
How the peaceful world of puzzles has been upended by the global trade war
Puzzle people are used to putting pieces in their place. But the chaos of the Canada-U.S. trade war is flipping the industry over, leaving business owners to pick up the pieces.
"It's the uncertainty. It's nearly impossible to navigate," Bruce Donnelly told Day 6.
Donnelly is the owner of Puzzles Canada, based in Georgetown, Ont. It's one of the largest puzzle retailers in Canada, stocking 92 jigsaw brands and thousands of different puzzles. It ships thousands of them each week.
But the current trade war has taken a sizable piece out of those orders. And with continued uncertainty around tariffs, many puzzle retailers on both sides of the border are worried about the future of their businesses.
The Toy Association, a lobby group for the U.S. toy industry, surveyed 400 of its member companies in April. It found that nearly half of its small or medium-sized businesses were worried they may go out of business because of their government's tariffs.
Facing tariffs
In March, Canada announced its retaliatory tariffs against Donald Trump and the U.S., which included a 25 per cent tariff on jigsaw puzzles made in the U.S. And Donnelly didn't have a chance to react.
"We had shipments that were en route. We didn't have a choice. We had to pay the tariff," he said.
Not wanting to put the cost on his customers, Puzzles Canada paid the difference.
Even though Americans make up only 20 per cent of Puzzles Canada's customer base, Donnelly says he's feeling the impact. Half of the brands Donnelly sells are made in China, making them costly to send to U.S. customers.
Initially, the U.S. put a 145 per cent tariff on goods shipped from China. That has since been reduced to 30 per cent.
"We're definitely [taking] a hit," said Donnelly.
The company has had to make adjustments. He's since had to halt shipments of made-in-China puzzles to the U.S., because those extra fees were just too high. He's also had to increase the price for all customers of games from White Mountain Puzzles, Springbok Puzzles, and New York Puzzle Co., which are all U.S.-made, though he didn't give an exact figure.
Donnelly is bringing in more puzzles from Europe, and he can continue to sell to customers in Canada. Even so, Donnelly says his U.S. sales could be cut in half.
And it's not just companies in Canada that are struggling.
Mia Galison, owner of the eeBoo Corporation, is based in New York and sells jigsaw puzzles and children's toys. But many of her products are manufactured in China.
"It's devastating. We are a very small company. We don't work on huge margins," said Galison.
"We're hoping that some reason prevails with these tariffs or that we get some kind of carve-out for small businesses or carve-outs for the toy industry."
To make ends meet, Galison has also increased the prices of her puzzles. Even with the increase, she's trying to keep them under $25 US each, but says it's not enough to make up for the cost of tariffs.
Puzzles, bowling balls and toilet seats
It's not just puzzles that have been caught in the crossfire of the trade war. Other seemingly odd U.S.-made products, such as toilet seats and bowling balls, have been slapped with retaliatory tariffs by the Canadian government. But why?
The Canadian government hasn't provided an exact explanation for each product on that list, but international lawyer Lawrence Herman says those measures were put in place to inflict maximum pain on the United States.
"These items are carefully designed to ensure that they affect companies, producers, exporters in areas where U.S. politicians may be influenced by the effect," Herman told the Cost of Living.
"A company in one or another area that is affected by these Canadian tariffs would complain to its senator or to its member of Congress, asking for the tariffs on Canada to be removed. That's the whole idea behind these lists."
In the meantime, Herman says Canadian companies will have to look to ship to other markets, such as Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
One of the solutions could be to shift manufacturing from China to the U.S. or Canada. But Galison of eeBoo says that isn't an easy pivot. She says it would take her company decades to develop its own manufacturing in the U.S. that would produce puzzles at the quality she's looking for. And she can't afford such an endeavour.
For Galison, it's not just a matter of a slight downturn in profit. She worries her business, and many others, might not make it to the end of the year.
