logo
CORRECTING and REPLACING Cyware Survey Reveals That 92% Believe Threat Intelligence Is Critical — But Most Organizations Still Struggle to Operationalize It

CORRECTING and REPLACING Cyware Survey Reveals That 92% Believe Threat Intelligence Is Critical — But Most Organizations Still Struggle to Operationalize It

Yahoo22-05-2025
Cyware survey identifies significant gaps in internal collaboration, tool integration, and automation — with only 13% confident their systems currently work well
NEW YORK, May 22, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Headline of release dated May 20, 2025 should read: Cyware Survey Reveals That 92% Believe Threat Intelligence Is Critical — But Most Organizations Still Struggle to Operationalize It (instead of RSA Conference Survey Reveals That 92% Believe Threat Intelligence Is Critical — But Most Organizations Still Struggle to Operationalize It).
The updated release reads:
CYWARE SURVEY REVEALS THAT 92% BELIEVE THREAT INTELLIGENCE IS CRITICAL — BUT MOST ORGANIZATIONS STILL STRUGGLE TO OPERATIONALIZE IT
Cyware survey identifies significant gaps in internal collaboration, tool integration, and automation — with only 13% confident their systems currently work well
Cyware, the industry leader in threat intelligence operationalization, collaboration, and orchestrated response, today released the results of an onsite survey conducted at RSA Conference 2025. The survey captured insights from 100 cybersecurity executives and professionals across enterprises, government agencies, and service providers about how organizations are operationalizing threat intelligence across their security operations.
The findings reveal a sharp disconnect between awareness and action: While nearly all respondents (92%) said collaboration and information sharing are either "absolutely crucial" or "very important" in the fight against cyber threats, the data tells a different story when it comes to the adoption of this practice. Only 13% said their current automation between cyber threat intelligence (CTI) and SecOps tools is working well, and nearly 40% struggle to coordinate data across critical security tools like Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIPs), SIEMs, and vulnerability management platforms.
"The RSAC survey data reveals a serious gap between that belief and the operational reality," said Anuj Goel, Co-founder and CEO of Cyware. "Threat intelligence isn't just about collecting data — it's about connecting people, processes, and platforms to act on it. These findings reinforce the need for more unified, automated, and collaborative approaches to security operations."
Key survey findings:
Internal collaboration and automation maturity remain major gaps: While 92% of respondents said threat intel sharing is "absolutely crucial" or "very important," only 13% said their automation between CTI and SecOps tools is working well.
AI optimism is high, but its implementation is still uneven: 78% of respondents believe AI will improve threat intel sharing within their organization, but only 43% say it's made a meaningful impact so far.
Threat intel sharing is not occurring in real time: Only 17% of teams share threat intel across roles like SecOps, IR, and vulnerability management in real time, while another 25% do so daily. 22% reported sharing information rarely or not at all.
External threat intel sharing collaboration has much room for improvement: While 57% of respondents said their organization collaborates with industry peers to improve threat intel, 30% were unsure if such collaboration even exists.
Automation gaps persist: More than half of respondents (56%) reported either significant or moderate challenges automating workflows across CTI and SecOps teams.
ISAC participation is low or unknown: Only 18% confirmed that their organization is part of an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) or Organization (ISAO), while 45% said they didn't know. That lack of clarity could be limiting access to valuable sector-specific threat insights — and further compounding intelligence silos.
The survey results reflect growing urgency to bridge the gap between threat intel awareness and execution. As cyber threats grow more complex and coordinated, Cyware is helping organizations unify threat ingestion, sharing, and response — powered by AI and hyper-automation.
To learn how Cyware is helping organizations transform threat intelligence into coordinated defense, visit www.cyware.com.
About Cyware
Cyware is leading the industry in operational threat Intelligence and collective defense, helping security teams transform threat intelligence from fragmented data points to actionable, real-time decisions. We unify threat intelligence management, intel sharing and collaboration, as well as hyper-orchestration and automation — eliminating silos and enabling organizations to outmaneuver adversaries faster and more effectively.
From enterprises to government agencies and ISACs, Cyware empowers defenders to turn intelligence into impact.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250520357677/en/
Contacts
Media Contact: Jay SmithTouchdown PR for Cywarecyware@touchdownpr.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now
3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now

