Global Firms Target Malawi's $30Bn Mineral Boom
Malawi could generate up to $30 billion (https://apo-opa.co/4bJnYZL) from mineral exports between 2026 and 2040, with annual revenues expected to hit $3 billion by 2034, according to the World Bank. The financial institution projects the sector to account for 12% of the country's GDP by 2027, driven by new projects and the expansion of existing production initiatives. As prospects within Malawi's mining industry continue to grow, the upcoming African Mining Week in Cape Town will serve as a key platform to connect Malawian stakeholders, regulators and global investors, driving investment inflows and fostering strategic collaborations to accelerate sectoral development.
Malawi has recorded several industry growth milestones in 2025, with global partners expediting exploration and production projects in line with the country's Agriculture, Tourism and Mining Strategy, designed to attract new investments for economic growth. Last month, Australian company Lotus Resources secured $38.5 million (https://apo-opa.co/3Fym3et) in funding from South African banks First Capital Bank and Standard Bank for its Kayelekera Uranium Project. This financing injection not only supports operational readiness, but also enhances Malawi's positioning as a competitive uranium producer amid rising global demand. With the funds providing working capital and supporting the firm's equipment procurement, the development marks a huge milestone for the project, ahead of a planned Q3 2025 first production target.
Sovereign Metals, supported by Rio Tinto, is fast-tracking the Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project, home to the world's largest known rutile resource and the second-largest flake graphite reserve. A February 2025 test conducted by the firm confirmed the mine's suitability for refractory applications, while a January 2025 feasibility study projected $16.4 billion in revenue potential. As global markets increasingly seek sustainable sources of high-quality rutile and graphite, Kasiya is well-positioned to become a pivotal supplier, meeting rising industrial and green energy needs. With $665 million allocated for project development, Kasiya is expected to become a major revenue generator for Malawi.
In the rare earths sector, Australia's Lindian Resources is seeking to attract new investment partners for its Kangankunde Rare Earths Project. The company recently awarded a $1.3 million contract to Mota-Engil to develop infrastructure and carry out civil works, advancing project timelines. With rare earth elements playing a crucial role in high-tech industries, clean energy and defense applications, this project strengthens Malawi's position in the global supply chain.
In January 2025, Kula Gold and African Rare Metals established a joint venture (JV) for the Wozi Niobium Project to accelerate project development through expertise and shared capital. The JV has applied for an exploration license, with plans for fieldwork, sampling and a $100,000 drilling program beginning in Q2 2025. Given growing demand for niobium for steel production, the project is poised to generate substantial foreign exchange earnings for Malawi.
Amid these developments, African Mining Week will provide a platform for deal-making and partnerships, connecting Malawi's mining sector with global investors and showcasing the country's growing potential as a hub for critical minerals. With an increasing focus on securing reliable mineral supplies for the energy transition, Malawi's rich deposits of uranium, graphite, niobium and rare earths present a unique opportunity for international stakeholders seeking long-term, stable partnerships.
