Senate Armed Services leader pans Trump's Qatar jet plan
Sen. Roger Wicker, the powerful leader of the Armed Services Committee, disparaged President Donald Trump's plan to accept a Boeing aircraft from Qatar — adding to a bipartisan chorus of lawmakers criticizing the potential gift.
Wicker disputed the central rationale for the swap — which Trump is touting as a no-cost solution for a new Air Force One — noting that officials would need to scrub the aircraft for any surveillance equipment and install numerous security upgrades.
'It would be like the United States moving into the Qatari embassy,' he said in an interview. 'I'm not sure how quickly the Qatari aircraft can be retooled.'
His comments underscore the rising Republican unease with the idea, a move that experts say could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and take years to complete.
Trump has argued that the Qatari jet is a patriotic gift that could come sooner than Boeing's delayed replacements for the aging Air Force One aircraft he currently uses. But retrofitting the Qatari jet would prove a costly and complex process, Wicker said.
The senator called for Boeing to instead 'redouble their efforts,' rather than have Trump accept a gift that would require nearly as much work. 'Clearly, the listening devices, the communication devices, things like that, the safety features all have to be factored in and have to be done to our American standards,' he said.
Trump has said he would transfer the jet to his presidential library as a museum piece after he leaves office, an idea that has also raised bipartisan objections.
'If the Qataris want to make a gift to the United States, then it would be a lot more proper for that gift to be made to the government of the United States — to be used by Mr. Trump and his successor — and not given to the library,' Wicker said.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune and several other Republican lawmakers have expressed apprehension over the ethical implications and security risks of accepting a lavish gift from a foreign government. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have all voiced unease.
Democrats are going even further. A group of Senate Democrats, which includes Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, is urging the Department of Defense Inspector General to investigate what they describe as an unconstitutional foreign gift to Trump. The group, which includes Senate Armed Services ranking member Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), argued the plane wouldn't be ready for Trump's use until nearly the end of his term.
'If the Qataris want to make a gift, it should be a gift to the United States — not to one individual, and certainly not something routed through the Pentagon for personal use,' Reed told reporters.
Reed said Democrats aren't ruling out a legislative response if the administration proceeds with the Qatar jet plan. He indicated that he would look to Republicans, the majority party, for support. 'We have options,' he said.
While no one mentioned the jet during the president's visit to Qatar on Wednesday, there was still a bit of diplomatic theater. The Trump administration announced several defense sales deals that were already in the works, including one that was agreed to under the Biden administration.
The White House on Wednesday touted a $1 billion agreement between Raytheon and Qatar for the company's anti-drone system. The agreement was first announced in December during the Biden administration. A $2 billion March agreement between General Atomics and Qatar for surveillance drones was also celebrated in the White House note.
The Trump administration announced another $142 billion in potential arms deals with Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to buy U.S. weapons and military equipment. The administration did not provide details as most of the package remains aspirational, said one administration official, who was granted anonymity to discuss potential negotiations.
The announcements were reminiscent of Trump's much-touted $100 billion worth of defense deals during his first visit to Saudi Arabia in 2017. That involved tens of billions of dollars in projects already put in motion by the Obama administration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's China Envoy Seeks to Calm US Firms as Trade Ties Fray
US Ambassador David Perdue sought to reassure American businesses in China that the countries will maintain their commercial ties, as tensions flare between the world's largest economies over export controls. The envoy told US business groups on Thursday the Trump administration is looking for ways to cooperate with China and supports their presence in the country, according to people familiar with the matter. The exchanges took place as a dispute over China's grip on critical materials threatens to derail tariff talks that the US said has stalled.


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Taking Harvey Milk's name off Navy ship won't silence what he stands for
Regarding 'Trump reportedly to strip Harvey Milk name off naval vessel' (Politics, June 3): The order to remove Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship is a stunning and shameful act of political erasure. Milk, a Navy veteran who served during the Korean War, was assassinated after becoming one of America's most courageous and pioneering LGBTQ+ civil rights leaders. To claim that his name no longer reflects 'the Navy's values' or the 'warrior ethos' is not just revisionist — it's malicious. The timing is no accident. On the first days of Pride month, this move speaks volumes about the stories the Trump administration seeks to silence. This decision is not about standards. It's about politics and an insult to every LGBTQ+ American who has served this country with honor. I am the beneficiary of Milk's groundbreaking efforts to have LGBTQ+ people treated with respect, dignity and the opportunity to love who we choose. The name Harvey Milk endures — in the hearts of those who carry his legacy forward and in every Pride flag raised this month. Jonathan Finck, San Francisco Stand with veterans On Friday, the anniversary of D-Day, I'll be in Washington, D.C., marching alongside thousands of other veterans and families at the Unite for Veterans rally. We're not showing up to make noise. We're showing up because we believe in something worth defending: the promise this country made to those who served. I served in Afghanistan as an Army infantry officer. I've spent my civilian career working to improve systems for veterans, at a Bay Area tech company and at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and I can tell you this: Undermining veteran care doesn't reduce waste, it reduces access, stability and dignity for those who earned it. The Department of Veterans Affairs is under threat. The systems veterans rely on for health care, housing and mental health are being hollowed out. At the same time, disinformation is spreading about how these systems work and who they serve. This isn't about one party or one president. It's about priorities. We've never hesitated to invest in national defense and caring for veterans is part of that commitment. So I'm standing up. And I'm asking others to do the same. Demand that this country keep its word to those who wore the uniform. George Chewning, San Francisco Train not so smart Regarding 'Enthusiasm 'sky high' as Sonoma-Marin rail service expands northward' (Bay Area, May 31): The story about SMART train reaching Windsor reads like a promo piece. A deeper look shows that the boom in ridership occurred after SMART started giving free rides to kids and seniors. And even with that incentive, it has yet to reach the 5,000 riders a day to which it aspires. SMART has been a huge boondoggle. It's a single-track rail line that runs through flood-prone fields, utilizing diesel engines, with no flexibility in case of earthquake or fire (unlike unsexy buses). The policy seems to be to build so much infrastructure that citizens will feel they must send good money after bad, but they're not consistently biting. Jean Arnold, Mendocino Learn more languages The more languages you know fluently, the better you understand your native language. I helped write courses of study for many languages. My granddaughters attended Spanish immersion classes and are now bilingual, opting to study additional languages. While I agree that English literacy should be better, students are immersed in English all day long though social media is eroding their grammar and punctuation. This is a separate battle that won't be improved by outlawing immersion classes. To improve communication and alternate ways of organizing reality, I say we should offer more immersion classes.


