logo
Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Courier-Mail8 hours ago

Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Two Tesla foes have joined forces to attack Elon and his automotive semi-autonomous driving technology.
The Dawn Project and the Tesla Takedown movement have partnered to highlight what they claim are 'critical safety defects' in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software.
In a recent test conducted in the United States (US), a Tesla Model Y equipped with the latest version of Full Self-Driving (version 13.2.9) was presented with a common scenario: a school bus stopped on the side of the road with its flashing lights and stop signs activated. A child-sized mannequin was then pulled across the street, simulating a child attempting to catch the bus.
Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project)
Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project)
MORE: Inside China's total domination of Australia
The Tesla, travelling at an average speed of approximately 32 km/h, failed to stop at the bus stop sign and proceeded to strike the mannequin in each of the eight test runs. The system also reportedly failed to alert the driver to the collision.
The tests come as Tesla prepares to launch robotaxis in the US, fully autonomous vehicles designed for taxi services.
While Tesla CEO Elon Musk has stated that the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' regarding its forthcoming robotaxi launch, organisers like The Dawn Project and Tesla Takedown aren't convinced.
Tesla runs passed stop sign. (Picture: The Dawn Project)
MORE: Crisis sends Australian fuel prices soaring
The Dawn Project said, 'Full Self-Driving ran down the child mannequin while illegally blowing past the school bus on every single attempt.'
'Tesla's Full Self-Driving software did not disengage or even alert the driver to the fact there had been a collision on any of the test runs,' they added.
However, it's important to note that the Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is not fully autonomous but rather semi-autonomous.
Tesla states explicitly that the system is designed for 'use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.'
Autonomous driving is a key pillar of investment for Tesla. Having introduced its 'Autopilot' driver assistance system more than a decade ago, Tesla doubled down on 'full self-driving' in the US.
Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project)
MORE: Magic mushies, booze kill off 'soft' utes
Recently, Tesla was faced with a significant challenge after Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Build Your Dreams (BYD) unveiled its new driver-assistance system, 'God's Eye.'
This innovative technology, which BYD has installed for free in some of its models, enables cars to drive themselves on highways and in urban environments.
Some experts argue that 'God's Eye' is more advanced than Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, which costs nearly US $9,000 ($13,800) in China.
Tesla's Full Self-Driving capability in Australia is currently being tested and is not yet fully legal for public use.
However, the system could be arriving soon.
Earlier this year, the EV giant published a video on X.com of a Tesla Model 3 with prototype software successfully negotiating busy streets in inner-city Melbourne.
2025 Tesla Model Y. Picture: Mark Bean
The brand's country director for Australia, Thom Drew, says an expansion of Tesla's driverless features is high on Elon Musk's list of priorities.
'That's Elon's push,' Drew said.
'We have a global engineering team that are working across markets around a lot of FSD… actively working across all our markets to roll it out.'
Critics are watching closely as Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems remain under investigation following a series of crashes and fatalities.
Originally published as Tesla's Full Self-Driving system fails in 'safety test'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Electric cars vs petrol cars: The pros and cons of going electric
Electric cars vs petrol cars: The pros and cons of going electric

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Electric cars vs petrol cars: The pros and cons of going electric