African Mining Week serves as a premier platform for exploring the full spectrum of mining opportunities across Africa. The event is held alongside the African Energy Week: Invest in African Energies 2025 conference from October 1-3 in Cape Town. Sponsors, exhibitors and delegates can learn more by contacting sales@energycapitalpower.com.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Energy Capital&Power.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
11 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Global economic growth outlook plunges to 2.3%, says World Bank
The World Bank lowered its 2025 global growth forecast to 2.3 per cent, down from 2.7 per cent previously expected. In its latest economic prospects report, the 189-country organisation attributed the downgrade to escalating trade tensions and policy uncertainty, noting that the US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have strained international ties and dampened economic outlooks worldwide. This revision marks the latest in a series of downgrades by international organisations. Meanwhile the International Monetary Fund said that its next global growth forecast in July will take into account both positive and negative trade developments but declined to predict a tariff-driven GDP downgrade similar to that released by the World Bank this week. IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said that since the last release of the Fund's World Economic Outlook in April, there have been some positive developments that could support improved economic activity, including a major tariff reduction between the US and China and an initial trade deal between the US and Britain. 'So taken together such announcements combined with the April 9 pause on the high level of tariffs, these could support activity relative to the forecast that we had in April,' Kozack told a regular IMF news briefing. 'But nonetheless, we do have an outlook for the global economy that remains subject to heightened uncertainty, especially as trade negotiations continue.' The IMF also will take into account US President Donald Trump's added steel and aluminium tariffs, she said. These have now reached 50 per cent for all exporters. The World Bank slashed its 2025 global growth forecast by four-tenths of a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.3 per cent, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies. The development lender cut forecasts for nearly 70 per cent of all economies - including the US, China and Europe, but the prior forecast came before Trump took office and imposed tariffs on nearly all trading partners. The IMF's steep April forecast cut did take into account Trump's initial tariff assault, reducing the 2025 global growth outlook by half a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.8 per cent, with a slower decline in inflation. Kozack said the next IMF World Economic Outlook update will be issued toward the end of July, but did not provide a specific date. Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff pause is currently scheduled to expire on July 8, with many countries seeking to negotiate tariff-reducing deals before then. And Trump has said there could be extensions of that deadline for countries engaged in good faith negotiations with the US Kozack said that more recent activity indicators reflect 'a complex economic landscape' with first quarter front-loading activity to beat tariffs, while there has been some diversion of trade and an unwinding of import activity in the second quarter. There also could be more trade deals or other developments to take into account. 'So all of this creates kind of a complicated picture for us, with some upside risk, some other developments, and we'll take all of these developments together into account as we update our forecast,' Kozack said. The International Monetary Fund said that its next global growth forecast in July will take into account both positive and negative trade developments but declined to predict a tariff-driven GDP downgrade similar to that released by the World Bank this week. IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said that since the last release of the Fund's World Economic Outlook in April, there have been some positive developments that could support improved economic activity, including a major tariff reduction between the US and China and an initial trade deal between the US and Britain. 'So taken together such announcements combined with the April 9 pause on the high level of tariffs, these could support activity relative to the forecast that we had in April,' Kozack told a regular IMF news briefing. 'But nonetheless, we do have an outlook for the global economy that remains subject to heightened uncertainty, especially as trade negotiations continue.' Meanwhile world stock markets fell on Friday, and oil prices surged, as Israel launched military strikes on Iran, sparking inflows into safe havens such as gold and the dollar. An escalation adds uncertainty to financial markets at a time of heightened pressure on the global economy from US President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies. Brent crude oil prices were last up 7.25 per cent at $74.39 per barrel, having jumped as much as 14 per cent during Asian trading hours. They were set for their biggest one-day jump since 2022, when energy costs spiked after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Gold, a safe haven in times of global uncertainty, rose 1.4 per cent to $3,432 per ounce, bringing it close to the record high of $3,500.05 from April. The rush to safety was matched by a dash out of risk assets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.65 per cent, the S&P 500 dropped 0.86 per cent, and the Nasdaq Composite lost 0.9 per cent. Reuters
