RFK Jr.'s vaccine comments and inside his controversial week
It's been a busy week for the "Make America Healthy Again" leader - from updating the COVID vaccine guidelines, to threatening to bar government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals.
Kennedy's COVID vaccine rollbacks and comments on scientific research are concerning, and it might be difficult for people to absorb all the medical news and recommendations they're hearing about, says Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC.
Similar to how Kennedy wooed supporters with his commitment to cracking down on ultraprocessed foods and artificial food dyes, his comments against scientific journals contain a nugget of truth - companies can fund research, and people need to be able to trust the scientific studies used to inform health decisions.
"It's a tricky situation when you have someone who is sharing valuable information about the impact of ultraprocessed food and the influence that the large companies can have on policy, and how we have to change that, while at the same time he is spreading falsehoods about the value of vaccination on people's health," Besser says.
RFK Jr., vaccine recommendations and what changed
On May 15, Kennedy told people not to take "medical advice" from him after being asked about the measles vaccine by Wisconsin Democrat Rep. Mark Pocan.
"What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant," he said.
But on May 27, Kennedy announced in a video clip shared to X that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, in a move that breaks with previous expert guidance.
Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices would meet and vote on changes to the immunization schedule or recommendations on who should get vaccines before the director of the CDC makes a final call. The committee has not voted on the changes Kennedy announced, and a CDC representative was not included in Kennedy's video.
Kennedy also spoke on the "Ultimate Human" podcast, calling the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet, three of the most influential medical journals in the world, "corrupt."
"Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we're going to create our own journals in-house," he said, referring to the National Institutes of Health, an HHS agency and the world's largest funder of health research.
He added that these journals publish studies funded and approved by pharmaceutical companies. And there is some merit to Kennedy's statements - major food and drug companies have funded scientific research. According to a 2015 article published in The Lancet, Coca-Cola disclosed spending $118.6 million over five years on scientific research and health and wellbeing partnerships; several influential medical organizations, including the American Cancer Society, received funding from the company.
RFK Jr.'s changes raise 'grave concerns' from scientific community
Kennedy's move to change COVID vaccine guidelines contradicts his previous claims that he wouldn't "take away anybody's vaccines."
However, the changes to the guidelines may affect what is covered by insurance and who has access to the shot if they still wish to receive it. Federal vaccine recommendations affect what private insurances will cover, and Medicaid only covers the full cost of recommended vaccines.
Besser says Kennedy's updated guidelines "raise grave concerns about the stability of our vaccine recommendations."
"There was no opportunity for people to explore the data that may be behind this decision or to ask questions," he explains, "which makes me feel that there could be other decisions coming with the same lack of transparency."
To lead their healthiest possible life, Besser recommends that people, especially parents, consult their trusted health provider to "sort through the massive amounts of information being thrown at them."
