Drone-mounted grenade launchers have entered the fight in Ukraine
A Ukrainian drone maker released footage on Tuesday showing what's believed to be the first time a grenade launcher was fired in combat from a first-person-view uncrewed aerial system.
The Wild Hornets firm published the clips on its Telegram channel, crediting the "Bulava" drone unit of the 3rd Mechanized Battalion in the Bohdan Khmelnytsky Separate Presidential Brigade.
The footage shows two instances of the mounted grenade launcher firing over open terrain.
In the first clip, a soldier can be seen caught in the resulting explosion and being knocked to the ground. Their fate was unclear based on the footage, but the Wild Hornets said the target was a Russian soldier who died. The target in the second clip was not clearly visible.
The drone maker said both clips featured one of its designs, the "Queen of Hornets" drone, as the platform for the grenade launcher. With a 15- to 17-inch frame, the quadcopter is among the largest FPV drones commercially produced for combat in Ukraine, and it's typically used as a bomber.
Wild Hornets did not say when the footage was shot, nor did it specify which grenade launcher was used. But during September testing with the "Bulava" unit, the company said the "Queen of Hornets" drone was fitted with the Bulspike AP, a Bulgarian anti-personnel grenade launcher. The platform is meant to be reusable.
The Bulspike AP fires a 2-kilogram fragmentation grenade at an effective range of about 100 meters, or 328 feet.
A drone mounted with such a weapon could thus give Ukrainian operators far more options to strike, since FPV combat drones are typically either used to fly directly into a target as a munition or to drop explosives from above.
The clips released on Tuesday demonstrated the launcher's range capability, showing the mounted weapon firing at enemy targets positioned well ahead of the drone itself.
"From now on, an ordinary rocket launcher can work at a distance of 5+ km. This opens up new opportunities for the military," Wild Hornets wrote at the time of testing in September.
💥 Successful test of the world's first rocket launcher droneThe Bulava drone unit of the Separate Presidential Brigade named after Bohdan Khmelnytsky installed a rocket launcher on the Queen Hornet FPV drone and conducted a successful test.From now on, an ordinary rocket… pic.twitter.com/AAkaHgcS7z
— Wild Hornets (@wilendhornets) September 13, 2024
Still, it's unclear whether Ukraine can or will produce and deploy these drone-mounted launchers at scale. Dozens of Ukrainian companies have developed and tested a massive variety of drone weapons, such as mounted shotguns and Kalashnikov rifles, but troops are still widely relying on loitering munitions and bombers as their bread and butter.
Wild Hornets, in particular, has been recognized for producing some of the war's most exotic drone weapons, including FPV drones that spew thermite from above or interceptors designed to fly faster than 100 mph.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia launches nearly 500 drones and missiles at Ukraine during overnight bombardment
Russia launched nearly 500 drones and missiles at Ukraine late Sunday, marking the biggest overnight drone bombardment of the war, the Ukrainian Air Force reported on Monday. According to The Associated Press, the strike comes after Ukraine attacked Russian air bases on June 1. It also comes as part of the Kremlin's summer offensive amid direct peace talks, which haven't yet made any progress toward stopping the fighting. Even though the two countries haven't been able to reach a ceasefire, Ukraine and Russia swapped another batch of prisoners on Monday. Russia's overnight bombardment included 479 drones and 20 missiles of various types, which were fired at different areas of Ukraine. The Ukrainian Air Force said that barrage mainly targeted the central and western parts of the country. 'According to preliminary data, as of 10:30, air defense neutralized 479 enemy air attack vehicles, 292 were shot down by fire weapons, 187 were lost in location,' the air force said in a message, per ABC. Ukrainian officials say that only 10 drones or missiles hit their targets and one person was injured. As the strikes began, the Ukrainian air force issued a number of alerts saying Russian drones were targeting multiple areas throughout the country, according to ABC. Following these alerts, Polish and allied planes briefly scrambled in Polish airspace. Along with the recent escalation in aerial attacks, there has been a renewed Russian battlefield push along eastern and northeastern parts of the front line. According to the AP, on Sunday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said 'the situation is very difficult' in some of those areas. As Russia and Ukraine fail to reach a ceasefire, the two countries have exchanged hundreds of prisoners of war — both soldiers and civilians — which is a small sign of cooperation. The latest prisoner swap occurred on Monday and the staggered exchange process is expected to continue over the coming days, per the AP. The swap included wounded soldiers and those under 25 years old. 'The process is quite complicated, there are many sensitive details, negotiations continue virtually every day,' Zelenskyy said, per BBC. Petro Yatsenko, a spokesperson for the Ukrainian body overseeing prisoners, said the Ukrainian POWs were in poor health. During their imprisonment, they lacked food and had no access to medical care. The AP reported that over 200 Ukrainian POWs have died during imprisonment since the war started in 2022.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Growing Drone Threats Lead To Army Modular Shelter Kit Improvements
