
‘Serial borrower from the IMF': India mocks Pakistan at UN; rebuts Islamabad's Kashmir, Indus Water Treaty claims
Marking the 80th anniversary of the UN, India's ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said that states violating the principle of "good neighbourliness" by fomenting cross-border terrorism "must bear a serious cost.
"
"There should also be a serious cost to states that violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism. Recently, consequent to the gruesome terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on 22 April 2025 that led to the killing of 26 innocent tourists, and based on the Council statement of 25 April—where members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organizers, financiers, and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice," Harish said.
"India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which was focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature, aimed at achieving its primary objectives. A cessation of military activities was directly concluded at the request of Pakistan," he added.
Harish drew a stark contrast between the two countries and accused Pakistan of being plagued by terrorism and economic instability.
"I am constrained also to respond to the remarks made by the representative of Pakistan. The Indian subcontinent offers a stark contrast in terms of progress, prosperity, and development models. On the one hand, there is India—a mature democracy, a surging economy, and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan—steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF," Harish said.
"As we debate promoting international peace and security, it is essential to recognize that there are some fundamental principles which need to be universally respected. One of them is zero tolerance for terrorism. It ill behoves a member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community," he added.
This came after Pakistan's deputy prime minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar raised the dispute between India and Pakistan over the Indus Waters Treaty, which New Delhi placed into abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack in April.
"Jammu and Kashmir remains one of the oldest disputes on the agenda of the UN Security Council. It is an internationally recognized disputed territory, the final disposition of which is to be made in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people. No cosmetic measures can serve as a substitute for the fundamental and inalienable right of self-determination of the Kashmiris, as guaranteed by the relevant Security Council resolutions," Ishaq Dar said.
"A 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan is a noteworthy example of dialogue and diplomacy working to peacefully arrive at a water-sharing arrangement between two neighbours. The treaty has withstood periods of trials and tribulations in bilateral relations. It is most unfortunate and regrettable that India has chosen to illegally and unilaterally hold this treaty in abeyance on baseless grounds, with the intention of withholding the flow of water to 240 million people of Pakistan, who rely on it for their livelihood and survival," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
50% tariff by Trump will have severe impact on India, says TMC's Abhishek Banerjee; blames BJP govt's ‘failed foreign policy'
TMC National General Secretary Abhishek Banerjee on Wednesday hit out at the BJP-led central government over the recent imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian goods by former US President Donald Trump. Speaking at the Kolkata airport, Banerjee called it a direct fallout of the PM Modi government's 'failed foreign policy and diplomatic missteps.' 'In 2019, Modi campaigned for Trump in Texas. In 2020, Trump visited Gujarat and Modi called him 'my friend and India's friend, Donald Trump.' Now the same Trump has imposed this tariff. Those who campaigned for him should answer why this has happened,' Banerjee said. 'The onus is on the Prime Minister and the NDA government, not the Trinamool Congress, to answer for this diplomatic failure,' he added. Banerjee also condemned Trump's reported remark that India's economy is 'dead,' but said the economy is in the ICU. 'I do not agree that India's economy is dead. No one has the power to kill the Indian economy. It is surviving on the love and affection of 140 crore Indians. I can say the Indian economy is in the ICU. From bad, it has become worse in the last ten years. And by imposing a 50% tariff, there will be substantial job loss. Exports will come down. And this is all because of the poor foreign policy of the Indian government,' he said. He warned that the tariff would severely affect India's IT, pharmaceutical and textile sectors. 'Exports will be affected, especially in three industries – IT, pharmaceuticals and textiles. The services around these sectors will also be impacted… India should respond firmly to this,' Banerjee said. Framing the issue as a broader diplomatic and strategic failure, he added: 'Those who want to weaken India and create pressure—how did they suddenly become so powerful? The government that used to boast about its '56-inch chest', despite being in power, has been snubbed by China, the US, and many other countries.' Banerjee said he did not wish to speak about these matters publicly but felt compelled to do so. 