Doctors warn of ‘threat to patient safety' over elderly people stuck in A&E
Senior doctors have warned of an 'alarming threat to patient safety' after figures showed more than a million elderly people endure long waits in A&E – and the older they are, the more likely they are to experience it.
A report from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), shared with the PA news agency, shows that rising numbers of elderly and frail people are stuck in A&E, often on trolleys in corridors.
Figures obtained by RCEM via the Freedom of Information Act show that 1.15 million people aged 60 and over waited more than 12 hours to be transferred, admitted or discharged in England's major A&E departments last year.
This is a jump from the 991,068 in 2023 and about three times the figure for 2019, when 305,619 were affected.
The research also found that the likelihood of experiencing a 12-hour wait in an emergency department increases with the age of the patient.
People aged 60-69 have a 15% chance of waiting 12 hours or more, whereas for those aged 90 and above, the likelihood rises to 33%.
The RCEM has been looking in detail at the care older people receive and also found that many are missing out on vital checks in A&E.
Its Quality Improvement Programme (QIP) study received data from 149 emergency departments involving 24,865 patients.
Among patients over 75, the research found insufficient screening for three common conditions which frequently affect older people.
Although there have been some improvements, the report found:
– Only 16% of patients were screened for delirium – a reversible condition which is linked to increase risk of death and is noted by a sudden change in mental function.
– On average, fewer than half (48%) of patients were screened for their risk of falls.
– Just over half (56%) were screening for general frailty – which if picked up early can lead to prompt extra support in hospital and at home.
The report recommended changes, including 'front door frailty screening' in every A&E. This is already being introduced across Scotland.
Dr Adrian Boyle, president of the RCEM, said, 'The healthcare system is failing our most vulnerable patients – more than a million last year.
'These people are our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents.
'They aren't receiving the level of care they need, as they endure the longest stays in our emergency departments, often suffering degrading and dehumanising corridor care.
'It's an alarming threat to patient safety. We know long stays are dangerous, especially for those who are elderly, and puts people's lives at risk.
'As our QIP highlights, more needs to be done to improve their care – vital tests need to get under way as soon as they arrive to inform the care they need and mitigate the risk of another visit to the emergency department.
'There are good pockets of practice, and emergency medicine clinicians are trying their best to deliver the care they need.
'It's the system that's the issue and will continue to disproportionally affect older people unless governments across the UK make A&E a political priority.'
Dr Anu Mitra, project lead of RCEM's care of older people QIP, said: 'Older people make up a large proportion of attendances to the emergency department, bringing greater health complexities and evolving care needs.
'In the backdrop of worsening crowding and increasing long stays, emergency clinicians need to ensure they maintain the basic elements of care and comfort for older patients.
'It's been encouraging to see that, despite the challenging environments emergency medicine clinicians are working in, there has already been improvements in ensuring these patients are receiving the assessments they need.
'It's vital we continue this work for this vulnerable patient cohort to meet their needs and provide the level of care they deserve.'
Dr Nick Murch, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: 'This situation, where over a million older patients are known to have endured prolonged periods of over 12 hours in emergency departments, frequently in unsuitable and undignified settings such as corridors, is a matter of grave concern.
'It is clear that, despite the considerable dedication and hard work of multidisciplinary teams including emergency medicine, acute medicine and acute frailty services, these extended waiting times signify a profound failure within our healthcare system.
'We must ensure that 12-hour waits in emergency departments again become an infrequent exception rather than the norm.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'It is unacceptable that older people are waiting up to 12 hours or more in A&E.
'This Government is investing £26 billion in the NHS and social care over the next two years, has ended the resident doctor strikes so staff are on the front line, and is committed to cutting A&E waiting times so patients are seen faster.