Australia's new car market is becoming more diverse, with an increased number of choices available to buyers seeking different powertrains. No longer is it just a choice between diesel and petrol, though they are still the dominant fuel types in the market. Now buyers have options including hybrid (HEV), plug-in hybrid (PHEV) and the fully-electric (EV) options popularised by brands such as Tesla. New vehicle registrations for the first five months of 2025 show petrol remains the most popular fuel type across all vehicle types (41.2 per cent), followed by diesel (30.1 per cent), hybrid (16.1 per cent), electric (4.8 per cent) and then plug-in hybrid (4.0 per cent). In trend terms, diesel is losing its relevance (sales down 6.6 per cent this year) and pure petrol models are down 9.8 per cent, whereas hybrid sales have jumped 18.3, and plug-in hybrids are up a staggering 208.1 per cent from a very low base, largely in part due to fringe benefits tax breaks which have now been axed. Here we break down the pros and cons of each fuel type. Diesel Cons: Nasty for the environment, and won't suit all driving styles Our market is dominated by diesel dual-cab utes and four-wheel drives. It is less likely to fluctuate in price as much as petrol, and is available in just about every single servo across the country. In other parts of the world, this fuel has effectively been phased out in favour of electrification; research has found that diesel emissions can be harmful to the environment and humans – in fact, European environmental agencies have stated that nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from diesel fumes has killed hundreds of thousands of people in Europe. Modern diesel vehicles have particulate filters that require some high-speed driving regularly to activate the burn-off sequence. That mandatory technology is expensive to repair if you don't drive to suit the requirements. Petrol Pros: Not overly complicated, suits all driving styles Cons: Fluctuating fuel prices make it hard to control running costs There are different types of petrol. Cheaper choices are between the 'regular' 91 RON (research octane number) petrol, or E10, which includes a 10 per cent ethanol blend made from agricultural sources such as corn, wheat, or sorghum. It might be cheaper initially, but E10 fuel has been known to adversely impact some engines over time. Then there are the higher-octane premium petrol choices – 95 RON or 98 RON – which are more expensive, but also more refined and better suited to hi-tech engines and turbocharged powertrains in particular. They can be more fuel efficient, too. The biggest problem with petrol is choosing the right day and the correct location to refill, because pump prices can vary dramatically – up to $0.60c/litre in the space of a few kilometres or picking Wednesday or Thursday to fill up. Hybrid (HEV) Pros: Proven improvements to fuel use and tailpipe emissions Cons: Additional complexity for maintenance, battery life Most hybrids can run on electric power for short periods, doing their best work in stop-start driving where braking will feed energy back to the battery. HEVs have a small battery and an electric motor that can do some of the work, some of the time – either in assisting the engine, or acting alone. Hybrids were popularised by cars such as the Toyota Prius and Camry, and in recent years the Japanese maker has moved to make hybrids the go-to for passenger cars and SUVs. You can't buy a petrol-only Yaris, Corolla, RAV4 or Kluger now. But not all hybrids are the same. Suzuki markets the Swift as a hybrid, but it's a very mild 12-volt system; and Mazda calls its mild-hybrid CX-60 (-70, -80, -90) model ranges 'all hybrid', when they're actually only partly electrified by a 48V system. Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) Pros: Longer EV-only driving Cons: Cost, having to plug in There are two ways of looking at plug-in hybrids: the best of both worlds, or the worst. PHEVs have a larger battery pack and more powerful electric motor pure EV driving for longer periods. A few years ago, 50km of EV range was great; today, some PHEVs in Australia claim 180km of EV range. If you can drive to work and back each day and just use electric mode, that's a win. But you're constantly lugging around a petrol engine as well. Most PHEVs allow you to use the engine and battery together for fast acceleration if you need it. PHEVs have gotten more affordable in recent years, but there are still high price premiums to have the tech compared to petrol models. A subset of PHEVs is the range-extender EV (REEV) models which are entering the market, which use a petrol engine as a generator only. Electric (EV) Cons: Expensive, resale questionable, range and charging anxiety Electric cars are exactly that. Cars that run on electricity. They use bigger battery packs to offer long driving range, and while many of us would never actually drive from Sydney to Melbourne, there are no EVs on sale that could do it without recharging. Finding a charging station that isn't occupied and is reliably working is another thing altogether – Australia is big, the distances are huge, and the infrastructure is lagging behind.



Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin
Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Courier-Mail

