Doctors warn of ‘threat to patient safety' over elderly people stuck in A&E
A report from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), shared with the PA news agency, shows that rising numbers of elderly and frail people are stuck in A&E, often on trolleys in corridors.
Figures obtained by RCEM via the Freedom of Information Act show that 1.15 million people aged 60 and over waited more than 12 hours to be transferred, admitted or discharged in England's major A&E departments last year.
This is a jump from the 991,068 in 2023 and about three times the figure for 2019, when 305,619 were affected.
The research also found that the likelihood of experiencing a 12-hour wait in an emergency department increases with the age of the patient.
People aged 60-69 have a 15% chance of waiting 12 hours or more, whereas for those aged 90 and above, the likelihood rises to 33%.
The RCEM has been looking in detail at the care older people receive and also found that many are missing out on vital checks in A&E.
Its Quality Improvement Programme (QIP) study received data from 149 emergency departments involving 24,865 patients.
Among patients over 75, the research found insufficient screening for three common conditions which frequently affect older people.
Although there have been some improvements, the report found:
– Only 16% of patients were screened for delirium – a reversible condition which is linked to increase risk of death and is noted by a sudden change in mental function.
– On average, fewer than half (48%) of patients were screened for their risk of falls.
– Just over half (56%) were screening for general frailty – which if picked up early can lead to prompt extra support in hospital and at home.
The report recommended changes, including 'front door frailty screening' in every A&E. This is already being introduced across Scotland.
Dr Adrian Boyle, president of the RCEM, said, 'The healthcare system is failing our most vulnerable patients – more than a million last year.
'These people are our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents.
'They aren't receiving the level of care they need, as they endure the longest stays in our emergency departments, often suffering degrading and dehumanising corridor care.
'It's an alarming threat to patient safety. We know long stays are dangerous, especially for those who are elderly, and puts people's lives at risk.
'As our QIP highlights, more needs to be done to improve their care – vital tests need to get under way as soon as they arrive to inform the care they need and mitigate the risk of another visit to the emergency department.
'There are good pockets of practice, and emergency medicine clinicians are trying their best to deliver the care they need.
'It's the system that's the issue and will continue to disproportionally affect older people unless governments across the UK make A&E a political priority.'
Dr Anu Mitra, project lead of RCEM's care of older people QIP, said: 'Older people make up a large proportion of attendances to the emergency department, bringing greater health complexities and evolving care needs.
'In the backdrop of worsening crowding and increasing long stays, emergency clinicians need to ensure they maintain the basic elements of care and comfort for older patients.
'It's been encouraging to see that, despite the challenging environments emergency medicine clinicians are working in, there has already been improvements in ensuring these patients are receiving the assessments they need.
'It's vital we continue this work for this vulnerable patient cohort to meet their needs and provide the level of care they deserve.'
Dr Nick Murch, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: 'This situation, where over a million older patients are known to have endured prolonged periods of over 12 hours in emergency departments, frequently in unsuitable and undignified settings such as corridors, is a matter of grave concern.
'It is clear that, despite the considerable dedication and hard work of multidisciplinary teams including emergency medicine, acute medicine and acute frailty services, these extended waiting times signify a profound failure within our healthcare system.
'We must ensure that 12-hour waits in emergency departments again become an infrequent exception rather than the norm.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'It is unacceptable that older people are waiting up to 12 hours or more in A&E.
'This Government is investing £26 billion in the NHS and social care over the next two years, has ended the resident doctor strikes so staff are on the front line, and is committed to cutting A&E waiting times so patients are seen faster.