'Through our 10-year health plan, we will ensure that patients, including older people, are seen promptly in A&E, waiting times continue to come down, and more people get a GP appointment.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
D-Day landings boosted by import of ‘wonder drug' to Britain, archives reveal
Production of the antibiotic penicillin had struggled to take hold at a large scale in Britain, despite being discovered in 1928 in London by Sir Alexander Fleming. Attempts to produce substantial quantities of medicine from the bacteria-killing mould had not been achieved by the start of the Second World War. Then prime minister Sir Winston Churchill became increasingly frustrated that Britain had not been able to produce enough penicillin in the preparations for the Normandy landings in 1944. Official papers released by the National Archive – containing handwritten notes by Sir Winston – highlight efforts to boost quantities of the antibiotic, with Britain eventually forced to import it from America. The documents were released ahead of the 81st anniversary of D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. Official papers highlight the efforts to boost quantities of penicillin (The National Archives/PA) In one report on February 19, after the issue had been raised in the House of Commons, Sir Winston scrawled in red ink on a Ministry of Supply report noting the Americans were producing greater quantities: 'I am sorry we can't produce more.' On another paper, he complained: 'Your report on penicillin showing that we are only to get about one tenth of the expected output this year, is very disappointing.' Elsewhere in the same file he instructs: 'Let me have proposals for a more abundant supply from Great Britain.' With preparations for D-Day ramped up, efforts to deliver enough American-made penicillin for frontline military personnel soon became a matter of urgency. Decisions needed to be made on the quantities of antibiotic imported, how much to administer to individual patients, and how to get medical staff trained in time. Most British doctors did not know how to issue penicillin – until this point, doctors had nothing available to treat infections like pneumonia and many people died of blood poisoning after minor injuries because no drug existed that could cure them. Royal Navy D-Day veteran John Dennett, 101, at the British Normandy Memorial in Ver-sur-Mer to mark the 81st anniversary of the landings (Gareth Fuller/PA) Early in January 1944, Prof FR Fraser, the Ministry of Health's adviser on the organisation of wartime hospitals, wrote that 50,000-100,000 wounded could be expected from the Second Front. He proposed the Emergency Medical Services might need as many as five billion units of penicillin per month for this. Further documents show discussions on whether the antibiotic should be supplied as calcium or sodium salts, or in tablet form. Ultimately, it was agreed powdered calcium salts would be issued for superficial wounds and sodium salts for use in deep wounds. On May 24 1944, less than a fortnight before D-Day, Prof Fraser reported: 'Sufficient supplies of penicillin are now available for the treatment of battle casualties in EMS hospitals, but not for ordinary civilian patients.' Plans were made for casualties from the frontline in France to be brought back to coastal hospitals in Britain for treatment. A week before D-Day, on May 30 1944, hospitals were instructed to treat battlefield patients en route: 'In an endeavour to prevent the development of gas gangrene and sepsis in wounds the War Office have arranged for the treatment of selected cases by penicillin to be commenced as soon after injury as possible.' Military reenactors watch the sunrise over Gold Beach in Arromanches-les-Bains, Normandy, on the 81st anniversary of the D-Day landings (Gareth Fuller/PA) Injections of penicillin were to be given to them at intervals of not more than five hours and patients would be wearing a yellow label with the letters 'PEN'. The time and size of penicillin doses should be written on it, they were told. Dr Jessamy Carlson, modern records specialist at the National Archives, said: 'File MH 76/184 gives a glimpse into the extraordinary levels of preparation undertaken in advance of the D-Day landings. 'Only six weeks before, penicillin is just reaching our shores in quantities which will allow it to play a major role in improving the outcomes for service personnel wounded in action.' As Allied forces made inroads into Europe, restrictions on the use of penicillin for civilians began to relax, but only in special cases. In July 1944, Ronald Christie, professor of medicine, wrote to Prof Fraser to tell him: 'The War Office approves of American penicillin being used for medical conditions in service patients and for air raid casualties among civilians.' On the home front, demand for the new 'wonder' drug began to increase, according the National Archives. It was decided that penicillin for civilians should only be supplied to larger hospitals where the staff had been properly trained to administer it. Only in 1946 did it become fully available for the general public.


