BEE is essential for economic growth
The debate about racialised socio-economic redress is at the centre of South African public policy debates. It has even permeated trade relations with the United States, which ironically has its own version of economic redress for minority groups in certain states. Yet US President Donald Trump is challenging redress policies in a country that has systemic racialised class and gender socio-economic inequalities.
His views are echoed in Professor William Gumede's intervention in this debate. His article, which appeared in the
There is general consensus in society that the current black economic empowerment model has largely failed to produce the intended socio-economic outcomes. But this does not mean the constitutional and policy imperatives underpinning redress should be abandoned.
Several researched analyses of racialised disparities in both labour and product markets illustrate the need for strengthened economic redress.
Gumede's extreme position overlooks this empirical evidence and draws on the following flawed arguments.
First, he uses the term 'political capitalists' to describe individuals or enterprises that obtain state contracts or private equity in firms without any knowledge of business operations. These political capitalists are described as inherently parasitic by Gumede and he further suggests that they all have connections to the ANC-led political alliance.
This generalisation is problematic because it assumes that only black-owned businesses obtain state contracts and established white corporations do not rely on state procurement. Policy and basic market intelligence reports refute this claim and illustrate how large corporations equally benefit from government contracts.
Additionally, the term 'political capitalists' is conceptually and theoretically flawed because it creates a superficial divide between political and economic actors in a society. Political economy studies highlight that business and state relations are inherently connected in economic history. In simple terms: there is no Chinese wall between political and economic developments in a society.
The second problem with Gumede's view is that he says BEE is primarily responsible for structural issues such as deindustrialisation, poverty, inequality and unemployment. This proposition is not backed up by evidence and he does not explain how he arrived at this conclusion.
Research literature on economic trends challenge Gumede's position. Deindustrialisation in South Africa has been caused by structural changes in the economy, especially since the early 1990s. Trade and financial liberalisation exposed our domestic manufacturers to competition in key sectors such as textiles.
In addition, the country's financial sector has prioritised short-term investment returns and implemented investment risk strategies that make it difficult for enterprises interested in long-term economic activity associated with sustaining South Africa's industrial base.
Furthermore, there are several studies on the causes of poverty and inequality. This research explores multidimensional causes and does not cite economic redress policy as an impediment for addressing systemic socio-economic exclusion.
In other words: there is no factual basis for Gumede's proposition on the causal link between BEE and the economic structural fault lines cited above.
Another flaw in Gumede's article is the erroneous and sweeping generalisation about corruption. He attributes corrupt or patronage-based networks in the economy to the creation of BEE. This narrow approach is not based on a holistic understanding of corruption in the economy.
The Zondo Commission Report and other authoritative market behaviour investigative accounts elucidate illegal economic activities that go beyond the scope of BEE policy implementation. For example, practices such as price collusion, tax evasion and dividing product markets.
Actually, some of the established multinationals that Gumede and others laud were cited as facilitators of corrupt dealings in these reports. Corruption is a significant impediment for inclusive growth in South Africa. But it is incorrect to suggest that it is solely caused by BEE. Economic rents such as incentives, subsidies and preferential procurement policy instruments are used across the world successfully. These measures are not abnormal or inherently corrupt if used for developmental purposes.
