Exact date ALL phones will blast out ‘emergency alarm' in system tests revealed
The National Emergency Alerts System is used to warn people of an imminent danger to life nearby.
During the upcoming test, all 87 million mobile phones in the UK will vibrate and make a loud 'siren sound' for roughly 10 seconds, even if they are set to silent.
Phones will also display a message, stating that the alarm is only a test and not a genuine threat to life.
The next test will begin at around 15:00 BST on Sunday, September 7.
This will be the first time that the Emergency Alerts System has been tested in two years, following the system's launch in 2023.
Cabinet minister Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, says: 'Emergency Alerts have the potential to save lives, allowing us to share essential information rapidly in emergency situations including extreme storms.
'Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test the system so that we know it will work if we need it.'
Once the alert is issued, all phones in the affected area will make a loud siren-like sound, vibrate, and read out the warning.
The Government does not need to know your phone number in order to send the message, and all phones will automatically trigger the alert.
This announcement follows a recent government commitment to test the system once every two years.
The Government says this is so emergency services can be certain the system works, and so that the public becomes familiar with the alerts.
Ahead of the upcoming test, the Cabinet Office says it will be running a public information campaign to inform people about the test.
This will include targeted outreach for vulnerable groups, such as victims of domestic violence, who may have hidden phones that the alarm test would reveal.
The Emergency Alerts System was introduced in 2023 to quickly inform the public of an impending threat such as severe flooding, wildfires, or extreme weather events.
When it was first tested, the emergency system sent a message to phones which read: 'Severe Alert. This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a new UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby.
'In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe.
'Visit gov.uk/alerts for more information. This is a test. You do not need to take any action.'
Since its introduction, the Emergency Alerts System has been used in real life scenarios five times, primarily during major storms when there was a serious risk to life.
The largest ever use saw approximately 4.5 million people in Scotland and Northern Ireland receive an alert during Storm Éowyn in January 2025, after a red weather warning was issued.
The system has also been used in more localised incidents, such as when an unexploded World War II bomb was uncovered in Plymouth.
Glen Mayhew, assistant chief constable for Devon and Cornwall Police, says: 'By their nature, emergency incidents occur with very little notice. They can develop at speed and across wide areas which puts lives at risk.
'This system has the ability to send an alert to those whose lives may be at risk, to ensure they can act to help themselves and others.'
Similar systems are already used widely across a number of other countries, primarily for natural disaster preparation.
This comes after Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned that the UK homeland has come under direct threat for the first time in years
Japan has one of the world's most sophisticated systems, which combines satellite and cell broadcast technology.
This system forms part of a wider scheme called J-ALERT that informs the public in case of earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic activity, or missile threats.
South Korea frequently uses its national cell broadcast system to alert citizens about issues ranging from weather alerts and civil emergencies to local missing persons cases.
The US has a similar system to the UK that utilises 'wireless emergency alerts' to send messages that look like texts with a unique sound and vibration pattern.
The announcement of the UK's upcoming emergency alert test comes at a time when more people are growing worried about the threat of war.
The latest version of the Government's defence strategy, published last month, lays out a chilling warning that the UK is no longer safe from military threats.
The report states: 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario.'
In a foreword to the report, Prime Minister Keir Starmer adds: 'The world has changed. Russian aggression menaces our continent. Strategic competition is intensifying. Extremist ideologies are on the rise. Technology is transforming the nature of both war and domestic security.'
What time will the test take place?
The test will take place at around 15:00 BST on 7th September 2025.
Regular testing ensures the system is functioning correctly, should it be needed in an emergency.
Emergency Alerts work on all 4G and 5G phone networks in the UK. Your mobile phone or tablet does not have to be connected to mobile data or Wi-Fi to get alerts.
However, you will not receive alerts if your device is turned off; connected to a 2G or 3G network; Wi-Fi only; or not compatible.
What will the test look and sound like?
Devices will vibrate and make a loud siren sound for roughly 10 seconds. A test message will also appear on screens.
The government will publish the test message in due course. It will make clear the alert is only a test.
Do other countries run similar tests?
Lots of other countries operate similar emergency systems and run regular tests, including Japan and the United States of America.
Some countries test their systems monthly, such as Finland, while other countries test their systems annually, such as Germany.
Data about you, your device or location will not be collected or shared.
