logo
Labour's work to devise official definition of 'Islamophobia' should be suspended IMMEDIATELY as it risks worsening grooming gangs scandal, report warns

Labour's work to devise official definition of 'Islamophobia' should be suspended IMMEDIATELY as it risks worsening grooming gangs scandal, report warns

Daily Mail​4 hours ago

Labour moves to draw up an official definition of Islamophobia would shut down efforts to combat grooming gangs, a new report warns.
The Policy Exchange think-tank said the work of the Government's 'Anti-Muslim Hate/Islamophobia Definition Working Group', set up earlier this year, should be immediately suspended.
Devising a government-backed definition of Islamophobia – even though it would not initially have any force in law – would 'almost certainly turbocharge cancel culture ', it said.
Policy Exchange's warning came days after a long-awaited review by Whitehall troubleshooter Baroness Casey found public bodies covered up sickening evidence about Asian grooming gangs 'for fear of appearing racist '.
Councils, police forces and the Home Office repeatedly 'shied away' from dealing with 'uncomfortable' questions about the ethnicity of rapists preying on thousands of vulnerable girls.
In the wake of the Casey review, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper promised to 'root out' the grooming gang 'scourge'.
But Policy Exchange's report warns: 'At the same time, ministers are pursuing a policy which will have the opposite effect.
'It would have made exposing the grooming scandal even harder and slower than it already was. It will make rooting out the scourge more difficult. It will give perpetrators a new place to hide.'
Ministers said in March that the move to devise a definition would 'seek to provide the government and other relevant bodies with an understanding of unacceptable treatment and prejudice against Muslim communities'.
It would not carry statutory power, at least initially, but there have been widespread concerns that it would lead to Islam being given protections beyond those afforded to other religions.
The work is being led by former Tory attorney general Dominic Grieve KC.
Policy Exchange senior fellow and former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir John Jenkins, said in a letter to Mr Grieve: 'Whatever form of words is chosen, and whatever legal status it has to start with, any definition will have serious consequences.
'It will almost certainly turbocharge 'cancel culture'.
'Even without the force of an official definition, claims of Islamophobia are already used to close down legitimate debate and deter investigation of alleged wrongdoing, as in Rotherham or Batley, with disastrous results all round, including for the wider Muslim community itself.'
He added: 'Unless it literally restates the existing legal protections covering all faiths, any official Islamophobia definition will be an undeniable act of two-tier policy, creating special status and protection for members of one faith alone.
'It is unlikely to alleviate Islamist discontent – it will stoke it, creating new opportunities for grievance politics, challenge and attack in every institution and workplace.'
Sir John said the working group 'may have begun its work with its conclusions pre-determined', adding that he had 'little confidence' it would approach key issues with an open mind.
The report said the government's work should be put on hold until the end of a national inquiry on grooming gangs, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer belatedly ordered in the wake of the Casey review.
Dr Paul Stott, head of security and extremism at Policy Exchange, said: ''A danger going forward is that the proposed 'Islamophobia' definition could shut down discussion on grooming gangs and if accepted by Government restrict debate on this and on other issues vital to our social cohesion.'
He added: 'This week has demonstrated the need to move on from the view that concern about grooming gangs is in some way racist, Islamophobic, or a far-right issue.
'It is clearly not and it never was.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How did my MP vote on assisted dying?
How did my MP vote on assisted dying?

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

How did my MP vote on assisted dying?

Sir Keir Starmer once again voted in favour of legalising assisted dying on Friday as the House of Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 314 votes to 291. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, and a number of her Cabinet colleagues, including Yvette Cooper and Ed Miliband, followed suit. Foreign Secretary David Lammy did not vote. In November, the Commons voted in favour of the Private Member's Bill – sponsored by Labour's Kim Leadbeater – by a majority of 55. Having passed its third reading on Friday, albeit by a halved margin of just 23 votes, it will head to the House of Lords for further scrutiny before becoming law. The Bill allows terminally ill adults in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for medical assistance to end their own lives. MPs have subjected the Bill to immense scrutiny over the past few months, with over 500 amendments tabled. Backbenchers and ministers alike were given a 'free vote' – allowing them to decide based on their conscience rather than follow the party line. The Government's position is neutral. The Cabinet was, as a result, split. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, continued to vote against, as did Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary. Both Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, and Nigel Farage' leader of Reform UK, maintained their opposition to the Bill. At least a dozen MPs who backed or abstained on the Bill had indicated they were likely to oppose it. Critics claimed many of the proposed changes weakened its safeguards – including replacing the need for a High Court judge to approve every case with an expert panel. In the event, 56 changed their votes, including Reform's Lee Anderson and Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey, who voted against in November but abstained today. Of those MPs who were either against or abstained, 11 now voted in favour, while 24 others changed from yes or abstain to a no this time around. A further 21 changed from a yes or no vote to an abstention. Other amendments made the Bill more palatable to those formerly on the fence. It now prohibits advertising for assisted dying services and clarifies that two independent doctors must make separate assessments before eligibility can be approved. Minister Chris Bryant now backed it, having abstained in November.

