
Google Pixel 10 Pro tipped for gimmicky feature they should have ditched years ago
Not that I have a particular dislike of the Pixel 9 design, quite the opposite. But for the fact that the phone still seems to have a temperature sensor alongside the camera. And that's a feature that should have been scrapped by now. If only because it's a gimmick that has overstayed its welcome.
The Pixel temperature sensor is a feature that could have been useful, had it appeared three years earlier than it did. The Pixel 5 was released towards the end of 2020, back before COVID-19 vaccines were available and the virus was still a significantly bigger threat than it is today.
Those of you that remember that time will likely remember having your temperature taken at one place or another. In a store, at an event, arriving at work, you name it. At that point a smartphone with a built in temperature sensor, especially one approved for medical use on humans, could have been a very big deal. Unfortunately the Pixel temperature sensor arrived on the Pixel 8 Pro in 2023.
It's almost as though Google saw how useful such a feature could have been, and started work on it for a future phone. It's just unfortunate that by the end of 2023, the threat of COVID-19 has dropped significantly. Vaccines were available, lockdowns had ended, and while it never really went away, a lot of people had stopped worrying about the disease by that point.
To make matters worse, the feature didn't even have FDA approval when the phone was released — that didn't happen until December, two months after release.
Had the temperature sensor come bundled in on the Pixel 6 Pro, or even the Pixel 7 Pro, it could have proven its worth a little more than it already has. But the Pixel 8 Pro was released far too late. By late 2023, the need for such a feature was long gone.
I've been using a Pixel 9 Pro, which also has a temperature sensor on the back, for almost a year now and I've found little need for a temperature sensor. Aside from some testing, and comparing the sensor to a thermal camera add-on, I'm not sure I've ever even used it. Aside from using food, I just don't have any need to regularly check the temperature of people or things.
Maybe food, but I sure as heck am not sticking my phone into a partially cooked meal to see how much more time it needs.
While the Pixel 10 Pro is only the third time the temperature sensor has been included on a Google phone, I can't help but think it's overstayed its welcome.
Maybe I'm just the wrong target audience for it, but I feel like anyone who desperately needs to measure temperatures would probably just buy a dedicated thermometer — especially if it was for use with humans.
The way I see it, the temperature sensor feels like a waste of money and resources — and Google would be better off utilizing the effort elsewhere. Whether that's for adding new AI features, improving staples like camera quality and battery life, or with some new piece of hardware that has better potential for success.
Considering we've seen multiple Pixel price hikes in the past few years, it's strange that Google hasn't tried to trim the fat and cut costs. The lower price tag was one of the key selling points of buying a Google phone, even if Pixels weren't nearly as affordable as the old Nexus lineup.
There are plenty of other benefits, like the exclusive features and first access to Android updates, but we can't ignore the fact that the ever-increasing cost of Pixel phones makes them a lot less appealing.
If Google can save a little bit of money, by scrapping a feature that it really doesn't need to keep pursuing, and pass that saving onto the customers, it would be of benefit to everyone. But that hasn't happened, and I suspect it won't happen until we get another significant redesign to the flagship Pixel hardware.
Considering the Pixel 9 series was a major deviation from the previous 3 generations, I can't see that happening anytime soon.
There is a reason why Google has kept the temperature sensor around on Pixel phones, even if it doesn't seem like a particularly logical choice. We just don't know what that reason is, and so far Google hasn't been quick to volunteer an answer.
Still, I can't help but feel like the temperature sensor is the kind of feature that should have been scrapped already. Like the Pixel 4's Motion Sense gesture recognition feature, it should have been a one and done piece of hardware. Because it's just not the kind of thing anyone needs to have on their phone, especially now that we're not trying to dodge exposure to a deadly virus on a daily basis.
