Labour must decide if messy break-up with Catherine Connolly is salient factor in presidential backing
Catherine Connolly
diagnosed the
Labour Party
had 'lost its soul'. This afternoon, the Independent TD for Galway West - who was a Labour councillor and Dáil aspirant for the party before decamping in 2006 - will go searching for its votes to formally back her for the
presidential election
race.
A meeting is set between Connolly and the 13 Oireachtas members of the Parliamentary Labour Party for 4.30pm today. Connolly, having secured the backing of the
Social Democrats
,
People Before Profit
and several Independent members, has the wind at her back and seems almost certain to secure the 20 required votes regardless of whether Labour backs her. In some ways, it's a more consequential decision for Labour than it is for Connolly.
It must decide if the messy break-up between the party and Connolly is still a salient factor. She left the party having failed to get on the ticket as a running mate for
Michael D Higgins
in the 2007 general election. As an Independent TD, she was a forthright critic of Labour in government.
However, some party grandees who served in cabinet and were on the receiving end of those criticisms are sanguine about her potential endorsement by the party. 'On balance,' says one, speaking privately, 'I think bygones be bygones'. This mirrors the views of some within the current parliamentary party, who like her politics and her pugnacious, sincere style, while harbouring some concerns. One TD says her history with Labour is 'not relevant' to their consideration of her candidacy: 'The past is just that'.
[
Who is Catherine Connolly? The outspoken left-wing campaigner running for president
Opens in new window
]
A second former senior figure in the Labour Party says they are undecided, while simultaneously saying they would have no principled objection to Connolly based on her history with Labour. But they outline their view that the forthright Galway native can be 'quite difficult to work with', adding knowingly that people who favour her within Labour may not have had much to do with her in the past. There are also those who want to know more about what her platform is - and what precisely is the nature of support that will be sought. Will it just be Oireachtas votes and rhetorical endorsements, or will manpower and money also be sought?
Openness should not be confused for a headlong enthusiasm for backing Connolly, from past or present members of the parliamentary party - and she will have her work cut out to win over some current TDs. Some are of the view that Tipperary North's Alan Kelly will take particular convincing. But what she does have going for her is an alignment of political circumstances that leaves Labour open to endorsement, rather than fielding its own candidate.
The party views itself as having changed the nature of the presidency with Mary Robinson, and as having some political custody of the office given Higgins's enduring popularity across his two terms. Sitting out the presidential campaign entirely would be unpalatable - but it also knows that Connolly's emergence as a left wing front-runner will soak up Oireachtas votes that could go to an alternative candidate, even one given a significant bump by 13 Labour votes.
A second left candidate could also split the vote, while Connolly is seen as someone who may be well positioned to surf the political zeitgeist in the autumn. By this stage, muses one grandee, the evenings will be longer, the weather worse, and an unpopular Government will be closing in on a budget with none of the baubles that voters have become used to. In those circumstances, many may use the chance to back an anti-establishment candidate so the Government parties feel their displeasure in what is ultimately a second order election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Catherine Connolly, presidential hopeful, gave her first press conference today — here's what she said
THE SALARY, SYRIA and a vision for the next presidency. These were just some of the topics Galway TD and presidential hopeful Catherine Connolly spoke about today during her first press conference of her campaign. Connolly said she is a not a politician seeking office, but a 'citizen' looking to serve as president of Ireland. She said she battled with the decision to run, calling it a torturous decision, but said she told reporters she made the call last week to put her name forward. Catherine Connolly speaks to reporters outside Leinster House today. So what did we learn? 'United Ireland' coming very soon Connolly told reporters that she believes Northern Ireland is 'extremely important'. 'I think we're going to have united Ireland very soon. 'I think the Good Friday Agreement has set the framework for that… I think tremendous work has been done on the ground with cross-border bodies, and I look forward to the day when we have a united Ireland. Advertisement 'I absolutely value the diversity, and we must value the different backgrounds in Northern Ireland,' she added. On the €350,000 salary and would she take a reduced amount? The salary for the presidency is approximately €350,000. President Michael D Higgins has waived a portion of it over his two terms. When The Journal asked if she would take a reduced salary, Connolly said she will 'look at the salary'. She added that she is 'open to ideas on that'. 