logo
Green MLAs want quicker action on glyphosate report

Green MLAs want quicker action on glyphosate report

CBC11-06-2025
Three and a half years after a report recommended tighter restrictions on glyphosate spraying, some lawmakers say the pace of implementation has been too slow.
"It's clear that not a lot of work was done on it in that time," Green MLA Megan Mitton said.
"There were some things completed and some things very recently completed, but I would have liked to see more progress."
The report by the legislature's committee on climate change and environmental stewardship made a number of recommendations on the future of herbicide spraying in the province. It followed extensive hearings with scientists, foresters, Health Canada researchers, First Nations, industry and the public.
The recommendations included larger setbacks from dwellings and watercourses, that N.B. Power phase out aerial glyphosate spraying and an analysis of potential alternatives.
In an update to the committee, Christie Ward, the assistant deputy environment minister, said 11 of 20 recommendations have been "completed" to date, while the remaining nine are underway.
Some MLAs pointed out, however, that what the department has implemented is not what the initial report actually recommended.
"When you went through the recommendations of the committee that were unanimously adopted, you pointed to a number of those recommendations that were marked as completed, which were not implemented as recommended," David Coon told department staff Wednesday.
"So essentially you rejected those recommendations."
For example, the report called for setbacks from dwellings to increase to one kilometre from 500 metres. Ward said permits for aerial glyphosate spraying issued last year increased setbacks to 500 metres from 155 metres.
Instead of the minimum 100-metre setback from watercourses recommended in the report, ground application requirements were moved to 30 metres from 15 metres, and aerial spraying requires a minimum distance of 65 metres.
Ward said that the department has spent time trying to understand the intent of the committee's recommendations and to carry out the spirit of them, even those based on a misunderstanding of the regulations that already existed.
"These recommendations are complex in some cases, many of them require rigorous scientific review, they also require a baseline of information, so you know where you're starting from and where you need to get to," she said.
"There's been a lot of work done in the background to really understand all aspects of the pesticide program."
But Mitton said she'd prefer a more direct answer from the department on whether the committee's recommendations have been followed.
"When the auditor general has a report, there's a response from the department and then there's an update," she said.
"I almost feel like we need a bit more of a formal process, or to bring them in more often, to keep that accountability going because I don't accept some of those answers as a checkmark."
Environment Minister Gilles LePage backed up his staff, noting the report, which he helped prepare as an opposition member of the committee, did err at times in its understanding of existing regulations.
However, LePage agreed with other comments over the pace of action on the report over the last few years.
"In the past six years, I think there was a lack of work on that file, and that's why it's part of my mandate," he said.
"I was part of the evolution of pesticides in this province, with the research on this committee, and I take it personally, and we are going to focus on pesticides even more than the previous government."
LePage's mandate letter from Premier Susan Holt includes two mentions of herbicide spraying. One is to implement all recommendations from the committee's report. The other is to investigate alternatives to pesticide and herbicide use and "re-evaluate the safety of glyphosate with new and comprehensive data specific to New Brunswick."
"We're looking daily and monthly on the impacts of how it's done," he said.
"But don't forget, our regulations are very strong and very rigid for application and for use."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events
Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events