'I was part of the all-party delegation and visited five countries. A multilateral forum like ASEAN consists of 11 countries. It includes Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, among others. Let alone putting pressure on Pakistan, they did not even issue a statement condemning Pakistan's actions,' he said. He also brought up national security concerns, citing incidents in Pulwama and Pahalgam, and questioned the government's approach to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). 'The Home Minister said on the floor of the House that PoK is part of India. But what action has been taken? If there's no action, countries will continue to weaken India and create pressure,' Banerjee said. Turning to domestic issues, Banerjee accused the Election Commission of working in favour of the BJP and overstepping its mandate. 'The ECI is working months ahead of the election, which is still 10-11 months away, only to prevent the elected state government from functioning,' he said. He alleged that the ECI was trying to disenfranchise 'genuine Bengalis' and called its actions a 'shameless role' for a supposedly impartial institution. He also accused the Central government of misusing investigative agencies and the judiciary to undermine the Bengal government, citing over 50 CBI cases since 2021. Sweety Kumari reports from West Bengal for The Indian Express. She is a journalist with over a decade of experience in the media industry. Covers Crime, Defence, Health , Politics etc and writes on trending topics. With a keen eye for investigative and human-interest stories. She has honed her craft across diverse beats including aviation, health, incidents etc. Sweety delivers impactful journalism that informs and engages audiences. Sweety Kumari is a graduate of Calcutta University with an Honors degree in Journalism from Jaipuria College and a PG in Mass Communication from Jadavpur University. Originally from Bihar, she is brought up in Kolkata and completed her education from Kendriya Vidyalaya SaltLake. Multilingual, Sweety is fluent in English, Hindi, Bengali, and Maithili. She started her career as an Entertainment and lifestyle journalist with a newsportal in Kolkata. She is working with The Indian Express for 8 years now. ... Read More


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is cautious ‘Elephant-Dragon' tango making a comeback as Donald Trump tightens trade screws against India?
India and China are showing signs of re-engagement. High-level visits and dialogues are being planned. Russia-India-China trilateral dialogue may revive. Despite this, trade tensions persist. The US has increased tariffs on Indian exports. This comes amid pressure on India's ties with Russia. It is unclear if India's strategic position is shifting. All these factors add complexity to the situation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Signs of cautious re-engagement emerge NSA visit, ministerial engagements underline dialogue effort Defence minister holds firm at SCO meeting Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Direct flights still remain on hold China joins BRICS in terrorism condemnation Trade friction continues beneath surface diplomacy Apple's India expansion hit by Chinese engineer recall US pressure grows amid tariff escalation Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Strategic recalibration or temporary adjustment? Just as the US announced new tariffs, raising it to 50 % on Indian exports, a cautious thaw appears to be taking shape in India-China relations . Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China for the first time in seven years. National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, External Affiar Minister S Jaishankar and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh 's recent visits to China signal a tentative improvement in bilateral ties, which have remained tense since the 2020 Galwan clashes, even as friction continues on trade, technology, and security activity between India and China has picked up pace in recent weeks. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China for the first time in seven years. Efforts are also underway to revive the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, reflecting an attempt to engage on regional and global month, as per an ET report, India signaled willingness to consider reviving the long-inactive Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, following renewed interest from Moscow. Russia's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov had urged the resumption of the RIC format. Speaking at a conference, Lavrov said, "I would like to confirm our genuine interest in the earliest resumption of the work within the format of the troika -- Russia, India, China which was established many years ago on the initiative of Yevgeny Primakov."National Security Advisor Ajit Doval's recent visit to China focused on strategic and border security matters. His trip follows earlier visits by India's foreign and defence ministers, suggesting a coordinated effort to keep diplomatic channels open even as border tensions remain June, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh participated in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Defence Ministers' meeting in Qingdao, China. He refused to back a joint statement that, according to Indian officials, would have weakened India's position on the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. As a result, the SCO did not issue a joint statement due to disagreements over and China are also in talks to resume direct passenger flights, which were suspended in 