'I'm certainly going to use it for the common good,' she said. She said she would discuss it with her team and set out how she would use the salary 'in due course'. On her trip to Syria during dictator Bashar al-Assad's time When questioned about a trip to Syria she undertook with former TDs Clare Daly, Mick Wallace and Maureen O'Sullivan, she told reporters that she funded the trip herself: 'We went there for a purpose of fact finding. I met no member of government. Indeed, our whole thing was a Palestinian activist… I saw firsthand the destruction of a whole city. I mean, my idea up to then of a refugee camp wasn't up to scratch really, I was looking at demolition of a city. 'We were shown around by Palestinians. We stayed with them all of the time. After that, we went down to Aleppo. We met the Chamber of Commerce. We had a meeting with UNICEF. We went into a convent, and met a nun, unfortunately who has since died, and many other, many other aspects of that trip. On no occasion had I anything to do with the government, nor did I ever utter one word of support for Assad,' she said. Does she regret signing the nomination papers of Gemma O'Doherty in the last presidential election? Connolly says she doesn't regret her decision to sign O'Doherty's papers at the time, stating that she did not know her personally but saw her as a journalist who had done some very good work in the past. 'Do I support her in any way? Not at all,' she said, stating that her 'judgment call was right at the time'. Related Reads Question mark over Mary Lou McDonald's potential candidacy as support for Connolly builds Left parties begin to align behind Catherine Connolly in race for Áras Forget the presidency - Joe Duffy is now doing ads for Lidl Will she make spending in Áras an Uachtaráin more transparent? There has long been a debate on creating more transparency around the spend on the presidency. While most State bodies are subject to the Freedom of Information Act, the office for the presidency is not. The office of presidency spends about €7m per year, but the breakdown of that spending is kept under wraps. Would Connolly change that? She wouldn't commit to that, only telling The Journal that while she sat on the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee closely scrutinised the spending, stating that she would hope such scrutiny continues. She says she's not a Michael D Higgins continuity candidate Connolly told reporters today that she is proud of President Micheal D Higgins and how he has spoken out about Gaza. 'He showed courage when courage was necessary,' she said. 'I would never describe myself as a continuity candidate. I come from a family of 14, and we have all striven to have our own personalities, and indeed, we would take great exception to say we're following somebody else. I have my own vision and my own support and my own values,' she said. How does she plan to fund her campaign? Connolly said that she will be asking for contributions from supporters, but said parties that are backing her have also offered cash. 'If I had thought about the cost and what's been estimated, a quarter of a million or a half a million [Euro], I think I'd be overwhelmed, and you wouldn't stand,' she said. Connollys said she wants her message to be that 'you do not need to be rich. You do not need to have wealth to stand, nor should you need it'. 'Having said that, I will need money, and we will be asking for contributions, because obviously we need a campaign. But the stronger message is we can do this. This is bigger than wealth and money. This is about having a voice, having a vision, and reflecting the people on the ground, in all its diversity, north and south,' said Connolly. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Taoiseach hits back at US ambassador's 'vat of Guinness' comments over Occupied Territories Bill
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has hit back at claims from a senior Trump administration figure that the Government "fell into a vat of Guinness" when drawing up the Occupied Territories Bill. US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee had posted on social media that Ireland should "sober up" and apologise to Israel for the bill's passage through the Oireachtas. "Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness and propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to act of diplomatic intoxication?" Mr Huckabee said in the post. "It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. Sober up Ireland! Call [the Israel foreign ministry] and say you're sorry!" Trade ban The bill will ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. The Government said there is a narrow legal basis, based on an advisory opinion from the UN's top court, to ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements. The Government has said this is being done to comply with the International Court of