"Empty shelves are kind of an unpleasant image when you think of it," said Galison.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Green MLAs want quicker action on glyphosate report
Three and a half years after a report recommended tighter restrictions on glyphosate spraying, some lawmakers say the pace of implementation has been too slow. "It's clear that not a lot of work was done on it in that time," Green MLA Megan Mitton said. "There were some things completed and some things very recently completed, but I would have liked to see more progress." The report by the legislature's committee on climate change and environmental stewardship made a number of recommendations on the future of herbicide spraying in the province. It followed extensive hearings with scientists, foresters, Health Canada researchers, First Nations, industry and the public. The recommendations included larger setbacks from dwellings and watercourses, that N.B. Power phase out aerial glyphosate spraying and an analysis of potential alternatives. In an update to the committee, Christie Ward, the assistant deputy environment minister, said 11 of 20 recommendations have been "completed" to date, while the remaining nine are underway. Some MLAs pointed out, however, that what the department has implemented is not what the initial report actually recommended. "When you went through the recommendations of the committee that were unanimously adopted, you pointed to a number of those recommendations that were marked as completed, which were not implemented as recommended," David Coon told department staff Wednesday. "So essentially you rejected those recommendations." For example, the report called for setbacks from dwellings to increase to one kilometre from 500 metres. Ward said permits for aerial glyphosate spraying issued last year increased setbacks to 500 metres from 155 metres. Instead of the minimum 100-metre setback from watercourses recommended in the report, ground application requirements were moved to 30 metres from 15 metres, and aerial spraying requires a minimum distance of 65 metres. Ward said that the department has spent time trying to understand the intent of the committee's recommendations and to carry out the spirit of them, even those based on a misunderstanding of the regulations that already existed. "These recommendations are complex in some cases, many of them require rigorous scientific review, they also require a baseline of information, so you know where you're starting from and where you need to get to," she said. "There's been a lot of work done in the background to really understand all aspects of the pesticide program." But Mitton said she'd prefer a more direct answer from the department on whether the committee's recommendations have been followed. "When the auditor general has a report, there's a response from the department and then there's an update," she said. "I almost feel like we need a bit more of a formal process, or to bring them in more often, to keep that accountability going because I don't accept some of those answers as a checkmark." Environment Minister Gilles LePage backed up his staff, noting the report, which he helped prepare as an opposition member of the committee, did err at times in its understanding of existing regulations. However, LePage agreed with other comments over the pace of action on the report over the last few years. "In the past six years, I think there was a lack of work on that file, and that's why it's part of my mandate," he said. "I was part of the evolution of pesticides in this province, with the research on this committee, and I take it personally, and we are going to focus on pesticides even more than the previous government." LePage's mandate letter from Premier Susan Holt includes two mentions of herbicide spraying. One is to implement all recommendations from the committee's report. The other is to investigate alternatives to pesticide and herbicide use and "re-evaluate the safety of glyphosate with new and comprehensive data specific to New Brunswick." "We're looking daily and monthly on the impacts of how it's done," he said. "But don't forget, our regulations are very strong and very rigid for application and for use."

National Post
31 minutes ago
- National Post
Updated Briefing and Discovery Schedule for CITGO Sale Hearing
Article content PEMBROKE, Bermuda — Gold Reserve Ltd. (TSX.V: GRZ) (OTCQX: GDRZF) (' Gold Reserve ' or the ' Company ') announces that the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the ' Court ') issued an order adopting the following revised schedule for briefing and discovery deadlines proposed by the Special Master given the expiration of the Topping Period on June 18, 2025 and rescheduled start date for the Sale Hearing to August 18, 2025, as previously announced here. Article content Event Deadline Deadline for the Special Master to submit his Final Recommendation July 2 Deadline to serve written discovery on the party (or parties) whose bid is selected as the Final Recommendation July 7 Opening expert reports due July 7 Deadline for the filing of any objections to the Special Master's Final Recommendation July 9 Deadline for any Competing Objector to disclose its own bid materials (such materials to be commensurate with those disclosed by the Special Master of the recommended bid) July 9 Deadline to serve written discovery on a Competing Objector July 11 Deadline to serve responses and objections for discovery requests served after the Final Recommendation July 15 Deadline to meet and confer regarding the scope of discovery to be produced in response to discovery requests served after submission of the Final Recommendation July 16 Deadline to serve witness disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(3) July 18 Deadline to notice witness depositions July 21 Deadline to serve responsive expert reports July 21 Deadline to complete document productions in response to discovery requests served before the submission of the Final Recommendation and substantially complete document productions in response to discovery requests served after the submission of the Final Recommendation July 22 Deadline to serve reply expert reports, if any July 25 Conclusion of the discovery period July 31 Deadline for the filing of responses to objections to the Special Master's Final Recommendation August 1 Deadline for the filing of replies regarding any objections to the Special Master's Final Recommendation August 8 Deadline for the filing of sur-replies to replies regarding any objections to the Special Master's Final Recommendation (only to the extent new arguments are raised in reply briefing) August 12 Deadline for the Special Master to submit Joint Status Report August 13 Deadline to disclose exhibits pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(3) August 13 Deadline to serve objections to FRCP 26(a)(3) exhibit disclosures August 15 Commencement of the Sale Hearing August 18 Article content Article content A copy of the Court's complete order can be found here. Article content A complete description of the Delaware sale proceedings can be found on the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system in Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, 1:17-mc-00151-LPS (D. Del.) and its related proceedings. Article content This release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of applicable U.S. federal securities laws and 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws and state Gold Reserve's and its management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. They are frequently characterized by words such as 'anticipates', 'plan', 'continue', 'expect', 'project', 'intend', 'believe', 'anticipate', 'estimate', 'may', 'will', 'potential', 'proposed', 'positioned' and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions 'may' or 'will' occur. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements relating to any bid submitted by the Company for the purchase of the PDVH shares (the 'Bid'). Article content We caution that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other risks that may cause the actual events, outcomes or results of Gold Reserve to be materially different from our estimated outcomes, results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: the discretion of the Special Master to consider the Bid, to enter into any discussions or negotiation with respect thereto and that the Special Master may reject the Bid at any time; the Special Master may choose not to recommend a Base Bid or Final Bid to the Court; the failure of the Company to negotiate the Bid, including as a result of failing to obtain sufficient equity and/or debt financing; that Bid submitted by the Company will not be selected as the 'Base Bid' or the 'Final Recommend Bid' under the Bidding Procedures, and if selected may not close due to the Sale Process not being completed, including as a result of not obtaining necessary regulatory approval to close on the purchase of the PDVH shares, including but not limited to any necessary approvals from the U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control ('OFAC'), the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or the TSX Venture Exchange; failure of the Company or any other party to obtain any required shareholders approvals for, or satisfy other conditions to effect, any transaction resulting from the Bid; that the Company forfeit any cash amount deposit made due to failing to complete the Bid or otherwise; that the making of the Bid or any transaction resulting therefrom may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; that, prior to or as a result of the completion of any transaction contemplated by the Bid, the business of the Company may experience significant disruptions due to transaction related uncertainty, industry conditions, tariff wars or other factors; the ability to enforce the writ of attachment granted to the Company; the timing set for various reports and/or other matters with respect to the Sale Process may not be met; the ability of the Company to otherwise participate in the Sale Process (and related costs associated therewith); the amount, if any, of proceeds associated with the Sale Process; the competing claims of other creditors of Venezuela, PDVSA and the Company, including any interest on such creditors' judgements and any priority afforded thereto; uncertainties with respect to possible settlements between Venezuela and other creditors and the impact of any such settlements on the amount of funds that may be available under the Sale Process; and the proceeds from the Sale Process may not be sufficient to satisfy the amounts outstanding under the Company's September 2014 arbitral award and/or corresponding November 15, 2015 U.S. judgement in full; and the ramifications of bankruptcy with respect to the Sale Process and/or the Company's claims, including as a result of the priority of other claims. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking statements. For a more detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting the Company's business, see the Company's Management's Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 and other reports that have been filed on SEDAR+ and are available under the Company's profile at Article content Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Gold Reserve or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this notice. Gold Reserve disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, subject to its disclosure obligations under applicable rules promulgated by applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws. Article content Article content Article content Article content


Globe and Mail
32 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
GME Earnings: GameStop Reports Mixed Financial Results and 4,710 Bitcoin
GameStop's (GME) share price is down about 5% after the video game retailer reported mixed first-quarter financial results. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The Texas-based company announced earnings per share (EPS) of $0.09, which topped the $0.04 consensus expectation of analysts. However, revenue for the quarter came in at $732.4 million, which was below the consensus Wall Street estimate of $754.2 million. The company also reported an improved operating margin of -1.5%, which was up from -5.7% in the same quarter of 2024. GameStop's free cash flow at the end of the quarter totaled $189.6 million, which was a big improvement from negative -$114.7 million a year earlier. GameStop's profitability. Source: Main Street Data Bitcoin Purchases Along with its financial results, GameStop disclosed that it bought 4,710 Bitcoins (BTC) between May 3 and June 10 of this year. It's not known what the average purchase price of the Bitcoin was. However, GameStop's BTC holdings are currently worth $516.6 million based on the current price of Bitcoin. GameStop announced previously that it planned to begin buying and holding cryptocurrencies, adopting a similar playbook to that of software developer turned serial BTC acquirer Strategy (MSTR). GameStop has said it plans to use its excess cash to make investments in risk assets such as crypto and stocks. The company made its first Bitcoin investment in May of this year. Is GME Stock a Buy? Currently, only one Wall Street analysts offers a rating and price target on GME stock. So instead, we'll look at the stock's three-month performance. As one can see in the chart below, GameStop's share price has gained 33% over the last 12 weeks.