GOP Senator Declares Having a Federal Minimum Wage 'Doesn't Make Any Sense'
Sen. Kevin Cramer decried efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, questioning whether a nationwide wage floor should exist at all.
"I don't even know why we have a quote 'federal minimum' wage to be honest," the North Dakota lawmaker said, referring to the current rate of $7.25 an hour, unchanged since 2009.
"Where I come from in North Dakota, businesses are fortunate if they can get someone for less than $15," he said on Fox News. "I think the market works really well."
Cramer argued that increasing the minimum wage, particularly to $15 an hour, would limit opportunities for entry-level workers.
"You reduce the number of people who can get a beginner's job — work at a fast food restaurant, whatever the case might be, in the service sector or otherwise," he said. "I just think manipulating markets with mandatory wages doesn't make any sense."
The senator's comments come amid ongoing debate over wage standards and cost-of-living disparities across states.
In 2024, the average fair market rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in the U.S. was $1,390, but the rent affordable to one full-time worker earning federal minimum was $377, according to Statista.
The federal minimum wage was enacted in 1938 under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which also granted workers a 40-hour work week, set overtime pay at "time-and-a-half," and banned "oppressive child labor." The hard-won legislation was part of former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal.
"Do not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day, ...tell you...that a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry," FDR said in 1938.
While Democrats continue to push for a higher federal baseline, many Republicans maintain that wages should be determined locally by market conditions rather than federal mandate.
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tulsi Gabbard Fed Potentially Classified Documents Into AI to Determine If They Were Classified
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed Tuesday that artificial intelligence tools have been used to scan tens of thousands of potentially classified documents to determine whether they should remain secret. Speaking at the Amazon Web Services Summit in Washington, Gabbard said AI helped expedite the declassification review process for material related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination, and that of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, AP reported. The effort, ordered by President Donald Trump, led to the release of large volumes of previously unreleased information that may have otherwise taken months or years. "We have been able to do that through the use of AI tools far more quickly than what was done previously — which was to have humans go through and look at every single one of these pages," Gabbard said. Gabbard did not specify what safeguards were in place to protect the data fed into the AI systems or how the tools determined what content remained classified. In her remarks, Gabbard said AI will be critical to modernizing intelligence workflows, allowing analysts and field officers to focus on high-value tasks. She hopes to expand partnerships with private-sector tech companies, rather than invest federal resources into internal system development. "How do we look at the available tools that exist — largely in the private sector — to make it so that our intelligence professionals... are able to focus their time and energy on the things that only they can do?" she asked. Her comments come amid a broader debate in Washington over the role of commercial AI in national security — and how much trust should be placed in machines to handle America's most sensitive secrets. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Elon Musk Pestered About Epstein Files Bombshell After Admitting Some of His Trump Tweets 'Went Too Far': 'Are You Covering?'
Social media users are badgering billionaire Elon Musk about posts he when feuding with President Donald Trump, particularly ones linking the president to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Musk took to social media early Wednesday morning to announce that he went to extremes with some of his posts about the 47th president, and that he wished he had not done so. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote. Social media users rapidly took to the replies of Musk's post to ask if he was talking about the posts he made implicating Trump in the Epstein case. "So did you lie about him being on the Epstein list? Or, are you covering for someone on the Epstein list?" asked one. "Notice, he didn't deny what he said. He just regrets saying it," said another. "Did you lie or do you just not mind that he is a predator?" asked one user. "The Epstein Files are protected once more..." one dismayed user wrote. In a now-deleted post initially published last Thursday, Musk claimed that Trump's name had been included in the Epstein files and further alluded to the president's involvement with Epstein. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," he wrote. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk further stated that he would only agree to apologize to the 47th president "as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files," on Friday, in a post that has also since been deleted. "That's called 'old news.' That's been old news. That has been talked about for years. Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it -- it's old news," Trump said in an interview with NBC News on Saturday. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
GOP Senator Declares Having a Federal Minimum Wage 'Doesn't Make Any Sense'
Sen. Kevin Cramer decried efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, questioning whether a nationwide wage floor should exist at all. "I don't even know why we have a quote 'federal minimum' wage to be honest," the North Dakota lawmaker said, referring to the current rate of $7.25 an hour, unchanged since 2009. "Where I come from in North Dakota, businesses are fortunate if they can get someone for less than $15," he said on Fox News. "I think the market works really well." Cramer argued that increasing the minimum wage, particularly to $15 an hour, would limit opportunities for entry-level workers. "You reduce the number of people who can get a beginner's job — work at a fast food restaurant, whatever the case might be, in the service sector or otherwise," he said. "I just think manipulating markets with mandatory wages doesn't make any sense." The senator's comments come amid ongoing debate over wage standards and cost-of-living disparities across states. In 2024, the average fair market rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in the U.S. was $1,390, but the rent affordable to one full-time worker earning federal minimum was $377, according to Statista. The federal minimum wage was enacted in 1938 under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which also granted workers a 40-hour work week, set overtime pay at "time-and-a-half," and banned "oppressive child labor." The hard-won legislation was part of former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. "Do not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day, ...tell a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry," FDR said in 1938. While Democrats continue to push for a higher federal baseline, many Republicans maintain that wages should be determined locally by market conditions rather than federal mandate. Originally published on Latin Times