Assisted dying: The heat and emotion of today's significant vote
Assisted dying: The heat and emotion of today's significant vote

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Assisted dying: The heat and emotion of today's significant vote

Today's vote is hugely significant. It now looks highly likely that assisted dying will be introduced in England and vote by MPs to approve Kim Leadbeater's bill is arguably the biggest vote regarding bodily autonomy since the legalisation of abortion in Great Britain in the baking heat of London's Parliament Square today, hundreds of campaigners stood chanting their views - both for and against assisted dying - amid a sea of colourful banners and was emotion too. Some carried photos of loved ones who died in pain, while others expressed their fears for the vulnerable in debate around assisted dying has been a polarised one - and there are still hurdles to cross before it will be a reality here. What happens next? The Terminally Ill (End of Life) Bill will now go to the Lords, where it is likely to spend several months undergoing the same line-by-line scrutiny that it did before this year, perhaps around October, the bill would come back to the Commons for any changes to be voted on and it could then be sent for Royal Assent. So when could assisted dying become available in England and Wales?The government has said it could take up to four years to set up an assisted dying service, meaning it could be 2029 or even 2030 before the first medically-assisted death minister Stephen Kinnock said this delay was needed to ensure "safe and effective implementation" of an "entirely new service with robust safeguards and protections" which would need to be "carefully developed and tested".Under the proposals, mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with a life expectancy of less than six months would be eligible for an assisted would need to make two separate declarations, signed and witnessed, about their "clear, settled and informed" wish to die, and satisfy two independent doctors that they are eligible, and have not been would be at least a seven-day gap between each application would then go before a multidisciplinary panel comprising a psychiatrist, social worker and a panel would hear evidence from at least one of the doctors and the applicant, possibly via live the panel approved the application there would be a further 14-day "period of reflection" which could be cut to 48 hours if the patient is likely to die within a month. Ms Leadbeater has said the whole process could take up to two months, which does raise the risk of people dying while they are waiting for process is also far longer than other comparable services on which the Leadbeater bill is Oregon, the first US state to legalise assisted dying nearly 30 years ago, there is a 15-day waiting period between the first and second request. Since 2020, this restriction has been lifted for patients at risk of imminent California, the 15-day cooling off period has been cut to 48 hours because of the risk of patients dying before their medically assisted death is chief medical officer for England Professor Chris Whitty has cautioned against creating a system that would risk terminally ill patients being "stuck in a bureaucratic thicket" in their final months of the Leadbeater bill contains a lot of detail, there is still plenty to sort out if it becomes law. Training for doctors If the legislation is passed, the Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who voted against the bill, will be required to set up an assisted dying service under the NHS This means sorting out the training for doctors who will assess patients for capacity and for any signs of coercion or pressure, plus creating safeguards for those with a learning MPs first voted on the issue in November, the plans included a High Court judge who would need to approve each proposal has now been dropped and replaced with the new service will be overseen by a voluntary assisted dying commissioner, who will be either a serving or retired senior role will include appointing members of review panels, referring cases to them and monitoring the operation of the law. Although the proposed law is based on legislation in 10 US states and Australia, there are important California, patients are able to store the lethal medication at home and they are not required to have a medical professional present when they the Leadbeater bill, a doctor would prepare the drug, and be present when the patient self-administers would usually mean swallowing the lethal substance, although if that is not possible, the bill allows for a "medical device" to be used to enable the patient to ingest will be strict limits on what a doctor can and can't do. Mr Kinnock said it would be legal for them to help a patient sit up and make them comfortable, but not for them to tip a cup of pills into their health secretary will regulate what drugs can be used. In all likelihood these will come in a powdered form and need to be mixed with liquid for swallowing. Elsewhere in the world I was present at an assisted death in California and witnessed the doctor adding fruit juice to the drug in order to make it more palatable and less bitter for the patient to that occasion the patient, Wayne Hawkins, was unconscious within a few minutes of swallowing the drug and died in around 35 iplayer - Assisted dying: The Final ChoiceDeaths usually occur within an hour although there have been rare cases of it taking several some other countries that have legalised assisted dying, euthanasia is permitted, whereby a doctor or nurse administers the lethal dose, usually by is allowed in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, but even for most supporters of assisted dying here, it is seen as a step too impact assessment, carried out by civil servants estimated there could be between 1,042 and 4,559 assisted deaths in the 10th year after the law came into upper estimate would represent around 1% of all deaths in England and happens to the Leadbeater bill in the coming months, assisted dying is coming to the British Isle of Man has already approved an assisted dying bill and Jersey is also committed to changing the law.A bill to legalise assisted dying in Scotland has passed an initial vote at Holyrood, but faces further hurdles. The Scottish bill does not have a life expectancy timescale for eligibility and instead refers to advanced and progressive disease that is expected to cause premature dying, or assisted suicide as many critics prefer to call it, remains illegal in most of the medicine means that healthcare systems can keep people alive longer than ever before, but often with limited quality of say that assisted dying gives autonomy and control to patients. For opponents it is a chilling and dangerous step which puts the vulnerable at risk of happens to the bill at Westminster, this heated and polarising debate will continue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store