RFK Jr.'s vaccine comments and inside his controversial week
Kennedy's COVID vaccine rollbacks and comments on scientific research are concerning, and it might be difficult for people to absorb all the medical news and recommendations they're hearing about, says Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC.
Similar to how Kennedy wooed supporters with his commitment to cracking down on ultraprocessed foods and artificial food dyes, his comments against scientific journals contain a nugget of truth - companies can fund research, and people need to be able to trust the scientific studies used to inform health decisions.
"It's a tricky situation when you have someone who is sharing valuable information about the impact of ultraprocessed food and the influence that the large companies can have on policy, and how we have to change that, while at the same time he is spreading falsehoods about the value of vaccination on people's health," Besser says.
RFK Jr., vaccine recommendations and what changed
On May 15, Kennedy told people not to take "medical advice" from him after being asked about the measles vaccine by Wisconsin Democrat Rep. Mark Pocan.
"What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant," he said.
But on May 27, Kennedy announced in a video clip shared to X that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, in a move that breaks with previous expert guidance.
Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices would meet and vote on changes to the immunization schedule or recommendations on who should get vaccines before the director of the CDC makes a final call. The committee has not voted on the changes Kennedy announced, and a CDC representative was not included in Kennedy's video.
Kennedy also spoke on the "Ultimate Human" podcast, calling the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet, three of the most influential medical journals in the world, "corrupt."
"Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we're going to create our own journals in-house," he said, referring to the National Institutes of Health, an HHS agency and the world's largest funder of health research.
He added that these journals publish studies funded and approved by pharmaceutical companies. And there is some merit to Kennedy's statements - major food and drug companies have funded scientific research. According to a 2015 article published in The Lancet, Coca-Cola disclosed spending $118.6 million over five years on scientific research and health and wellbeing partnerships; several influential medical organizations, including the American Cancer Society, received funding from the company.
RFK Jr.'s changes raise 'grave concerns' from scientific community
Kennedy's move to change COVID vaccine guidelines contradicts his previous claims that he wouldn't "take away anybody's vaccines."
However, the changes to the guidelines may affect what is covered by insurance and who has access to the shot if they still wish to receive it. Federal vaccine recommendations affect what private insurances will cover, and Medicaid only covers the full cost of recommended vaccines.
Besser says Kennedy's updated guidelines "raise grave concerns about the stability of our vaccine recommendations."
"There was no opportunity for people to explore the data that may be behind this decision or to ask questions," he explains, "which makes me feel that there could be other decisions coming with the same lack of transparency."
To lead their healthiest possible life, Besser recommends that people, especially parents, consult their trusted health provider to "sort through the massive amounts of information being thrown at them."
Contributing: Sudiksha Kochi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Got the sniffles? Here's what to know about summer colds, COVID-19 and more
Summer heat, outdoor fun ... and cold and flu symptoms? The three may not go together in many people's minds: partly owing to common myths about germs and partly because many viruses really do have lower activity levels in the summer. But it is possible to get the sniffles — or worse — in the summer. Federal data released Friday, for example, shows COVID-19 is trending up in many parts of the country, with emergency department visits up among people of all ages. Here's what to know about summer viruses. How much are colds and flu circulating right now? The number of people seeking medical care for three key illnesses — COVID-19, flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV — is currently low, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu is trending down and RSV was steady this week. But COVID-19 is trending up in many mid-Atlantic, southeast, Southern and West Coast states. The expectation is that COVID-19 will eventually settle into a winter seasonal pattern like other coronaviruses, but the past few years have brought a late summer surge, said Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at University of California Davis Children's Hospital. Other viruses circulating this time of year include the one that causes 'hand, foot and mouth' disease — which has symptoms similar to a cold, plus sores and rashes — and norovirus, sometimes called the stomach flu. Do viruses spread less in the summer? Many viruses circulate seasonally, picking up as the weather cools in the fall and winter. So it's true that fewer people get stuffy noses and coughs in the summer — but cold weather itself does not cause colds. It's not just about seasonality. The other factor is our behavior, experts say. Nice weather means people are opening windows and gathering outside where it's harder for germs to spread. But respiratory viruses are still around. When the weather gets too hot and everyone heads inside for the air conditioning, doctors say they start seeing more sickness. In places where it gets really hot for a long time, summer can be cold season in its own right. 