Dramatic slowdown in melting of Arctic sea ice surprises scientists
The finding is surprising, the researchers say, given that carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning have continued to rise and trap ever more heat over that time.
They said natural variations in ocean currents that limit ice melting had probably balanced out the continuing rise in global temperatures. However, they said this was only a temporary reprieve and melting was highly likely to start again at about double the long-term rate at some point in the next five to 10 years.
The findings do not mean Arctic sea ice is rebounding. Sea ice area in September, when it reaches its annual minimum, has halved since 1979, when satellite measurements began. The climate crisis remains 'unequivocally real', the scientists said, and the need for urgent action to avoid the worst impacts remains unchanged.
The natural variation causing the slowdown is probably the multi-decadal fluctuations in currents in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, which change the amount of warmed water flowing into the Arctic. The Arctic is still expected to see ice-free conditions later in the century, harming people and wildlife in the region and boosting global heating by exposing the dark, heat-absorbing ocean.
Dr Mark England, who led the study while at the University of Exeter, said: 'It is surprising, when there is a current debate about whether global warming is accelerating, that we're talking about a slowdown.
'The good news is that 10 to 15 years ago when sea ice loss was accelerating, some people were talking about an ice-free Arctic before 2020. But now the [natural] variability has switched to largely cancelling out sea ice loss. It has bought us a bit more time but it is a temporary reprieve – when it ends, it isn't good news.'
The research, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, used two different datasets of Arctic sea ice levels from 1979 to the present day. The scientists analysed the sea ice area for every month of the year and the slowdown was seen in all cases.
To see if such a slowdown could be a result of natural variation, they examined the results of thousands of climate model runs. 'This is not an extremely rare event – over a century, it should happen a couple of times,' said England, now at the University of California, Irvine. Furthermore, all the simulations showed sea ice loss accelerating again after the slowdown.
Prof Julienne Stroeve, of University College London, said: 'We know climate records, be it in global temperatures or sea ice, can remain the same for several years in a row as a result of internal climate variability.'
Stroeve's analysis of the long-term trend from 1979 to 2024 shows that about 2.5 sq metres of September ice is lost for every tonne of CO2 emitted.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Prof Andrew Shepherd, of Northumbria University, said: 'We know that the Arctic sea ice pack is also thinning, and so even if the area was not reducing, the volume still is. Our data show that since 2010 the average October thickness has fallen by 0.6cm per year.'
The rate of the rise in global surface temperature has also slowed down in the past, before resuming a rapid rise. A major El Niño event in 1998 was followed by a decade or so of similar global temperatures, which was nicknamed 'the pause'. However, the planet continued to accumulate heat throughout and global temperatures have since risen rapidly.
England rejected any suggestion the sea ice slowdown suggested climate change was not real. 'Climate change is unequivocally real, human-driven, and continues to pose serious threats. The fundamental science and urgency for climate action remain unchanged,' he said.
'It is good to explain to people that [the slowdown] is happening, else they are going to hear it from someone who is trying to use it in bad faith as a way to undermine our very solid understanding of what's happening with climate change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Natural alternative' to fat jabs found – and it could help you lose 17% of your body weight
MANY weight loss interventions, such as gastric bypass surgery and fat jabs, can be seen as invasive or being on negative side effects. For people looking for a natural alternative to shedding the pounds, scientists have developed edible microbeads. 1 The microbeads, made from green tea polyphenols, vitamin E and seaweed, when consumed, bind to fats in the gastrointestinal tract. And preliminary results from tests carried out in a new study found this approach to weight loss may be safer and more accessible than surgery or pharmaceuticals. 'Losing weight can help some people prevent long-term health issues like diabetes and heart disease,' said Yue Wu, a graduate student at Sichuan University. 'Our microbeads work directly in the gut to block fat absorption in a noninvasive and gentle way.' Weight gain is caused by genetic and lifestyle factors, including eating a high-fat diet. So, Wu and her colleagues wanted to target the fat absorption process with their weight-loss intervention, but avoid negative side effects. She said: 'We want to develop something that works with how people normally eat and live." The team created the tiny plant-based beads that spontaneously form through a series of chemical bonds between the green tea polyphenols and vitamin E. The beads were then coated in a natural polymer derived from seaweed to protect them from acid in the stomach. Once ingested, this protective polymer coating expands, the the green tea polyphenols and vitamin E compounds bind to and trap partially digested fats in the intestine. Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons With the microbeads being nearly flavourless, the researchers foresee them being easily integrated into people's diets. The researchers assessed the microbeads as a weight-loss treatment in rats. They were placed into three groups - those which were fed a high-fat diet either with or without microbeads and those which were fed a normal diet for 30 days. The rats fed the high-fat diet and microbeads were found to have lost 17 per cent of their total body weight, while rats in the other groups didn't lose weight. Wu and her team have now started working with a biotechnology company to manufacture the plant-based beads. 