Tesla's Full Self-Driving system fails in ‘safety test'
Two Tesla foes have joined forces to attack Elon and his automotive semi-autonomous driving technology.
The Dawn Project and the Tesla Takedown movement have partnered to highlight what they claim are 'critical safety defects' in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software.
In a recent test conducted in the United States (US), a Tesla Model Y equipped with the latest version of Full Self-Driving (version 13.2.9) was presented with a common scenario: a school bus stopped on the side of the road with its flashing lights and stop signs activated. A child-sized mannequin was then pulled across the street, simulating a child attempting to catch the bus.
The Tesla, travelling at an average speed of approximately 32 km/h, failed to stop at the bus stop sign and proceeded to strike the mannequin in each of the eight test runs. The system also reportedly failed to alert the driver to the collision.
The tests come as Tesla prepares to launch robotaxis in the US, fully autonomous vehicles designed for taxi services.
While Tesla CEO Elon Musk has stated that the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' regarding its forthcoming robotaxi launch, organisers like The Dawn Project and Tesla Takedown aren't convinced.
The Dawn Project said, 'Full Self-Driving ran down the child mannequin while illegally blowing past the school bus on every single attempt.'
'Tesla's Full Self-Driving software did not disengage or even alert the driver to the fact there had been a collision on any of the test runs,' they added.
However, it's important to note that the Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is not fully autonomous but rather semi-autonomous.
Tesla states explicitly that the system is designed for 'use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.'
Autonomous driving is a key pillar of investment for Tesla. Having introduced its 'Autopilot' driver assistance system more than a decade ago, Tesla doubled down on 'full self-driving' in the US.
Recently, Tesla was faced with a significant challenge after Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Build Your Dreams (BYD) unveiled its new driver-assistance system, 'God's Eye.'
This innovative technology, which BYD has installed for free in some of its models, enables cars to drive themselves on highways and in urban environments.
Some experts argue that 'God's Eye' is more advanced than Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, which costs nearly US $9,000 ($13,800) in China.
Tesla's Full Self-Driving capability in Australia is currently being tested and is not yet fully legal for public use.
However, the system could be arriving soon.
Earlier this year, the EV giant published a video on X.com of a Tesla Model 3 with prototype software successfully negotiating busy streets in inner-city Melbourne.
The brand's country director for Australia, Thom Drew, says an expansion of Tesla's driverless features is high on Elon Musk's list of priorities.
'That's Elon's push,' Drew said.
'We have a global engineering team that are working across markets around a lot of FSD… actively working across all our markets to roll it out.'
Critics are watching closely as Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems remain under investigation following a series of crashes and fatalities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
30 minutes ago
- ABC News
The Trump family's next venture, a gold smartphone and mobile phone service
Donald Trump's family business is launching a new Trump-branded phone service in its latest plan to monetise the US president's name, though even his son admits manufacturing phones in America will be a challenge. The Trump Organization, which is run by Mr Trump's sons Donald Jr and Eric Trump, said it planned to license a third party to sell a gold smartphone with Mr Trump's name that will be "proudly" built in the United States. It joins Trump-branded watches, sneakers, fragrances and Bibles as products capitalising on his political brand, the licensing of which has made millions for his family. But industry experts say the pitch to manufacture the phones in the US at a cheaper price point isn't possible, at least in the near future. In announcing its plans, the executive vice-president of the Trump Organization, Eric Trump, said consumers deserve a phone that aligns with their values. A website for the project advertises a $US47.45 monthly plan, an apparent nod to Mr Trump's two terms as the 47th and 45th president of the United States. The mobile phone service also pitched a policy of "discounted" international calls for families with members serving in the military outside the US. It's not the first time Mr Trump has ventured into the telecommunication industry. He once gave speeches and promoted a multi-level marketing company called ACN. It was eventually sued for fraud and misleading customers. The Trump Organization has also had a string of business failures tied to licensing, including Trump Vodka, Trump Steaks and Trump Mattresses. According to the announcement, the $US499 ($765) T1 "sleek, gold smartphone" will be "proudly designed and built in the United States". For comparison, Apple's iPhone 16 Pro Max — which is mainly made in China — costs $US1,199. A mock-up