But hey, I guess I'll just have to continue not using the temperature sensor and hope that Google realizes the Pixel 11 could probably go without. At the very least I'm happy to hear rumors that the Pixel 10 could finally offer Qi2 magnetic charging, under the name "PixelSnap."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Gainfront replaces guesswork with data-driven supplier discovery for risk-averse corporations
Global procurement executives must lie awake at night contemplating this troubling business scenario: Their companies spend billions on sophisticated enterprise systems that track every dollar once it's committed yet rely on what amounts to educated guesswork when selecting the suppliers who receive those dollars. The most critical decision in the procurement life cycle — which vendors to trust with components, materials and services essential to operations — remains startlingly primitive at most Fortune 1000 companies. However, this scenario is starting to be a tale of the past with the rise of the AI/ML supplier life cycle management platform Gainfront. Here's how Gainfront's proprietary EfficiencyAI tool changes the game in supplier selection and identification. This scenario plays out daily across corporate America: Procurement teams tasked with finding and vetting new suppliers rely on a mix of Google searches, LinkedIn browsing, industry directories and word-of-mouth recommendations. It's a surprisingly analog approach in a world where artificial intelligence has transformed nearly every other aspect of business operations. The cost of getting it wrong can be daunting. A supplier that fails to deliver, violates compliance requirements or faces financial instability can trigger a cascade of disruptions that ripple through global supply chains. In the most severe cases, these disruptions can halt production lines, compromise product quality, damage brand reputation and even lead to regulatory penalties. 'There's literally nothing more important in a CEO's mind right now than managing their supplier life cycles and supply chain and making sure that they are positioned well, to kind of compete in a market that is fluctuating very, very rapidly,' explains Srikant Sharma from Gainfront. The traditional approach to supplier discovery isn't just inefficient — it's fundamentally broken. Legacy systems, which dominate the procurement software market, were designed for a different era. They excel at transactional processes but offer limited capabilities for the complex task of identifying and evaluating new suppliers. 'They are built on an existing solution structure that is platform-based,' Sharma argues. 'That structure is very inflexible and requires massive amounts of services, professional services and contractor work to configure it.' What makes Gainfront's approach a game changer is the recognition that supplier discovery isn't just a search problem, it's an intelligence problem. The company's proprietary EfficiencyAI suite leverages domain-trained large language models to transform how corporations identify potential suppliers. Rather than simply matching keywords, its sophisticated AI systems analyze supplier information the way an experienced procurement professional would. They evaluate websites, marketing materials and other documents across multiple languages, extracting meaningful insights from unstructured data that would take human analysts weeks to process. Gainfront can identify 'hidden gem' suppliers who might be overlooked due to language barriers or formatting limitations. Through its AI-powered supplier discovery database, businesses have access to new, qualified suppliers across 16,000-plus categories. This capability is particularly valuable for global corporations changing their business model or expanding into new markets. Gainfront's use of AI addresses a fundamental challenge in supplier discovery: the information asymmetry between buyers and potential vendors. In Gainfront, suppliers present themselves in the best possible light, with profile visibility by 95%, highlighting strengths while obscuring weaknesses. Without this ability to verify claims and identify risks, procurement teams are left making decisions based on incomplete or misleading information. Sharma explains, 'The system doesn't just find suppliers — it evaluates them, flagging potential risks related to financial stability, compliance history and operational capabilities. This innovative technology and data-driven insights ensure you can trust your choices.' For business operations that heavily rely on dependable supply chain management, Gainfront's approach can compress what traditionally takes months into minutes. Instead of assigning junior staff to compile lists of potential suppliers through manual searches, the AI-powered platform can scan millions of supplier profiles, evaluating them against specific criteria and generating concise reports for decision-makers. The company maintains a massive database of global suppliers — both diverse and nondiverse, traditional and green — that procurement teams can tap into immediately. This database isn't static; it's continuously updated and enhanced with new information, ensuring that recommendations reflect current market realities. 'It's really important to build something that's modular, that is an end-to-end solution in something that is super critical, which is managing the supply chain and managing supplier life cycles across the operations,' Sharma explains. The modular nature of Gainfront's platform allows companies to implement just the supplier discovery component if that's their most pressing need or deploy it as part of a comprehensive supplier lifecycle management solution. This flexibility has proven attractive to Fortune 1000 companies looking to modernize their procurement operations without disrupting existing systems. Data-driven supplier discovery may be just a small portion of the whole business operation, but its impact extends beyond efficiency gains. By applying AI to the evaluation process, companies can identify suppliers that not only meet basic requirements but also align with broader strategic objectives. For organizations with diversity spending targets, the platform can highlight qualified minority-owned or women-owned businesses. For those focusing on sustainability, it can identify suppliers with strong environmental credentials. And for companies concerned about geopolitical risks, it can flag potential vulnerabilities in global supply networks. For instance, one manufacturing company discovered that 43% of their tier-two suppliers — the suppliers to their direct suppliers — were concentrated in a single region with escalating political tensions. This hidden risk exposure might have gone undetected without AI-powered analysis of supplier networks. Hetal Mehta, CEO of Gainfront, shares, 'In today's complex global market, business leaders can no longer afford the luxury of uncertainty. The stakes are simply too high to make critical supplier decisions based on incomplete information or intuition alone. At Gainfront, we're committed to transforming procurement from a guesswork into a science of data-driven certainty, providing our partners with the intelligence they need to navigate increasingly unpredictable business scenarios.'