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) says it has developed upgrades for a family of modular, rapidly deployable protective structures to improve their ability to shield against drone attacks. The announcement follows Ukraine's unprecedented covert drone attacks that destroyed multiple Russian bombers and other aircraft at several bases across that country. The Ukrainian attacks had already underscored a heated debate about whether or not the U.S. military should be building more hardened aircraft shelters and other fortified infrastructure to improve its defenses against uncrewed aerial threats, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles, as you can read more about here. USACE's Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) quietly shared news about the anti-drone updates to the Modular Protective System-Overhead Cover (MPS-OHC) in a recent post on LinkedIn. MPS-OHC was originally developed during the Global War on Terror era in response to indirect fire threats like artillery shells, rockets, and mortar rounds that U.S. forces were facing in Afghanistan and Iraq. The modular structure system first began being employed operationally in the early 2010s. The full MPS family includes other modular structures designed to help provide force protection against other threats, including suicide bombers. 'The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) has improved the Modular Protective System-Overhead Cover (MPS-OHC) to better defend against drone attacks, which are increasingly targeting infrastructure, key assets, and critical resources in conflict areas,' ERDC's LinkedIn post reads. 'In April, the MPS-OHC underwent validation testing to its improvements for use in the Indo-Pacific region. These upgrades – including stronger armor, a new armor arrangement and easier setup on shipping containers – demonstrated a near perfect success rate in protecting against explosive threats.' In addition, 'the updated design can withstand direct hits and is quick to assemble without the need for a concrete foundation, making it ideal for rapidly changing situations. The system is scalable to protect a variety of assets and is already in use now with contracts awarded to send these systems to forward deployed soldiers,' the post added. 'ERDC researchers are creating guides on how to employ the system depending on the drone threat level and working to make upgrade kits widely available.' TWZ has reached out to ERDC for more information about the upgrades to the MPS-OHC. MPS-OHC does already offer a relatively simple and low-cost way to add additional layers of top-down defense against indirect fire threats already mentioned. The structures come in kits packed in standard shipping containers, the primary components of which are armored 'roof' elements covering areas up to 52.5 feet by 15 feet. Kits, some of which also come with their own wall units, can also be combined to create larger structures. As seen in the chart below, the costs per kit range from $57,000 to $359,000, depending on their exact configuration. 'The roof panels are composed of an inexpensive concrete core material combined with a tough elastic outer layer,' according to ERDCWERX, a non-profit 'innovation hub' that is partnered with ERDC. 'This panel eliminates penetration of fragments and debris from natural disasters, explosions, and even munitions.' The modular roof panel design also allows for at least some degree of tailorability to expected threats, according to a separate ERDC fact sheet. As such, the modular structures can be used to protect critical assets and equipment, non-hardened structures/containers, unprotected weapon systems, etc,' according to the fact sheet. 'The MPS-OHC can be assembled with no equipment and requires no special tools for up to a 30-ft span. Only a standard military 10k forklift is required for 30-ft to 52.5-ft spans.' Specialized engineering units are not required to erect the structures, either, the fact sheet adds. At the same time, uncrewed aerial threats are not limited to top-down attacks. The kinds of first-person-view (FPV) kamikaze drones Ukraine used in recent covert attacks on Russian airbases have a demonstrated ability to get inside buildings through any sufficiently sized openings. Many larger kamikaze drones also dive onto their targets at lower angles, rather than attack straight down. As seen earlier in this story, at least in their original configurations, the MPS-OHC kits present wide open fronts and backs, as well as significant gaps on the sides. Ukrainian drone operators located a concentration of Russian hardware inside a large warehouse somewhere in the south of Ukraine, preparing for an very skilled drone operators sent in several drones and eliminated several MBTs, IFVs, trucks and more. In the end, the… — (((Tendar))) (@Tendar) February 20, 2024 Russian correspondent hides from a Ukranian drone … it looks for him like in a scary movie. — Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) September 11, 2024 How the 'stronger armor' and 'new armor arrangement' for the MPS-OHC may address these and other issues is unclear. It is interesting to point out here that U.S. Air Force officials at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia have at least been looking into the possibility of adding retractable netting to open sunshade-style aircraft shelters at that base to address lower-end drone threats. Leadership at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in North Carolina has also expressed interest in using an unspecified type of 'passive barrier' to provide