of the planned phone on the company's website shows Mr Trump's slogan Make America Great Again on the front and an etched American flag on the back. Tingling Dai, a Johns Hopkins University business professor, told the Wall Street Journal "there's absolutely no way you could make the screen, get the same memory, camera and battery" in the US. He estimated it would take "at least five years" to build the infrastructure needed for domestic smartphone production. High labour costs, supply chain complexity and reliance on overseas component sourcing are also key pain points. In fact, the US only has one company that makes smartphones domestically, California-based Purism which makes Liberty phones that retail for $US1,999. The Trump family hasn't disclosed which company would manufacture the phone, or which suppliers will provide the components. Even the president's son, Eric Trump, suggested that the first delivery of phones in August might not be made in the US. "Eventually, all the phones can be built in America," he claimed on the Benny Show podcast. "If the Trump Phone is promising a $US499 price tag with domestic manufacturing, this announcement looks to be classic vapourware," said Todd Weaver, CEO of Purism, referring to the unlikelihood of a US-manufactured phone being available at that price. Vapourware refers to software or hardware that has been advertised to the public but has not and may never become available. Currently, only Chinese makers like Xiaomi and Oppo have hardware to match at the $US499 price point. Speaking to Fox Business, Eric Trump said call centres supporting the phone service would also be based in the US. "You're not calling up call centres in Bangladesh. "You're doing it right out of St Louis, Missouri." In April, Mr Trump told reporters on Air Force One he would be announcing tariff rates for imported semiconductors. One of the main aims of these tariffs was to encourage firms to manufacture more products in the US. "We want to make our chips and semiconductors and other things in our country," Mr Trump said. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), the US is projected to more than triple its semiconductor manufacturing capacity in the decade following the CHIPS and Science Act. But a shortage of skilled workers may present a challenge to reinforcing chip supply chains on US shores. The SIA says there would be a shortfall of 67,000 technicians, computer scientists, and engineers in the semiconductor industry by 2030, and a gap of 1.4 million such workers throughout the broader US economy. When Mr Trump announced the tariffs, experts also investigated what it would take to make an iPhone in the US. Dan Ives, an analyst at US financial firm Wedbush Securities, said the US would need years and $US30 billion to establish factories needed to match China's output. At the time, Mr Ives said the concept of making iPhones in the US is a "non-starter" if Apple were to begin assembling iPhones in the US, a Chinese or Indian-made device that previously sold for $US1,000 would cost more than $US3,000. Currently, the US, UK, Europe and China rely heavily on Taiwan for semiconductors. The country's Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company provides over half the world's supply. The Trump Organization's latest venture has raised ethical concerns and conflicts of interest for mobile carriers who would be contracted to the president. The mobile service is partnering with existing cellular carriers with access to a 5G network, raising questions about how they will be treated by federal regulators now that they have partnered with his company. The Trump Organization said those companies are America's three biggest mobile network providers, an apparent reference to Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, the latter with a trademarked name that is very similar to Trump's T1 Mobile. The Federal Communications Commission, the primary regulatory body overseeing mobile phone companies, has already launched investigations of media outlets Mr Trump dislikes and, in some cases, is personally suing. The phone deal comes as a mandatory financial disclosure report provided a glimpse into the vast business holdings of the billionaire president. Mr Trump reported making more than $US600 million last year, including millions from items such as Trump-branded bibles, watches, sneakers and fragrances. Forbes estimated in March that his net worth was $US5.1 billion, more than double that a year earlier. It said the surge was due in part to the president's social media company, which runs the Truth Social platform.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Nasty' Oscar Piastri act called out by former world champ
