
Reader critiques: The Post's ‘pope slot machine' was deeply offensive
To associate the election of a pope with pulling the lever on a slot machine is one step above crap-shooting with Christianity. 'The world's holiest wager,' read the headline on a May 8 Style article. 'Instead of betting on college sports, try your luck on the College of Cardinals,' a secondary headline suggested. Gambling on election outcomes is an age-old pastime, but promoting it in the case of this ceremony is ludicrous.
I guess the artist could have made the illustration wider and the operating lever longer, to symbolize the cardinals 'pulling the lever' again and again with each vote. Alternately, the artist could replace the miters on the reels with Bibles. Then use a small miter for the top of the lever. Keep your thumb on God.
John Hebbe, Fairfax Station
Michael Ramirez hit a new low with his May 9 editorial cartoon, 'An American pope,' depicting the newly elected pope garbed in stars and stripes.
Did Ramirez intend to celebrate with American Catholics? Does he understand how offensive his cartoon is to non-Catholic Christians struggling against Christian nationalism? Does he recognize what his cartoon signals to millions of Americans who do not happen to be Christian and who depend on the separation of church and state to protect their rights?
Clara M. Lovett, Chevy Chase
The misuse of the word 'America' seems to have spread from the White House, misnaming the Gulf of Mexico, to coverage of Pope Leo XIV. Contra the May 9 front-page headline 'First American pope is chosen,' he is not the first American pope. That honor belongs to his predecessor. Why? Because Francis was born in Argentina and was therefore South American. Hence, Leo should be identified as the first North American pope.
Jay Levy, Takoma Park
Thank you for putting the May 11 article 'Japanese American GIs are feted as 'saviors' 80 years on' on the front page. As the world is becoming more divided, it is important to remember those who have fought and sacrificed for democracy and the just treatment of all people. Through everything they endured in the United States, Japanese American soldiers gave the 442nd Regimental Combat Team the reputation as 'the most decorated unit for its size and length of combat service in the history of the U.S. military.'
America's strength is realized only when we all support one another despite our backgrounds. I believe the majority of legal immigrants come here to become model citizens and to support this country. If you don't like what America stands for, then don't come; no one is forcing you to be here. But we should remember that what makes our country strong and unified is the people. Fortunately, as shown in this little-known piece of history, in times of crisis, people step up and do the right thing to help others. I can only hope that our politicians will follow in their path: Wake up, do your jobs and start working together.
Adrian Fremont, Alexandria
The May 7 Metro obituary 'Soulful novelist had a mordant wit' memorialized a writer of remarkably poignant humor, Jane Gardam of England, who elevated my continuous amazement at how we are enriched by books. One evening some time ago, my all-male book club in Baltimore was discussing 'Old Filth' and my wife sneaked down to the landing to eavesdrop. Our conversation ended on a question about Edward Feathers, the 'Old Filth' of the title: British colonial, empire lover, lawyer, judge, betrayed husband, wit and bit of a twit, tragicomically thrashing through having lost his wife, Betty, as she gardened. Our book club's question: Did Feathers avoid intimacy, or was he incapable of it? My friends left, and my wife, Betsey, had one comment on what she'd overheard: 'I didn't think men could think like that.'
Thanks, Jane Gardam.
Stan Heuisler, Baltimore
Oh, come on! There were three men in the photo accompanying the May 7 Metro article 'NFL commissioner is working all angles to get stadium deal completed,' but you ID'd only two. That would have been bad enough on its own, but you left out the good-looking one!
Leonora Weimer, Bowie
Barbara Vuk's April 26 Free for All letter, 'Telling it like it will be,' argued that 'old age stinks' and 'someone needs to say it without sugarcoating.' Vuk highlighted something that's been bugging me for a long time, especially in those 'Good news!' newsletters: the fetishizing of older adults ('Awww! They got married! Ain't it cute?'), including the hero-making of exceptions to the rule ('Awww! This old person lifted more weight than 95 percent of adults in the world! And so can you!' Hint: No, you can't.).
Gag me. I'm with Vuk. The media highlights this stuff at the expense of the reality of how aging works for most of us, regardless of what we might do to keep healthy. It's as though the culture is so frantic about the possibility of not 'aging well,' whatever that means, that we must not only focus on the exceptional but also drive ourselves toward it.
The thud that hits everyone lucky enough to live long enough to discover that they will not perpetually feel 35, no matter what they do, too often comes as shock. And yet, that's the picture that confronts the majority.