The emergency services and the UK government do not need your phone number to send you an alert.
What should drivers do?
It is illegal to use a hand-held device while driving. Find somewhere safe and legal to stop before reading the message.
Emergency alerts potentially contain life-saving information and devices should be kept switched on for your own safety. However, there may be some scenarios where it is sensible to opt out of alerts, including victims of domestic abuse with a concealed phone. The government will continue ongoing engagement with domestic violence charities and campaigners in the run up to the test, to ensure people know how to switch off alerts on a concealed phone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Schools say shorter day in Norfolk will have 'minimal' impact
A school trust that is testing having a shorter school day on Fridays believes pupils will have more time with teachers in the classroom. Following consultations, teachers at Reedham Primary and Winterton Primary in Norfolk will use a Friday afternoon for planning and professional development time. If successful, it could be rolled out in all Consortium Trust schools, including a further nine in Suffolk, by September Aalders-Dunthorne, the trust's chief executive, said: "The intention of this programme is to make sure children have teachers in front of them for more time than they already do now." Since the Covid-19 pandemic, the schools already have an earlier start to the day and a shorter lunch break. "Because we have extended the school day after the Covid pandemic to 08:30 BST starts and we have maintained that all the way through, so the reduction actually is quite minimal," said Mr the national guidance is 32.5 hours of teaching a week, the chief exec said the trust was closer to 34 hours at the moment, which meant teachers could finish in the classroom at 12:15 each Friday when the trial starts. He said: "The key reason is to use the finite resources of the trust more effectively, which is largely around staffing and finance to ensure that we are using what we do have effectively."One of the challenges for small rural primary schools is the ability to release teachers to keep up to date with their training... all teachers are entitled to a 10% reduction in their timetable to allow them to participate in planning and preparation - we have found this very disruptive in small primary schools." On a Friday afternoon, a childcare provision put in place would be focused around the curriculum for working parents until 15:15 which the chief exec hoped would minimise the impact on working families. "The division is pretty equally split. Some parents have come to us and they are really pleased... they welcome the opportunity to start their weekend early," he said. "We have other parents quite rightly expressing issues around potentially lost learning time and the impact on working families." The trust said it had sent letters and run consultations with parents ahead of introducing the trial In November. Mr Aalders-Dunthorne said if it had no positive impact on pupil outcomes, behaviours and attendance, it would not be carried forward. He said: "We are absolutely passionate of making sure that primary schools in rural communities are seen as community assets and we will do everything within our power to protect them and this trial is one of those pieces of innovation which we think could support those schools moving forward." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Thriving nature reserve near Stretham all began with a lake
A farmer and conservationist who transformed 300 acres into a thriving wildlife reserve 30 years ago said it all began when he dug out a Green created Kingfishers Bridge wetland habitat out of an intensively farmed sugar beet and potato farm between Wicken and Stretham, lake resulted in animals and birds using it every day, he said, so he founded the reserve which is marking its 30th anniversary on Saturday and Sunday. "Now we have more than 420 plant species, 215 different birds, 740 different moths and many more [species]," he said. Kingfishers Bridge was "almost exclusively a birder reserve" until the Covid-19 pandemic, with visitor numbers rising from about 2,000 in 2019 to 21,000 in now has a car park, a cafe, a visitor centre and a shop, as well as offering regular visitor tours of its rare Green said: "About 50 years ago, I realised that [to make] a wetland conservancy, it had to be with plenty of water to make it work, and so I made a lake – this followed with animals and birds using it every day."He praised manager James Moss for expanding and developing the habitats after the farm officially became a nature reserve."[He] gradually found the right places on land and water, leading to a wonderful nature reserve for which he had an extraordinary ability for managing," Mr Green said. "a massive increase" in its breeding population of lapwings, a farmland wading bird which is on a list of endangered has also seen a vast increase in the vulnerable water germander, from 12 plants in 1996 to seven million today, and it was the first place in Cambridgeshire to successfully breed bitterns since the 1930s. The data comes from RSPB, BTO & Environment Agency surveys, said Mr Bridge also has herds of water buffalo and konik ponies, which help manage the has organised an open weekend of events to mark its 30-year milestone, including guided tours, talks, performances by local musicians and food from local vendors. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Tom Hollander makes a dazzling Truman Capote – but it's the fantasy that's truly seductive