Lando Norris accepted the blame, but outspoken 1997 F1 world champion Jacques Villeneuve says Oscar Piastri is not entirely without fault for the bundle between the two McLarens in Canada. The dig at the world championship leader is the latest chapter in Villeneuve's book of disdain for Australian drivers after his regular targeting of Daniel Ricciardo. Like his scathing assessments of Ricciardo during the twilight of his F1 career, the Canadian's opinion on the Norris-Piastri incident is sure to raise eyebrows. As the two McLarens hunted a podium place in the dying laps of the Grand Prix won by Mercedes' George Russell, Norris crashed into the back of Piastri after anticipating a gap would open up on the inside of the first turn. The Australian held his line however, Norris lost control, and slammed into the pit wall, wrecking his car and his race with three laps remaining. Piastri drove on unscathed and held on to finish fourth, widening his gap over Norris in the drivers' standings to 22 points as a result. The Brit immediately apologised on the team radio before making the walk of shame back to the garage. Post-race, he reiterated those words to Piastri face-to-face, and then stressed his sorrow once again in his press conference. McLaren CEO Zak Brown thanked Norris publicly for his 'candour', while Piastri said his teammate's willingness to admit his error was a great quality to have. Team principal Andrea Stella, meanwhile, said Norris made a 'misjudgement' that 'should have not happened'. The FIA stewards placed the responsibility for the incident firmly on Norris' shoulders too, slapping him with a redundant five-second time penalty. The views of everyone directly involved contradicted those, however, of Villeneuve, who couldn't resist yet another chance to target an Australian driver. 'The clash between the two McLaren drivers, [it was] easy to point the finger at Norris,' he said. 'He realised too late that Piastri was moving towards the left because he had his nose in the gearbox of Piastri, he didn't realise it and Piastri was edging gradually towards the left. 'He's not supposed to be doing that, it was a little bit nasty, so there will be some talks later inside the team.' Esteemed F1 commentator Martin Brundle was another who reiterated that Norris was at fault, and respected Piastri's tactics. 'Oscar did well to see the first move coming because Lando was a long way behind when he launched it into Turn 10,' he told Sky Sports. 'Lando probably thought he got him because Oscar was at an acute angle into the final chicane and tight and wide. Oscar wasn't being particularly kind to him, but then why should he? Lando seemed to persevere down that left-hand side when it wasn't on. 'I don't think it was anything other than not recognising early enough that it wasn't going to happen, followed by wiping his front wing on his rear tyres. It was just very clumsy and sort of unnecessary.' Fans on social media love pushing the bold claim that Villeneuve — who was once engaged to pop singer Dannii Minogue — holds resentment towards Australians. His comments about Piastri come after whacking Jack Doohan following his crash in practice in Japan earlier this year, as well as his long-running feud with Ricciardo. Things got 'personal' between Villeneuve and Ricciardo at last year's Canadian Grand Prix when the 54-year-old responded to a question on Sky Sports during Friday practice about Ricciardo's future, by asking 'Why is he still in F1?'. Villeneuve went onto torch Ricciardo's whole career even more harshly. 'He was beating a [Sebastian] Vettel that was burnt out, that was trying to invent things with the car to go win and just making a mess of his weekends,' he said. 'Then he was beating for half a season [Max] Verstappen when Verstappen was 18 years old, just starting. 'Then that was it. He stopped beating anyone after that. 'I think his image has kept him in F1 more than his actual results.' After qualifying in fifth that week, Ricciardo then told ESPN that Villeneuve was 'talking s***'. 'I still don't know what he said, but I heard he's been talking s***,' he said. 'But he always does. 'I think he's hit his head a few too many times, I don't know if he plays ice hockey or something. 'I won't give him the time of day, but all those people can suck it.' Australians are not the only ones in the opinionated former driver's sights however, as he also took aim at race officials for denying fans a more exciting finish in Canada. The race ended under a Safety Car because of the McLarens crash, and Villeneuve suggested that a red flag should have been waved instead. 'What could have been, should have been an exciting race, turned into a not-so-exciting race,' he said. 'The end of the race – I mean, the rules allow for red flags so we can have a new start for a two-lap sprint, always exciting, and they decided to have a boring safety car finish. Well, too bad.' McLaren team boss Stella said the team 'appreciated' Norris' response to the crash. With the two drivers vying for world championship honours, there could be more incidents of its kind to come in the remaining 14 races. Stella believes the internal rivalry will only make the team stronger. 'We did appreciate the fact that Lando immediately owned the situation, raised his hand, and took responsibility for the accident,' he said. 'He apologised immediately to the team. He came to apologise to me as team principal in order to apologise to the entire team. 'It's important the way we respond and we react to these situations, which ultimately will be a very important learning point. 'I don't think it's learning from a theoretical point of view, because the principle was already there, but it's learning in terms of experiencing how painful these situations can be, and this will only make us stronger in terms of our internal competition and in terms of the way we go racing.'