Dr Khwezi Mabasa is a part-time sociology lecturer at the University of Pretoria and Economic and Social Policy lead at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung South Africa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
28 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Taking back Africa's wealth
In 2019, The Economist magazine carried a cover story with the headline 'The new scramble for Africa', which heralded a new way of grabbing natural resources or, in other words, 'soft power' on the continent. Governments and businesses from all around the world are now willing to strengthen diplomatic, strategic and commercial ties with Africa. Among the new actors are Turkey, Japan and The Gulf countries, along with China and the US. This cannot be seen simply as trade wars over Africa. Often when African countries initiate their own economic policies, they are hampered by global challenges and restrictions. Afropessimist discourse has been invented to undermine democratic transitions in young, independent African countries in order to justify their continued exploitation. Proxy wars will be waged over Africa as long as the continent remains dependent on foreign investment. Africa seems to be appealing to the world again and recent strategies and diplomacies around the continent show the scope of this interest. In May, American academic Walter Russell Mead raised issues on US policy on Africa and called for change. He pointed out that Africa has grown economically and this growth will continue. That is the reality. Since mineral resources and commodity production in Africa are of importance to the rest of the world, the vital question that arises is how to keep most of the benefit of these resources in the continent. US President Donald Trump's recent tariffs on South Africa clearly shows claiming your own resources does not always yield, since we are all conscripts of globalisation. Handling these complex issues is not free of foreign dynamics as well. Horman Chitonge's Reclaiming Economic Sovereignty in Africa is a timely call for economic independence in the face of global challenges. The book looks at the possibility of economic power which would enable African countries to serve and prioritise their own people. The main argument of the book is how African countries can establish economic stability by using their own natural resources. Countries rich in natural resources can leverage these assets to drive industrialisation, boosting their productive capabilities and reducing reliance on primary commodity exports. Chitonge argues successful implementation of this strategy can enhance economic independence by decreasing reliance on foreign resources, such as capital, goods and technology. By building on their natural wealth, countries can create opportunities for sustainable economic growth and gradually reduce the vulnerabilities that undermine their economic independence. He also maintains that the strength of an economy is premised on a country's degree of dependence on other countries: 'While countries today are interdependent on each other in such a way that there is no single country that can exist on its own, it is the level of dependence which determines the degree of autonomy a country enjoys. 'If the available natural wealth on the continent was exploited to benefit African peoples, we would not be seeing the levels of poverty and inequality which have come to define the continent for several centuries.' Chitonge believes the industrialisation of Africa is a hallmark of economic independence. Unless natural resources are used as strategic assets to promote industrial development, economic sustainability will remain dependent on foreign capital. One of the striking points he makes is the outcome of the Covid-19 pandemic, which allowed African countries to realise the importance of building productive capabilities in the manufacturing sector. In reclaiming and strengthening economic independence, the first step, he says, should be 'building productive capabilities which play a central role in enlarging a country's agency and options not only in the economic sphere but in other spheres as well'. One of the important issues here is the possibility of economic autonomy in the face of globalisation. Since countries with vulnerable economies are not in a position to make decisions, what is the solution to unpacking their potential? Reclaiming Economic Sovereignty in Africa is an urgent call for African countries to rethink their approach to their vast natural resources and transform it into wealth. Reclaiming Economic Sovereignty in Africa is published by Anthem Press.
Mail & Guardian
28 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Time to elevate the cooperation between Africa and Japan
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Supplied) The Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD 9) opens today, 20 August, in Yokohama, Japan and will run until Friday. This summit-level meeting brings together a large number of African leaders, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, to discuss how Japan and Africa can work hand in hand to build a prosperous future. TICAD — open, inclusive, pioneering TICAD is more than an international conference; it is an ongoing process that embodies the ideas and partnerships forged within it. Some of its defining features are openness and inclusiveness. From its inception, TICAD has welcomed international organisations as well as business sectors and civil society. Now, Japan, the UN, the United Nations Development Programme, the World Bank and the African Union Commission are co-organisers of TICAD. This reflects Japan's conviction that drawing on the expertise of diverse actors leads to richer dialogue and more effective contributions to Africa's development. Another defining feature of TICAD is its pioneering nature. Japan launched this conference with Africa in 1993 — well ahead of other countries — at a time when the continent was marginalised from the international community. It was Japan that played a significant role in bringing global attention back to Africa. Since then, TICAD has evolved into a more powerful and efficient framework for supporting African development and achieving a co-prosperous relationship between Africa and Japan. Throughout its long history, TICAD has witnessed some significant moments. At TICAD 6 in Nairobi, Kenya, in 2016, then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced the vision of a 'Free and Open Indo- Pacific'. On stage, he said, 'Japan bears the responsibility of fostering the confluence of the Pacific and Indian Ocean and of Asia and Africa into a place that values freedom, rule of law and