Crypto Insight
16 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
BlackRock quietly accumulated 3% of all Bitcoin. Here's what that means
BlackRock's entry into the Bitcoin market through the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has marked a new era in institutional Bitcoin accumulation. Since its launch on Jan. 11, 2024, IBIT has grown at a pace that few expected, and no other ETF has matched. As of June 10, 2025, BlackRock holds over 662,500 BTC, accounting for more than 3% of Bitcoin's total supply. At today's prices, that's $72.4 billion in Bitcoin exposure, a staggering figure by any measure. For comparison, it took SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) over 1,600 trading days to reach $70 billion in assets under management. IBIT did it in just 341 days, making it the fastest-growing ETF in history. In addition to being a milestone for BlackRock itself, this fact also shows us how deeply institutional interest in Bitcoin has matured. BlackRock's Bitcoin holdings now eclipse those of many centralized exchanges and even major corporate holders like Strategy. In terms of raw Bitcoin ownership, only Satoshi Nakamoto's estimated 1.1 million BTC outnumbers IBIT, and that lead is narrowing. If inflows continue at the current pace, IBIT may eventually become the single largest holder of Bitcoin, a major change for Bitcoin supply distribution and ownership concentration. BlackRock Bitcoin accumulation over time Did you know? Coinbase Custody, not BlackRock, holds the private keys for the BTC in IBIT, safely storing client assets offline and backed by commercial insurance. Behind BlackRock's massive allocation is a strategic shift in how it views Bitcoin: as a legitimate component of long-term, diversified portfolios. The BlackRock Bitcoin strategy BlackRock's internal thesis embraces Bitcoin's volatility as a tradeoff for its potential upside. With IBIT, they're betting that broader adoption will stabilize the asset over time, improving price discovery, increasing liquidity and narrowing spreads. In this view, Bitcoin is a long-term play on monetary evolution and digital asset infrastructure. This philosophy (coming from the world's largest asset manager) sends a strong signal to peers. It reframes the conversation around institutional adoption of Bitcoin, shifting it from 'whether' to 'how much' exposure is appropriate. The investment case for institutional Bitcoin accumulation BlackRock highlights several factors that make Bitcoin appealing in 2025: Scarce by design: With a hard cap of 21 million coins and a halving-based issuance model, Bitcoin scarcity mirrors gold, but with a digital backbone. Some estimates suggest a meaningful share of existing coins are lost or inaccessible, making the effective supply even tighter. With a hard cap of 21 million coins and a halving-based issuance model, Bitcoin scarcity mirrors gold, but with a digital backbone. Some estimates suggest a meaningful share of existing coins are lost or inaccessible, making the effective supply even tighter. Alternative to dollar-dominance: With growing sovereign debt and geopolitical fragmentation in mind, Bitcoin's decentralized nature offers a hedge against fiat risk. It's positioned as a neutral reserve asset, resistant to government overreach and monetary manipulation. With growing sovereign debt and geopolitical fragmentation in mind, Bitcoin's decentralized nature offers a hedge against fiat risk. It's positioned as a neutral reserve asset, resistant to government overreach and monetary manipulation. Part of the broader digital transformation: BlackRock views Bitcoin as a macro proxy for the shift from 'offline' to 'online' value systems, from finance to commerce to generational wealth transfer. In their words, this trend is 'supercharged' by demographic tailwinds, especially as younger investors gain influence. Put together, these factors provide distinct risk-return characteristics that traditional asset classes can't replicate. BlackRock's framing (that Bitcoin offers 'additive sources of diversification') makes a compelling case for its integration into mainstream portfolios. BlackRock crypto portfolio integration BlackRock advocates a measured approach, 1% to 2% exposure within a traditional 60/40 stock-bond mix. This may sound small, but in a portfolio of institutional scale, it's enough to generate impact and normalize Bitcoin exposure for conservative allocators. They also benchmark Bitcoin's risk profile against high-volatility equities, like the 'Magnificent Seven' tech stocks, to demonstrate how it can fit within standard portfolio models. Did you know? Unexpected by-products ('dust') from Bitcoin transactions within IBIT have included tiny amounts of other tokens. BlackRock keeps these in a separate wallet or donates them to charity, avoiding tax complications. BlackRock's decision to accumulate over 3% of Bitcoin's total supply through its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is a turning point for how Bitcoin is perceived, traded and regulated. Bitcoin has always been known for its volatility, driven by fixed supply, shifting sentiment and regulatory uncertainty. Historically, the relatively thin liquidity of crypto markets made large trades highly impactful. Now, with IBIT absorbing hundreds of thousands of BTC, the question is whether institutional capital will stabilize or further complicate the market. Supporters