‘Poverty is not a shield': Life term to man for killing wife
New Delhi: A Delhi court, refusing to accept "poverty" as a major mitigating circumstance, sentenced a man to life imprisonment for murdering his wife in 2014 by setting her ablaze.
The court observed that the aggravating circumstances in the case outweighed the mitigating circumstances.
The court of additional sessions judge Virender Kumar Kharta, in an order dated May 17, stated that in the present case, the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstances. However, the case did not fall within the purview of the rarest of rare doctrine, which would warrant the death penalty.
The court was hearing arguments on the quantum of sentence against Giriraj Kishor Bhardwaj, alias Shyam Naga, who was earlier convicted under Section 302 (murder) of the IPC.
"While sentencing, the purpose of sentencing has to be borne in mind. The sentence imposed must establish a right balance between the rights of the convict and the rights of the victim and the purpose of law. Poverty is not a major mitigating circumstance," the judge said.
Additional public prosecutor Pankaj Kumar Ranga sought the death penalty for the convict, stating he committed the heinous offence of murdering his wife, Kusum, by pouring a flammable liquid and setting her ablaze with a matchstick on Sept 24, 2014.
The prosecutor mentioned that after the murder, one of the sons of the accused discontinued his studies and became a drug addict, while the other, a minor, started working as a helper for a vegetable vendor.
The court then sentenced Bhardwaj to life imprisonment. "The convict is a first-time offender. The offence committed by the convict is heinous in nature. The deceased was the wife of the convict. The trauma of the family members of the deceased, Kusum, and her sons can be understood," the judge observed.
The court also referred the case to the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLA) to determine adequate compensation for the deceased's legal representatives, acknowledging that they suffered mental trauma, inconvenience, hardship, disappointment, and frustration.
The counsel for the convict submitted before the court that the case does not fall under the rarest of rare doctrine and hence, he cannot be awarded the death penalty. She further argued that a lenient view may be taken against the convict, as he belongs to a poor strata of society.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man, 2 sons get life term for murder over land dispute
Agra: A court in Etah has sentenced a man and his two sons to life imprisonment for the murder of a neighbour following a dispute over the boundary of their agricultural fields. According to ADGC (Crime) Kusum Tomar, the incident occurred on July 21, 2017, when Shabbir Khan and his sons, Jafruddin Khan and Tillu, attacked Yunus Khan with sticks and rods, striking him on the head. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Yunus's field was adjacent to that of the accused, and a long-standing boundary dispute had escalated into violence. Yunus was initially taken to the District Hospital in Etah in a severely injured condition. He was later referred to SN Medical College, where he succumbed to his injuries during treatment on July 31, 2017. Following the attack, a case was registered on the same day at Awagadh Police Station under IPC sections 302 (murder) and 506 (criminal intimidation), among others, based on a complaint filed by Yunus Khan's brother, Nanhe Khan. Police arrested Jafruddin Khan on Sept 13, 2017, and a chargesheet was filed in Dec that year. During the trial, the defence argued that the accused came from an impoverished background and had dependents to support. However, Additional district and sessions Judge Sudha (who goes by his first name only) dismissed the plea, stating that financial hardship could not justify a crime. The court found all three accused guilty of murder and imposed a fine of Rs 31,000 on each. In case of non-payment, they will face an additional two months of imprisonment.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Rape accused was a repeat offender; scooter gifted by sister
The man who raped a toddler and was gunned down in a police encounter in the early hours of Friday was booked in criminal cases registered at two police stations in the city. Charges for rioting, criminal intimidation and others were booked against him in these cases. According to police, Deepak Verma, 24, was the youngest of the four siblings. 'His elder brother, Vishnu Verma, earns his living working as a labourer and fruit vendor. His elder sister lives in Surat, and his younger sister lives in Lucknow. Two years ago, the sister in Surat had gifted Vishnu a scooter, which Deepak forcibly took and used to commit crimes,' said Subhash Chand, the Alamabh station house officer (SHO), adding he often stayed out late. In a CCTV footage, Deepak was seen fleeing with the two-year-old child on a white scooter. The police said Deepak usually left home at 6 pm and returned by 5 am. A police investigation also revealed his prior involvement in a similar crime, leading to his imprisonment along with two of his accomplices. 'The accused has two criminal cases, one registered in Para in 2024 and another at Hazratganj police station in 2021,' read details shared by the police. While the case at Para police station was booked under sections 504 (intentional insult) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, IPC sections 147 (rioting), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504, and 506 were invoked in the other. 'Sold water in trains, organised jagrata' According to police, Deepak would, at times, help his brother-in-law in the latter's fruit business. 'He also sold water in trains. He organised ritualistic jagrata events for which he made tableaus as well,' said DCP (Central) Ashish Srivastava. In a picture widely shared on social media, the accused can be seen posing in front of a statue of Lord Shiva, which he had made as part of a tableau for a jagrata event. Police added Deepak would often dress himself as a member of the 'aghori' sect, which is known for its ascetic practices. 'Several photos recovered by the police show him in aghori attire,' said an official. Pic cap: In a picture widely shared on social media, the accused can be seen posing in front of a statue of Lord Shiva, which he had made as part of a tableau for a jagrata event.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Thief or no thief? What cases say about Vijay Mallya