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
D-Day landings boosted by import of ‘wonder drug' to Britain, archives reveal
Attempts to produce substantial quantities of medicine from the bacteria-killing mould had not been achieved by the start of the Second World War. Then prime minister Sir Winston Churchill became increasingly frustrated that Britain had not been able to produce enough penicillin in the preparations for the Normandy landings in 1944. Official papers released by the National Archive – containing handwritten notes by Sir Winston – highlight efforts to boost quantities of the antibiotic, with Britain eventually forced to import it from America. The documents were released ahead of the 81st anniversary of D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. Official papers highlight the efforts to boost quantities of penicillin (The National Archives/PA) In one report on February 19, after the issue had been raised in the House of Commons, Sir Winston scrawled in red ink on a Ministry of Supply report noting the Americans were producing greater quantities: 'I am sorry we can't produce more.' On another paper, he complained: 'Your report on penicillin showing that we are only to get about one tenth of the expected output this year, is very disappointing.' Elsewhere in the same file he instructs: 'Let me have proposals for a more abundant supply from Great Britain.' With preparations for D-Day ramped up, efforts to deliver enough American-made penicillin for frontline military personnel soon became a matter of urgency. Decisions needed to be made on the quantities of antibiotic imported, how much to administer to individual patients, and how to get medical staff trained in time. Most British doctors did not know how to issue penicillin – until this point, doctors had nothing available to treat infections like pneumonia and many people died of blood poisoning after minor injuries because no drug existed that could cure them. Royal Navy D-Day veteran John Dennett, 101, at the British Normandy Memorial in Ver-sur-Mer to mark the 81st anniversary of the landings (Gareth Fuller/PA) Early in January 1944, Prof FR Fraser, the Ministry of Health's adviser on the organisation of wartime hospitals, wrote that 50,000-100,000 wounded could be expected from the Second Front. He proposed the Emergency Medical Services might need as many as five billion units of penicillin per month for this. Further documents show discussions on whether the antibiotic should be supplied as calcium or sodium salts, or in tablet form. Ultimately, it was agreed powdered calcium salts would be issued for superficial wounds and sodium salts for use in deep wounds. On May 24 1944, less than a fortnight before D-Day, Prof Fraser reported: 'Sufficient supplies of penicillin are now available for the treatment of battle casualties in EMS hospitals, but not for ordinary civilian patients.' Plans were made for casualties from the frontline in France to be brought back to coastal hospitals in Britain for treatment. A week before D-Day, on May 30 1944, hospitals were instructed to treat battlefield patients en route: 'In an endeavour to prevent the development of gas gangrene and sepsis in wounds the War Office have arranged for the treatment of selected cases by penicillin to be commenced as soon after injury as possible.' Military reenactors watch the sunrise over Gold Beach in Arromanches-les-Bains, Normandy, on the 81st anniversary of the D-Day landings (Gareth Fuller/PA) Injections of penicillin were to be given to them at intervals of not more than five hours and patients would be wearing a yellow label with the letters 'PEN'. The time and size of penicillin doses should be written on it, they were told. Dr Jessamy Carlson, modern records specialist at the National Archives, said: 'File MH 76/184 gives a glimpse into the extraordinary levels of preparation undertaken in advance of the D-Day landings. 'Only six weeks before, penicillin is just reaching our shores in quantities which will allow it to play a major role in improving the outcomes for service personnel wounded in action.' As Allied forces made inroads into Europe, restrictions on the use of penicillin for civilians began to relax, but only in special cases. In July 1944, Ronald Christie, professor of medicine, wrote to Prof Fraser to tell him: 'The War Office approves of American penicillin being used for medical conditions in service patients and for air raid casualties among civilians.' On the home front, demand for the new 'wonder' drug began to increase, according the National Archives. It was decided that penicillin for civilians should only be supplied to larger hospitals where the staff had been properly trained to administer it. Only in 1946 did it become fully available for the general public.