Denise Showers, Janesville, Wisconsin
I noted the patrilineal histories of the Kentucky Derby entrants in the May 3 Sports section ['Before they Run for the Roses, get to know them']. Probably there is merit and even some quantitative data on the predictive power of such lineages. But perhaps consideration should include the mares as well. Mitochondria, the energy sources in cells, are inherited solely via the female ancestral line. A deep look at how the efficiency of their mitochondria affects the performance of horses and other athletes would yield some valuable information on the physiology of competition.
George Hoskin, Burtonsville
The May 9 Metro article 'He can't speak aloud, but his artwork says it all,' on a nonverbal local painter, was inspiring. Not only an artist but also a poet, Charles Lenny Lunn proves that sheer will, brilliance and empowerment by a devoted parent, with the help of doctors, therapists and teachers, can move mountains — in eloquent contradiction of the ignorant, defeatist comments of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Jan H. Kalicki, Alexandria
I'm wondering whether I missed an executive order declaring May 4 as OCD Sunday, because the top five tiles on my Post app were all about cleaning, or faking cleaning, or not being messy, or some such, and yet another farther down was on the same theme. Seriously? Not a word about Israel, Gaza, Ukraine, tariffs, economic news. Is this the new 'we're all about the markets' Washington Post? I consume as many Procter & Gamble products as the next guy, but this is ridiculous.
Andrew Kuhn, Bedford, New York
The May 7 front-page article 'Prison proposal gets rocky response' quoted Aaron Peskin, a former member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, as saying, 'The chances of Alcatraz becoming repurposed as a prison are about as large as landing a man on Pluto.' No doubt.
President Donald Trump said a lot of newsworthy things at his May 5 news conference besides the reiterated suggestion to reopen Alcatraz. The Post chose this one to publish front-page, center, above-the-fold, continuing to nearly three-quarters of Page A2, with coverage from two reporters and two huge photos of tourists visiting the site.
Trump's spaced-out idea deserved this much attention?
Joseph A. Capone, Oakton
Regarding the May 6 online headline 'Trump wants to reopen Alcatraz. Californians are deeply skeptical.':
Everyone should be beyond 'deeply skeptical.' The prison is a crumbling wreck that was useful more as a PR prop than as anything else and always cost tons of money to operate. No sensible person would even think to resurrect it except for show — or to distract attention from more serious things.
Gail Goldey, Santa Fe, New Mexico
Throughout history, the word 'republican' has been used to describe political systems and their advocates that radically reject kings, autocrats and tyrants. The Latin root of the word, 'res publica,' means 'the public affair,' as opposed to a private affair serving the interest of one person. By this and other measures, our 'Republicans' are no more 'republican' than King George III was an American revolutionary.
Let's call the Republican Party by its real name: the Monarchist Party.
Gerson S. Sher, Washington
It is dismaying that presumably self-described liberal readers of The Post object to any inclusion of letters defending the Trump administration ['Readers wondered why we asked for Trump voters' views. Here's why.,' May 8]. This attitude seems decidedly illiberal, and it calls to mind a decades-old quote from William F. Buckley Jr.: 'Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view.'
Larry Ciolorito, Darnestown
I request that The Post stop using the term 'conservative' to refer to right-wing politicians, including supporters of President Donald Trump. These politicians and their associated pundits are not demonstrating anything like conservatism, in the sense defined by Edmund Burke in the 18th century and probated in the United States by Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley Jr., nor in the nonpolitical sense of conserving traditions, heritage, resources and land.
Noting a politician's party affiliation is objective identification, but 'conservative' is a word with value associations, as are 'progressive' and 'liberal.' Such terms inadequately describe politicians' actions, tendencies, policies or interests. Readers rely on journalists to use words for what they mean rather than how they've been adopted, adapted and owned.
Howard Mandel, Chicago
I'm hooked on reading the print edition online. Available no matter where I am in the world at the moment. Razor-sharp visuals, including beautiful photography. Enlargeable with a pair of fingers. Nothing to toss in recycling afterward. But way too often, photos appear only in black and white.
On May 9, my temper finally blew when a photo caption accompanying the Metro article 'Trump names five board members' identified a woman in a group shot by noting she was the one 'in red pants' — in a black and white photo. Does not compute!
David Sproul, Bethesda
As someone who values informed citizenship and the media's role in shaping public discourse, I write to express my concern about how executive orders are often reported. It's disheartening and misleading to hear these orders presented as if they were laws. Executive orders are directives to enforce existing laws or manage the executive branch. They do not create new laws.