Contributing: Sudiksha Kochi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Staff 'caught COVID-19' while working at factory on Anglesey
Mark Edwards, Glynne Roberts, Nia Williams and Brian Perry, who worked as food processing operatives for 2 Sisters Food Group, are bringing claims against the company for damages for injuries and losses following development of symptoms of the virus in mid-2020. 2 Sisters Food Group shut its Llangefni factory in 2023. A previous court hearing found in 2 Sisters' favour, but at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre in April, Judge Sir Peter Lane allowed an appeal of this ruling from all four ex-employees. In July 2024, Judge Wendy Owen concluded that the ex-employees would face a 'nigh-on impossible task' in establishing a causal link between a breach of duty from 2 Sisters and their contracting of COVID-19. They say they were working 'shoulder to shoulder' when, in June 2020, there was an outbreak of COVID-19 at the Llangefni factory, and that the site was then closed at the direction of Public Health Wales. As far as they are aware, 217 of the 560 staff at the factory contracted COVID-19 during the course of the outbreak, including all four of them. 2 Sisters admits they worked in close proximity with each other but contests the 'shoulder to shoulder' claim, and refutes the suggestion that the factory's closure was directed by Public Health Wales. In his written reasons, published on Wednesday (May 28), Judge Lane wrote: 'The causation issue stands front and centre of this case. The scenario posited by the appellants was not a fanciful one. 'What is potentially relevant to the present claims is, however, the prevalence of COVID-19, certainly in the area containing the factory and perhaps further afield, depending on the places of residence of the appellants.' Judge Lane added that if evidence were to show, for example, relatively low levels of COVID-19 on Anglesey in June 2020, then 'it is plainly not fanciful for the appellants to be able to show, on the balance of probabilities, that their illness would not have been sustained but for the respondent's breach of duty'. Though he allowed their appeals, he said they 'face an uphill task' in proving their cases.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New Covid variant 'under monitoring' after spike in cases and hospitalisations
First identified in January, NB. 1.8.1 is spreading quickly across multiple countries, leading to an increase in cases and hospitalisations, the World Health Organisation said A new coronavirus variant has been labelled as "under monitoring" by the World Health Organisation following a spike in cases and hospitalisations. First identified on January 22 2025, NB. 1.8.1 is a derivative of the Omicron strain. The variant is causing concern among health experts after being identified in multiple countries including popular holiday destinations like Egypt, Thailand and the Maldives. The WHO has warned that the new strain is now responsible for more than 10 per cent of all infections and is already the dominant strain in Hong Kong and China. The Centre of Disease Control (CDC) in the US has also identified cases in a number of states including New York, California, Arizona, Ohio, Washington, and Rhode Island. Despite saying that the variant is currently being monitored, WHO said in their report that the current risk to the public is deemed to be low - and currently approved vaccines are expected to "remain effective to this variant against symptomatic and severe disease." WHO said that despite an increase in cases and hospitalisations, currently there is no indication that this variant leads to more severe illness than other variants in circulation. Even though NB.1.8.1 has been found in popular holiday destinations, the WHO says there is no need for travel or trade restrictions at this time, Wales Online reports. The organisation urges countries to stay alert and adjust their responses as needed, but does not recommend closing borders or limiting travel. The official report states: "WHO recommends that countries remain vigilant, adapt to evolving epidemiological trends, and leverage Covid-19 management strategies to strengthen systems for all respiratory disease threats. Member States should continue offering Covid-19 vaccines in line with WHO recommendations." Health experts at the CDC say that symptoms may vary in accordance with the variant, however they will likely be similar to the typical symptoms of Covid-19. These include fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, new loss of taste or smell, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, nausea or vomiting, diarrhoea. This week, Lara Herrero Associate Professor and Research Leader in Virology and Infectious Disease at Griffith University, said that thanks to multiple mutations, the new strain "may infect cells more efficiently than earlier strains." Professor Herrero explained: "It's possible a person infected with NB.1.8.1 may be more likely to pass the virus on to someone else, compared to earlier variants. The evidence so far suggests NB.1.8.1 may spread more easily and may partially sidestep immunity from prior infections or vaccination. These factors could explain its rise in sequencing data. "But importantly, the WHO has not yet observed any evidence it causes more severe disease compared to other variants. Reports suggest symptoms of NB.1.8.1 should align closely with other Omicron subvariants. Common symptoms include sore throat, fatigue, fever, mild cough, muscle aches and nasal congestion. Gastrointestinal symptoms may also occur in some cases." The WHO report reads: "SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, and between January and May 2025, there were shifts in global SARS-CoV-2 variant dynamics. At the beginning of the year, the most prevalent variant tracked by WHO at the global level was XEC, followed by KP.3.1.1. In February, circulation of XEC began to decline while that of LP.8.1 increased, with the latter becoming the most detected variant in mid-March. Since mid-April, the circulation of LP.8.1 has been slightly declining as NB.1.8.1 is increasingly being detected."