time8 hours ago

  • Courier-Mail

Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. Two Tesla foes have joined forces to attack Elon and his automotive semi-autonomous driving technology. The Dawn Project and the Tesla Takedown movement have partnered to highlight what they claim are 'critical safety defects' in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software. In a recent test conducted in the United States (US), a Tesla Model Y equipped with the latest version of Full Self-Driving (version 13.2.9) was presented with a common scenario: a school bus stopped on the side of the road with its flashing lights and stop signs activated. A child-sized mannequin was then pulled across the street, simulating a child attempting to catch the bus. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Inside China's total domination of Australia The Tesla, travelling at an average speed of approximately 32 km/h, failed to stop at the bus stop sign and proceeded to strike the mannequin in each of the eight test runs. The system also reportedly failed to alert the driver to the collision. The tests come as Tesla prepares to launch robotaxis in the US, fully autonomous vehicles designed for taxi services. While Tesla CEO Elon Musk has stated that the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' regarding its forthcoming robotaxi launch, organisers like The Dawn Project and Tesla Takedown aren't convinced. Tesla runs passed stop sign. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Crisis sends Australian fuel prices soaring The Dawn Project said, 'Full Self-Driving ran down the child mannequin while illegally blowing past the school bus on every single attempt.' 'Tesla's Full Self-Driving software did not disengage or even alert the driver to the fact there had been a collision on any of the test runs,' they added. However, it's important to note that the Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is not fully autonomous but rather semi-autonomous. Tesla states explicitly that the system is designed for 'use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.' Autonomous driving is a key pillar of investment for Tesla. Having introduced its 'Autopilot' driver assistance system more than a decade ago, Tesla doubled down on 'full self-driving' in the US. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Magic mushies, booze kill off 'soft' utes Recently, Tesla was faced with a significant challenge after Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Build Your Dreams (BYD) unveiled its new driver-assistance system, 'God's Eye.' This innovative technology, which BYD has installed for free in some of its models, enables cars to drive themselves on highways and in urban environments. Some experts argue that 'God's Eye' is more advanced than Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, which costs nearly US $9,000 ($13,800) in China. Tesla's Full Self-Driving capability in Australia is currently being tested and is not yet fully legal for public use. However, the system could be arriving soon. Earlier this year, the EV giant published a video on of a Tesla Model 3 with prototype software successfully negotiating busy streets in inner-city Melbourne. 2025 Tesla Model Y. Picture: Mark Bean The brand's country director for Australia, Thom Drew, says an expansion of Tesla's driverless features is high on Elon Musk's list of priorities. 'That's Elon's push,' Drew said. 'We have a global engineering team that are working across markets around a lot of FSD… actively working across all our markets to roll it out.' Critics are watching closely as Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems remain under investigation following a series of crashes and fatalities. Originally published as Tesla's Full Self-Driving system fails in 'safety test'

Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin
Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Daily Telegraph

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Tesla's FSD runs over child mannequin

Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. Two Tesla foes have joined forces to attack Elon and his automotive semi-autonomous driving technology. The Dawn Project and the Tesla Takedown movement have partnered to highlight what they claim are 'critical safety defects' in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software. In a recent test conducted in the United States (US), a Tesla Model Y equipped with the latest version of Full Self-Driving (version 13.2.9) was presented with a common scenario: a school bus stopped on the side of the road with its flashing lights and stop signs activated. A child-sized mannequin was then pulled across the street, simulating a child attempting to catch the bus. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Inside China's total domination of Australia The Tesla, travelling at an average speed of approximately 32 km/h, failed to stop at the bus stop sign and proceeded to strike the mannequin in each of the eight test runs. The system also reportedly failed to alert the driver to the collision. The tests come as Tesla prepares to launch robotaxis in the US, fully autonomous vehicles designed for taxi services. While Tesla CEO Elon Musk has stated that the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' regarding its forthcoming robotaxi launch, organisers like The Dawn Project and Tesla Takedown aren't convinced. Tesla runs passed stop sign. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Crisis sends Australian fuel prices soaring The Dawn Project said, 'Full Self-Driving ran down the child mannequin while illegally blowing past the school bus on every single attempt.' 'Tesla's Full Self-Driving software did not disengage or even alert the driver to the fact there had been a collision on any of the test runs,' they added. However, it's important to note that the Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is not fully autonomous but rather semi-autonomous. Tesla states explicitly that the system is designed for 'use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.' Autonomous driving is a key pillar of investment for Tesla. Having introduced its 'Autopilot' driver assistance system more than a decade ago, Tesla doubled down on 'full self-driving' in the US. Anti-Tesla activists testing FSD system. (Picture: The Dawn Project) MORE: Magic mushies, booze kill off 'soft' utes Recently, Tesla was faced with a significant challenge after Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Build Your Dreams (BYD) unveiled its new driver-assistance system, 'God's Eye.' This innovative technology, which BYD has installed for free in some of its models, enables cars to drive themselves on highways and in urban environments. Some experts argue that 'God's Eye' is more advanced than Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, which costs nearly US $9,000 ($13,800) in China. Tesla's Full Self-Driving capability in Australia is currently being tested and is not yet fully legal for public use. However, the system could be arriving soon. Earlier this year, the EV giant published a video on of a Tesla Model 3 with prototype software successfully negotiating busy streets in inner-city Melbourne. 2025 Tesla Model Y. Picture: Mark Bean The brand's country director for Australia, Thom Drew, says an expansion of Tesla's driverless features is high on Elon Musk's list of priorities. 'That's Elon's push,' Drew said. 'We have a global engineering team that are working across markets around a lot of FSD… actively working across all our markets to roll it out.' Critics are watching closely as Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems remain under investigation following a series of crashes and fatalities. Originally published as Tesla's Full Self-Driving system fails in 'safety test'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store