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine Braces for Putin's Retaliation
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A NATO official has echoed President Donald Trump's warning that his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will seek revenge for Ukraine's drone strikes on Russia's military airfields. Following his phone call with the Russian president, Trump said Putin "will have to respond" to the attack on airfields, which Kyiv said damaged 41 aircraft including heavy bombers and A-50 spy planes. As Trump's envoy has warned the strikes risked escalation in the war, an unnamed NATO official told The Moscow Times that Russia would take "retaliatory actions" against Ukraine for its "Spiderweb" drone operation. Experts have told Newsweek that, in response, Putin is likely to step up drone and missile attacks. Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin and the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry by email for comment. File photo: Russia's President Vladimir Putin sits at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence, outside Moscow, on June 4, 2025. File photo: Russia's President Vladimir Putin sits at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence, outside Moscow, on June 4, It Matters Ukraine heralded the strikes on Russian airfields as far away as Siberia as a blow to Russia's military capabilities. Pro-Russian Telegram channels have expressed anger at the lack of protection at the sites, but the comments by Trump and his envoy will add to anticipation over what Putin will do in response. What To Know Trump said on the social-media platform Truth Social on Wednesday that, during his phone call with Putin, the leaders had discussed Ukraine's attacks on airplanes. The U.S. president said Putin said "very strongly" that he would have to respond to Kyiv's drone attacks without specifying what this would be nor whether he had urged restraint. Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, had earlier told Fox News that Ukraine's attack on "part of their national survival system, which is their … nuclear triad," had significantly increased the risk of escalation. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Planet Labs PBC An alliance official told The Moscow Times before NATO's defense ministers meeting in Brussels that Putin will use the attacks to justify additional heavier strikes and stall negotiations. Cédomir Nestorovic, academic co-director at the ESSEC Institute for Geopolitics & Business, told Newsweek that, in response, Russia could launch massive drone attacks on Ukraine, but probably not the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile that Putin has boasted about, nor any nuclear missiles. Aurélien Colson, from the same institute, told Newsweek that Putin's response will be primarily military, but his options are limited to missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities. Zev Faintuch, head of research and intelligence at security firm Global Guardian, told Newsweek that Ukraine's attack might slow the massive aerial bombardments of the major Ukrainian cities. However, the only way to bring the Russians to the negotiating table would be to halt their advances on the battlefield, he added. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said Wednesday that Putin used his call with Trump, in which they also discussed the train derailments in Russia that Moscow blamed on Kyiv, to portray Ukraine falsely as uninterested in peace and as a bad actor. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields." A NATO official said to The Moscow Times: "There will certainly be retaliatory actions that Russia will take. And there will be defensive things that Russia will do." Aurélien Colson, academic co-director at the ESSEC Institute for Geopolitics & Business, said: "(Putin) will probably launch another larger air attack on Ukrainian cities and infrastructures, through missiles and drones," adding that "going nuclear at the tactical level is excluded," due to China's opposition to such a move. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said on Wednesday: "Putin's statements to Trump are also likely aimed at distracting from Russia's own disinterest in negotiations and continued preparations for a prolonged war effort." What Happens Next Amid speculation over how Putin might respond to his worst week of 2025, the Russian president told his senior officials on Wednesday that he was no longer interested in negotiating with Ukraine, saying, "How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?" Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of R. Politik, a political analysis firm focused on Russia, posted on X, formerly Twitter, that Western audiences may view Ukraine's attacks as strengthening Kyiv's negotiating position, but the effect "will likely be the opposite." Stanovaya said such attacks will only reinforce Putin's determination to dismantle the Ukrainian state and that he will respond "by becoming more hard-line and less compliant."