With chipmaker stocks in focus on recent news like Trump's Nvidia deal and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's White House meeting, KeyBanc Capital Markets equity research analyst John Vinh shares his top AI chip plays for the near term. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. Well, chips are in focus after a strong year for AI driven demand with investors now looking ahead to earnings from Nvidia and watching Intel as it works to regain its competitive footing. Joining us now is John Vinh, Equity Research Analyst at KeyBanc Capital Markets. John, thanks for being here. As we know, the AI story is still front and center, but taking a step back, how should investors be positioning for it right now? And is upside still mostly in the Mac 7 or are you seeing pockets of opportunity elsewhere? Yeah, I cover the semiconductor industry and I I think the three names right now in the near to medium term that are best positioned for AI demand is going to be um Nvidia, Broadcom, and AMD. You know, Nvidia, obviously, kind of the bellwether. They've got a clear lead on the space. No one's even close to them. They just dominate the space. They're ramping kind of their new server rack platform called GB200, also called Blackwell. They're also on the verge of also ramping Blackwell through the back half and that's only going to further extend their lead. Uh if I think about Broadcom, they are kind of your play on custom AI silicon. More and more hyperscalers, like Google uh with their TPU franchise, uh that's going to be kind of the key tailwind for them into the back half of the year. And then AMD is kind of your up and comer, right? They they started at a really small market share position. They're launching their latest AI GPU, the MI355. That's going to drive significant upward estimate revisions in the second half and drive outside growth for them. So those are my three favorite plays right now uh heading into earnings.

AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids
AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids

In Brief Do A.I. chatbots packaged inside cute-looking plushies offer a viable alternative to screen time for kids? That's how the companies selling these A.I.-powered kiddie companions are marketing them, but The New York Times' Amanda Hess has some reservations. She recounts a demonstration in which Grem, one of the offerings from startup Curio, tried to bond with her. (Curio also sells a plushie named Grok, with no apparent connection to the Elon Musk-owned chatbot.) Hess writes that this is when she knew, 'I would not be introducing Grem to my own children.' As she talked to the chatbot, she became convinced it was 'less an upgrade to the lifeless teddy bear' and instead 'more like a replacement for me.' She also argues that while these talking toys might keep kids away from a tablet or TV screen, what they're really communicating is that 'the natural endpoint for [children's] curiosity lies inside their phones.' Hess reports that she did, eventually, let her kids play with Grem — but only after she'd removed and hidden the voice box. They still talked to it and played games with it; then they were ready for some TV.

Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So
Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So

AI-powered conversational search engine Perplexity is in the news for offering to buy Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion. But in December of 2024, Perplexity considered buying The Browser Co. And just months ago, Perplexity reportedly offered to buy Brave, the privacy-focused browser, for about $1 billion. Why does Perplexity want a web browser so badly? Possibly because a browser just might be key to our agentic AI future. I recently interviewed Opera senior product leader Henrik Lexow on my TechFirst podcast. Opera, the 30-year-old browser company that pioneered tabbed browsing, pop-up blocking, and ad blockers, has about 300 million active users globally. This year, Opera was the first to bring AI agents right into our browsers in a project called Opera Neon. 'The agentic browser … is that sort of the new operating system?' Lexow asked during the podcast. 'It's a big question.' Regardless of where the browser goes, Opera's pretty sure about the future of the internet itself. That's a huge shift, by the way. An agentic internet would be a massive and fundamental change from a user-driven internet to an agent-driven version. In a user-driven internet, you search, you see results, you make selections, you click links, you fill out forms, you book flights, and you buy products. In a sense, you are the agent. In an agentic internet, you tell something – maybe your agentic browser – to do those things for you. Except you don't say search, look, select, and buy; you say buy me more of the underwear I got six months ago. The agent then consults its memory, forms a plan, takes multiple steps, and handles it all: from which underwear you bought, and where you bought them, to finding the same ones online (and maybe checking around for better prices), to adding them to cart, to checking out … and reporting back to you with the results. The agent – in this case potentially an agentic browser – is therefore essentially a personal assistant, a force multiplier. But will an agentic browser be the main way we engage with agents? Perplexity seems to think it's pretty important, given the company's persistent and repeated but so far unfruitful attempt to buy a browser. Opera certainly thinks so, if only because Opera has a browser, and a very innovative one at that. Opera launched AI in a browser back in 2023 in a project called ARIA. ARIA enabled contextual interactions within web pages in a GPT-based chat interface. Over time, that's evolved to a tripartite strategy under the Opera Neon brand: The reality is that for many of us, most of our work happens in a browser. I'm writing this story in a browser. I recorded the interview in a browser. I've researched Opera and Perplexity in a browser. I made episode art for the podcast in a browser (thanks, Canva). Opera's thesis is that having agents embedded where you work makes them vastly more useful: they have access to your history, to your work, to your sites and apps. Important note: the Neon agentic browser's AI lives locally on your hardware, making it your agent, not Opera's, and not your employer's. This should boost your privacy, which is critical if you're going to give an agent access to very personal information including, likely, your credit card. Of course, this is just one vision of the future. Apple with Siri, as justly maligned as it is, would have another vision. Google, with Gemini and its own vast fleet of Android-enabled phones, would have another. Microsoft's Copilot is another. And OpenAI, which has ChatGPT apps for mobile devices as well as full computers, might have yet another vision of how we'll integrate AI into our lives and work. So whether the browser will be the locus of our agentic AI future or not is yet to be determined. Remember the old proverb: every problem looks like a nail to the person who only has a hammer. But it seems like a fairly good bet to me.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store