Justice, which said last year that countries should "take steps to prevent trade or investment relations" that maintain illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. In response, Mr Martin said that he "rejects the comments made by the ambassador". "The situation is very serious in Gaza, including an appalling loss of human life. Terrible war crimes are being committed," he said. "Ireland has consistently condemned Hamas and we equally condemn Israeli breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza. The slaughter of children must stop. The slaughter of innocent civilians queuing for food must stop. What is going on is beyond any moral compass. "Ireland stands for peace and a political pathway forward." Mr Huckabee's criticism was echoed by others in the US, including the pro-Israel organisation, the Anti-Defamation League, which said it was "deeply concerned" about the bill, which will impact a small amount of trade. On Wednesday in the Seanad, Senator Michael McDowell roundly rejected all and any claims that the actions of Ireland, its Government, or its Houses of Parliament were motivated by, or amounted, to anti-semitism. Claims that Ireland's position reflected anti-semitism, which he defined as hatred of Jews, were grossly defamatory and untrue. 'Our position on Gaza is shared by many Israeli Jews, including a former Israeli prime minister.' Referring to the appearance of former deputy Alan Shatter at an Oireachtas committee, Mr McDowell cited a passage in a book written and published by Mr Shatter in which the former justice minister had claimed that an accusation of 'arrogance' made against him by Willie O'Dea in the Dáil was an 'anti-semitic' trope. 'It is simply defamatory and untrue to assert that Ireland's position on Gaza and recognition of the Palestinian state was motivated by anti-semitism or hatred of Jews.' Read More Crush at Gaza aid site kills at least 20, GHF blames armed agitators
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Starmer and Martin to hold talks following Labour revolt over plan to abort Troubles Legacy Act
Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Keir Starmer , Britain's prime minister, are expected to hold talks this week, possibly on Thursday, after the UK government's plan to scrap Legacy Act immunity for British soldiers and others sparked a revolt within the Labour Party. Mr Starmer's Labour government had promised to effectively repeal and redraft the Act, which was found by a court in the North to be incompatible with human rights law. The Irish Government had also lobbied hard against the Act, passed in 2023 by the Tories even though it was opposed by both sides of the community in the North. However, the plan to withdraw immunity, potentially opening up soldiers and others to prosecution for acts committed during the Troubles, has become politically controversial in Britain. READ MORE Alistair Carns, the Labour government's veterans minister and a former royal marine, has threatened to resign if British soldiers are stripped of immunity. Labour backbenchers in working-class constituencies with big numbers of former soldiers, notably in England's midlands and north, also expressed concern. That led to fears in Downing Street of yet another backbench rebellion should it press ahead. Revolts from the backbenches have already forced the UK government into embarrassing U-turns on welfare cuts. Some of the most restive Labour MPs are in constituencies where Nigel Farage's Reform UK is their biggest electoral threat. Labour MPs who spoke to The Irish Times speculated Downing Street could reverse the plan to replace the Act or water any redraft down to prevent a rebellion. [ Keir Starmer was quick to condemn Kneecap, but strangely silent on Moygashel Opens in new window ] Colum Eastwood, SDLP MP for Foyle in Derry, challenged Mr Starmer over the issue at prime minister's questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday. He said the prime minister had gone to the North to meet victims' families and 'looked people in the eye and promised them that no murderer will be immune from prosecution'. He asked Mr Starmer to 'recommit' to the repeal plan. The prime minister responded: 'Can I begin by saying I have a profound respect and debt to our veterans who served' in the North. This prompted exasperation from Tory benches. One MP could be heard exclaiming: 'For f**k sake.' The prime minister did not directly respond to Mr Eastwood's exhortation to recommit, although he repeatedly referred to it as the 'failed Legacy Act' and the promise of immunity as 'false'. [ 'Worst of any prime minister': Ten moments that defined Labour's first year in power in the UK Opens in new window ] He also said, however, that veterans would be protected from 'unjustified persecution'. Officials were working on plans for Mr Martin and Mr Starmer to speak on Thursday or later in the week if necessary. An Irish government source said engagement is ongoing and the Government's priority is to assist victims and families. If the UK government backtracks on its plan, however, officials speculated it would cause friction between the two governments.