of the ETF model argue that institutional Bitcoin investment helps reduce volatility. With regulated players like BlackRock involved, the thinking goes, Bitcoin becomes more liquid, more transparent and more resistant to erratic moves. BlackRock itself has stated that broader participation improves Bitcoin price discovery, deepens market liquidity and can lead to a more stable trading environment over time. On the other hand, critics (including certain academics) warn that large-scale institutional involvement introduces traditional market risks into Bitcoin. These include leveraged trading, flash crashes triggered by algorithms and price manipulation via ETF flows. In this view, Bitcoin's financialization may trade one kind of volatility (retail-driven FOMO) for another (systemic, leverage-based risk). Also, as ETFs grow in influence, Bitcoin may become more correlated with other financial assets, undermining its value as an uncorrelated hedge. Undoubtedly, BlackRock's crypto strategy has turned Bitcoin from a fringe asset into a mainstream investment tool. For years, Bitcoin was dismissed by major financial institutions. BlackRock's deep exposure to BTC signals that the tide has turned. The launch of IBIT (and its rapid ascent to become one of the largest Bitcoin holders globally) has legitimized Bitcoin in a way no white paper or conference ever could. ETFs like IBIT offer a familiar, regulated structure for exposure, especially for institutions wary of the technical complexity or custodial risks of direct crypto ownership. BlackRock's involvement reduces reputational risk for others on the fence. In effect, this has normalized Bitcoin ownership by institutions, accelerating its inclusion in traditional portfolios. Retail investors benefit too. Instead of navigating wallets, seed phrases and gas fees, they can gain exposure to Bitcoin with a click through traditional brokerages. Did you know? Abu Dhabi's Mubadala sovereign wealth fund owns a significant stake in IBIT, with filings showing around $409 million invested. Bitcoin was built as a decentralized alternative to centralized finance. However, when the world's largest asset manager buys up over 600,000 BTC via a centralized vehicle, it creates a paradox: The decentralized asset is increasingly controlled by centralized institutions. Most users today rely on centralized exchanges (CEXs), custodians or ETFs. These platforms are easier to use, offer security features like insurance and cold storage and provide regulatory compliance (KYC, AML), which many see as essential. In contrast, decentralized tools like DEXs and self-custody wallets have higher friction, lower liquidity and less user protection. So even as Bitcoin remains technically decentralized, most people interact with it through centralized layers. Here, BlackRock's Bitcoin accumulation is emblematic. While some argue this undermines Satoshi's original vision, others view it as a necessary trade-off, a 'centralization of access' that allows Bitcoin to scale to global relevance. This is the heart of the Bitcoin centralization debate: balancing ideological purity with practical adoption. For now, the market seems to be accepting a hybrid model, with decentralized base layers and centralized access points. BlackRock's ability to launch IBIT was made possible by a landmark decision: the US Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024. That ruling broke a years-long deadlock and opened the floodgates for institutional capital. Still, the broader regulatory environment remains inconsistent and often contradictory. One of the biggest challenges when it comes to crypto? Asset classification. The SEC continues to send mixed signals on whether various tokens, like Ether or Solana, are securities. This regulatory gray zone has delayed the development of products like staking ETFs or altcoin ETPs, and created confusion for investors, developers and issuers alike. As Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw has pointed out, the SEC's current stance creates 'muddy waters' and reactive enforcement that stifles innovation. This directly impacts whether institutions feel confident investing beyond Bitcoin. For now, Bitcoin enjoys a more straightforward regulatory path. For the broader crypto market to mature, including Ether ETFs or DeFi-linked products, a more consistent and globally aligned regulatory framework will be essential. Institutions are ready – but they need rules they can trust. Source:
Arabian Post
17 hours ago
- Arabian Post
The High Stakes of the Latest U.S.-China Agreement
Dr Imran Khalid 'We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it.' So declared President Donald Trump in his familiar tone of triumphant ambiguity on June 11, fresh off what was touted as a breakthrough agreement to restore a trade truce between the United States and China. But if history has taught us anything, it is that 'done deals' in the Trumpian lexicon tend to be either dangerously fragile or conveniently fungible. The latest accord, emerging from two days of intense talks in London, follows an alarming spiral in trade tensions that had once again threatened to upend global markets and rekindle the tit-for-tat tariff warfare that haunted the latter years of Trump's first term. According to Trump, China has committed to lifting its restrictions on the export of rare earths – materials critical to the global technology and defense sectors – while the U.S. has agreed to a calibrated rollback of punitive measures, including the threatened revocation of visas for Chinese students. ADVERTISEMENT As ever, the devil