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Expert warns these five things can make contraception less effective
Reports of pregnancies in women using weight-loss injections, including those using contraception, have prompted concern from the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA has received over 40 reports of pregnancies among women using weight-loss medications. Data shared with the PA news agency also reveals 26 pregnancy-related reports specifically for the Mounjaro jab. This has led to online discussions about so-called "Ozempic babies". The MHRA advises that Mounjaro may reduce the effectiveness of oral contraceptives in overweight individuals. Patients taking Mounjaro are recommended to use condoms, especially in the first four weeks of starting the medication and after any dose increase. The agency also stresses 'skinny jabs' such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Saxenda, Victoza, and Mounjaro should not be used during pregnancy, when trying to conceive, or while breastfeeding. In some cases, women are also advised to continue using contraception for up to two months between stopping the medicine and trying to get pregnant. This guidance around pregnancy is included in patient information leaflets given to people who are accessing the skinny jabs from regulated sellers like pharmacies. In light of this news, we got in touch with Dr Alisha Esmail, women's health GP at London Gynaecology, to find out what other factors may influence hormonal contraception's effectiveness… 1. Illness Vomiting within a few hours of taking a contraception pill can reduce its effectiveness, says Esmail. 'If you're sick – especially with vomiting or diarrhoea – soon after taking your pill, your body might not absorb it properly, which can lower the hormone levels needed for it to work properly,' she explains. 'Remember, this applies to the morning-after pill too, which is especially time-sensitive. 'If you've been unwell, it's a good idea to use back-up contraception and check in with a clinician – they can help work out if you need to take another dose or consider a different option.' 2. Weight Weight can also play a role in how well some hormonal contraceptives work. 'For instance, the patch and emergency contraception might be a little less effective if you have a higher Body Mass Index (BMI),' says Esmail. 'This is because your body may absorb and process the hormones differently, although for most people the difference is quite small. 'Because of this, doctors often recommend exploring other methods to ensure you get the most reliable protection. Safety is key – some combined hormonal options (those with both oestrogen and progesterone) may carry a slightly higher risk of side effects for people with higher BMI, so it's always a good idea to discuss your personal health and preferences with your clinician.' 3. Medication Some medications can lessen the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives, so it's important to talk to a clinician if you're unsure how your medication might affect them. 'Some medications like certain antibiotics (e.g. Rifampicin), anti-seizure drugs, HIV medications, and even herbal supplements like St. John's Wort can reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives,' highlights Esmail. 'They may speed up how quickly hormones are digested in the liver, lowering your blood hormone levels and reducing its reliability. 'So, it's definitely worth letting your clinician know about any medications you're taking – whether they're prescribed or not.' 4. Inaccurate use Incorrect use is one of the main reasons why contraception can fail. 'Some of the most common slip-ups I hear about include forgetting pills, not taking them at the same time each day, starting a new pack late, or incorrect use of patches, rings, or injections,' says Esmail. 'With methods like the pill, consistency is key – even small drops in hormone levels can allow ovulation, increasing your risk of an unexpected pregnancy. 'If sticking to a routine is proving tricky, it's worth knowing there are plenty of longer-acting options that don't rely on daily habits – you've got choices.' The GP also points out that pill packs include a leaflet with a section on missed pill rules, which can be helpful when you're uncertain about what to do. She also reinforces the importance of timing when it comes to emergency contraception, such as Plan B. 'And when it comes to emergency contraception, timing really matters – the sooner it's taken after unprotected sex, the more effective it is,' says Esmail. 'Delays can reduce its chances of working, so don't wait to seek advice if you think you might need it.' 5. Heat The GP also recommends storing contraception pills at room temperature or cooler because if too hot the hormones within them could be changed/ deactivated. 'Storing your pills in a place that gets too hot – like a car on a sunny day – can affect how well they work,' says Esmail.