'I grew up on the East Coast and everybody gets sick in the winter,' said Dr. Frank LoVecchio, an emergency room doctor and Arizona State University researcher. 'A lot of people get sick in the summer here. Why is that? Because you spend more time indoors.' Should you get another COVID-19 booster now? For people who are otherwise healthy, timing is a key consideration to getting any vaccine. You want to get it a few weeks before that big trip or wedding, if that's the reason for getting boosted, doctors say. But, for most people, it may be worth waiting until the fall in anticipation of winter cases of COVID-19 really tick up. 'You want to be fully protected at the time that it's most important for you,' said Dr. Costi Sifri, of the University of Virginia Health System. People at higher risk of complications should always talk with their doctor about what is best for them, Sifri added. Older adults and those with weak immune systems may need more boosters than others, he said. Are more younger kids getting sick with COVID-19? Last week, the CDC noted emergency room visits among children younger than 4 were rising. That makes sense, Blumberg said, because many young kids are getting it for the first time or are unvaccinated. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that the shots would no longer be recommended for healthy kids, a decision that health experts have said lacks scientific basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics still endorses COVID-19 shots for children older than 6 months. How else can I lower my risk? The same things that help prevent colds, flu and COVID any other time of the year work in the summer, doctors say. Spend time outside when you can, wash your hands, wear a mask. And if you're sick, stay home. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
A professor had a $2.4m grant to study Black maternal health. Then Trump was elected
Jaime Slaughter-Acey was in a state of shock and anger when she learned that her National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study on birth outcomes in Black families was cancelled this spring. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill associate professor in epidemiology said that she felt like 'the rug was pulled out from under us' when the university called her to share the news. The termination notice said that the study no longer met the agency's priorities and didn't promise to increase life expectancy. 'It was heartbreaking,' Slaughter-Acey told the Guardian, 'and honestly, infuriating given the high rates of maternal and infant mortality in this country.' The cancellation came as the Trump administration terminated 1,902 NIH grants totalling more than $4.4bn between his January inauguration and the end of July, according to Grant Witness data. NIH followed guidance from the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) and Trump's executive orders to cut costs. Additionally, in April, the Trump administration let go of a majority of the staff at the federal Division of Reproductive Health, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) office that collects data on maternal experiences. It also surveils pregnancy-related deaths in an effort to reduce infant mortality and improve health outcomes for mothers and their children. Slaughter-Acey's several-year study funded by a more than $2.4m NIH grant aimed to look at how social and biological factors affect outcomes for more than 500 Black women in Detroit. The grant termination froze the team's more than $581,000 remaining funding. Through blood samples and surveys of Black mothers and grandmothers, Slaughter-Acey and her team aimed to understand if social environments accelerated how bodies physiologically age, otherwise known as biological ageing, which may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes for Black women. She said that the research is 'designed to tell us how social environment and the pathways that social environment affects us physiologically, to then increase this risk that Black moms and Black babies have with respect to pregnancy'. While most studies that look at racism only focus on one point in time, Slaughter-Acey said that hers was 'the first study to comprehensively examine how exposure to structural, cultural and intergenerational racism throughout a Black woman's life impacts her epigenome and her child's birth outcomes.' It was also innovative because Black women are underrepresented in epigenomic studies, a field where researchers look at how environment and behavior impacts a person's genes, said Slaughter-Acey, due to medical mistrust and experiences of racism in the healthcare system. The NIH-grant cancellation in late March followed the release of data from the CDC revealing that Black women were the only race or ethnic group who didn't experience a decline in deaths from pregnancy related causes in 2023. Out of every 100,000 live births, 50.3 Black mothers died, compared with 14.5 deaths for white people, 12.4 for Latinos and 10.7 for Asians. The NIH didn't respond to a request for comment. Slaughter-Acey fears that the grant-cancellation signals that research and efforts to close the maternal death gap are at risk of coming to a standstill under the Trump administration. Other NIH grants that have been terminated include one that looked at prenatal exposure to public drinking water contaminants and a study that analyzed why women of color die of cervical cancer at a disproportionate rate. On Thursday, the Trump administration froze UCLA research grants from federal agencies including NIH and the National Science Foundation totaling nearly $200m, accusing the university of antisemitism and discrimination in admissions. 