The Constitution clearly outlines that Congress makes laws and sets the budget (Article I), while the president's role is to 'faithfully execute' these laws (Article II). The Constitution vests all legislative powers in Congress, which includes passing laws, approving treaties and controlling government spending. Executive orders cannot override Congress, and The Post should not treat them as being able to.
Arthur Grau, New York
The 7 newsletter seems to be morphing into The 10 or The 12. The articles meander from one topic to another. Topics mentioned in the headline are getting buried.
Rather than trying to condense more than seven into The 7, consider changing the name to Today's Top 10.
Cheryl Nicolson, Hydesville, California
I don't like the use of 'congressman' instead of 'representative.' When I was a student at Powell Junior High School in D.C. years ago, we would get chastised for it. Senators are congressmen also. Usage changes but not always for the better.
Arnold Malhmood, Rockville
Regarding the May 13 news article 'White South Africans designated as refugees reach U.S.':
Please don't call the White people being brought from South Africa into the United States 'refugees.' They are not. Even mentioning the president's deceitful language diminishes the experiences of the hundreds of thousands of actual refugees around the world.
Susan Wallace, Washington
I and many of my wine-enjoying friends miss the weekly wine column that appeared in the Food section. Dave McIntyre, who left The Post in January, was and is an excellent writer, offering notes and descriptions of wines available in the area. Surely, The Post can find a replacement.
Robert Luskin, Bethesda
Presumably, The Post includes 'Prickly City' on its comics page to be inclusive of various political opinions. But the May 5 comic depicting an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent throwing one of the strip's characters into a van was deeply offensive.
The Trump administration has admitted to sending at least one person to El Salvador in error but seems to be doing everything in its power to resist bringing him home. The upshot is that anyone (not just those who are undocumented) is at risk of being sent to a maximum-security prison overseas without recourse. Please reconsider your inclusion of this strip in The Post.
Anne Schwartz, Washington
Readers often write in to say they find some cartoons in the Comics section not so very funny. May I suggest they also seek humor in other parts of Style — and other parts of the paper as well?
See this paragraph in the April 21 Style article 'Who's the woman set to change the Smithsonian?': 'Here we are: A former Fox News host is leading the Pentagon. A vaccine skeptic is running the Department of Health and Human Services. A former professional wrestling executive is head of the Department of Education.'
If that doesn't crack you up, you are either too highbrow or too lowbrow to appreciate the real-life irony being presented. Who's on fourth? The Fourth Estate, of course!
Skip Strobel, Washington
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Donald Trump has threatened since the Jeffrey Epstein scandal blew up in his face
July 2025 sparked a fresh new wave of Jeffrey Epstein controversy, thanks to none other than President Donald Trump. US Attorney General Pam Bondi said she had the Epstein client list "sitting on her desk" on February 21. At a MAGA influencer event held at the White House on February 27, she and her team revealed a "Phase 1" binder for the release. Fast-forward to July 7, when the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memo saying there was "no incriminating 'client list.'" MAGA began collapsing immediately, and #PedoPresident started trending on X (and hasn't stopped.) Petitions demanding transparency circulated, and Republican House Representative Thomas Massie introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act to enforce a vote among the House of Representatives to release the government's full files on the Epstein case, saying, 'We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes.' Trump responded by calling Massie the 'worst Republican Congressman.' Other outspoken Trump supporters like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer, Alex Jones, and Megyn Kelly started to criticize the president, with MTG echoing Massie's call for truth. Then, a bombshell Wall Street Journal scoop dropped on July 17, where investigators had found a bawdy 2003 birthday note, allegedly penned by Trump, in Epstein's personal files. Five days later, the DOJ admitted the president's name appears 'multiple times' in federal evidence—but then insisted there were 'no further Epstein files' to release. Instead of mollifying supporters, Trump has inserted himself into the conversation surrounding the pardon of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's alleged co-conspirator. When asked if he would pardon her, he said he was "allowed to" if he wanted, but that "nobody's asked" him about it. This move detonated his online base, whose Q-adjacent lore casts Maxwell as queenpin of a global trafficking ring. Overnight, some of Trump's most die-hard supporters turned their backs on him. His response has been to launch (or threaten) legal action in every direction as part classic countersuit strategy and part headline-scrambling fog machine. Below is a who's-who list of his current targets, and what each feud is really about. The Wall Street Journal FeatureFlash Photo Agency/Shutterstock On July 18, Trump lodged a $10 billion libel complaint in federal court, saying the Journal 'fabricated' the birthday letter and smeared him as Epstein's pal. Trump's lawyers immediately asked the judge to depose [owner Rupert] Murdoch 'within 15 days.' 