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How different kitchen items can cause life-changing illnesses
Kitchens are usually home to the most delicious items in your house, but mounting research has revealed that almost every appliance can also make you incredibly sick. From countertops and sinks to refrigerators and microwaves, scientists have found some disturbing links between these items and conditions like cancer, dementia, and sepsis. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that 48 million people in the U.S. get sick from foodborne diseases each year, leading to 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths. While food poisoning cases involving salmonella, listeria, norovirus, and E coli contribute to many kitchen-related illnesses and deaths, contaminated food is not the only thing people have to worry about. Here are 11 of the most concerning ways danger could be lurking in your kitchen. Countertops Kitchen counters can harbor a load of harmful pathogens due to poor cleaning habits and cross-contamination between different foods being prepared. Dr Darin Detwiler, a food safety expert at Northeastern University in Boston, recently told Daily Mail that the number of food poisoning outbreaks has continued to grow since the CDC's last full review of the problem in 2019. 'Each time you wipe a countertop or rinse a dish, you risk transferring millions of harmful microbes to your hands, cooking tools, and food,' Dr Detwiler added. Sponges The tool many people use to clean their kitchen counters may be an even more dangerous hiding place for germs. The moist environment of a sponge makes them notoriously one of the dirtiest items in the kitchen. Food safety expert Sylvia Anderson told the Daily Mail that a sponge's porous structure and ability to soak up water makes it an ideal incubator for microorganisms. 'Bacteria from sponges can transfer to dishes, counters, and hands, leading to foodborne illnesses or infections,' she added. In 2017 a study in Scientific Reports analyzed microbial communities in used kitchen sponges and found 45 billion bacteria per square centimeter of sponge. That same report revealed that these microbial colonies can cause skin infections, especially among individuals with weakened immune systems. Specifically, scientists have found that dirty sponges can carry Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, potentially deadly bacteria that cause skin infections if transferred to hands or open wounds. Sinks Another place where sponges are often used or kept, kitchen sinks are notorious traps for harmful pathogens that can cause food poisoning. They can become reservoirs for pathogens like E coli, salmonella, and pseudomonas due to food residue and moisture building up on the sink surface or in the drains. A 2016 study in Journal of Applied Microbiology found that kitchen sinks are often more contaminated than toilets, with biofilms harboring bacteria that can contaminate food or utensils, leading to food poisoning. Cutting boards Even if someone tries to stay safe by practicing good hygiene in their kitchen, germs will find you. Cutting boards are filled with harmful bacteria, and are perhaps the riskiest kitchen utensil when it comes to contracting infections. 'Cross-contamination is the biggest concern. If you use the same chopping board for raw meat and vegetables without washing it, bacteria like Campylobacter or E coli can transfer to ready-to-eat foods, leading to serious illness,' Anderson told the Daily Mail. One 2023 study by the UK's Food Standards Agency found about half of household cutting boards harbor bacteria. These pathogens include salmonella and campylobacter, which are leading causes of diarrheal disease. The study concluded that you may be safer opting for a wooden cutting board over a plastic one. 'Wooden boards are naturally antimicrobial but need regular oiling to prevent cracking. Plastic boards, while dishwasher safe, can develop deep cuts that trap bacteria, making thorough cleaning difficult,' Anderson warned. Dishwashers A new study has found that dishwashers may be a secret cause of the rising rates of dementia throughout the world. Scientists from the University of Queensland warned that placing plastic items in the dishwasher leads to the release of toxic microplastics, which can then contaminate other utensils. Microplastics are small enough to breach biological barriers such as the blood-brain barrier, raising concerns about their potential impact on human health and brain function. These particles have been linked not only to dementia, but also to cancer, heart disease, and fertility issues. The 2025 study found that a single dishwasher cycle involving plastic plates, bowls, cups, and cutlery can release nearly a million particles. Refrigerators According to Professor Judith Evans, of London South Bank University, and Oleskii Omelchenko, a PhD researcher at the Quadram Institute, your refrigerator could be a breeding ground for disease. Although this everyday appliance is meant to keep your food fresh and safe, fridges can help bacteria grow if the temperature is not right. However, the experts warn that even a 'well-chilled' fridge could harbor invisible dangers if you don't take the right precautions. A 2020 study in Food Control found that refrigerator temperatures above 41°F (5°C) can allow pathogens like listeria or salmonella to survive, potentially contributing to foodborne illness. 