is not just in the details, but in their implementation. Much like the May Geneva agreement that this deal purports to reinforce, the London framework is conditional, tentative, and, crucially, subject to 'final approval' by both President Trump and President Xi Jinping. That qualifier alone renders the euphoria premature. Still, to be charitable, the very fact that Washington and Beijing are speaking the language of dialogue rather than confrontation is an encouraging sign. Following a phone call between the two leaders earlier this month, there appears to be a renewed willingness – albeit under duress – to keep diplomacy afloat. For a world economy battered by uncertainty, this resumption of talks is, if nothing else, a stabilizing force. Yet, Trump's boastful framing – that the U.S. walks away with a 55% tariff shield while China gets 10% – betrays a zero-sum worldview that continues to inform his trade doctrine. The truth, however, is far less tidy. Tariffs have proved to be a double-edged sword, inflicting damage on American consumers, industries, and allies as much as they have squeezed Chinese exports. The World Bank's recent downward revision of global growth forecasts points to tariffs and unpredictability as 'significant headwinds,' underlining the global costs of such brinkmanship. Beijing, for its part, has projected a more measured tone. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, in remarks following the London consultations, emphasized mutual benefit, calling on the U.S. to 'honor their words with actions.' The Chinese side welcomed the 'principled consensus' as a foundation for predictability and stability in bilateral economic relations. While Beijing's rhetoric may be couched in diplomatic platitudes, it signals a strategic patience that stands in stark contrast to Trump's performative deal-making. Indeed, despite facing considerable pressure – both domestic and international -China has remained consistent in its emphasis on dialogue, reciprocity, and multilateralism. It is no secret that Beijing is playing a longer game. From its support for a multilateral trading system to its efforts in promoting South-South cooperation, China has positioned itself as a steady hand amid a turbulent global order. ADVERTISEMENT In this light, the reestablishment of a U.S.-China economic and trade consultation mechanism should be viewed as more than a temporary fix. It offers a framework through which recurring disputes can be ironed out, interests aligned, and trust slowly rebuilt. Importantly, it provides a venue for strategic communication -something sorely missing during the height of tariff wars in 2018–19. However, for this framework to bear fruit, both sides must resist the urge to revert to maximalist posturing. The United States must accept that unilateralism – whether in tariffs or technology controls – cannot substitute for a sustainable policy. Likewise, China must be prepared to meet the U.S. halfway, especially on issues of market access, intellectual property, and transparency. The elephant in the room, of course, is the technological cold war that continues to simmer beneath the surface. While rare earths and tariff percentages dominate headlines, it is the battle over semiconductors and AI supremacy that threatens to define the next phase of U.S.-China relations. Washington's decision to maintain restrictions on high-end AI chips – particularly those from Nvidia- while easing others, reveals both the complexity and the stakes involved. Beijing, not surprisingly, has responded with innovation. The resurgence of Huawei, once a poster child of American sanctions, stands as testament to China's determination to chart its own technological path. As Huawei's founder Ren Zhenfei put it bluntly this week, China may still be a step behind, but it is catching up – by stacking and clustering if necessary. In the short term, these dynamics will continue to fuel friction. But in the long term, they offer a compelling reason for structured cooperation. For neither side can afford the costs of sustained decoupling. The global economy – still reeling from inflationary shocks, supply chain disruptions, and climate-induced volatility – desperately needs the world's two largest economies to find common ground. To that end, the inclusion of Chinese students in American universities, affirmed in this deal, is more than a diplomatic gesture. It is a recognition that people-to-people ties remain a cornerstone of bilateral engagement. Academic exchanges, research collaboration, and cross-cultural education build bridges that tariffs and bans cannot destroy. They plant the seeds of mutual understanding in a landscape too often scorched by suspicion. The road ahead remains bumpy. Structural trade conflicts persist, strategic mistrust abounds, and electoral politics – particularly in the U.S. – can derail even the most promising of frameworks. But the London agreement offers a glimpse of what is possible when mutual interest outweighs mutual animosity. This development not only helps stabilize U.S.-China relations but also injects much-needed momentum into the global economy. It serves as a reminder that even amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry, there is still space – indeed, an urgent need – for pragmatic cooperation. Trump may brand it a win, but real victory lies not in tariffs or trophies, but in the hard, unglamorous work of sustained diplomacy. For now, both sides have stepped back from the precipice. The challenge will be to keep walking forward – together. Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