additional counter-drone protection. Notably, both sides of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine have been making extensive use of nets and other kinds of add-on physical defenses to help shield armored vehicles, forward positions, and static structures against drone attack. Though Ukraine's recent attacks on Russian air bases offer a particularly glaring example, the threats posed by even weaponized commercial drones to critical assets and infrastructure, and well away from established battlegrounds, are not new, as TWZ regularly points out. Even lower-end uncrewed aerial systems are set to grow ever more capable of navigating to designated areas and finding targets on their own with limited, if any human intervention, thanks heavily to advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning. This, in turn, will only present additional challenges for defenders, as you can read more about in this past feature. What Ukrainian forces recently demonstrated in Russia with the use of weaponized commercial-type drones to conduct mass attacks on fragile aircraft exposed in the open on flightlines is a nightmare scenario that TWZ has been specifically highlighting the threat of for years now, as well. СБУ оприлюднила нове відео зі спецоперації «Павутина»: кадри показують шлях одного з FPV-дронів від вильоту з даху модульного будинку до ураження літака — СБ України (@ServiceSsu) June 7, 2025 More recently, a tangential debate about whether or not the U.S. military should be investing more in hardened base infrastructure, particularly new reinforced aircraft shelters, has also emerged around a shift toward preparing for a potential high-end fight in the Pacific against China. That focus is underscored by ERDC having directly linked to the MPS-OHC upgrades to the Indo-Pacific region in the LinkedIn post. Large established air bases would be prime targets for Chinese forces, in general, in such a conflict. The U.S. military does have hardened aircraft shelters and other fortified infrastructure at a number of bases, including in South Korea and Japan, but has not made significant investments on this front since the end of the Cold War. In January, the Hudson Institute think tank in Washington, D.C., published a report assessing that any aircraft parked in the open and fuel storage facilities at key airbases like Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in Japan, Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, or Langley Air Force Base in Virginia could be neutralized by 10 enemy missiles, each with a warhead capable of scattering cluster munitions across areas 450 feet in diameter. The graphic below offers a divisual depiction of the areas such attacks could cover. U.S. military officials, especially those from the Air Force, do not dispute that there will be a need to fight from bases under attack during any future major conflict, such as one with China. However, they have often pushed back against major investments in new hardened facilities, typically citing cost, and arguing in favor instead of more active defenses like surface-to-air missiles. Work now to establish a new and expansive air and missile defense architecture on Guam is a choice example of this 'active' defense focus. 'We've always known that hardening our bases is something that we need to do. And so we have that actually, in our budgets, to be able to get more resilient basing, and we have some hardening for the shelters, and we have some more survivable capabilities of our bases forward,' Gen. David Allvin, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, said at a conference put on by the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) think tank las tweek. 'Right now, I don't think it's where we need to be.' 'It's something that we haven't necessarily been ignoring, but it's been a matter of resource prioritization,' he continued, questioning whether it would be an optimal use of funding 'if all we're doing is playing defense and we can't shoot back.' 'So, we will have the need for bases, the main operating bases from which we operate,' Air Force Gen. Kevin Schneider, head of Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), also said at the Air & Space Forces Association's (AFA) 2025 Warfare Symposium in March. 'The challenge becomes, at some point, we will need to move to austere locations. We will need to disaggregate the force. We will need to operate out of other locations, again, one for survivability, and two, again, to provide response options.' In line with Allvin's comments, Schneider added that these were all things that 'cost money' and force the Air Force to 'make internal trades,' such as 'do we put that dollar towards, you know, fixing the infrastructure at Kadena [Air Base in Japan] or do we put that dollar towards restoring an airfield at Tinian.' Though certainly not a silver bullet solution, Army MPS-OHC kits with added features to provide additional defense against drone attacks might provide one option for readily improving physical defenses at air bases and other facilities at a lower cost than traditional hardened structures. The MPS-OHC kits that exist now are orders of magnitude less expensive than new hardened aircraft shelters, which can cost millions of dollars apiece, though they also do not provide anywhere near that level of protection, especially against more powerful direct hits. The baseline kit options that exist now are also not large enough to readily hold a tactical jet, but it is possible they could be adapted to act as an aircraft shelter, especially if combined together. Still, in general, as TWZ has noted in the past, even unhardened shelters