'I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Apart from Murdoch, the suit names the Journal's Publisher, Dow Jones & Company, alongside its parent, News Corporation. The Dow Jones CEO, Robert Thomson, is also on there, as are the two reporters on the Epstein story bylines, Joseph Palazzolo and Khadeeja Safdar. Former President Barack Obama ZB Photos/Shutterstock Growing tired of blaming everything on Biden, Trump turned back to his 2016 tactics of blaming everything on former President Barack Obama. At a July 22 press talk, Trump urged the DOJ to 'go after' Obama, claiming he 'buried' evidence tying Bill Clinton to Epstein and engineered the original Russia probe to retaliate. He later shared a photo across his social media channels depicting O.J. Simpson's car chase, with Obama in Simpson's driver's seat and Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance driving two cop cars behind him. In doing so, Trump also inadvertently trolled Vance by using the digitally fattened face photo that many people use to make fun of him. Former President Bill Clinton Lev Radin/Shutterstock The second former president Trump went after was Bill Clinton, who has long faced conspiracy theories from MAGA over his relationship with Epstein. During a meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer while visiting Scotland, Trump said he'd never 'had the privilege' of going to Epstein Island and that it was one of his 'very good moments' turning down the invite. However, he took it a step further, saying, 'Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times. I never went to the island, but [former Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers, I hear, went there, he was the head of Harvard. And many other people that are very big people, nobody ever talks about them.' For the record, Clinton, like Trump, was also found on the Epstein flight logs. However, even Democrats and Clinton supporters are just as willing to hang him as they are Trump, but if he says his name being on there is a lie, who's to say the same isn't true for Clinton? Former Vice President Kamala Harris OogImages/Shutterstock As if two former presidents weren't enough, Trump's also turning his gaze to former Vice President and 2024 challenger Kamala Harris, who he now says ran a campaign 'funded by illegal celebrity payments.' He's hinted that the DOJ should indict her based on 'wire fraud.' In another Truth Social rant, Trump said he was 'looking at the large amount of money owed by Democrats, after the Presidential Election,' saying they'd admitted to paying, 'probably illegally,' for celebrity endorsements. He later emphasized, 'YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them.' Beyoncé, Al Sharpton, and Oprah Photo by; Jaguar PS/Shutterstock; Ovidiu Hrubaru/Shutterstock In the same Truth Social post targeting Harris, Trump also went after Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, and Al Sharpton for various reasons. As for Queen Bey, he (falsely) said she was paid $11 million for 'an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!)' Oprah allegedly took $3 million for 'expenses,' while Sharpton, whom he called 'a total lightweight' and 'low rated TV 'anchor,'' allegedly took $600,000 for…something. Sharpton refuted the claims on MSNBC, saying, 'This is the second or third time lawyers for National Action Network are looking at whether we can sue him for defamation because he had knowledge this time that there was no endorsement and that I didn't get any money. This went to the nonprofit I'm connected to.' ABC News and NBC News Creative Salim; bangoland/Shutterstock Every news that doesn't worship the ground he walks on is Fake News in the Trump world, and neither ABC nor NBC is safe from his wrath. Fresh off a $16 million settlement from Paramount, the owners of CBS, Trump called for the networks to lose their licenses for being 'political pawns for the Democratic Party.' He first attacked their viewership and management, then doubled down on his stance that networks 'aren't allowed to be political pawns,' but only for the Democratic Party. Shockingly, following the settlement with Paramount, Trump has done nothing to bring any legal action against South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone for that epic takedown of him on the most recent season premiere, showing him in bed with Satan and making fun of his small penis. So, can the lawsuit blitz bury the Epstein story? Photo byHopefully not. The $10 billion WSJ case will crawl through discovery; Obama and Clinton enjoy presidential immunity from most civil claims; campaign-finance prosecutions would require evidence the FEC says it hasn't seen; and broadcast licenses can't be yanked just because he says so. What this strategy does do however, is keep conservative media focused on Trump's counter-punches instead of the potential impending pardon and withholding of the actual files. You know, his usual 'distract and deflect' MO. Whether the president's scatter-shot legal barrage can recapture these voters—or will simply keep Epstein in the headlines—is an open question. For now, the only certainty is that the defendant list keeps growing, and it's not likely to stop anytime soon. And here we were, hoping they'd simply release the files. This article originally appeared on Pride: Everyone Donald Trump has threatened since the Jeffrey Epstein scandal blew up in his face
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma authorities investigate reports of explicit images on state education chief's TV