WATCH: Saskatchewan's new Parents' Bill of Rights was back in court on Wednesday. Donovan Maess has the details. More than a year after the Government of Saskatchewan introduced the pronoun policy, the constitutionality of it continues to be questioned. Eventually introduced as Bill 137, the Parents' Bill of Rights was legally challenged by UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity. On Monday morning, the two sides will go to the Court of Appeal to have their arguments heard by a judge. Here is a timeline laying out the events leading up to this point. Aug. 22, 2023 The Government of Saskatchewan introduced policy changes in schools, which include requiring parents to be informed of third-party education and being able to opt their children out of sex-ed. This particular policy change stemmed from the provincial government banning Planned Parenthood in schools following the distribution of 'ABC sex cards' to Grade 9 students in a Lumsden, Sask. school. The Sask. United Party, who took a considerable amount of votes in a by-election in the constituency of Lumsden-Morse earlier in August, campaigned on the controversy sparked by Planned Parenthood. The day after that, Premier Scott Moe holds a news conference where he said the ruling Saskatchewan Party heard a 'message' by voters. Ultimately, Planned Parenthood is suspended, leading to the pause of other third-party groups in schools. The new policy announced by then Education Minister Dustin Duncan also requires students under 16 years of age to have parental permission before they could change their pronouns or names in school. A similar decision made by the Government of New Brunswick earlier in August limited the use of preferred pronouns, which led to significant backlash. Aug. 23, 2023 Saskatchewan was not exempt from the backlash, as the Saskatchewan Advocate for Children and Youth announces an immediate review of the changes the following day, noting that the potential impact of the policy is 'deeply troubling.' As well, several school boards collectively ask the government for a 'reasonable pause' on the sudden policy change. Advocates who work with trans and gender-diverse youth in the province also say the policy shift could pose safety risks. Other third-party groups who present in schools, including the Regina Sexual Assault Centre, voice their concerns, saying their material is age appropriate and focused on assault prevention and safety. Aug. 29, 2023 UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity, a group within the University of Regina, prepares to take legal action against Saskatchewan's new policy for students' names and chosen pronouns. Represented by advocacy group Egale Canada and law firm McCarthy Tétrault LLP, UR Pride prepares to file a lawsuit against the policy at Saskatchewan's Court of King's Bench, citing violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. UR Pride asks the provincial government to suspend the policy by 5 p.m. on Aug. 30 and threatens to file an injunction to block the policy from coming into effect if the deadline is not met. The government does not suspend the policy, so UR Pride files the injunction. Sept. 28, 2023 Justice Michael Megaw issues the injunction, which effectively presses pause on the policy until the court rules on the legal challenge put forth by UR Pride. In his decision to grant the injunction, Megaw references testimony of an expert witness who pointed out potential harms of the policy. 'On the whole of the evidence, I am satisfied that those individuals affected by this policy, youth under the age of 16 who are unable to have their name, pronouns, gender diversity, or gender identity, observed in the school will suffer irreparable harm,' Megaw wrote. However, in defiance of the King's Bench ruling, Premier Scott Moe issues a statement to say the Legislative Assembly would be recalled early to 'to pass legislation to protect parents' rights.' Premier Moe says he will turn to the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian constitution, which would delay potential Charter challenges after the policy becomes law. This was met with backlash from the NDP opposition, who said the policy will harm vulnerable students. Oct. 12, 2023 Premier Moe recalls the Legislature two weeks early, and the policy, thus known as Bill 137 or the Parents' Bill of Rights, is introduced and read for the first time in the Saskatchewan Legislature. The bill invokes the notwithstanding clause to override certain sections of the Charter and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Codes to ensure parents must consent if their child wants to change their gender identification in school. The introduction of the bill receives unanimous support by Saskatchewan Party MLAs and Saskatchewan United Party Leader Nadine Wilson. It was also unanimously opposed by all Saskatchewan NDP MLAs who are present for the vote. Oct. 19, 2023 The second reading of the Parent's Bill of Rights is passed in the Saskatchewan Legislature. Since Bill 137 is introduced, members of the opposition NDP take turns speaking for hours at a time in an attempt to stall the legislation. Oct. 20, 2023 The third and final reading of the Parents' Bill of Rights is passed in the Saskatchewan Legislature, it becomes law after being immediately granted Royal Assent. Oct. 26, 2023 During an intervention application at the Court of King's Bench, the government reveals what was known as the 'pronoun policy' has been rescinded since the Parents' Bill of Rights has become law. Egale Canada, one of the two organizations representing UR Pride, vows to continue legal action against the Parents' Bill of Rights. Feb. 16, 2024 Justice Megaw rules that UR Pride should still get the chance to challenge the law under the Charter. Megaw's decision would allow UR Pride and the government to present all their evidence and arguments in court. The judge would then be able to decide his next steps. The legal challenge is scheduled to be heard in court in ten days time on Feb. 26. The Saskatchewan government continues to defend the Parents' Bill of Rights and says the law may go to the Supreme Court. Feb. 26, 2024 The Saskatchewan government turns to the Court of Appeal to intervene which halts the legal battle. Attorney General Bronwyn Eyre says the Court of Appeal has agreed to hear the court's case. July 26, 2024 Saskatchewan's Court of Appeal denies a political group that opposes so-called 'gender ideology' intervener status in the legal dispute. Aug. 29, 2024 Nearing the start of the school year, school divisions say they are preparing to enforce the law. The Saskatchewan government prepares to make its case before the Court of Appeal in September, arguing that its use of the notwithstanding clause should prevent a judge from reviewing the law. Saskatchewan will be joined by the attorneys general of Alberta and New Brunswick in making its case to exclude the courts from the law. Eleven parties in total join as intervenors on the side of UR Pride, including labour groups, Amnesty International, and civil liberties organizations. Sept. 23, 2024 The legal battle is taken to the Court of Appeal. --With files from Josh Lynn, David Prisciak, Drew Postey, Laura Woodward, Rory MacLean, and the Canadian Press.

U.S. military preparing for National Guard activation in Washington D.C., officials say
U.S. military preparing for National Guard activation in Washington D.C., officials say

CTV News

time7 hours ago

  • CTV News

U.S. military preparing for National Guard activation in Washington D.C., officials say

The U.S. military is preparing for the activation of hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., two U.S. officials told Reuters on Sunday. The officials, who were speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a final decision was still to be made by U.S. President Donald Trump but the troops were prepared to deploy. One of the officials said it was unclear what exactly the troops would do, but could take part in efforts to protect federal agents or even carry out administrative tasks to free up law enforcement officials. (Reporting by Idrees Ali; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store