Android Authority
5 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Gemini on Android is getting ready to listen to your audio files (APK teardown)
Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR In the latest beta of the Gemini Android app, we spotted an option to attach audio files, such as MP3s, to chats. A 'Talk live about this' prompt also appears, but the audio isn't accurately processed yet. While the feature might not be fully operational, we know that Gemini can comprehend audio. Ever wished you could just throw an MP3 at Gemini and have it explain what it's about? That might be coming soon, as we've spotted early signs of audio file support in the Gemini app for Android. ⚠️ An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. In version of the Google app beta, we managed to activate a new file attachment feature when chatting with Gemini. You can now attach audio files like MP3s, and when you do, Gemini shows a new suggestion: 'Talk live about this.' That sounds promising, but it doesn't actually work yet. After uploading an audio file, you can either type a regular question or choose to 'talk live' about it. In both cases, Gemini doesn't seem to understand or respond to the file in any meaningful way. Sometimes it ignores the audio entirely. Other times, it confidently makes things up, as seen in the third screenshot below, but chatbot hallucinations aren't exclusive to audio files or Gemini. Still, it's not hard to see where this is going. On the developer side, Gemini already supports audio input through the API. You can feed it audio and ask it to describe what it hears, summarize it, or transcribe what's being said. It even handles timestamp requests like 'from 2:30 to 3:29,' and works with formats like MP3, WAV, and FLAC. That's likely what Google is building toward on the Android app — we're just not there yet. For now, it's more like a placeholder than a finished feature, and there's also no guarantee when or if it will launch. However, with image uploads now widely available in the Gemini app, audio support seems like a logical next step. Follow
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google says its AI-based bug hunter found 20 security vulnerabilities
Google's AI-powered bug hunter has just reported its first batch of security vulnerabilities. Heather Adkins, Google's vice president of security, announced Monday that its LLM-based vulnerability researcher Big Sleep found and reported 20 flaws in various popular open source software. Adkins said that Big Sleep, which is developed by the company's AI department DeepMind as well as its elite team of hackers Project Zero, reported its first-ever vulnerabilities, mostly in open source software such as audio and video library FFmpeg and image-editing suite ImageMagick. Given that the vulnerabilities are not fixed yet, we don't have details of their impact or severity, as Google does not yet want to provide details, which is a standard policy when waiting for bugs to be fixed. But the simple fact that Big Sleep found these vulnerabilities is significant, as it shows these tools are starting to get real results, even if there was a human involved in this case. 'To ensure high quality and actionable reports, we have a human expert in the loop before reporting, but each vulnerability was found and reproduced by the AI agent without human intervention,' Google's spokesperson Kimberly Samra told TechCrunch. Royal Hansen, Google's vice president of engineering, wrote on X that the findings demonstrate 'a new frontier in automated vulnerability discovery.' LLM-powered tools that can look for and find vulnerabilities are already a reality. Other than Big Sleep, there's RunSybil and XBOW, among others. XBOW has garnered headlines after it reached the top of one of the U.S. leaderboards at bug bounty platform HackerOne. It's important to note that in most cases, these reports have a human at some point of the process to verify that the AI-powered bug hunter found a legitimate vulnerability, as is the case with Big Sleep. Vlad Ionescu, co-founder and chief technology officer at RunSybil, a startup that develops AI-powered bug hunters, told TechCrunch that Big Sleep is a 'legit' project, given that it has 'good design, people behind it know what they're doing, Project Zero has the bug finding experience and DeepMind has the firepower and tokens to throw at it.' There is obviously a lot of promise with these tools, but also significant downsides. Several people who maintain different software projects have complained of bug reports that are actually hallucinations, with some calling them the bug bounty equivalent of AI slop. 'That's the problem people are running into, is we're getting a lot of stuff that looks like gold, but it's actually just crap,' Ionescu previously told TechCrunch. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data