the market economy, free from force or coercion and making it prosperous. Japan wants to work together with you in Africa in order to make the seas that connect the two continents into peaceful seas that are governed by the rule of law.' This marked the start of Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific vision, which has since been embraced by many countries. TICAD 9 as a new chapter TICAD has continuously evolved and TICAD 9 represents a new chapter. In its early years, TICAD mainly served as a forum to discuss African development, as its name suggests. During this early stage, Japan sought to create opportunities to assist the region and to draw the international community's attention back to Africa. As Africa's development advanced and the continent came to be regarded as a powerful centre for growth, discussions expanded. In Japan, it was recognised that, in order to benefit from Africa's rising dynamism, it was crucial not only to provide support through Official Development Assistance (ODA) but also to expand business collaboration and promote trade and investment. African leaders also strongly called for robust business ties with Japan. Reflecting these voices, TICAD adapted to be a platform for promoting trade, business ties and investment. Now, TICAD 9 is expected to mark another turning point. Under the theme 'Co-create Innovative Solutions with Africa', the conference aims to elevate Africa-Japan cooperation to a new level. Building on Japan's continued support through ODA, as well as expanding trade and investment ties, TICAD 9 positions Africa and Japan as partners in shaping international governance and tackling global challenges together. The continent is undoubtedly a thriving hub for global development, with abundant resources, knowledge and human potential. Today, about one quarter of UN member states are African and in the near future a quarter of the world's population — and a third of the global youth — is expected to live in Africa. At the same time, Africa is among the most affected by climate change. Africa is in need of infrastructure development but has difficulty accessing finance. Africa is among the under-represented in international organisations. It is time to harness Japan's political endeavours and 'Made in Japan' technologies and products to Africa's vitality and dynamism in order to tackle the pressing challenges and global problems we are facing. Discussions at TICAD 9 TICAD 9 will focus discussions on three pillars — Economy, Peace and Stability and Society — alongside three cross-cutting topics: sustainable development led by the private sector; youth and women and regional integration and connectivity within Africa and beyond. The broad scope of these themes reflects Japan's commitment to working inclusively with Africa. Discussions on the economy will emphasise the importance of building pathways to sustainable development and strengthening connectivity — both within Africa and with the wider world. Unemployment remains one of the most pressing challenges. To tackle this, it is vital for Japan and Africa to work together to advance industrialisation and promote economic diversification through stronger industrial ecosystems. In terms of innovation, Japan has developed a distinctive approach to supporting African countries by applying innovation in ways best suited to their own industries. For example, in South Africa, Japan has supported productivity enhancement through the Kaizen project, helping workers identify solutions to improve efficiency and output while incorporating AI and other technologies. In this way, Japan has offered African countries a framework to establish their own approaches to innovation and problem-solving. Guided by the principle that Africa must lead in resolving its own conflicts, the discussions on Peace and Stability will include good governance, conflict resolution and Women, Peace and Security. The discussions on Society will cover a broad range of Africa-Japan cooperation, including health, youth and women's empowerment, people-to-people exchanges, environmental protection and climate change. In addition, as a country prone but resilient to natural disasters, Japan can offer its expertise in disaster prevention. These three pillars will be the focus of the plenary sessions taking place today and tomorrow. In addition, a public-private business dialogue will take place. Furthermore, numerous thematic events are planned, featuring more than 200 seminars and symposiums, along with approximately 300 exhibition booths organised by various sectors including international organisations, private companies and NGOs. This reflects the growing interest and enthusiasm for deepening partnerships with Africa. Elevating the South Africa-Japan partnership President Ramaphosa and several ministers, as well as many South African businesspeople, will participate in various TICAD events. Although TICAD is a multi-lateral forum between Japan and the entire African region, it is also an important opportunity to strengthen the bilateral relationship between South Africa and Japan. This year's TICAD 9 holds special significance as South Africa chairs the G20 and hosts the first G20 Summit on the African continent. It is crucial for South Africa and Japan to work closely together to link the success of TICAD 9 with that of the G20 and to jointly articulate a shared vision for Africa's future and reconfirm our will to collaborate to solve global challenges. Reflecting this, a South Africa-Japan summit meeting between President Ramaphosa and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is scheduled to take place during TICAD 9. While the two countries have already developed wide-ranging areas of cooperation, TICAD 9 will be a meaningful opportunity to further strengthen the relations, especially collaborations on decarbonisation. For Japanese companies here — about 250 in total — the South African market also serves as a gateway to the African continent. Strengthening business ties will therefore be mutually beneficial. Furthermore, exchanging views on the international situation will be essential for both countries as we work together in the international arena. During the TICAD 9 period, we will see tangible outcomes, both governmental and business ones. It is expected that TICAD 9 will stand as a major milestone in strengthening the relationship between Africa and Japan as partners to co-create innovative solutions together to deal with global challenges. For South Africa and Japan in particular, the conference offers a significant opportunity to address a wide range of issues and to further elevate our friendship. Fumio Shimizu is the Japanese ambassador to South Africa.