'Through our 10-year health plan, we will ensure that patients, including older people, are seen promptly in A&E, waiting times continue to come down, and more people get a GP appointment.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
9 hours ago
- Wales Online
Speed of improvement in cancer survival rates ‘slowing', say experts
Speed of improvement in cancer survival rates 'slowing', say experts The news comes as a study suggests survival between the most and least deadly types of the disease is wider than ever before. (Image: PA) Progress in cancer survival rates in the UK has "slowed down", experts have warned. The news comes as a study suggests survival between the most and least deadly types of the disease is wider than ever before. A national cancer plan was "essential" to "bring cancer survival trends back towards the best in the world", researchers said. The study, led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and funded by Cancer Research UK, analysed long-term trends in the cancer survival index (CSI) for adults across England and Wales from 1971 to 2018. Using records from the National Disease Registration Service for England and the Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, experts estimated net survival for up to 10 years after diagnosis for around 10.8 million people. They found that in 2018, the CSI for all cancers combined a decade after diagnosis was 49.8%, higher than the CSI at one year for those diagnosed in 1971/72. Researchers hailed the figure as "remarkable", but warned that the "speed of improvement in survival has slowed down". In the five years from 2000/01 to 2005/06, the 10-year CSI rose by 4%, from 41.2% to 45.2%. But between 2010/11 and 2015/16, the rise was 1.4%, from 47.9% to 49.3%. There were also major gaps in survival when it came to different cancer types. For example, 10-year survival for testicular cancer was 97%, compared with 4.3% for pancreatic cancer. Screening programmes had bolstered survival rates for cancers in the breast, bowel and cervix, according to Cancer Research UK. But survival for other types, such as stomach, lung and brain cancer, had increased by only a small amount in the past 50 years. Writing in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe, researchers warned this slowdown for individual cancers implied a "system-wide challenge". Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: "Thanks to research, most patients today are far more likely to survive their cancer than at any point in the past. "But the reality is that this progress is slowing – and for some cancers, it never got going in the first place." The Government launched a call for evidence to help shape a national cancer plan in February. The blueprint aims to outline actions to transform how the disease is treated in a bid to reduce deaths. Ms Mitchell said: "The upcoming National Cancer Plan for England must include commitments to spot more cancers earlier, as well as backing research into new treatments so that each patient, regardless of their diagnosis, can hope for more moments with the people they love." Michel Coleman, a professor of epidemiology and statistics at LSHTM, said: "Since I began my career in cancer research, I've seen substantial increases in survival for most types of cancer. "Our understanding of cancer biology has expanded, effective screening programmes have been introduced, and new treatments have been developed. Allowing this trend to stall will have devastating consequences. "This study was only possible because of data on millions of patients from cancer registries in England and Wales. "It's vital that the Government provides the political and financial support to ensure we maintain this crucial data. Without these, the Government will be flying blind on cancer control. "The National Cancer Plan is a chance to improve NHS cancer pathways and reap the benefits of new research – the Government must take it." Cancer Research UK is calling for the national cancer plan to slash waiting times for diagnosis and treatment, saying some patients face unacceptable delays. The plan should also improve early diagnosis of cancer, with plans to boost participation in existing screening programmes and a commitment to rolling out lung cancer screening fully in England by 2029. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "We are prioritising cancer care as we turn around more than a decade of neglect of our NHS. Article continues below "We're already seeing progress, with 95,000 more people having cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days between July 2024 and May 2025, compared to the same period the previous year. "The National Cancer Plan will set out how we will improve survival rates further and address the variation between different cancer types."