Single-sex education was not for me. I've published a 150,000-word memoir on the subject of how and why I became a poker champion, but I can sum that book up in two sentences: 'I wanted to meet boys. Then I met some.' Spending 13 years in an all-girls' school, I moved towards boys like a plant looking for light. And, like a plant, I was prepared to grow up twisted. (Plus, I'm riddled with greenfly.) I didn't yearn for romance, especially, just male energy. Or male lack of energy; both are great. Boys want to run around, playing games and laughing and throwing things. As they get older, they'll do almost anything for a quiet life. The combination is hugely appealing. If you find it in a woman, that's the absolute bingo. But it's annoyingly rare; men tend to be like that by default. Women have too pronounced a guilt mechanism either for mindless game-playing or a quiet life. It kicks in early. I remember the era when I was still playing hide-and-seek or looking up rude words in the dictionary, and eyes started to roll around me. 'Oh, Victoria,' they began to imply. 'Can't you grow up? Cecilia's got an idea for a new diet we could all go on. Jemima might have depression. Nobody's counting to 20 and looking for you behind a cupboard.' Did boys think like that? I always reckoned not. As for a quiet life, the evidence was that girls moved towards emotional confrontation and stress. It can't have been an accident every day. That lessens with age – older women feel more anger, while having fewer rows – but the guilt mechanism increases. There is no peace. Women might think they want a bit of calm and quiet, but the second their bum hits the sofa cushion, they leap up shouting 'Ooh I totally forgot to send that email / buy that present / defrost that stew / learn Japanese. Back in a minute.' Released from school, I hurried to an overwhelmingly male-dominated college, then became a stand-up comic, then started playing poker. Thus, I barely met another woman for about ten years. These days, I have some close female friends, but no 'gang' of girls at all. And that's a pity, because middle-aged women are terrific. Guilt-ridden, over-burdened and struggling to relax, but still more fun at 45 than they were at 15. I need a gang but don't know how to come by it – especially because I, too, am preoccupied with the endless to-do list of life. I can't join a book group, the bathroom needs grouting! I was thinking about this while watching Feud: Capote vs. The Swans, which was released last year on Disney+. It's the trueish story of a group of wealthy New York socialites who befriended the writer Truman Capote and then fell out with him. This is the long-awaited sequel to Feud: Bette and Joan, a great treat of 2017 with Susan Sarandon as Bette Davis and Jessica Lange as her rival Joan Crawford. That delicious series won many awards, but the makers didn't come back with a new story until 2024. Why not? Nobody really knows. There was Covid, of course. And there was an attempt at Feud: Charles and Diana but that was abandoned, perhaps because the material had been so comprehensively mined by other shows. The tale of Truman Capote and his haute couture frenemies seems a much better idea. Nobody needs to see a Lady Di lookalike finding that Fred and Gladys bracelet for the millionth time – and the ongoing generational trauma makes that all, still, too sad. This story feels fresher and spicier. Two episodes in, I'm enjoying it tremendously. There's a typically dazzling central performance from Tom Hollander as Capote (rarely has an actor combined so much charisma with so little vanity), Naomi Watts is magnificent as Babe Paley, and the glittery, beautiful roster of star cameos (Demi Moore, Calista Flockhart, Molly Ringwald) is as tempting as a box of New Berry Fruits. But an incalculable part of the appeal, for me, is the fantasy of 'ladies who lunch'. There they are, day after day in the same sumptuous restaurant: impeccably dressed, sipping white Burgundy and swapping vicious gossip. It looks idyllic. Can it be real? I bet it isn't. The fantasy is to be so rich, and so well staffed, that there's nothing to do but eat poached salmon and get your nails done. I expect nobody lives like that really. They'd just feel constantly busy and stressed with the whole project of employing other people to do the stuff – to clean the pools and drive the cars and walk the dogs and tailor the clothes and train the children; there'd be endless hiring and firing and worrying and lawyers. Lauren Bezos's wedding looked like an absolute admin nightmare. And yet, this show offers the traditional vision of rich married women with endless time for opulent lunches with gossipy friends. They walk their glossy horses down dappled avenues, hand the reins to obedient stable boys and snip a few flowers from the garden. The programme shows us bastard husbands, terminal illness and social shame, but I find it hard to sympathise because I'm so damn jealous of the free time.
