
US Anti-disinformation Guardrails Fall In Trump's First 100 Days
From slashed federal funding for disinformation research to the closure of a key agency combating foreign influence operations, the United States has dismantled vital guardrails against falsehoods within President Donald Trump's first 100 days in office.
The moves could have national security implications, experts warn, granting US adversaries such as Russia and China more freedom to sow disinformation as geopolitical rivalries intensify.
Combined with social media platforms scaling back content moderation -- and Meta's suspension of third-party fact-checking in the United States -- these developments have left researchers concerned that it may become even harder for the public to separate fact from fiction.
The National Science Foundation recently cancelled hundreds of research grants that it said were "not aligned" with the agency's priorities, including projects focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as misinformation and disinformation.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), charged with cutting government spending, praised the NSF's "great work" in cancelling 402 "wasteful" DEI grants -- a move the agency said saved $233 million.
"Shocking that understanding how people are misled by false information is now a forbidden topic," said Lisa Fazio, an associate professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University, confirming that her NSF grant to examine "how false beliefs form (and) how to correct them" had been cancelled.
"Our work will continue but at a smaller scale," she wrote on the platform Bluesky.
Several of the terminated grants were focused on health misinformation as well as artificial intelligence and deepfake detection on tech platforms, researchers said, at a time when scams fueled by cheap and widely available AI tools are rapidly proliferating.
"Research on how technology impacts society is critical to holding powerful tech platforms accountable," said Becca Branum, a deputy director at the nonprofit Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT).
"Shielding companies from criticism by defunding research is censorship that should trouble all of us."
The cuts came just days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio shut down the State Department's Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI) hub, which tracked and countered disinformation from foreign actors.
"By shutting down the office, Rubio has opened the American information space to the likes of Russia, China, and Iran," said Benjamin Shultz, lead researcher at the American Sunlight Project, an anti-disinformation watchdog in Washington.
In a report this month, the anti-disinformation firm Alethea said it had uncovered a Russian network seeking to sow mistrust in US defense and military programs.
The targets of the network, linked to a Russian influence operation known as "Portal Kombat," included the US giant Lockheed Martin and the F-35 fighter jet program.
The R/FIMI was previously known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC), and once had dozens of employees operating with a budget of around $60 million.
Rubio justified its closure, saying in a statement that it was the responsibility of government officials to "preserve and protect the freedom for Americans to exercise their free speech."
The GEC, established in 2016, had long faced scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, who accused it of censoring and surveilling Americans.
Its closing leaves the State Department without a dedicated office for tracking and countering disinformation from US rivals for the first time in over eight years.
The move comes as Rubio unveiled wider plans to restructure the State Department, cutting positions and shuttering specialized programs.
The Trump administration is also targeting officials who had been examining foreign interference in US elections.
The administration has reassigned several dozen officials working on the issue at the FBI and forced out others at the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), reports said.
"As we approach 100 days of Trump 2.0, it's harder than ever to believe that American politics -- and society writ large -- have reached a place where truth and facts are optional," said Shultz.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
19 minutes ago
- DW
World Cup 2026: Could cohost politics have an impact? – DW – 06/11/2025
A year out from a football World Cup across three countries, tensions between the USA, Canada and Mexico hang over preparations. From travel bans and trade wars to presidential grandstanding, politics could play a part. A year out from the World Cup in the USA, Canada and Mexico, host city Los Angeles is engulfed in protests related to the deportation of Mexicans and other minorities, an ever-shifting trade war threatens relations between the three hosts and a travel ban will prevent some fans attending. While the whims of US President Donald Trump make predictions perilous, fans, players and national teams must already start to make plans for one of sport's biggest events, one secured in Trump's first term when relations between the countires were much more harmonious. The ongoing riots are an immediate safety concern for the Club World Cup in the USA, with European champions Paris Saint-Germain set to meet Atletico Madrid in LA on the tournament's opening day on June 15 while the same city will host the first US game of the 2026 World Cup on June 12, a day after the tournament opens in Mexico. Trump's travel ban, which came in to effect on Monday, bars citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the US. An exception was made for "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state" but not for fans. Iran have already qualified for the World Cup but currently fans would not be able to travel to support them in the USA. Trump sees opportunity in sport The same is not yet true for citizens of Mexico and Canada. And for Andrew Zimbalist, Professor Emeritus of Economics at Smith College in the United States and author of "Circus Maximus: The Economic Gamble Behind Hosting the Olympics and the World Cup," putting on a good show to burnish his own reputation is likely to be at the forefront of Trump's mind. Trump issues travel ban for people from 12 countries To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Mr. Trump has shown a willingness to make exceptions when there's pressure. And I think further that Trump cares. He's a sports fan. He cares about his international image. He cares about the attention that that will come to him when both the Club World Cup in 2025 and the real World Cup in 2026 happen. These are photo opportunities for Trump to bask in in the game's glory," he told DW. Zimbalist added that with Trump, things can always change quickly. "There's a tremendous amount of tension and a tremendous amount of uncertainty about how Mr. Trump will behave, and we never know." World Cup cohosts Canada and Mexico were, along with China, the first countries targeted in the evolving tariff war that began soon after Trump took office. Zimbalist doesn't predict the uneasiness at governmental level will have a significant impact on the tournament, arguing that there will be enough fans prepared to travel for games that any discouraged from doing so will not be noticeable. He also believes that relatively new leaders in Claudia Scheinbaum (Mexico, elected