An Oklahoma sheriff's office Monday opened an investigation over reports that images of nude women were displayed on the state's school superintendent office television during a meeting with education board members. Top Oklahoma lawmakers have sought answers over accounts given by two State Board of Education members, who said they saw the images during a meeting in Ryan Walters 's office Thursday. Another board member, Chris Van Denhende, said he was not in a position to see the television but that 'something was on the screen that should not have been,' based on Walters' reaction. The investigation is in the early stages, said Aaron Brilbeck, a spokesperson for the Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office. He said it was not clear if any laws were violated. Walters, a Republican, has spent much of his first term in office lauding President Donald Trump, feuding with teachers unions and local school superintendents, and trying to end what he describes as 'wokeness' in public schools. Brilbeck said the sheriff's office was investigating at the request of the state's Office of Management and Enterprise Services, which handles technology, human resources and property management issues for state government. Education board members Becky Carson and Ryan Deatherage told the online news outlet NonDoc that they saw a video featuring naked women in Walters' office during the executive session. They said that they were the only people seated in places where they could see the screen. Carson said that when she asked Walters to turn it off he expressed confusion before doing so. Walters said in a post on the social platform X on Sunday that 'any suggestion that a device of mine was used to stream inappropriate content on the television set is categorically false.' 'I have no knowledge of what was on the TV screen during the alleged incident, and there is absolutely no truth to any implication of wrongdoing,' he wrote. Walters' office did not immediately reply to a request by The Associated Press for comment about the investigation on Monday. Van Denhende told the AP that he's fine with the sheriff's department investigating, though 'I'm not certain if it is a violation of law or state policy.' Senate Pro Tem Lonnie Paxton, a Republican, in a news release on Friday said it was 'a bizarre and troubling situation,' and that 'the accounts made public by board members paint a strange, unsettling scene that demands clarity and transparency.' State Sen. Adam Pugh, a Republican who is the Senate education chairman, said in the news release that the reports from the meeting 'raise a number of questions.' Carson nor Deatherage immediately replied Monday to a request for comment from the AP. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texans Deserve Choice, Not a Monopoly: Texas Hemp Business Council Urges Lawmakers to Defeat SB 5
AUSTIN, Texas, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Texas Hemp Business Council (THBC) today issued the following statement: "As SB 5 heads to the Senate floor during the special session of the 89th Texas Legislature, Lt. Governor Dan Patrick and Senators Charles Perry and Roland Gutierrez are actively looking to gift-wrap the entire cannabis market to a few, select state-licensed marijuana companies, one of which already controls over 75% of the market. "Their claim that the restrictive Texas Compassionate Use Program (TCUP) can replace hemp-derived cannabinoids is misleading and dangerous. "TCUP currently serves just over 100,000 patients and requires registration, physician prescriptions, higher prices and fewer options. While HB 46 was an attempt to improve the program, it does little to expand real access to a restrictive and expensive TCUP program that serves an entirely different purpose than hemp. "Meanwhile, hemp is legal and regulated under federal and state law and serves millions of adult consumers and veterans who rely on affordable, accessible alternatives for wellness, pain relief and more. "SB 5 would destroy a $10 billion industry that supports over 53,000 jobs and eliminate economic opportunity for thousands of small business owners across the state. All being done under the false flag of 'safety,' while the real goal is market control by a politically connected few. This isn't about protecting public health, it's about protecting a monopoly. 'Governor Abbott's veto message was clear: regulate hemp responsibly, don't ban it. Texans deserve choice, not coercion. SB 5 is prohibition disguised as policy and lawmakers should reject it. Public opinion, economic data and common sense all point in the same direction: this is a manufactured crisis driven by special interests, not public demand. "At a time when Texas faces real and pressing challenges like strengthening flood warning systems, redistricting and providing meaningful property tax relief, some Senate leaders are spending this special session pushing a hemp ban Texans clearly don't want. It's a clear example of misplaced priorities and misguided policies. 'That's why THBC and the vast majority of Texans strongly support a common-sense alternative that includes 21+ age limits, child-resistant packaging and setbacks from schools. It's the right path forward for public safety, economic freedom and the future of hemp in Texas.' About the Texas Hemp Business Council The Texas Hemp Business Council is an industry organization dedicated to promoting the hemp-based cannabinoid industry in Texas, while advocating for consumer safety, education and stakeholder engagement. More information is available at Media Contacts: Natalie Mu/George MediciPondelWilkinson310.279.5980nmu@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data