'All the ingredients are food grade and FDA-approved, and their production can be easily scaled up,' said Yunxiang He, Sichuan University associate professor and co-author on Wu's presentation. They've also initiated a human clinical trial in collaboration with the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. 'This represents a major step toward clinical translation of our polyphenol-based microbeads, following our foundational results,' said Wu. 'We have officially enrolled 26 participants in our investigator-initiated trial, and we anticipate that preliminary data may become available within the next year.' Latest on Mounjaro price hike Eli Lilly, the manufacturer of Mounjaro, has announced that prices will rise from September 1 this year. The price the pharma giant charges pharmacies for a mid-range 5mg dose will nearly double from £92 to £180. The maximum available dose - 15mg - will rise from £122 to £330. This is to bring UK prices in line with those in European countries. The price increase will affect everyone paying privately, from pharmacies to private clinics, with some of the cost falling on customers. All online providers will also be affected by these changes. The announcement doesn't affect the price the NHS pays, as the service has negotiated a heavily discounted rate for those getting the drug on prescription. With patients stocking up on the jab before the price hike, find out which sites still have it and are accepting new customers here.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists are baffled to discover a SLOWDOWN in melting of Arctic sea ice
Scientists have been left baffled after discovering that the melting of sea ice in the Arctic is actually slowing down. Despite rising temperatures, an analysis by experts from the University of Exeter has revealed that the Arctic has been melting at a slower rate for the past 20 years. From 1979 to 2024, ice was lost from the Arctic at a rate of 2.9 million cubic kilometres of ice per decade. But from 2010 to 2024, the rate had reduced to just 0.4 million cubic kilometres per decade – seven times smaller. 'Summer sea ice conditions in the Arctic are at least 33% lower than they were at the beginning of the satellite record nearly 50 years ago,' said Dr Mark England, lead author of the study. However, the scientists caution against celebrating the news. They believe the slowdown is only temporary and will probably only continue for five to 10 years. When it ends, it's likely to be followed by 'faster–than–average' sea ice decline, the experts warned. Despite rising temperatures, an analysis by experts from the University of Exeter has revealed that the Arctic has been melting at a slower rate for the past 20 years In their study, the researchers analysed two datasets containing satellite measurements of the Arctic from 1979 to the present day. The team decided to focus on September – the month at which ice cover is at its annual minimum. Their analysis revealed that sea ice between 2005 and 2024 declined by 0.35 and 0.29 million square km per decade respectively. Meanwhile, the longer–term rate of decline for the period 1979–2024 was 0.78 and 0.79 million square km per decade (depending on which dataset used). That makes the slowdown a 55 per cent and 63 per cent reduction – the slowest rate of loss for any 20–year period since the start of satellite records in 1979. Looking ahead, the researchers predict there's a one in two chance that this slowdown will continue for a further five years, and a one in four chance it will last through until 2035. However, the slowdown won't last forever, they warn. In fact, when the slowdown ends, the pace of Arctic sea ice loss could actually be 0.6 million square km per decade faster than the broader long–term decline. The researchers still don't know why the slowdown has occurred, although they suspect it's down to 'natural climate variations'. 'It may seem surprising to find a temporary slowdown in Arctic sea ice loss,' Dr England said. 'It is, however, entirely consistent with climate model simulations and is likely due to natural climate variability superimposed on the human–driven long–term trend. 'This is only a "temporary reprieve" and before long the rate of sea ice decline will catch up with the longer term rate of sea ice loss.' Dr England uses the analogy of a ball bouncing down a hill – where the hill is climate change. 'The ball continues going down the hill but as it meets obstacles in its path, the ball can temporarily fly upwards or sideways and not seem to be traveling down at all,' he added. 'That trajectory is not always smooth but we know that at some point the ball will careen towards the bottom of the hill.' WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF LOWER SEA ICE LEVELS? The amount of Arctic sea ice peaks around March as winter comes to a close. NASA recently announced that the maximum amount of sea ice this year was low, following three other record-low measurements taken in 2015, 2016 and 2017. This can lead to a number of negative effects that impact climate, weather patterns, plant and animal life and indigenous human communities. Additionally, the disappearing ice can alter shipping routes and affect coastal erosion and ocean circulation. NASA researcher Claire Parkinson said: 'The Arctic sea ice cover continues to be in a decreasing trend and this is connected to the ongoing warming of the Arctic. 'It's a two-way street: the warming means less ice is going to form and more ice is going to melt, but, also, because there's less ice, less of the sun's incident solar radiation is reflected off, and this contributes to the warming.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Vital' new study changes what we know about giraffes
A new assessment has concluded there are four distinct giraffe species, overturning the previous classification of the world's tallest land mammal as a single species. The review, conducted by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), used genetic data, skull structure, bone shape, and geographical features to identify the separate species. Historically, giraffes were classified as a single species with nine subspecies, but uncertainty over their taxonomy has long existed. Scientists describe this reclassification as vital for better assessing their conservation status and targeting action to protect them, as giraffes are currently vulnerable to extinction. The four officially recognised species are the Northern giraffe, Reticulated giraffe, Masai giraffe, and Southern giraffe, each with several recognised subspecies.