'It's part of a larger pattern of political interference in science that puts the health of all people at risk, especially vulnerable populations,' Slaughter-Acey said. The study 'is about understanding the root causes of poor maternal and infant health in this country – something that affects all of us, regardless of race or background. When science is silenced, communities suffer'. Still, Slaughter-Acey and her team are hopeful that the study will continue for years to come as they search for alternative funding sources, including donations. On Slaughter-Acey's LinkedIn page, she called upon her followers to donate to the University of North Carolina Department of Epidemiology, and to include a note that they support Slaughter-Acey's work, or the name of the study, 'LIFE-2'. 'The voices of these 500 plus moms and babies should not die or be silenced with the termination of this grant,' she told the Guardian. The pull in funding 'is an example of erasure of black mothers and infants'. There has been some temporary relief. This June, Slaughter-Acey's team received short-term funding from Michigan State University to continue their study over the next few months. Now nearly 600 moms are enrolled in the study, but without additional funding, it will probably pause again at the end of the year. The nearly 600 women who have joined the study were recruited from local delivery hospitals in Detroit, Michigan, in the day or two following childbirth. Slaughter-Acey chose Detroit since she completed her post-doc at the University of Michigan, where she researched the influence of social environments on Black maternal health. Participants for her study, which began in 2021, completed a post-delivery survey where they answered questions about social determinants of health including housing and food insecurity throughout their life. Along with collecting their blood through a finger prick, researchers also collect the babies' and mothers' birth certificates from the state health department as well as the mothers' blood that was collected at birth and stored in a biobank. About 20% of the babies' grandmothers are also participating in the study by answering questions about the social environment during their pregnancies and their daughters' early childhoods. The multilevel data collection allows the researchers to create 'this robust and triangulated dataset that includes social determinants of health, like information about food and housing insecurity', Slaughter-Acey said. 'It's capturing a more holistic view than what's been captured previously for moms in terms of maternal and infant health.' After the moms are discharged from the hospital, the researchers also follow up with a majority of the women eight to 10 weeks after they give birth to ask about their adjustment to motherhood, whether they've received support for breastfeeding, a postpartum healthcare visit, or if they've experienced discrimination from their healthcare providers. At the time of the funding termination, the research team was in the process of creating a 12-month postpartum checkup with the mothers to help define maternal thriving. 'When we are talking about maternal morbidity and mortality, we're defining maternal health by the absence of disease, by mom not dying, by mom not having a severe morbidity,' Slaughter-Acey said. 'But the field in general does not have a good understanding or even definition of, 'what does maternal thriving look like?' And we need to get past this conversation of maternal survival, and move to thriving.' More than two years of funding remained in the NIH grant, during which her team had planned to recruit more mothers and to conduct data analysis. They also aimed to create a website for participants to read about the study's findings. But the data that the team has analyzed thus far has revealed that mothers with a lot of adverse childhood experiences were more likely to have conflict with the father of the child. The finding, Slaughter-Acey said, 'underscores the importance of understanding how the social environment influences relationship dynamics and maybe perinatal outcomes. We know that social support is key during pregnancy'. The team also found that one in five study participants experienced housing insecurity during their pregnancy, a factor that she said greatly affects perinatal health and is rarely documented in hospital records. They also created a tool to measure racial microagressions from healthcare providers and in the mothers' everyday life, since many in the cohort said that they experienced harmful interactions that Slaughter-Acey said may explain why they felt unsupported. For Slaughter-Acey, the study findings 'highlight how structural inequities – across housing, healthcare, and personal history – intersect to shape maternal and infant outcomes. And they underscore why we need research that listens to and reflects the full complexity of Black women's experiences.' NIH research funding will probably continue to take a hit under the Trump administration. A new Trump administration policy requiring that multiyear grants be paid upfront lowers the odds that a research proposal will be accepted. As a result, university labs may close.