2020 due to the pandemic and border tensions. However, officials have not provided any timeline for the BRICS summit in Brazil, all member nations, including China, signed a joint statement condemning terrorism — marking a rare instance of alignment on India's security concerns. The statement specifically condemned the Pahalgam attack , where India had earlier faced pushback in other forums. India blamed Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack, in which 26 tourists were killed by ongoing diplomatic contacts, trade tensions persist. China recently delayed the shipment of a German-made tunnel boring machine intended for India's Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train this year, China temporarily halted rare earth exports to India, affecting the electric vehicle manufacturing sector. Some Indian producers warned of possible disruptions in India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has also alleged that China is restricting the export of capital equipment vital for electronics manufacturing in India, potentially undercutting India's efforts to become an electronics production July, about 300 Chinese engineers working at Foxconn's Indian plants were reportedly ordered to return to China. The move was widely seen as an attempt to delay Apple's supply chain shift to India and slow the production ramp-up of latest US tariff hike on Indian exports comes amid growing friction over India's energy ties with Russia. The White House has defended the 50% tariff as part of its broader strategic response to countries continuing trade with Moscow.A bill pending in the US Senate proposes a 500% tariff on imports from countries that do not align with US policy on Russia, which could further strain India's export-driven sectors. China faces similar scrutiny from backchannel diplomacy, multilateral cooperation, and possible high-level visits point to cautious re-engagement with China, it remains unclear whether India's broader strategic posture is shifting. The Galwan incident, trade disputes, and regional security concerns continue to shape the same time, the rising economic pressure from the US adds a new layer of complexity. Whether this pushes India to hedge more visibly between Washington and Beijing remains an open question, shaped by both external pressures and domestic strategic priorities.

Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump tariffs may hit India GDP growth, put industry at wide disadvantage: Experts
In a major decision by the Trump administration, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India, making the total tariff against India 50 per cent. In light of this, economists feel that the move can impact India's GDP growth in EY26 by 0.4 per cent. Trump's tariffs have sparked concerns among Indian trade exporters, as the new tariff will make Indian exports more expensive in the American market.(Reuters) Sonal Badhan, Economics Specialist at Bank of Baroda, told ANI that initially, the expected impact of Trump's tariffs was at 0.2 per cent impact with a 25-26 per cent tariff imposed on India. "There appears to be downside risk to our growth forecast of 6.4-6.6 per cent if lower rates are not negotiated," she said, talking about the consequences of tariffs on growth. Further, she said that depending on the terms of the final trade agreement, the total impact of tariffs on Indian GDP can range between 0.2-0.4 per cent. Sectors including garments, precious stones, pharmaceuticals, auto parts, electronics, and MSMEs are most likely to be affected by it. Also read: Indian stock market opens in red after Donald Trump's 50% tariffs on India Meanwhile, this move has also sparked concerns among the Indian trade exports, as the new tariff will make Indian exports more expensive in the American market. Announced by the Trump administration on Wednesday, this move was taken in response to India continuing its oil imports from Russia. The executive order by Trump stated, "I find that the Government of India is currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil.' Based on this, it said that articles from India imported into the customs territory of the US will be subject to an additional 25 per cent duty. Ajay Bagga, a banking and market expert, told ANI that the steep tariff is a major blow to India. "India is now hit with 50 per cent tariffs, but frankly, once it crossed 25 per cent, it didn't matter. It could be 1,000 per cent or 5,000 per cent; there's no trade possible anymore," he said. Bagga also pointed out that with shipments already prepared, the move hits exporters hard. "If USD 1 billion worth of textile exports are halted, it directly impacts around 100,000 workers," he said. Experts also called the additional tariff unnecessary and suggested mutual dialogue to resolve political differences. "I remain hopeful that the Government of India will continue to engage and seek a balanced resolution with the US," Agneshwar Sen, Trade Policy Leader at EY India, said. The Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) also expressed concerns at the situation with President, SC Ralhan, saying that, "nearly 55 per cent of our shipments to the US market are directly affected.' He also stated that the imposed tariffs will put Indian exporters at a competitive disadvantage by 30-35 per cent. While the order imposes tariffs on most Indian imports, some items, including certain mineral substances, fuels, industrial chemicals, metallurgical ores, and pharmaceutical precursors, have been excluded.