October 2024) and Mark Carney (Canada, elected March 2025) will not allow their countries to become marginalized. "I think both with Carney in Canada and Scheinbaum in Mexico, that he has met his real enemy. These leaders are not bowing down to him, and they're both very, very smart, very well prepared, and at the moment, are popular in their countries. And so they have the latitude to take on Trump." Mexican fans uncertain on match travel Nevertheless, for Mexican fans in particular, traveling across the border to World Cup, or indeed Club World Cup games, in the USA is a fraught business. "I don't feel afraid to go to the United States but it feels little bit like going to someone else's house where you are not welcome," said Alan, a Pachuca fan talking to DW ahead of his team's participation in the Club World Cup. Iran fans will not be able to travel to World Cup games in the USA as things stand Image: Ismael Adnan Yaqoob/Anadolu/picture alliance Other Pachuca fans complained that significant visa processing delays, some up to two years, meant they would have been unable to travel to support their team even without the current safety concerns. "Appointments were delayed and then the president said that some Mexicans shouldn't go there, I think that has a big influence on why they're taking so long with the visas," said Axel. "I would feel a little unsafe around the police and everything government-related and that side of the United States." While demand for, and interest in, the World Cup will be on a different level to the revamped Club World Cup, which has proved controversial in some quarters, and stands may be filled with foreign nationals who live in any of the North American countries, it does seem like political relations will have some impact on fans, even if the stands will be full. Canada and Mexico more able to stand up against Trump While Canadians are not quite as central to the current events in LA, the USA's northerly neighbors have been at loggerheads with the Trump administration. The Star Spangled Banner was booed at ice hockey games in Canada in recent months and Carney's surprise election was partly ascribed to his willingness to take on Trump and his plan to make Canada the 51st state of the USA. "Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign in the last several months, it's not for sale. Won't be for sale, ever," Carney told Trump when the pair met in May in a meeting that was otherwise relatively cordial despite clear tensions. For those hoping to plan a visit to, or participation in, the World Cup, judging the political mood – and the implications of changes in it – have become as important as waiting for results from qualifying. "I could see it happening along the way that if Scheinbaum becomes a little bit more aggressive than Trump wants her to be, or challenges some of Trump's immigration moves, that he would say: "You know what? I might not let Mexico participate in the World Cup, or I might not let this happen or that happen.' So I can see threats like that, but I'd have to believe that they wouldn't be carried out," said Zimbalist, musing on what might play out in the next year but speaking ahead of the LA protests. The Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday and is hosted solely by the USA, is perceived by some as a test of elements of the country's readiness to host the World Cup. But the development or deterioration of relations between the three cohosts will be critical to next year's tournament's success. Edited by: Chuck Penfold


Local Germany
33 minutes ago
- Local Germany
Germany's Merz condemns Russian 'terror against civilians' in Ukraine
Speaking at a press conference with his Dutch counterpart Dick Schoof, Merz called the recent Russian attacks "the most serious war crimes" and said Russia had "attacked no military targets but the civilian population". Merz said that Russia's latest actions were "anything but a proportionate response to the very precise Ukrainian attacks on military airfields and infrastructure in the last week". "Russia wanted to create a bloodbath and the fact that this only happened in a limited way is thanks to effective Ukrainian defence," he said, adding: "Once again, Russia is escalating instead of negotiating". Merz's comments come ahead of a G7 summit in Canada on June 15-17 and a NATO meeting later in the month, where allies will push US President Donald Trump to be more aggressive in punishing the Kremlin. Schoof agreed on the importance of supporting Kyiv, saying that Ukraine was fighting not only for its own security "but also for the security of Europe... after a war of aggression that was started by Russia". On the question of new sanctions on Russia from the European Union, Merz said he had been in touch with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen in recent days "and I encourage her to introduce this new round quickly". "There will be further sanctions on the banking sector, in the energy sector," he said. Advertisement Merz said that while Kyiv's allies were "ready for negotiations at any time, if negotiations are refused -- and they are being refused on the Russian side", then the response must be "military strength and massive economic pressure". Ukraine's allies must send "a signal of strength and deterrence" to Russia, Merz said. "This is unfortunately the only language that Moscow understands in the current weeks and months."


Int'l Business Times
12 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
GOP Senator Declares Having a Federal Minimum Wage 'Doesn't Make Any Sense'
Sen. Kevin Cramer decried efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, questioning whether a nationwide wage floor should exist at all. "I don't even know why we have a quote 'federal minimum' wage to be honest," the North Dakota lawmaker said, referring to the current rate of $7.25 an hour, unchanged since 2009. "Where I come from in North Dakota, businesses are fortunate if they can get someone for less than $15," he said on Fox News. "I think the market works really well." Cramer argued that increasing the minimum wage, particularly to $15 an hour, would limit opportunities for entry-level workers. "You reduce the number of people who can get a beginner's job — work at a fast food restaurant, whatever the case might be, in the service sector or otherwise," he said. "I just think manipulating markets with mandatory wages doesn't make any sense." The senator's comments come amid ongoing debate over wage standards and cost-of-living disparities across states. In 2024, the average fair market rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in the U.S. was $1,390, but the rent affordable to one full-time worker earning federal minimum was $377, according to Statista. The federal minimum wage was enacted in 1938 under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which also granted workers a 40-hour work week, set overtime pay at "time-and-a-half," and banned "oppressive child labor." The hard-won legislation was part of former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. "Do not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day, ...tell a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry," FDR said in 1938. While Democrats continue to push for a higher federal baseline, many Republicans maintain that wages should be determined locally by market conditions rather than federal mandate. Originally published on Latin Times