Wales Online
10 hours ago
- Wales Online
Over-50s provided more donated organs than ever before last year
Over-50s provided more donated organs than ever before last year However, only one in four people on the organ donation register are 50 or over, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said. (Image: PA) The highest-ever proportion of organ donors in the UK last year were over the age of 50, according to officials. However, only one in four people on the organ donation register are 50 or over, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said. NHSBT analysis found there were 932 donors aged above 50 last year, making up 63% of all people who donated organs after death – the highest-ever proportion. It is now calling for more people in the age group to sign the NHS Organ Donor Register. Anthony Clarkson, director for organ and tissue donation and transplantation at NHSBT, said: "We know from research many people aged over 50 mistakenly think they're too old to donate or that their health might stop them donating. "However, more and more research shows that organs from older donors are lifesaving. "The reality is the over-50s are more important to organ donation than ever. There is no age limit to organ and tissue donation, and people die every day waiting for a transplant." According to NHSBT, the rise could be down to the ageing population, public awareness of organ donation, new techniques and more research which shows that organs from older donors can be successfully used. Nick Beresford, from London, became an organ donor at 57. He was working as the resident representative of the United Nations Development Programme in Georgia in July 2023 when he had a brain haemorrhage. His kidneys and liver were donated and transplanted into three recipients: a man in his fifties, a woman in her sixties, and another woman in her fifties. Mr Beresford's wife Angela, 51, a pilates instructor, said: "Nick spent his whole life helping people living in extreme poverty, people with disabilities and the marginalised. He was a truly good and generous man. He was a fantastic dad and the love of my life. "Being a donor gives others that chance, that's probably the most beautiful thing a person can do. "I would definitely encourage other people over 50 to join the NHS Organ Donor Register – you could still save lives if something happens." Margaret Humphries, from Richmond in London, also donated both kidneys after a brain haemorrhage aged 65. Article continues below Husband John, a retired manager, said: "My darling wife was a very giving person. Margaret's two children from her first marriage and I all agreed that donation was the right decision. "Margaret was an absolute angel. It was very fitting that her last action would be to save somebody else." Mr Clarkson added: "Your organs don't need to be the same as when you in your 20s – if someone will die without a transplant, a healthy organ from someone over 50 will be a lifesaver."


Glasgow Times
21 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Parents who advised daughter against chemotherapy warned over inquest behaviour
Paloma Shemirani, 23, collapsed on July 19 last year and was taken to Royal Sussex County Hospital where she died five days later. She had earlier declined treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani, a prominent online conspiracy theorist and her father, Dr Faramarz Shemirani, who is 'sympathetic' to his ex-wife's views, believe medical professionals are to blame for their daughter's death. Coroner Catherine Wood, presiding over the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone, left the court due to the behaviour of Miss Shemirani's parents on Tuesday afternoon. Paloma Shemirani with her A-level results at Roedean School in 2019 (Gareth Fuller/PA) The inquest, which was originally scheduled to conclude on Wednesday, had been extended as the evidence and questioning of witnesses had taken longer than anticipated. On Tuesday, Mrs Shemirani, who was struck off as a nurse in 2021 after spreading harmful misinformation about Covid-19, was cross-examined by Dr Shemirani. Questioning broke down when Dr Shemirani, who is understood to have a PhD in computational fluid dynamics, tried to ask his ex-wife's opinion of medical evidence which she would then try to answer, despite warnings from the coroner. 'Mrs Shemirani, I've told you not to speak, I'll find you in contempt if you keep on speaking now,' the coroner said. 'Confine (yourself) to asking questions of this witness as a witness of fact,' she told Dr Shemirani. As Dr Shemirani argued back through his video-link, the coroner said: 'Dr Shemirani, challenge me by judicial review later' before trying to move on. 'Of course I will, of course I will,' he replied. Later, Dr Shemirani once again tried to ask questions which had already been ruled irrelevant by the coroner. 'I'm going to rise for a few minutes because I'm finding it incredibly difficult to keep you on track,' said Ms Wood. Dr Shemirani continued to speak until the coroner shouted 'Dr Shemirani, listen'. 'Your behaviour has been bordering on contemptuous to the court – when I make a ruling on something you cannot come back,' she added. Mrs Shemirani also accused osteopath Nick Gosset of lying under oath earlier in the inquest. Mr Gosset treated Miss Shemirani the day she collapsed and said she had appeared to be in the 'last stages of a very difficult disease'. He told the court that when he inspected her, he could feel lumps in her right shoulder going all the way up into her neck, which he identified as lymphoid mass and that he 'had never seen anything like it' in 43 years of practice. Mr Gosset told the court: 'It was obvious to me that I was not the right person to be helping her, normally you see a patient like that, you would refer her (to a GP). 'Any referral was refused – when I suggested that the proper avenue of approach was through a normal, medical channel she dismissed it. On Tuesday, Paloma's mother said 'his statement under oath is completely opposed with the truth' and has argued her daughter was healthy the day she collapsed. The inquest continues on Wednesday.