really going on?' 'He had just hung up with Bibi Netanyahu, the [Israeli] prime minister, and he said that the prime minister is bringing all the planes back. 'I said, 'Why are you so frustrated with Israel?' And he says, because he didn't feel like it was good faith, that even though they still had some time until the ceasefire, that they essentially unloaded on Iran.' Jones continued: 'I said, 'What about Iran?' as it relates to some of the reports that they're still doing the program? He says, 'They got to save face for the country. They still got to appear to be strong.'' 'But he goes, 'Their program is done.' He said, 'I probably fixed all of that when they hit their targets there.' But he says 'I'm not happy with both of them, but more so Israel,' because he goes, 'It's over, it's done, the program is done.'' Over on MSNBC, Morning Joe co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Jonathan Lemire were more scandalized by the expletive from Trump, noting his 'remarkable anger.' 'You can sort through the F word, but geopolitically, and I'm dead serious here, his message to Israel is really the great takeaway,' Scarborough said. 'Yeah, we got the full Trump experience just there,' Lemire agreed. 'Full Trump. He is certainly more – his language is much more colorful in private than he usually allows in public. We got a little bit of it there too. 'But you're right, it's interesting covering Donald Trump for a long time even in his remarks to reporters there, though angry at Iran, very clearly far more so at Israel. And then doubling down on that with that Truth Social post. That's the issue here.' The anchor continued: 'And we know that he and Benjamin Netanyahu used to be close allies, there was a real fraying of that in the previous months. We know that the president did not go to Israel when he went to the Middle East a month or so back. 'It did seem like he was working pretty well with Netanyahu in the last week or so during this campaign against Iran. But President Trump wants the war to stop. He didn't want it to begin in the first place. He went along with it. 'He did help, certainly, with that strike at the facilities on Saturday. But now he's eager for it to come to a quick conclusion. And he's furious that, at least for now, it hasn't just yet.'

Tech in the Iran-Israel conflict: internet blackout, crypto burning and home camera spying
Tech in the Iran-Israel conflict: internet blackout, crypto burning and home camera spying

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Tech in the Iran-Israel conflict: internet blackout, crypto burning and home camera spying