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
Africa's G20 moment: Why social innovators must be at the centre of the conversation
Youth unemployment is at an all-time high. Photo: Oupa Nkosi/M&G As South Africa prepares to host the G20 Summit in November, the first on African soil, the stakes are high. This historic opportunity places the country and the continent at a crossroads, one that demands not just economic diplomacy, but bold rethinking of how we build inclusive, sustainable societies. Amid rising inequality, youth unemployment and a climate crisis threatening livelihoods across the continent, a central question arises: 'Can social innovators help shape the G20 towards more human-centred, inclusive economic models?' And will global leaders be willing to listen? If South Africa seizes this moment with intention, the answer is, 'Yes.' Social innovation — the use of creative, entrepreneurial strategies to address pressing social problems — has long been underestimated in formal policy spaces. It is time to mainstream the social economy into global development frameworks. This is especially critical for the Global South, where social entrepreneurs are already stepping into service and infrastructure gaps left by overstretched or ineffective states. While often criticised for being more symbolic than solution-oriented, the G20 provides a platform for consensus-building on macroeconomic policy. Within that, there is the potential to elevate the role of social enterprise as a force for economic inclusion. Social innovators are not fringe actors. They are builders of jobs, creators of local economies and drivers of community resilience. The challenge, however, is access to capital, policy influence and recognition. Despite the G20's various engagement tracks — including Civil Society 20, Business 20 and Youth 20 — grassroots voices too often get drowned out in a sea of technical jargon and elite diplomacy. The need, then, is not just for a seat at the table but for a rethinking of who gets to shape the agenda. One opportunity is the 'Social Summit', which will be held in the lead-up to the G20 Leaders' Summit, designed to explore community-based solutions and ground the macroeconomic discussions in lived realities. If done right, it could ensure that the perspectives of township entrepreneurs, informal traders and innovators operating on the margins are elevated to the global stage. To do that, three key policy shifts are needed. First, the formal recognition of the social and solidarity economy must be accelerated. South Africa has a draft green paper on this but it remains in limbo. Elevating this to a white paper — driven by the department of trade, industry and competition — would acknowledge social enterprises as legitimate economic actors, opening access to finance, procurement opportunities and support services. Second, access to capital must go beyond rhetoric. Investment, blended finance and grant-based support can work in tandem to ensure that innovative ventures solving social problems don't fall through the cracks. Funding must support, not just start-up phases, but also the growth of enterprises, allowing them to scale and hire more people. Private capital is essential at this point in time, since development funding from the US was stopped. Third, skills development is essential. From school curricula and vocational training to integration in university curricula, young people need the tools to become creators of solutions, not just job seekers. The role of social innovators and entrepreneurs in equipping communities with these skills cannot be overstated. This agenda aligns with the broader global pivot toward 'business with purpose'. The idea that profit alone is no longer enough — companies must also consider people and the planet. While this might sound idealistic, the alternative is unsustainable. The planet is dying, inequality is rising and the American retreat from multilateralism threatens progress. We simply can't afford business as usual. Big businesses, too, must play their part — not merely through corporate social responsibility but by embedding impact into their business models and partnering with local innovators to extend their reach. There are, of course, risks. The G20 could once again devolve into an echo chamber of promises with little follow-through. But this is where Africa has a unique chance to lead differently. By focusing on inclusion, sustainability and innovation, South Africa can offer a model of economic policy rooted not in trickle-down theory but in inclusive economic transformation. The road ahead will not be easy. But the opportunity is real, not just to shape the G20, but to reshape our understanding of what drives meaningful economic development. Social innovation and entrepreneurship is not a miracle cure. It is, however, a durable and necessary path forward. In a world searching for effective models, Africa's innovators are ready to show the way — if we let them. Dr Solange Rosa is the director of the Bertha Centre for Social Innovation at the University of Cape Town's Graduate School of Business.
