
After blacks in Cincinnati beat white adults, why was there no nationwide, racial outrage?
The original altercation apparently broke out between a black and white male in he-said/he-said fashion. But that dispute soon turned into a virtual free-for-all.
Numerous male and female black youths sucker-punched a middle-aged woman. Others continued to kick or body slam the victims.
There were many disturbing aspects to the beat-downs.
One, the violence broke out along racial and age fault lines. After the initial dispute, groups of black youths swarmed solitary older white bystanders to pound them.
Two, the surrounding assembled group of black youths not only failed to intervene to restrain the bullies. They also recorded the beatings for social media and were heard cheering on the one-sided violence.
Three, there was neither a police presence nor any timely Good Samaritan interventions.
Four, oddly few of the usual black spokespeople who habitually comment on interracial violence were to be seen.
During the fake Jussie Smollett attack, self-appointed leaders from Al Sharpton to Kamala Harris immediately issued warnings about so-called systemic white racism that had reared its ugly head to victimize Smollett.
Yet when it was revealed Smollett had concocted the entire charade — and even hired his own assaulters — there were few if any retractions from those once so eager to shout 'racist!'
Such demagoguery is a well-known pattern dating back to the days of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax, the Duke Lacrosse charade, the Covington kids ruse, the Michael Ford 'Hands-up-Don't Shoot' fabrication or the NASCAR noose fable.
Racialists too often concoct white racist attackers and go silent when the evidence proves fabricated — only to be primed to manipulate the next hoax.
Five, the media and authorities did their best to either hide or play down the violence.
City leaders, the chief of police and the media variously blamed the mass black-on-white violence on 1) social media, 2) the original dispute, 3) alcohol, 4) the lack of civilian intervention to stop the violence and 5) a festival atmosphere — anything except endemic racial hatred shown toward whites from the crowd of black youths.
Six, had a gang of white toughs beat middle-aged African-Americans senseless, recorded it and cheered on the violence, there would have been immediate national outrage.
Nor did anyone wish to raise the taboo topic of inordinate black crime rates, disproportionate to respective demographic realities.
In rare interracial violent crimes, the asymmetrical ratio of black-on-white versus white-on-black assaults ranges from three to five times greater.
Seven, the quiet of the left-wing media to the reprehensible violence stands in marked contrast with their usual rush-to-judgment racialism in two near-simultaneous incidents.
When a shooter entered a New York City corporate headquarters last week and executed four innocents, CNN falsely raised the speculation that a 'white male' was perhaps responsible — despite the photograph of the suspect, who was as clearly male as he was not white.
Media and municipal officials jumped to explain the violence as due to the killer's alleged past traumatic brain injury or because of his access to a semi-automatic weapon — or anything other than his hate-filled plan to murder an NFL executive.
Actress and model Sydney Sweeney just cut a jeans commercial in front of a poster that said, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes' — with 'genes' crossed out and replaced with 'jeans.'
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
The left then exploded, alleging the ad was a supposed Hitlerian reference to white eugenics.
Yet the eugenics movement in America was mostly a product of left-wing progressives, from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger to Democratic President Woodrow Wilson.
And the ad's sponsor, American Eagle, had previously used all sorts of models from all racial backgrounds.
All might agree that the ad simply shows both tight, sexy jeans and a naturally attractive wearer — period.
The country is descending into a tribal morass of double standards and racial fixations.
The diversity/equity/inclusion industry, the defund-the-police madness and the perpetual left-wing hunt for 'white racism/white privilege/white rage' — from the prior Pentagon hierarchy to the lunatic fringe of Jasmine Crockett, Joy Reid and Zohran Mamdani — have all legitimized double standards while lowering the bar of the once unacceptable.
When our careerist left-wing elites seek to divide us by race and make it essential, not incidental, to our identities, that tribalist message filters throughout communities.
The ensuing signal is that 'payback' violence is OK — on the expectation that there are no consequences for interracial violence — as long as the victim is white and the assaulter is not.
Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Will pro-Trump Latinos vote Republican in the 2026 midterms? A new poll casts doubts
A quarter of Latinos who supported President Donald Trump in the November election are not guaranteed to vote for Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections, according to a new national poll by Equis, a leading research and polling group. Last week Equis, alongside progressive think tank Data for Progress, released a July memo that summarized key findings from a national poll of 1,614 registered voters, conducted between July 7 and July 17. This time frame coincides with some notable turning points in politics: namely, when Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law, as well as his execution of mass deportations and controversial handling of the Epstein files. Respondents were asked, 'If the 2026 election for United States Congress were held today, for whom would you vote?' Only 27% replied that they would vote for a Republican candidate, marking a significant political party drop from the 45% who said they voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. A quarter of those polled said they were not sure whom they would vote for (16%), would vote for someone else (5%), or would not vote at all (4%). This shaky political alignment comes at a critical time for Republicans, who are banking on continual Latino support in 2026 — especially as Texas Republicans plan to flip five blue seats under a newly proposed congressional map. The Equis study also found that 63% of Latinos disapproved of Trump's job as president in July, a slight uptick from polling numbers in May, when 60% disapproved. This rating seems to reflect broader sentiments regarding the state of the U.S. economy: 64% of Latinos rated the economy as 'somewhat or very poor,' while only 34% viewed it as 'somewhat or very good.' However, a disapproval of Trump does not mean Latinos have rushed to back the Democratic Party. Half the Latinos polled said Democrats care more about people like them, versus the 25% who said Republicans care more. Meanwhile, 17% said they believe that neither party cares. Swing voters — including those who Equis calls 'Biden defectors,' or voters who elected Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024 — are twice as likely to say that neither party cares about people like them (38%). 'Growing dissatisfaction with Trump offers Democrats an opportunity, but only if they are willing to capitalize on it,' the July memo states. Overall, Trump's national approval ratings are taking a nosedive, according to aggregate polling by the New York Times, which notes that Trump's approach to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has angered his base. On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department for the files; lawmakers believe they could implicate Trump and other former top officials in the sex-trafficking investigation. Trump's anti-immigration policies have also likely shifted his popularity. Early July Gallup polling revealed that Americans have grown more positive toward immigration — 79% of Americans say immigration is a 'good thing' for the country, which marks a 64% increase from last year and a 25-year record high.


CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN's Harry Enten reacts to Trump flubbing his name as ‘Harry Emden'
President Donald Trump name-checked CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten in a recent interview, albeit with a slightly incorrect last name. Enten joined NewsNight to react to the president's error and to fact-check the claims of his approval rating.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
CNN's Harry Enten reacts to Trump flubbing his name as ‘Harry Emden'
President Donald Trump name-checked CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten in a recent interview, albeit with a slightly incorrect last name. Enten joined NewsNight to react to the president's error and to fact-check the claims of his approval rating.