Fugitive billionaire Vijay Mallya , accused of defaulting on bank loans, has made an elaborate show of contrition. Appearing on a four-hour podcast, Mallya, who is living in the UK, apologised for the downfall of his Kingfisher Airlines . Accepting responsibility for the collapse of the airline, Mallya said, "I apologise to everyone for the failure of Kingfisher Airlines ." But he also asserted that he is not a thief. Responding to charges of financial wrongdoing, Mallya said, "You may call me a fugitive, but I didn't run away. I flew on a prescheduled visit. Fair enough, I didn't return for reasons that I consider are valid… so if you want to call me a fugitive, go ahead. But where is the 'chor' (thief) coming from? Where is the 'chori' (theft)?" During the podcast, he also expressed willingness to consider returning to India under specific conditions. "If I have a fair assurance of a fair trail and dignified existence in India, I will think about it (returning to India) seriously." Mallya said the money he owed to banks has been recovered several times over from him. Industrialist Harsh Goenka has come to Mallya's defence. Responding to what Mallya said in the podcast, Goenka wrote on X: "Vijay Mallya lived the high life, yes. Defaulted, yes. Unlike most others, his Rs 9,000+ crore dues are now reportedly settled. Meanwhile, bigger defaulters walk free with much fatter haircuts from banks. If dues remain, the banks should clearly say so. If not, why is he still a political punching bag? Justice must be fair, not selective." "Thank you Harsh," Mallya responded on X. "The Union Finance Ministry has confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered Rs 14,100 crores from me against a DRT judgement debt of Rs 6,203 crores. Why the blatant discrimination?" Live Events Mallya owes Indian banks approximately Rs 9,000 crore. He fled India in 2016 and has been residing in the UK since then. In December last year, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman informed Lok Sabha that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had so far restituted Rs 14,000 crore worth of assets to various banks from the sale of Mallya's assets. What the cases against Mallya say Mallya may believe that he is not a thief and also appear to be a victim instead of a perpetrator, but there is certainly far more to the cases against him than simply a matter of repayment of outstanding loan. Investigating agencies have accused Mallya of criminal conspiracy, fraud and money laundering on several counts. Bank officials were also arrested in the Kingfisher Airlines case. Below are the main cases against Mallya: Loan default and fraud Rs 6,900 crore loan default: In 2016, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a case against Mallya and Kingfisher Airlines for allegedly defaulting on loans amounting to Rs 6,900 crore from a consortium of 17 public sector banks. The charges include criminal conspiracy and cheating under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Rs 900 crore IDBI Bank loan: In 2017, the CBI charged Mallya and others in a Rs 900 crore loan default case involving IDBI Bank. The charges include criminal conspiracy, cheating, and corruption. The agency alleged that the loan was granted without proper procedures, resulting in a loss of public funds. Rs 180 crore Indian Overseas Bank loan: In 2024, a special CBI court issued a non-bailable warrant against Mallya in connection with a Rs 180 crore loan default case involving Indian Overseas Bank. The CBI alleges that Mallya caused a wrongful loss to the bank by willfully defaulting on the loan. Money laundering Enforcement Directorate (ED) case: The ED has charged Mallya under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The agency alleges that Kingfisher Airlines diverted at least Rs 3,547 crore of the loan received from banks. Instances of alleged diversion include over-invoicing of aircraft lease rentals, payments for a corporate jet used exclusively by Mallya, and transfers to the Force India Formula One team and the Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL team. Service tax evasion Rs 100 crore service tax default: In 2012 and 2015, the service tax department filed complaints against Kingfisher Airlines for non-payment of over Rs 100 crore in service tax, despite collecting this amount from passengers. A Mumbai court issued non-bailable warrants against Mallya and others in connection with this case. Corporate misgovernance and fraud Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) case: In July 2016, the SFIO issued notices to 17 companies for taking loans from banks to finance the defunct Kingfisher Airlines. The investigation uncovered instances of corporate misgovernance and financial irregularities. Mallya's accusation of recovering debt "multiple times over" In February this year, Mallya moved the Karnataka high court challenging the debt recovery proceedings against him. In his petition, Mallya sought a statement by the banks of accounts for the amounts owed by him to United Breweries Holdings Limited (in liquidation) and other certificate debtors. It was submitted that the amount due had already been recovered, and even still additional recovery proceedings had been carried out against Mallya. "Parallelly there was a debt recovery proceeding, in that a sum of Rs 6200 crore was ordered to be paid by the primary debtor Kingfisher and the UBHL which was the guarantor. That order also attained finality," Mallya's advocate said. "However, between 2017 the Rs 6200 crore was recovered multiple times over and there is an admitted statement which I have filed, as on date, the recovery officer says Rs 10,200 crore has been recovered. While the official liquidator says banks have made their money restored. Lastly a statement is made in the Parliament by the Finance Minister that 14,000 crore is recovered," he added. (With TOI inputs)