'Part of the problem is that many fridges lack an accurate, accessible way to monitor their internal temperature,' Evans and Omelchenko said in The Conversation. 'On top of that, every time you open the door, warm air rushes in. The longer the door stays open, especially if you're lingering while choosing a snack, the more the internal temperature climbs toward room temperature, creating a more suitable environment for bacteria to thrive.' Gas stoves According to Dr Ben Ewald, gas stoves are among the most dangerous household appliances today. 'Living with a gas stove is the health equivalent of living with a smoker,' he warned. Studies have shown that tiny but harmful nanoparticles, such as nitrogen dioxide, produced by the flames are the perfect size to flow into the human respiratory system and stick to your lungs, triggering several respiratory illnesses. Dr Ewald warned that breathing in these particles while cooking can lead to acute asthma, increased allergies, and even pneumonia. Scientists said the flames also release formaldehyde, which is another respiratory irritant, and tiny amounts of benzene, a known carcinogen. A 2023 study in Environmental Health Perspectives found that 12.7 per cent of childhood asthma cases in the U.S. could be attributed to gas stove emissions. Cookware As for the pots and pans you're placing on these gas burners, non-stick cookware is coated with chemicals now linked to severe hormone dysfunction. Scientists have repeatedly warned about the dangers of PFAS. These toxins are called 'forever chemicals' because they can linger in the environment for thousands of years. Multiple studies have been linked to everything from cancer to infertility. Dr Nathan Cohen, an expert in environmental medicine and public health at Mount Sinai Health in New York, said that these recent findings, 'should serve as a warning to women everywhere about the potentially harmful effects of PFAS when they are planning to conceive.' 'We can minimize PFAS exposure by avoiding foods that are associated with higher levels of these chemicals and by purchasing PFAS-free products.' Microwaves Microwave ovens can harbor bacteria if not cleaned properly, as food splatters create environments for microbial growth. A 2024 study in Frontiers in Microbiology investigated bacterial contamination in household appliances, including microwaves, and found bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus in uncleaned microwaves. These bacteria can cause infections if transferred to food or surfaces. S. aureus can cause severe infections, including sepsis, if it enters the bloodstream through contaminated food or wounds. Laundry machines Cancer can be caused by exposure to toxic chemicals, radiation, or environmental pollutants. Laundry machines can contribute to cancer risk by dispersing chemical residues from detergents, solvents from dry-cleaned clothes, or microplastics into the clothes you wear. Some detergents may also contain cancer-causing compounds that persist on clothes or in the environment long after the wash cycle. The 2011 Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health study confirmed that scented detergents and dryer sheets release cancer-causing volatile organic compounds like acetaldehyde and benzene through dryer vents, posing a potential risk of breathing in these toxins. Garbage cans Botulism is a rare but serious illness caused by the botulinum neurotoxin and produced by Clostridium botulinum, a spore-forming bacterium. It leads to paralysis, which can be life-threatening if untreated. Household garbage cans could contribute to botulism by harboring Clostridium botulinum spores in food waste, particularly from improperly canned or spoiled food. A 2018 case report in Journal of Medical Case Reports described two cases of foodborne botulism in Germany linked to home-canned green beans. The infections caused cranial nerve paralysis and descending quadriparesis - weakness or paralysis starting in the upper body and spreading to the legs - in a 47-year-old woman and her husband. The diagnosis was confirmed by detecting botulinum toxin type A in the woman's blood. Symptoms of the condition included dizziness, double vision, slurred speech, and breathing problems severe enough to need a machine to help them breathe.