could provide at least a modicum of protection against drones with smaller warheads, cluster submunitions, and shrapnel from other munitions. Fully enclosed shelters of any kind would also make it harder for enemy forces to know where exactly to strike, potentially prompting them to waste valuable resources against empty targets. In the meantime, the U.S. military general downplaying of physical hardening at its bases is increasingly at odds with global trends. In recent years, China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, in particular, have been steadily constructing additional hardened and unhardened aircraft shelters, as well as even more robust facilities, some of which are built underneath mountains. Russia's construction spree began well before Ukraine's recent covert drone attacks, but had been largely focused on bases closer to the front lines, including on the occupied Crimean Peninsula. Protective shelters for warplanes are also being constructed by the Russians at the Saki Air Base in the — Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) June 9, 2025 The U.S. military also continues to lag behind in the development and fielding of counter-drone capabilities intended for use by forces downrange and at home. Inside the borders of the United States, an array of often obtuse laws and other regulations present further challenges for expanding counter-drone defenses, as you can read more about here. Passive defenses like hardened shelters and MPS-OHC kits are notably not subject to these stipulations, increasing their potential attractiveness for domestic use, at least in the near term. The U.S. military has been pushing for new counter-drone authorities within the U.S. homeland, as well. The recently announced upgrades to the MPS-OHC kits are an example of a new U.S. counter-drone capability that is actually in the process of being fielded, at least on some level, and one aimed at addressing increasingly glaring gaps in terms of physical defenses. Contact the author: joe@
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine war latest: Ukraine shoots down nearly 500 drones, missiles in Russian record strike, Air Force says
Key developments on June 9: Ukraine shoots down nearly 500 drones, missiles in Russian record strike, Air Force says Ukraine begins new major prisoner exchange with Russia Russia claims offensive in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast aimed at creating 'buffer zone,' Ukraine denies reports of incursion Putin approves new naval strategy as Russia seeks to restore maritime power Ukraine says it hit military aircraft, electronic warfare facility in Russia Ukraine's Air Force said on June 9 that it intercepted a total of 479 Russian drones and missiles during a record-high wave of strikes overnight. According to the official statement, Russia launched 499 weapons, including 479 Shahed‑type attack drones and various decoy drones, four Kh‑47M2 "Kinzhal" air-launched ballistic missiles, 10 Kh‑101 cruise missiles, three Kh‑22 cruise missiles over the Black Sea, two Kh‑31P anti‑radar missiles, and one Kh‑35 cruise missile from occupied Crimea. Ukraine had reportedly neutralized 479 of the incoming targets, with 292 shot down and 187 jammed or lost via electronic warfare. The main target of the Russian attack was one of Ukraine's airfields, Ukraine's Air Force spokesperson Yurii Ihnat said on national television, without specifying the location or the strike's impact on the facility. The spokesperson called the June 9 attack "one of the largest that Russia has launched against Ukraine in recent times" and praised the Ukrainian air defense. "Of course, there are also hits. We won't specify in which locations, but with the number of missiles and drones that Russia is launching, it is impossible to shoot down everything," Ihnat added. Read also: Russia makes a year's worth of NATO ammunition in 3 months, Rutte says Ukraine has begun a large prisoner exchange with Russia as part of a deal reached during recent peace talks in Istanbul, President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed on June 9. "Ukrainians are coming home from Russian captivity," Zelensky said in a statement. "Today, the exchange began and will continue in several stages over the coming days. Among those being returned now are wounded and severely wounded prisoners, as well as those under 25." The swap marks the first stage of the agreement negotiated at the second round of direct Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul on June 2. The Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said the first group of released prisoners includes personnel from Ukraine's Navy, Ground Forces, Air Force, National Guard, Border Guard Service, Territorial Defense, and State Special Transport Service. Among those freed are defenders of Mariupol who had spent more than three years in captivity. All those returned in this stage are enlisted and noncommissioned soldiers, officials said. "Most of those returned were captured in the first days of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022," Ukraine's Human Rights Ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets said. Join our community Support independent journalism in Ukraine. Join us in this fight. Support Us Lubinets said his office monitored the exchange on the ground to ensure respect for human rights under the Geneva Convention and helped freed Ukrainians contact their families. "We warmly welcome all who can now breathe the air of their homeland after years of captivity," Lubinets said. "Our team shares in the joy of the families who received that precious and long-awaited call." The ongoing