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I felt sick at home - I've had to relearn how to walk and talk'
Melissa Clayton was left paralysed and unable to speak A woman who was left unable to speak or walk after suffering a stroke at the age of 33 has "had a bit of a glow up" and is "excited to be back" to her normal life – including being back on the dating scene. Melissa Clayton, now 34, had a stroke in hospital following a seizure at her home in January 2024. She spent the subsequent three months in hospital being fed through a tube, during which time she underwent surgery to remove a bone from the top of her spine to alleviate pressure on her brain, and had a shunt – a thin, hollow tube – implanted into her brain. Now, however, she is gearing up to return to work as a PR account director full time, after gradually increasing her hours since early February 2025, and is confidently back on the dating scene – an endeavour that is providing her with some unexpected connections. In January 2024, at 33, Melissa was "thriving" in her high-flying PR job, working with major clients like McDonald's. She resided in a shared house in Hackney Wick, north-east London, and was in the process of moving into her own flat in Old Street, central London. One evening after work, Melissa felt "a bit sick and feverish" and decided to retire to bed early. She began feeling faint and suffered a seizure in bed. Her flatmate discovered her and rang for an ambulance. Melissa's sole recollection from that fateful night is a paramedic assisting her to sit upright. While admitted at the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel, east London, Melissa suffered a stroke. Her mum recounted the surgeon's words, stating that Melissa was gravely ill and they were uncertain about her chances of full recovery. During her hospital stay, she contracted Covid, battled two chest infections, underwent surgery to remove a bone from the top of her spine to alleviate brain pressure caused by blood and swelling, and had a shunt inserted into her brain. Her facial muscles tightened to such an extent that she found it difficult to speak and swallow, necessitating tube-feeding. She also lost mobility in her right arm and leg, making independent movement and walking a struggle. Speaking in August 2025, Melissa reveals that she has made significant progress on her recovery journey, but has also encountered some unforeseen hurdles. "Work has actually been way harder than I thought, mainly because you're learning what's different, it takes you longer to process information," Melissa shared. "Also, because my stroke affected my emotions, I can be quite reactive rather than responding to someone. "Like anyone going back to work, if it's maternity leave or whatever, it does take time to get back into the swing of it," she said, adding that her employer has been very supportive of the adjustments she needs in her work life. "The thing is, I'm naturally impatient and very determined and also, I'm a perfectionist. I'm a Virgo! I have been quite hard on myself, whereas my coach at work will be like: 'You really need to slow down'. So yes, I'm excited to be back – I won't know until I try it!" Melissa is making considerable headway in her personal life as well. She lives alone in London – though with her therapy dog, Maya, a Pomeranian cross – but is getting ready for a relocation to Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, awaiting the finalisation of a house purchase. She has also returned to the dating world, and whilst when she initially started dating again following her stroke she discovered it to be on somewhat shaky ground, she now feels "more confident" in her quest for romance. Whereas previously Melissa had mentioned the fact she is a stroke survivor on her dating app profiles, she has since chosen to omit that information, as it "isn't just who I am". "I think also, with my speech getting a bit better, people won't notice as much," she added. "I also feel like probably what I'm looking for is a bit more serious than it was back then, and therefore I just want to get to know someone better before I tell them about what I've gone through." Through dating, Melissa has also formed some surprising platonic bonds – including a mate of a potential date who has likewise suffered a stroke. "I matched with one person who instantly said 'I need to put you in touch with my friend'. And he'd had a stroke as well," she said. "We ended up just chatting. We met for a coffee. I think it was about a month ago, a month or two ago. I think it's really highlighted to me how strokes really affect other people." In late July 2025, Melissa had her feeding tube – which had been fitted when she battled with chewing after the stroke – taken out, which she describes as "one thing that just made me feel really clinical, just a daily reminder that I had it". She has also shed some unwanted pounds, transformed her hair, and is "feeling much better" within herself. "I feel like I've had a bit of a glow up," she revealed. Most importantly, the traumatic ordeal has shown Melissa not to take life for granted. She has been attending the theatre – something she always adored – and sampling new restaurants with mates, which she explains are all things she would take for granted before her stroke. "I don't really take anything too seriously, because nothing is worse than what I've gone through," she revealed. "But equally, I also don't have any patience for being mucked around in terms of dating. I don't need anyone. I choose to want someone. "I like being independent. I think I really cherish my independence more than anything now, and the fact that I can do what I want, when I want, and not have to be under any kind of concern or worry."