The war between Israel and Iran, though largely a fight of fighter planes, drones and bombs, is erupting in the digital realm as well. Both countries have long histories with digital warfare. The particular focus of the current conflict, Iran's nuclear program, was the target of one of the first cyberweapons meant to cause physical destruction, the sophisticated worm Stuxnet. Iran, clearly fearful of an online Israeli incursion, imposed a near-total internet blackout early last week. My colleague Johana Bhuiyan reports: Cybersecurity company Cloudflare assessed that internet traffic levels in Iran 'are now ~97% below where they were at the same time a week ago'. Severed internet connectivity has led to a troubling lack of access to information for everyday Iranians as their country descends into conflict. The reduction in internet speeds comes after an anti-Iranian government hacking group with potential ties to Israel claimed that it hacked Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah. Fatemeh Mohajerani, a spokesperson for Iran's government, said on Twitter/X that officials in Tehran had restricted internet access to ward off additional cyberattacks. On Wednesday, Iran's fears came to fruition. My colleague Dan Milmo reports: An Israel-linked hacking group has claimed responsibility for a $90m (£67m) heist on an Iranian cryptocurrency exchange. The group known as Gonjeshke Darande, Farsi for Predatory Sparrow, said on Wednesday it had hacked the Nobitex exchange, a day after claiming it had destroyed data at Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah. Elliptic, a consultancy specialising in crypto-related crime, said it had so far identified more than $90m in cryptocurrency sent from Nobitex crypto wallets to hacker addresses. The hackers appear to have in effect 'burned' those funds, rendering them inaccessible by storing them in 'vanity addresses' for which they do not have the cryptographic keys, Elliptic said. Iran has attempted to retaliate, but as with the wider war, it seems that Israeli attacks have been more successful and damaging. Israeli officials warned the country's residents that Iran is hijacking home security cameras that are connected to the internet to gather real-time intelligence on the ground, Bloomberg reports. Security professionals say hackers for Hamas and Russia have done the same. Home cameras may be a new front in the waging of war, but disrupting them does not seem as powerful as disrupting a central bank, as Israel has done. Late Friday, Iran seemed to lift the internet blackout for some citizens, the New York Times reported, though even those who could access limited online services believed their connections were temporary. PornHub, widely estimated to be the most-visited site for pornographic content in the world, returned to France on Friday after a three-week blackout. The site's owner, Aylo, had rescinded access to the site protest of a new French law demanding adult websites verify users' ages with a credit card or identification document. PornHub drew a line in the sand on the issue and revoked access for a market of nearly 70 million rather than implement an age gate. Since then, a French court has suspended the law while it considers compliance with the European Union's constitution, and so Pornhub is back online. But the quarrel between Paris and PornHub is the latest front in the debate over online age verification, which is heating to a boil across the globe. The issue sits at the intersection of two driving forces of internet regulation that often conflict: keeping children safe online and preserving both privacy and freedom of expression. It's an area where lawmakers have been uncharacteristically prone to action, even in the US, where tech regulation is often as hands off as can be. More than 20 states now have age verification laws on the books. PornHub has made itself unavailable in 17 of them. Texas, the second-most populous state in the US with 31m people, is the highest-profile example. The state legislature there passed a law requiring an ID to visit PornHub in September 2023. In March of the following year, the site went dark in the state, greeting would-be visitors with a banner calling the law 'ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous'. In Louisiana, which has imposed age verification laws, PornHub is still available, but it has seen traffic there decline by 80%, which it attributes to the barrier of the ID requirement. The US supreme court heard arguments in January over whether these laws infringe on the constitutional right to free speech. Research into the laws into the US have found that they are not effective in their stated goal. Online search data showed that people in states with age verification laws sought out porn sites that did not comply with local laws so as to circumvent the age gates as well as virtual private networks to hide their locations from internet providers. The other battlefields over age verification concern social media bans for underage users. Australia, which has passed a law banning under-16s from social media, has been testing different technologies with which to enforce its prohibition but found them lacking. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The UK is the next frontier in the fight. The UK's system for verifying ages to keep pornography away from children, a provision of the Online Safety Act, will take effect in July. Will London be the next Paris or the next Texas? Last week, Donald Trump debuted a mobile phone branded with his family name – 'T1' etched into the gold case alongside an American flag – with a listed price of $500 and a pledge that it would be 'proudly designed and built in the United States'. Specifically in Alabama, California and Florida. Its monthly service plan will cost $47.45. The Trump phone will struggle to live up to those promises. Its makers have to abide by the same market forces as other phonemakers. Both cheap labor and electronics expertise reside in China. They do not in the US. There's a reason Apple's phones are labeled 'Designed in California' – to take advantage of the caché and appeal of the US without suffering its labor costs. Looking ahead, experts predict that Trump's own tariffs could cause the price of smartphones to spike by double or even triple digits. The electronics supply chain in the US is nowhere near developed enough to assemble a phone entirely domestically. Analysts at investment bank UBS warned in April that the price of an iPhone 16 Pro Max with 256GB of storage could rise by 79% from $1,199 to about $2,150, based on a total tariff of 145%. Apple itself seemed to concur with those assessments when it flew some $2bn worth of iPhones into the US before the tariffs on China went into effect. There is already an example of a phone assembled – but not entirely made – in the US, the Liberty Phone. It costs nearly four times what Trump promises his will, nearly $2000. The Liberty Phone sources its motherboard from the US but still requires screens, batteries and cameras manufactured overseas, according to a Wall Street Journal interview with the CEO of Purism, which manufactures the device. Its operating system can only run basic apps such as a calculator and a web browser because it runs on PureOS, software of the company's own making, per the Journal. The specs on the Liberty Phone are worse than Trump's T1, though the price is higher, making the president's device even less likely to appear on the market as announced. Some of the promised technical capabilities of the T1 would best those of the top-of-the-line iPhones, which cost nearly double what Trump has promised. The Verge put together a good list of which Chinese companies might manufacture the phone for Trump to white label. Eric Trump, who is co-leading the venture with his brother Donald Jr, has acknowledged that the first batch of T1 phones will not be made in the US. 'Eventually, all the phones can be built in the United States of America,' Eric Trump said last week. We'll see. Read more: Why you can't just repair your phone in the US to avoid Trump tariffs Do electric vehicles make people more carsick? Internet users advised to change passwords after 16bn logins exposed WhatsApp messaging app banned on all US House of Representatives devices OpenAI takes down mentions of Jony Ive's io amid trademark row 'Have you heard of this BDSM trend?' What I learned recording thousands of hours of teens on their phones Tesla set to unveil self-driving car service in Austin Trump's plan to ban US states from AI regulation will 'hold us back', says Microsoft science chief Keir Starmer's AI tsar to step down after six months in role

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store