exchange covers specific categories — soldiers under 25, the severely wounded, and seriously ill prisoners — and Ukraine continues to work to repatriate the bodies of fallen servicemembers, according to the General Staff. Ukrainian officials did not disclose the total number of POWs freed on June 9, citing security reasons. Ahead of the exchange, Zelensky had said Ukraine aimed to bring home 500 prisoners in the June 7-8 swap, which ultimately did not take place as scheduled. June 9 swap comes after Kyiv denied Russian claims that it had delayed the planned June 7-8 exchange. Russian negotiator Vladimir Medinsky had accused Ukraine of postponing the swap indefinitely. Ukrainian officials dismissed this as disinformation. Russian forces are conducting their offensive in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk Oblast as part of efforts to create a "buffer zone" on Ukrainian territory, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on June 9, according to Russian state-controlled media. Peskov's comments allude to Russia's claims that the neighboring Ukrainian Donetsk Oblast belongs to Moscow. The claim is based on Russia's proclaimed annexation of the region in September 2022. Kremlin spokesperson comments follow weeks of renewed Russian advances in Donetsk Oblast and President Vladimir Putin's May 22 statement that Moscow is working to establish a "security buffer zone" along Ukraine's borders with Kursk, Bryansk, and Belgorod oblasts. Ukrainian officials denied Russia's latest claims of progress in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. "As of the morning of June 9, all Russian information, including Peskov's statements, about an offensive in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast does not correspond to reality," said Andrii Kovalenko, head of Ukraine's Center for Countering Disinformation. Operational Command South reported on June 8 that Russian troops are continuing attempts to break into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast but described the situation as "tense" rather than indicating any successful advance. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed on June 8 that its forces had entered Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Ukrainian officials immediately rejected the assertion. Viktor Trehubov, spokesperson for Ukraine's Khortytsia group of forces, also called the reports false, telling CNN that Russian forces had not advanced from the Pokrovsk or Novopavlivka directions, where the three oblasts of Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Dnipropetrovsk converge. Since 2014, Russian aggression has heavily impacted Donetsk Oblast, while Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has remained free from confirmed ground incursions. Ukraine rejected similar Russian claims in May, when officials debunked allegedly fabricated photos purportedly showing Russian troops in the region. Despite this, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has faced frequent Russian missile and drone attacks throughout the full-scale war. The region began mandatory evacuations from four front-line villages in April as a precaution. Read also: Inside Russia, calls for peace come with conditions — and Kremlin talking points Russian President Vladimir Putin has approved a new naval strategy aimed at fully restoring Russia's position as a leading global maritime power, Kremlin aide Nikolai Patrushev said in an interview with the Russian state-controlled Argumenty i Fakty newspaper, published on June 9. Patrushev, a former KGB officer, told the Russian newspaper that the new document, titled The Strategy for the Development of the Russian Navy up to 2050, was approved in late May. "Russia's position as one of the world's greatest maritime powers is gradually recovering," Patrushev said. He added that such work requires a long-term vision of future maritime challenges and threats. Patrushev provided no further details on the new naval strategy. Russia currently operates the world's third most powerful navy, according to most public rankings, behind China and the United States. However, the fleet has suffered a string of losses during the war against Ukraine, particularly in the Black Sea. Read also: Exclusive: Russia's ballistic missile production up at least 66% over past year, according to Ukrainian intel figures Ukraine damaged two Russian military aircraft — a MiG-31 and either a Su-30 or Su-34 fighter jet, as well as struck the JSC VNIIR-Progress facility in the Russian city of Cheboksary in the Chuvashia Republic, the General Staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces said on June 9. Ukrainian drone units, in coordination with other units, targeted VNIIR-Progress and ABS Electro in Cheboksary overnight as part of efforts to degrade Russia's capacity to produce air attack systems. The targeted facilities are part of Russia's military-industrial complex and produce adaptive Kometa antennas, used in Shahed-type attack drones, planning and correction modules for guided aerial bombs (KAB), and other precision-guided weapons, the General Staff said. The Ukrainian military confirmed that at least two drones struck the site, causing a large fire. The results of the strike are still being assessed. Ukraine's overnight strike also targeted the Savasleyka airfield in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, which the Kremlin uses to launch MiG-31K jets armed with Kinzhal hypersonic missiles, according to the General Staff. The operation was conducted by Ukrainian Special Operations Forces in coordination with other units. Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
