US drops Covid-19 vaccine recommendation for healthy children, pregnant women
'The recommendation is coming down from the secretary, so the process has just been turned upside down,' said William Schaffner, professor of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Centre and a consultant to the Acip.
Schaffner said the CDC's panel was to vote on these issues at a June meeting, where he had expected them to favour more targeted shots instead of a universal vaccine recommendation, 'but this seems to be a bit preemptory'.
Dorit Reiss, professor of law at UC Law San Francisco, said in a Facebook post going around the advisory committee might hurt the agency in the case of potential litigation.
Studies with hundreds of thousands of people around the world show Covid-19 vaccination before and during pregnancy is safe, effective and beneficial to the pregnant woman and the baby, according to the CDC's website.
But Makary said in the video there was no evidence that healthy children need routine Covid-19 shots. Most countries have stopped recommending it for children, he added.
Covid-19 vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment.
Dr Cody Meissner, professor of paediatrics at Dartmouth, who co-wrote an editorial with Makary during the Covid-19 pandemic against masks for children, said he agreed with the decision.
He believed the US had been overemphasising the importance of the Covid-19 vaccine for young children and pregnant women and previous recommendations were based on politics, adding the severity of the illness generated by the virus seems to have lessened over time in young children.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
4 hours ago
- The Herald
‘Disgusting abomination': Musk on Trump's tax and spending bill
The Senate, also controlled by Trump's Republicans, aims to pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' in the next month, though senators are expected to revise the House version. Republicans on the Senate finance committee, which oversees tax policy, are due to meet Trump at the White House on Wednesday afternoon to discuss making the bill's business-related tax breaks permanent, according to senator Steve Daines, a panel member. Analysts have warned such a move would greatly increase the measure's cost. Republican Senate majority leader John Thune said he disagreed with Musk's assessment about the cost of the bill and stood by the goal of passage by July 4. 'We have a job to do, the American people elected us to do. We have an agenda everybody campaigned on, most notably the president of the US, and we're going to deliver on the agenda,' the South Dakota lawmaker told reporters. Republican House speaker Mike Johnson also dismissed Musk's complaints, telling reporters, 'my friend Elon is terribly wrong'. Musk's loud opposition to a bill Trump has urged Republicans to pass presents a test of his political influence a week after his formal role in the administration as a special government employee with the department of government efficiency came to an end. As chief of the department, he upended several federal agencies but ultimately failed to deliver the massive savings he had sought.
Mail & Guardian
a day ago
- Mail & Guardian
BEE is essential for economic growth
Analyses of racialised disparities in both labour and product markets illustrate the need for strengthened economic redress. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy/M&G The debate about racialised socio-economic redress is at the centre of South African public policy debates. It has even permeated trade relations with the United States, which ironically has its own version of economic redress for minority groups in certain states. Yet US President Donald Trump is challenging redress policies in a country that has systemic racialised class and gender socio-economic inequalities. His views are echoed in Professor William Gumede's intervention in this debate. His article, which appeared in the There is general consensus in society that the current black economic empowerment model has largely failed to produce the intended socio-economic outcomes. But this does not mean the constitutional and policy imperatives underpinning redress should be abandoned. Several researched analyses of racialised disparities in both labour and product markets illustrate the need for strengthened economic redress. Gumede's extreme position overlooks this empirical evidence and draws on the following flawed arguments. First, he uses the term 'political capitalists' to describe individuals or enterprises that obtain state contracts or private equity in firms without any knowledge of business operations. These political capitalists are described as inherently parasitic by Gumede and he further suggests that they all have connections to the ANC-led political alliance. This generalisation is problematic because it assumes that only black-owned businesses obtain state contracts and established white corporations do not rely on state procurement. Policy and basic market intelligence reports refute this claim and illustrate how large corporations equally benefit from government contracts. Additionally, the term 'political capitalists' is conceptually and theoretically flawed because it creates a superficial divide between political and economic actors in a society. Political economy studies highlight that business and state relations are inherently connected in economic history. In simple terms: there is no Chinese wall between political and economic developments in a society. The second problem with Gumede's view is that he says BEE is primarily responsible for structural issues such as deindustrialisation, poverty, inequality and unemployment. This proposition is not backed up by evidence and he does not explain how he arrived at this conclusion. Research literature on economic trends challenge Gumede's position. Deindustrialisation in South Africa has been caused by structural changes in the economy, especially since the early 1990s. Trade and financial liberalisation exposed our domestic manufacturers to competition in key sectors such as textiles. In addition, the country's financial sector has prioritised short-term investment returns and implemented investment risk strategies that make it difficult for enterprises interested in long-term economic activity associated with sustaining South Africa's industrial base. Furthermore, there are several studies on the causes of poverty and inequality. This research explores multidimensional causes and does not cite economic redress policy as an impediment for addressing systemic socio-economic exclusion. In other words: there is no factual basis for Gumede's proposition on the causal link between BEE and the economic structural fault lines cited above. Another flaw in Gumede's article is the erroneous and sweeping generalisation about corruption. He attributes corrupt or patronage-based networks in the economy to the creation of BEE. This narrow approach is not based on a holistic understanding of corruption in the economy. The Zondo Commission Report and other authoritative market behaviour investigative accounts elucidate illegal economic activities that go beyond the scope of BEE policy implementation. For example, practices such as price collusion, tax evasion and dividing product markets. Actually, some of the established multinationals that Gumede and others laud were cited as facilitators of corrupt dealings in these reports. Corruption is a significant impediment for inclusive growth in South Africa. But it is incorrect to suggest that it is solely caused by BEE. Economic rents such as incentives, subsidies and preferential procurement policy instruments are used across the world successfully. These measures are not abnormal or inherently corrupt if used for developmental purposes. Dr Khwezi Mabasa is a part-time sociology lecturer at the University of Pretoria and Economic and Social Policy lead at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung South Africa.
The Herald
2 days ago
- The Herald
Djokovic beats Norrie to join Nadal in French Open century club
The seventh-seeded Keys cantered through the opening set before Baptiste broke for 3-1 in the second, pushing the Australian Open champion to the limit on Court Suzanne Lenglen. Baptiste eventually cracked, allowing her opponent and friend to set up a meeting with second seed Coco Gauff in the next round, ensuring an American presence in the semifinals. 'Hailey is such an amazing player, it was such a tough second set. Today I just had to kind of make as many balls as possible,' said Keys. The 30-year-old could count on the support of new US Billie Jean King Cup captain and former coach Lindsay Davenport plus 2017 US Open champion Sloane Stephens, who is sidelined through injury and was also watching from the stands. 'We've a lot of really great players constantly helping us, inspiring us and if we have any questions they're of great help. It's great being friends with such amazing players,' she added.