Courier-Mail
4 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. Two Tesla foes have joined forces to attack Elon and his automotive semi-autonomous driving technology. The Dawn Project and the Tesla Takedown movement have partnered to highlight what they claim are 'critical safety defects' in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software. In a recent test conducted in the United States (US), a Tesla Model Y equipped with the latest version of Full Self-Driving (version 13.2.9) was presented with a common scenario: a school bus stopped on the side of the road with its flashing lights and stop signs activated. A child-sized mannequin was then pulled across the street, simulating a child attempting to catch the bus. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Inside China's total domination of Australia The Tesla, travelling at an average speed of approximately 32 km/h, failed to stop at the bus stop sign and proceeded to strike the mannequin in each of the eight test runs. The system also reportedly failed to alert the driver to the collision. The tests come as Tesla prepares to launch robotaxis in the US, fully autonomous vehicles designed for taxi services. While Tesla CEO Elon Musk has stated that the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' regarding its forthcoming robotaxi launch, organisers like The Dawn Project and Tesla Takedown aren't convinced. Tesla runs passed stop sign. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Crisis sends Australian fuel prices soaring The Dawn Project said, 'Full Self-Driving ran down the child mannequin while illegally blowing past the school bus on every single attempt.' 'Tesla's Full Self-Driving software did not disengage or even alert the driver to the fact there had been a collision on any of the test runs,' they added. However, it's important to note that the Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is not fully autonomous but rather semi-autonomous. Tesla states explicitly that the system is designed for 'use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.' Autonomous driving is a key pillar of investment for Tesla. Having introduced its 'Autopilot' driver assistance system more than a decade ago, Tesla doubled down on 'full self-driving' in the US. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Magic mushies, booze kill off 'soft' utes Recently, Tesla was faced with a significant challenge after Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Build Your Dreams (BYD) unveiled its new driver-assistance system, 'God's Eye.' This innovative technology, which BYD has installed for free in some of its models, enables cars to drive themselves on highways and in urban environments. Some experts argue that 'God's Eye' is more advanced than Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, which costs nearly US $9,000 ($13,800) in China. Tesla's Full Self-Driving capability in Australia is currently being tested and is not yet fully legal for public use. However, the system could be arriving soon. Earlier this year, the EV giant published a video on of a Tesla Model 3 with prototype software successfully negotiating busy streets in inner-city Melbourne. 2025 Tesla Model Y. Picture: Mark Bean The brand's country director for Australia, Thom Drew, says an expansion of Tesla's driverless features is high on Elon Musk's list of priorities. 'That's Elon's push,' Drew said. 'We have a global engineering team that are working across markets around a lot of FSD… actively working across all our markets to roll it out.' Critics are watching closely as Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems remain under investigation following a series of crashes and fatalities. Originally published as Tesla's Full Self-Driving system fails in 'safety test'
